Jetmarc
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:54 am

VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:14 pm

New service from SFO to both AUS and ANC...

USATody link

SFO-AUS begins May 21st: x1 daily

SFO-ANC begins June 6th: seasonal, x6 per week

[Edited 2013-02-12 06:18:22]
"Sucka, I'm gonna send you out on Knuckle Airlines. Fist Class!!" ~ Mr. T
 
DFWHeavy
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 5:35 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:22 pm

Way to go VX. I hope the SFO-AUS route does well and they increase it to 3x daily like SFO-DFW.
Christopher W Slovacek
 
Longhornmaniac
Posts: 2967
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:33 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:22 pm

Great news for AUS! I'm admittedly skeptical that they will be able to fill up an A319 with B6 and UA already established on the route, but culturally, AUS seems like a good fit for the target VX customer.

Good luck to them!

Cheers,
Cameron
Cheers,
Cameron
 
HeeseokKoo
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:54 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:23 pm

Finally to Austin. Awesome.

SFO-AUS 1015AM-335PM
AUS-SFO 500PM-700PM

so the timing is not duplicated with Jetblue's one daily flight. BTW, UA has 4 daily flights, 3 regionals and 1 mainline. I hoped VX open a couple of flights each to SFO and LAX, but this is still an awesome news.
 
SCQ83
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:32 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:24 pm

Anchorage is quite interesting... when you think that they are getting new service with JetBlue, Virgin America and Icelandiar which are quite "cool" airlines. Is Anchorage the new hipster mecca (a la Portland, OR) or am I missing something?  
 
DFWHeavy
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 5:35 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:35 pm

Does anyone know what gate they will be using at AUS?
Christopher W Slovacek
 
BigGSFO
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:27 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:40 pm

Hmmm..SJC-LAX, SFO-AUS...I'm guessing VX is trying to make a run for some of that Bay Area tech traffic. You'd think they would have tried to capitalize on that earlier.
 
hiflyeras
Posts: 1474
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:48 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:42 pm

AS used to operate SFO-ANC in the summer but chose to drop that and instead increase LAX-ANC to 2x daily. Maybe they learned something VX doesn't know? Will be interesting to see what kind of response there is...AS is offering triple miles this summer SEA-ANC in response to B6's SEA-ANC.
 
widget1580
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 4:14 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:52 pm

VX has become so mainstream. All of the hipsters will flock to UA.

Can't wait to see VX in AUS!
KLM | Journeys of Inspiration
 
luv2fly
Posts: 11056
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:57 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:56 pm

Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 4):
Anchorage is quite interesting... when you think that they are getting new service with JetBlue, Virgin America and Icelandiar which are quite "cool" airlines. Is Anchorage the new hipster mecca (a la Portland, OR) or am I missing something?

Seasonal flights amd it is all cruise related I would bet money.
You can cut the irony with a knife
 
md3
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:40 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:07 pm

Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 4):

Anchorage is quite interesting... when you think that they are getting new service with JetBlue, Virgin America and Icelandiar which are quite "cool" airlines. Is Anchorage the new hipster mecca (a la Portland, OR) or am I missing something?  

I'd say B6 and VX are two modern LCC's entering a market that hasn't seen that type of attention before. FI on the other hand, neither cool nor modern, just another way to get to Europe with smaller aircraft for a lower demand city such as ANC. Just my opinion.

I do hope they do well but can see AUS doing much better than ANC for them.

[Edited 2013-02-12 07:09:19]
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3944
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:45 pm

Quoting jetMarc (Thread starter):
SFO-ANC begins June 6th: seasonal, x6 per week

It will be interesting to see if AS defends their territory by adding back SFO-ANC. They have defended their Alaska territory in the past.

However, AS doesn't seem to show a lot of love for SFO, having dropped ANC, LAX, CUN, YVR, ZIH and MZT, plus the short-lived SAN and TUS in the past.
 
Kleiner
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:32 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:04 pm

VX is using the JetBlue expansion strategy to go after AS on the west coast. They say they're going after legacies, but there's no doubt they mean AS.
 
dwcontroller
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:39 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:05 pm

Launching EWR and SJC with 3-4 a day, AUS x1 daily, ANC x6 a week. No new planes. Not cutting any routes.

Is there a frequency downgrade on the other markets? Where are the planes coming from? What cities are seeing less service?
Best phrase to hear at the airport - "All standbys have been cleared and may board at this time"
 
Bobloblaw
Posts: 1680
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:15 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:07 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 11):
It will be interesting to see if AS defends their territory by adding back SFO-ANC. They have defended their Alaska territory in the past.

I think AS will add SFO-ANC

Quoting Kleiner (Reply 12):
VX is using the JetBlue expansion strategy to go after AS on the west coast. They say they're going after legacies, but there's no doubt they mean AS.

Well the big difference is B6 actually makes money
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15323
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:10 pm

Quoting Kleiner (Reply 12):
VX is using the JetBlue expansion strategy to go after AS on the west coast. They say they're going after legacies, but there's no doubt they mean AS.

That's just comical--AS is one of the most profitable carriers in the world, in terms of margin, and VX is probably right about now burning through its first $1B.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
SANFan
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:10 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:14 pm

I'm truly surprised at what we're seeing from Virgin early this year. Most were expecting a very uneventful year in 2013 with a/c deliveries delayed, Cush's talk about concentrating on getting profitable and developing existing routes with little expansion, retrenching, etc.

So far, it seems like the company is on a pace to shatter past growth patterns. According to my records, the most new stations added by Virgin in a year over their brief 7-year history has been 4, which happened twice -- in 2010 and 2011. (In their start-up year, they "added" 5 cities but I don't consider that.)

So far in 2013 they've added EWR, SJC, ANC and AUS. And it's not even the middle of February! Plus, they've also connected a couple of dots this year -- LA and Vegas -- and that's VERY unusual! They also seem to be following separate courses from SF and LA more than before. EWR was started from both CA hubs but since then, all adds have been from one or the other. Interesting

I wonder if this activity will continue? Are we truly seeing some changes in the business model and expansion plans? I don't know if this will all help the bottom line but it's interesting to see something different happening... finally.

bb
 
dcajet
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:31 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:15 pm

Quoting jetMarc (Thread starter):
Is Anchorage the new hipster mecca (a la Portland, OR) or am I missing something?  

     

Nah, just cruise lines traffic. The VX product should appeal to the premium cruise line sector - Celebrity, Seabourne (sp?), so if their marketing team has done its homework, ANC could be a keeper for VX. Hope they do well, as God only knows we need some competition to UA @ SFO.
"Unattended children will be given espresso and a free kitten"
 
UA735WL
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:08 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:19 pm

Awesome that they finally decided to add AUS .....I'm going to SFO in July...now I know who I'm going to fly!);

[Edited 2013-02-12 08:21:01]
I do find their timing strange, though...with UA'S recent upgauge to mainline, it almost seems like they waited for their competitors to add capacity before starting the route.

Best of luck to VX though.  Smile


[Edited 2013-02-12 08:26:04]
"One test is worth a thousand expert opinions" -Tex Johnston
 
SANFan
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:10 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:24 pm

Quoting Kleiner (Reply 12):
VX is using the JetBlue expansion strategy to go after AS on the west coast

I don't particularly agree. Virgin is headquartered and hubbed in CA. AS is a major west coast presence; there's bound to be a lot of overlap on their respective route maps.

Virgin is still looking for the low-hanging fruit and doesn't generally care about how much competition there is on a potential new route. I would think that if VX were specifically going after AS, they would have jumped on LAX-ANC instead of SF-ANC. (Now if we see VX start SEA-AUS, I might re-think my stand!)

bb
 
lhcvg
Posts: 1255
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:53 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:35 pm

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 2):
Great news for AUS! I'm admittedly skeptical that they will be able to fill up an A319 with B6 and UA already established on the route, but culturally, AUS seems like a good fit for the target VX customer.

That seems to be the VX model -- take routes UA flies out of SFO and fly them yourself. So far, they've gotten pretty good at losing money doing it, and at offering gimmicks like the status match. But who knows - as you point out, AUS-SFO might well be in VX's wheelhouse.

Quoting bobloblaw (Reply 14):
Quoting Kleiner (Reply 12):VX is using the JetBlue expansion strategy to go after AS on the west coast. They say they're going after legacies, but there's no doubt they mean AS.

Well the big difference is B6 actually makes money

You can say that again.
 
BigGSFO
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:27 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:37 pm

Quoting bobloblaw (Reply 14):
I think AS will add SFO-ANC

Perhaps. VX hasn't pissed off AS for awhile. Maybe it's time for another investigation into VX's ownership.   
 
SocalApproach
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:08 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:42 pm

Quoting SANFan (Reply 16):
I'm truly surprised at what we're seeing from Virgin early this year.

I couldn't agree more. Here we all are expected VX to be in hot water deferring plane deliveries and staying stagnant in growth because "they are out of money" but with all this growth it seems quite the contrary! I personally am very excited about all the VX news. I want them to stick around.

Quoting dwcontroller (Reply 13):
Is there a frequency downgrade on the other markets? Where are the planes coming from? What cities are seeing less service?

There are cities already at this very moment with frequency cuts. I cant speak for every city but for SEA specfically over the past summer they were 4-5x daily on SEA-SFO. Now on some days they are as low as 1x daily SEA-SFO....1x DAILY! SEA-LAX has also seen cuts from the past summer and is as low as 2x daily from 5x daily over the summer. So they have the planes that are sitting around to do all this expansion. ANC is seasonal anyways and AUS is only 1x daily. That Can easily be run with an aircraft arriving from SEA/SAN/LAX or possible a city from the east coast since it doesn't depart until after 10am. VX may very well be going back to the strategy of 100% aircraft usage/day
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3944
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:45 pm

Quoting BigGSFO (Reply 21):
Perhaps. VX hasn't pissed off AS for awhile. Maybe it's time for another investigation into VX's ownership.

Yeah, I'm sure AS is just trembling in their boots over VX.

I can't speak for Bill Ayer and AS's leadership, but it appeared that AS just expects their competitors to play on a level playing field and obey the laws.
 
as739x
Posts: 5008
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:23 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:46 pm

Quoting dwcontroller (Reply 13):
Launching EWR and SJC with 3-4 a day, AUS x1 daily, ANC x6 a week. No new planes. Not cutting any routes.

They currently have 2-3 planes sitting around SFO daily as it is. They have a lot of flex in their scheduling as well.

Quoting bobloblaw (Reply 14):
I think AS will add SFO-ANC

I wouldn't count on it. As stated above, SFO has been dramatically decreased by AS. UAX has taken gate 24, so AS operates from only 2 gates now. And since '07 have dropped from 31 daily flights to 16 daily. If AS does restarted SFO-ANC, then they clearly have a beef with VX.

UA on the other hand, maybe add a 2nd daily?? We shall see....
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15323
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:50 pm

Quoting SANFan (Reply 19):
Virgin is still looking for the low-hanging fruit

Virgin is looking for the oxygen mask. There is no low hanging fruit for VX, in case anyone hasn't noticed yet.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
doug_or
Posts: 3125
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2000 9:55 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:50 pm

Quoting dwcontroller (Reply 13):

Is there a frequency downgrade on the other markets? Where are the planes coming from? What cities are seeing less service?

Anecdotal, but it seems they have some slack in their schedule (at least their current winter one). There are always a few planes sitting around at the remote stands when I go through SFO.
When in doubt, one B pump off
 
SANFan
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:10 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:58 pm

Quoting SocalApproach (Reply 22):
So they have the planes that are sitting around to do all this expansion. ANC is seasonal anyways and AUS is only 1x daily. That Can easily be run with an aircraft arriving from SEA/SAN/LAX or possible a city from the east coast since it doesn't depart until after 10am. VX may very well be going back to the strategy of 100% aircraft usage/day.

Agreed. In the past, Virgin has had a lot of slack in their skeds, with many a/c sitting around in SFO (and LA?) so this could be just a matter of tightening things up a lot and getting those birds in the air. Most of the adds this year (since EWR) have been relatively short hauls so that could be most of what is going on.

I can say that our sked in SAN has not seen any significant changes in times or frequencies. Most of last year we were seeing about 5x daily flights (all to SF of course...) I know we are right now at ~4 daily flts and who knows what this summer will see; right now, it's at 4-5 per day in May/June.

bb
 
diverdave
Posts: 454
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:00 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:10 pm

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 15):
That's just comical--AS is one of the most profitable carriers in the world, in terms of margin, and VX is probably right about now burning through its first $1B.

Nothing like bringing a knife to a gunfight, eh?  

Quoting as739x (Reply 24):
If AS does restarted SFO-ANC, then they clearly have a beef with VX.

I'm thinking AS will restart SFO-ANC. UA should have no love for VX, and who knows, might even be persuaded to provide gate space for AS if needed.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 25):
Virgin is looking for the oxygen mask. There is no low hanging fruit for VX, in case anyone hasn't noticed yet.

Well said!

David
 
SCQ83
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:32 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:23 pm

Quoting luv2fly (Reply 9):
Seasonal flights amd it is all cruise related I would bet money.

Yes, I know about the cruise traffic, but I was wondering if there is some kind of gentrification of ANC and would be in the typical "Top 100 places to go in 2014" in the NYT and hipsters are kicking away oil guys  . I don't know much about ANC but for instance I know they got a new fancy City Museum http://www.anchoragemuseum.org/calendar/calendar.aspx, which actually surprised me when I learnt about it not long ago (I meant, I didn't think Anchorage was to be the type of place getting those trendy cultural buildings).

Quoting md3 (Reply 10):
I'd say B6 and VX are two modern LCC's entering a market that hasn't seen that type of attention before. FI on the other hand, neither cool nor modern, just another way to get to Europe with smaller aircraft for a lower demand city such as ANC. Just my opinion.

I do hope they do well but can see AUS doing much better than ANC for them.

Well I would say Icelandair is very hipster (certainly my friends using it are). First, FI is not alligned to any alliance, so you don't get much alliance traffic (like VX). Secondly, Scandinavia (which are one of the main targets from the US) and particularly Iceland are easily the most hipstery countries in the world. For that reason, FI probably gets more tech'n'savvy traffic that plans travelling by themselves (instead of travel agency or circuit), even going to a place like Alaska.
 
User avatar
jfklganyc
Posts: 4015
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 2:31 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:48 pm

Quoting SANFan (Reply 16):
They also seem to be following separate courses from SF and LA more than before. EWR was started from both CA hubs but since then, all adds have been from one or the other. Interesting

Notice B6 followed the same path with JFK and BOS.

One size doesnt fit all in an industry with low profit margins.

This may work better for VX
 
User avatar
SFOA380
Posts: 411
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:35 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:04 pm

It's really quite amusing reading all the hate that surrounds VX, especially from the AS folks. You all act like it's your money they're burning. Who cares!!! At the end of the day if everyone ups their ante as a result, we all win! AS--you used to be an awesome airline in the day and you have retreated to just mediocre--perhaps this is why you're profitable. HA is fantastic and they're (for the most part) profitable... So what's your excuse?
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3944
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:15 pm

Quoting sfoa380 (Reply 31):
AS--you used to be an awesome airline in the day and you have retreated to just mediocre--perhaps this is why you're profitable.

I fly AS all the time and find them to still be awesome. Not sure what your definition of mediocre is. Just about always on time. Very friendly crews. Very responsive customer service people if you call or e-mail. Were really awesome when I was MVP or MVP Gold. A very new comfortable fleet (and I still don't buy this bit about the A320 being more comfortable than a 738).

What incentive would I have to, say, select VX to fly from SEA-LAX instead of AS?
 
User avatar
RWA380
Posts: 4467
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:51 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:18 pm

Quoting as739x (Reply 24):
If AS does restarted SFO-ANC, then they clearly have a beef with VX.
Quoting diverdave (Reply 28):
I'm thinking AS will restart SFO-ANC

I can not see why AS would start a 4-5 hour flight, on a route that they have previously retreated from, just so they can mess with a little 6x a week schedule from a carrier that is mostly unknown up in Alaska. AS did not become the financial rock that it is, making impassioned maneuvers. Now if VX started SEA-ANC like B6, I'd expect that reaction to be somewhat different.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 23):
Yeah, I'm sure AS is just trembling in their boots over VX.

Yeah can you see VX making a dent on a route that AS does not even serve? VX will most likely be mostly connection vs O & D IMHO.

Quoting diverdave (Reply 28):
UA should have no love for VX,

I would imagine UA has not been excited about an SFO based carrier that has entered multiple markets that UA previously dominated or were the sole carrier on from SFO prior to VX's arrival on the scene. I was living in SF when VX started up, and there were several hiring fairs for experienced airline personal. UA most likely lost some good employees to VX then.
Next Flights: PDX-HNL-OGG-LIH-PDX On AS, WP & HA
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:30 pm

This summer will be interesting for Alaska. Their cash cow anchorage route where they have 20 or so SEA-ANC flights will be competing now with JetBlue. ANC-SFO will also take away some traffic from AS even though AS doesn't fly SFO-ANC, many people connect.

The interesting thing with Virgin America and JetBlue to Alaska is that their satellite TV won't work.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
southwest737500
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:49 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:05 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 32):

VX is the best love the service
Next flight: TUL-ATL-CLT CRJ900 and MD88
 
austinairport
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:56 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:14 pm

Neat! I'll admit I was very shocked when this popped up on my Facebook feed.

I can't wait to see Virgin America at AUS.
Whoever said you can do anything you set your mind to has obviously never tried to slam a revolving door!!!
 
ASA
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:12 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:21 pm

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 34):
The interesting thing with Virgin America and JetBlue to Alaska is that their satellite TV won't work.

Interesting ... I didn't know that!

They'll probably play the movies for free - like in the Caribbean routes?
 
B6JFKH81
Posts: 1970
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:35 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:29 pm

Quoting ASA (Reply 37):
Interesting ... I didn't know that!

They'll probably play the movies for free - like in the Caribbean routes?

Yes, when I did the LGB-ANC run, the TV's went out somewhere off the coast of Seattle. Movies were free.
"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
 
hatbutton
Posts: 275
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:39 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:41 pm

Quoting sfoa380 (Reply 31):
It's really quite amusing reading all the hate that surrounds VX, especially from the AS folks. You all act like it's your money they're burning. Who cares!!! At the end of the day if everyone ups their ante as a result, we all win! AS--you used to be an awesome airline in the day and you have retreated to just mediocre--perhaps this is why you're profitable. HA is fantastic and they're (for the most part) profitable... So what's your excuse?

VX has stellar service and amenities but is wildly unprofitable, so what's your point?

HA makes money, which is better than losing money, but to sustainably grow an airline and pay for salaries that go up each year you need a healthy return, not just any profit. HA made money in 2012 but their net margin was only 2.7%. Compare that to AS at 6.8%. I also find it funny that you're using HA to compare to AS. Everyone bashes AS for their monopoly in the state of Alaska yet HA has a similar monopoly within the state of Hawaii. Nobody seems to think there's anything wrong with that. Sure Go! has an operation that helps keep fares in check a little bit but a few of the communities in Alaska also have competition like ANC-FAI.

When your profits are too low, you need to borrow money to grow and that just drags more on the bottom line. So it's not a true comparison to just say "hey, they're profitable" because there are degrees of profitability. B6 is another good example. They make money but much less money compared to AS and they are bigger than AS. B6's net margin in 2012 was 2.6%. Even on a dollar basis B6 only made $128 million compared to AS's $316 million. B6 have stated they will grow between 5.5% and 7.5% in 2013 while AS will grow 8%. AS can largely fund that growth through profits and won't need to go to the bank to do it.

You're also slamming people for bashing VX, yet now you're bashing AS? And I agree with another poster, you should define mediocre, because AS has the second highest load factor behind G4, so it appears that people aren't running away in droves because of this "mediocre" service. At the end of the day people want to get from A to B on time and at a reasonable price. AS does that. We always have known that and airlines like FR and NK prove it every day. So the bright lights and TV argument will continue to be moot until VX makes money.
 
User avatar
airportugal310
Posts: 3217
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 12:49 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:44 pm

Quoting sfoa380 (Reply 31):
t's really quite amusing reading all the hate that surrounds VX, especially from the AS folks. You all act like it's your money they're burning. Who cares!!! At the end of the day if everyone ups their ante as a result, we all win! AS--you used to be an awesome airline in the day and you have retreated to just mediocre--perhaps this is why you're profitable. HA is fantastic and they're (for the most part) profitable... So what's your excuse?

This pretty much hits it all on the head, except the part maybe about AS being mediocre (though I'm not impressed, my opinion is really not important)

Some people above see it as a personal slight that VX would dare do something different to maybe TRY and stop bleeding money. Who cares? AS came to Hawai'i, and HA and AS play well in the sandbox together for the most part. Plenty of carriers play their games, and that's just business.

Calm down people. Just calm the heck down. Some of the comments are just straight up childish and one of the reasons its hard to take a.net serious sometimes.
I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
 
hiflyeras
Posts: 1474
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:48 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:47 pm

Quoting RWA380 (Reply 33):
I can not see why AS would start a 4-5 hour flight, on a route that they have previously retreated from, just so they can mess with a little 6x a week schedule from a carrier that is mostly unknown up in Alaska. AS did not become the financial rock that it is, making impassioned maneuvers. Now if VX started SEA-ANC like B6, I'd expect that reaction to be somewhat different.

Well said. The summer schedule is pretty firm at this point. No extra a/c will be sitting around to fly a route out of spite. While I'm sure they're annoyed the VX is coming north I don't think it will register a response other than triple miles SFO-SEA and SFO-ANC. Maybe even SEA-LAX as well....any route they compete on could be fair game for a little love from AS.
 
deltaflyertoo
Posts: 1479
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2000 3:18 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:19 pm

Quoting Widget1580 (Reply 8):
VX has become so mainstream. All of the hipsters will flock to UA.

LOL, agree. VX in my view has tarnished the Virgin band as a whole. THere used to be something special about taking that one daily VS flight to London (I KNOW 2 different owners but same concept overall) and now with the VX, cheeky, cheap feel and my FB updates from those who aren't exactly world travelers bragging about their next VX flight (while the well to do established fliers brag about the actual destination)-it makes me not want to fly any of the VIrgin brands (even though their service is good).

Quoting LHCVG (Reply 20):
That seems to be the VX model -- take routes UA flies out of SFO and fly them yourself. So far, they've gotten pretty good at losing money doing it, and at offering gimmicks like the status match.

Because that is what the VS model was built on out of Heathrow against BA. Go head to head with something different, and, it worked there but yes it seems a different story when you apply it on US domestic routes against something like United.
 
as739x
Posts: 5008
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:23 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:21 pm

Quoting diverdave (Reply 28):
I'm thinking AS will restart SFO-ANC. UA should have no love for VX, and who knows, might even be persuaded to provide gate space for AS if needed.



UA will be giving no gates to AS. All the gates in T-1 are express gates and can not handle a 737. (UA) have no gate availability as is and it treading water till the E councourse is opened.

Quoting hatbutton (Reply 39):
HA makes money, which is better than losing money, but to sustainably grow an airline and pay for salaries that go up each year you need a healthy return, not just any profit. HA made money in 2012 but their net margin was only 2.7%. Compare that to AS at 6.8%. I also find it funny that you're using HA to compare to AS. Everyone bashes AS for their monopoly in the state of Alaska yet HA has a similar monopoly within the state of Hawaii. Nobody seems to think there's anything wrong with that. Sure Go! has an operation that helps keep fares in check a little bit but a few of the communities in Alaska also have competition like ANC-FAI.

Well said. People seem to have a problem looking at VX in reality.
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
 
allegiantflyer
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:59 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:47 pm

Im in shock after seeing this....i had NO idea VX was even considering ANC
 
User avatar
CV880
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:56 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:24 am

Quoting BigGSFO (Reply 21):
Perhaps. VX hasn't pissed off AS for awhile. Maybe it's time for another investigation into VX's ownership

IIRC, Virgin Group owns 25% of VX & 51% of VS and DL will own 49% of VS, yet DL seems to be in bed with AS, so maybe what appears to be intense hatred on the West Coast, really isn't?

[Edited 2013-02-12 16:26:12]

[Edited 2013-02-12 16:27:47]
 
diverdave
Posts: 454
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:00 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:45 am

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 32):
A very new comfortable fleet (and I still don't buy this bit about the A320 being more comfortable than a 738).

I would agree that the cabin interiors of the AS fleet are rather comfortable.

David
 
SEA
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:21 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:24 am

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 25):
Virgin is looking for the oxygen mask. There is no low hanging fruit for VX, in case anyone hasn't noticed yet.

Realistically though, there is no low hanging fruit for anyone in the US market at this point and economy.
 
Bobloblaw
Posts: 1680
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:15 pm

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:45 am

Quoting cv880 (Reply 45):
IIRC, Virgin Group owns 25% of VX & 51% of VS and DL will own 49% of VS, yet DL seems to be in bed with AS, so maybe what appears to be intense hatred on the West Coast, really isn't?

Youre over-reading, Why would DL's relationship with VS which owns 25% of VX mitigate how AS responds to VX?
 
User avatar
CV880
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:56 am

RE: VX Announces SFO-AUS/ANC

Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:57 am

Quoting bobloblaw (Reply 48):
Youre over-reading, Why would DL's relationship with VS which owns 25% of VX mitigate how AS responds to VX?

From the looks of things VX appears to be holding off warfare with AS @ LAX.....just saying that DL may or may not have some influence going forward, esp if at some point VS/DL become more integrated and or VS/VX do the same.