yankeejuliet
Topic Author
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:55 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:55 pm

With the elimination of waving galleries and observation decks, are expensive paint necessary on passenger aircraft anymore? Employees on the tarmac or in the terminal only require.s the registration on an all white aircraft for identification of the airline. Spotters are very few and hardly catered for at airports.
 
DLPMMM
Posts: 2118
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:34 am

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:01 pm

The planes need to be painted anyway. It is not that much more to add the livery, and it provides for marketing and product differentiation.

Otherwise we might just as well have generic airlines, like generic toilet paper.

If it was that much cheaper and not worth it in terms of marketing return, you could be sure that MOL and Ryanair would have all white.
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:20 pm

Quoting yankeejuliet (Thread starter):
Employees on the tarmac or in the terminal only require.s the registration on an all white aircraft for identification of the airline.

And when ATC says "follow company plane to ..." and all of the planes are white ...
International Homo of Mystery
 
BMI727
Posts: 11093
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:29 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:39 pm

Quoting yankeejuliet (Thread starter):
With the elimination of waving galleries and observation decks, are expensive paint necessary on passenger aircraft anymore?

You'll need some sort of paint or polish for protection of the aircraft skin. You might as well use the free advertising space.
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18838
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:47 pm

Most of today's liveries are simpler than they used to be, partly because a large percentage of airliners are leased and frequently change operators. The simpler the livery the cheaper it is for the lessor when the lease expires and they have to find a new operator.

Air travel is also rapidly becoming a commodity where most people only care about finding the lowest fare which makes the livery less important.

Branding is still important but primarily in advertising, websites etc., not on the aircraft itself. By the time people see the aircraft they've already made their purchase decision, and even if they haven't, it's doubtful the livery will have much if any impact on the customer's choice of carrier.
 
bx737
Posts: 547
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 4:47 am

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:15 pm

It is interesting to note though that passengers pay attention. I recently worked on my own airline's retro jet and was asked quite a number of times about the livery from passengers as they boarded.
 
User avatar
PA110
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 1:30 am

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:43 pm

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 1):
Otherwise we might just as well have generic airlines, like generic toilet paper.

Have you flown recently? We already do!   

There is very little product differentiation these days. Airlines with identifiable style have gone the way of the dodo bird. Only a.nutters would pick apart esoteric differences such as interior furnishings, crew uniforms, etc... To the traveling public, it's very much transport from point A to point B. The only branding that seems to matter these days is the loyalty program.

The OP poses a provocative question: Do liveries really matter any more? I would suspect to the general public, probably not so much.

[Edited 2013-03-29 14:44:49]
It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
 
EricR
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:15 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:03 pm

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 4):
The simpler the livery the cheaper it is for the lessor when the lease expires and they have to find a new operator.



Why would this make a difference to the lessor? I think you mean it is cheaper for the lessee. Under the majority of leases, it is the lessee's responsibility to return the aircraft the lessor in plain white finish.
 
EIDL
Posts: 779
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:11 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:21 pm

Customers - not even aviation geek ones - definitely still notice and appreciate liveries. Just take a quick Google for the reaction that Irish people who've been abroad for some time appear to get when they see a green top down the end of their pier in an airport.
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18838
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:24 pm

Quoting EricR (Reply 7):
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 4):
The simpler the livery the cheaper it is for the lessor when the lease expires and they have to find a new operator.



Why would this make a difference to the lessor? I think you mean it is cheaper for the lessee. Under the majority of leases, it is the lessee's responsibility to return the aircraft the lessor in plain white finish.

In any case, it's still cheaper if the livery is already mostly white.

[Edited 2013-03-29 15:27:25]
 
User avatar
ODwyerPW
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:30 am

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:00 am

737 windshield bezels are notorious for having chipped paint.

I've seen passengers look out the window at a waiting 737NG and comment.. Look how old it is? I fly southwest allot. The Canyon Blue around the windows just peels and oxidizes away. Customers think they are boarding an old airplane, when if fact they are flying with a carrier who maintains a young fleet.
learning never stops.
 
User avatar
b727fa
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:21 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:05 am

OD brings up a good point. Put a a chipped up paint job a/c on the ramp and people notice. It matters.
My comments/opinions are my own and are not to be construed as the opinion(s) of my employer.
 
cschleic
Posts: 1226
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 10:47 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:29 am

Yes, so the tower knows which plane is which when there are 50+ moving around down on the ground.
 
skyguyB727
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:45 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:40 am

Branding is an important part of any company's marketing. Would McDonalds continue to be as successful as they are if they got rid of the golden arches and just had a black and white sign saying "Restaurant"? Branding can have a huge impact on a business' success.
 
delta88
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 7:35 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:49 am

I would also agree with Marketing Techniques. Even with AA 's new livery, its still being used to say to everyone that sees it that its the "new American". Airlines use liveries nowadays to protect aircraft and to advertise. A Few companies use winglets on aircraft fitted with them to advertise their websites. Liveries help differentiate aircraft from one airline to another.
B712,B738,B739,B752,B762ER,B763ER,B772ER,MD82,MD83,MD88,MD90,A320,CRJ9,CRJ2,EMJ145,ERJ175
 
User avatar
cosyr
Posts: 750
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:23 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:16 am

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 3):

And WestPac could shed some light on how useful that is for marketing or profit generation.
 
User avatar
Braybuddy
Posts: 5852
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:14 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:02 am

Quoting yankeejuliet (Thread starter):
With the elimination of waving galleries and observation decks, are expensive paint necessary on passenger aircraft anymore?

Airport lounges, departure lounges and aircraft all still have windows. So as long as aircraft can be seen through them, I would say YES!
 
flyingalex
Posts: 623
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:32 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:32 am

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 2):
And when ATC says "follow company plane to ..." and all of the planes are white ...
Quoting cschleic (Reply 12):
Yes, so the tower knows which plane is which when there are 50+ moving around down on the ground.

This part is really important. For that reason alone, aircraft ought to have some degree of distinguishing marks.

It really helps the guys in the tower sort out who is who.
Public service announcement: "It's" = "it is". To indicate posession, write "its." Looks wrong, but it's correct grammar
 
CXfirst
Posts: 2875
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:13 pm

Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:51 am

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 4):
Branding is still important but primarily in advertising, websites etc., not on the aircraft itself. By the time people see the aircraft they've already made their purchase decision, and even if they haven't, it's doubtful the livery will have much if any impact on the customer's choice of carrier.

A passenger is booking a flight and has to choose between Airline A and Airline b. He decides to fly Airline A and is now at the airport. As he waits, he sees airline B and airline C, and airline he didn't know about. Next time he flies, he chooses between Airline A, B and C.

Advertising on planes at airports is a relatively cheap option, and do serve a purpose.

-CXfirst
 
Semaex
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:17 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:41 am

Quoting cschleic (Reply 12):
Yes, so the tower knows which plane is which when there are 50+ moving around down on the ground.

I heard of a recent invention called Secundary Radar the other day. Uses Sierra-Transponders and stuff to make identification of aircraft inflight and on the ground a lot easier or even possible without having to see them. For example when it's dark, the plane is far away or the weather is misty  

Somebody mentioned that pax don't care about the livery. I think different on the matter. It's a whole lot of a deal to the people whether they board a "premium" carrier or a random airline - and the proof of doing so is usually a photo on facebook with the according - unique and well-known - livery of the respective carrier.
// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
 
airproxx
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:07 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:24 pm

Quoting Semaex (Reply 19):

Somebody mentioned that pax don't care about the livery. I think different on the matter. It's a whole lot of a deal to the people whether they board a "premium" carrier or a random airline - and the proof of doing so is usually a photo on facebook with the according - unique and well-known - livery of the respective carrier.

Same opinion here. Branding and airplanes colour are all about marketing, and Airline Liveries remain a very important part of the process...
A question comes to my mind though; why airlines don't use more advertisement on aircraft liveries? I know a lot of them already does, but anyway, legacy carriers seem to be reluctant on that point.... Thoughts?
If you can meet with triumph and disaster, and treat those two impostors just the same
 
dtw2hyd
Posts: 2980
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:11 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:49 pm

If at all technically feasible aircraft manufacturers should put LED screens in tail and on the side of fuselage, so there is no need for painting/repainting. They can display all code sharing partners logos one after another.

Same metal can be used by different airlines. No need to repaint on sublease/resale...

Just a wild thought.
 
ben175
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:44 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:55 pm

It really frustrates me when people on this site believe that the average person with no substantial aviation interest can show no knowledge or comprehension of the airline marketing and branding. It's pretty much saying aviation geeks can't tell the difference between a Daewoo and a Maserati, or Wal Mart and Nordstrum for example. I'd actually argue that to the vast majority, air travel is an interesting conversation and liveries, aircraft products, aircraft types/age, different flying experiences etc are commonly discussed amongst people.
 
Bernard Shakey
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2001 4:05 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:27 pm

The whole system would fall apart if there were a Groundstop to HPN.
Mindless drifter on the road, Carries such an easy load
 
B6JFKH81
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:35 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:37 pm

As someone who plays a big role at my airline when it comes to aircraft getting re-painted, I can tell you that the folks in the Brand Management and Marketing departments take aircraft appearance very seriously as it helps to create the identity of the product/service which you are trying to sell and it's the largest billboard that you have to sell your product/service.

If you think about it, airlines are very much like a lot of other industries. The airlines have a common product and service, they have pressurized aluminum cans with a bunch of seats in them to take you from point A to point B. Some have more watered-down basic service to the folks sitting in those seats (think NK, FR, G4), some have more perks (like IFE, increased seat pitch, etc.). That's on the the inside of the aluminum can where customers experience the product. BUT, you still want to differentiate yourself a little bit and help sell your product, that leads to using your free advertising space outside the aluminum can...and you get a livery as it helps create an identity.

It's not much different than the hotel industry, really. What are hotels? Buildings with a bunch of rooms that have beds in them for you to pay to sleep in. Common product. Some are very basic (watered-down interior, small room, basic cable TV and a bible in the night stand drawer), some have a lot more perks (lots of channels on the TV, movie offerings, a bar, a nice place to eat, shuttle vans, etc.). But in the end, they are a bunch of rooms with beds. That doesn't mean the hotel chains don't do their best to come up with an exterior design that fits their style. The buildings may look alike as they are hotels, but the small details like the color, shape, landscaping, signage, lighting, all help to differentiate to make their product stand out from the surrounding buildings.

Long story short, I believe that airline liveries are still quite necessary...and I'm not just saying that for job security LOL  
"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
 
2008matt
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:13 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:12 pm

I actually cannot believe some on a.net has asked this, this website would be nothing without liveries, and why would we want to ruin a great creation such as a.net!
Keep calm and up your game!
 
iFlyLOTs
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:45 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:17 pm

I would almost say that airplane liveries are more necessary now than they have been in the past. With the amount of planes there are out there now and how they are all made by just a hand full of manufacturers its almost a safety and security issue.
"...stay hungry, stay foolish" -Steve Jobs
 
ardian
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2000 3:15 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:28 pm

"Business without advertising is like winking to a girl in the dark. You know you're doing it, but nobody else does."
(Patsy Stone in AbFab, although it originates from Stuart Henderson   )
 
User avatar
JBo
Posts: 1610
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 7:23 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:48 pm

I would maintain that an airline's livery is still the single most important element of its brand execution, even if it's not something passengers always see.

Along with all of the arguments in favor of branding, advertising, and marketing strategies ... airline liveries are essential for one very practical reason: aircraft identification.

If everything was generic, air traffic controllers would have a much more difficult time visually identifying specific aircraft. It's the same reason even G.A. aircraft are given colorful paintjobs.
I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
 
airproxx
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:07 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:00 pm

Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 24):
As someone who plays a big role at my airline when it comes to aircraft getting re-painted

I've always wondered how it works! I've always been interested in graphic design, painting, drawing, and as a mix of my two passions, aircraft liveries has become some kind of hobby...
What happens if, say, I'm one of your airline employees, and I think I have a great idea to submit.... Can I show it to someone? Or is it too seriously considered to take some time to see some geek paintings   ? Just a thought though, I didn't say I have a great livery design to show you right now!
If you can meet with triumph and disaster, and treat those two impostors just the same
 
L0VE2FLY
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:54 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:52 pm

Quoting yankeejuliet (Thread starter):
Spotters are very few and hardly catered for at airports.

Very few? Really? So who's taking the thousands of aircraft photos being uploaded to aviation photography websites every day?!

I'm guessing you're the one who posted the first comment to this picture, although you don't live in the Netherlands!




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Johan K

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 2):
And when ATC says "follow company plane to ..." and all of the planes are white ...

When QF leased a 747 from BA they stripped the paint off the tail so the ATC & pilots wouldn't be confused.




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Royal S King

Quoting Braybuddy (Reply 16):
Airport lounges, departure lounges and aircraft all still have windows. So as long as aircraft can be seen through them, I would say YES!

  
 
ZRH
Posts: 4371
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 1999 11:32 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:50 pm

Quoting yankeejuliet (Thread starter):
With the elimination of waving galleries and observation decks,

What do mean with that? Here in Zurich we have two great observation decks. Bus tours where you can see the aircrafts take-off from very close. And furthermore plenty of spotting points outside of the fence.
 
777way
Posts: 6470
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:38 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:16 pm

Quoting airproxx (Reply 20):
A question comes to my mind though; why airlines don't use more advertisement on aircraft liveries? I know a lot of them already does, but anyway, legacy carriers seem to be reluctant on that point.... Thoughts?

it would look cheap.
 
airproxx
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:07 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:40 pm

Quoting 777way (Reply 32):
it would look cheap.

Well, agreed at some point, but I think it depends on the advert you got painted on the paint.... I mean, a Mc Donalds logo jet would look cheap indeed, while a "apple" logo jet would presumably look gorgeous... I was thinking of the branding design that are painted on F1 cars actually...
If you can meet with triumph and disaster, and treat those two impostors just the same
 
SYDAIRPORTS
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:15 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:24 pm

with LCC's growing, while legacies slowly die, liveries are probably more important now.

As most LCC's don't use airbridges, passengers see the aircraft livery before they board.

Seems to be a demand for flying billboards.

Ryanair have had quite a few over the years.

What does it costs to paint a 737 & how much can the likes of Ryaniar sell the advertising space for, or do they do deals with the likes of rental car companies, with no cash, but so many dollars worth of car rentals which they can push through their website ?
 
Wingtips56
Posts: 739
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:26 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:30 pm

There have been a number of carriers that feature their reservations phone number or website prominently in their livery, so obviously they do see it as an advertising vehicle. Even instead of the basic name of the airline, like "flyBrandX.com". Not my idea of attractive, but I guess it works for others.
Worked for WestAir, Apollo Airways, Desert Pacific, Western, AirCal and American Airlines
 
777way
Posts: 6470
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:38 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:49 pm

Quoting airproxx (Reply 33):

ok I didn't realize you were talking logo jets, I was picturing ad decals stuck on aircraft like in sports.
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:01 am

Quoting skyguyB727 (Reply 13):
Would McDonalds continue to be as successful as they are if they got rid of the golden arches and just had a black and white sign saying "Restaurant"?

Did someone say MickeyD's?  


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Toni Marimon

International Homo of Mystery
 
zippyjet
Posts: 5077
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 3:32 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:13 am

Quoting yankeejuliet (Thread starter):

A lot of the other replies are spot on plus, many airports have recently been making gate areas more spotter friendly. I.E large panoramic windows harking back to the old days of flying. Our Concourse A WN at BWI is a prime example. I believe much of concourse D at MIA has the same type design. There are counttless other examples. Even our gate area at STL features the large windows.
I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
 
User avatar
antoniemey
Posts: 1218
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:38 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:45 am

Quoting yankeejuliet (Thread starter):
Employees on the tarmac or in the terminal only require.s the registration on an all white aircraft for identification of the airline.

As a ramp agent at a small-ish airport, I can tell you that the livery of the plane helps us know when our plane has arrived. It can be hard enough to tell an Eagle ERJ from a blue-striped UAX ERJ at night, we'd never know whose plane was landing if they were just painted white with registrations and titles by the door.

Quoting cschleic (Reply 12):
Yes, so the tower knows which plane is which when there are 50+ moving around down on the ground.

I wonder if the US logojets throw them for a loop as much as they do me... I mean, I love them (well, maybe not the Steelers plane), but it always takes me a minute of "What airline is that?" before I get a good view and go "Oh, right, US Airways." Today's culprit was the PSA retrojet.
Make something Idiot-proof, and the Universe will make a more inept idiot.
 
B6JFKH81
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:35 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:27 am

Quoting airproxx (Reply 29):
What happens if, say, I'm one of your airline employees, and I think I have a great idea to submit.... Can I show it to someone? Or is it too seriously considered to take some time to see some geek paintings ? Just a thought though, I didn't say I have a great livery design to show you right now!

I'm not completely sure on that as I am on the technical side of things. For the last 2 years I was THE person that inspected the paint job on every aircraft in the fleet, filled out the survey (which I designed LOL), crunched numbers into a spreadsheet to track trends and make into a pretty presentation for the higher-ups to decide what planes get painted the next year and in what order.

BUT, I will say that I think it greatly depends on the culture of the airline itself. Here at B6, we have names for each aircraft, and all those names were made up by the crewmembers in the company. We even have a special tail design (building blocks) on N587JB that was designed by an everyday crewmember (not Marketing or Brand Management) and he won the "design a tail" contest. Here is the winner with his tail:



We are quite the open company and suggestions flow freely. Other airlines may not be the same case. So I guess to answer your question, it really depends on the culture of the airline itself, and how open they are to suggestions. If you have a good, solid business case behind the idea though, it's worth a shot!

~H81
"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
 
yankeejuliet
Topic Author
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:55 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:16 am

[quote=B6JFKH81,reply=40]
Great culture, naming of aircraft is an excellent idea. This was done at JM in honor of various Jamaican towns with historical values. Tail designs can be quite attractive. Many observation decks should be re-opened with heightened security if necessary, and this move could employ more people to operate food and souvenir outlets. The public would become more knowledegable of avaition and increase awareness of air travel. These moves will justify the need for liveries.
 
N766UA
Posts: 7843
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 1999 3:50 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:43 am

I don't get it. The OP seriously thinks airline liveries were created for and exist solely to appease planespotters on observation decks?
This Website Censors Me
 
flyingalex
Posts: 623
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:32 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:29 pm

Quoting Semaex (Reply 19):
I heard of a recent invention called Secundary Radar the other day. Uses Sierra-Transponders and stuff to make identification of aircraft inflight and on the ground a lot easier or even possible without having to see them. For example when it's dark, the plane is far away or the weather is misty

The problem with secondary radar is that it's expensive. Not very many airports have it yet.

Also, the pilots in the various aircraft don't have it either, and taxi instructions are often given with reference to other aircraft ("follow the BA A320", "give way to United 767", "behind landing KLM 737, line up runway 28, behind", etc.).

Quoting ardian (Reply 27):
"Business without advertising is like winking to a girl in the dark. You know you're doing it, but nobody else does."
(Patsy Stone in AbFab, although it originates from Stuart Henderson )

Love it!  
Public service announcement: "It's" = "it is". To indicate posession, write "its." Looks wrong, but it's correct grammar
 
YYZYYT
Posts: 899
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:41 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:30 pm

Quoting airproxx (Reply 20):
Quoting Semaex (Reply 19):
Somebody mentioned that pax don't care about the livery. I think different on the matter. It's a whole lot of a deal to the people whether they board a "premium" carrier or a random airline - and the proof of doing so is usually a photo on facebook with the according - unique and well-known - livery of the respective carrier.

Same opinion here. Branding and airplanes colour are all about marketing, and Airline Liveries remain a very important part of the process...

Agreed. If the image of the brand on the airplane doesn't matter, why do all airlines feature a picture of their "best" aircraft in flight? it's an image that evokes travel to faraway and exotic places, of course you want to associate that emotion with your brand.

And what about the impression created by a "show of force" at an airport, where you see endless lines of identical branded tails, stretching into the distance? I'm thinking of the line of BA 747 tails at LHR T4 (is there anyone else here who finds - or found, - that to be a damned impressive sight?)... could there be a better way to say THIS is the airline that can get you there, wherever "there" is?
 
777way
Posts: 6470
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:38 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:42 pm

Quoting N766UA (Reply 42):
I don't get it. The OP seriously thinks airline liveries were created for and exist solely to appease planespotters on observation decks?

Worse than that he seems be suggesting liveries should go.

Quoting YYZYYT (Reply 44):
I'm thinking of the line of BA 747 tails at LHR T4 (is there anyone else here who finds - or found, - that to be a damned impressive sight?)...

Seen that in pics here, fantastic look.
 
eaglepower83
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:54 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:38 pm

I would venture to guess that most everyday people DO care about the livery and appearance of the airplane they're flying on.
Most "flying rubes" will go for the cheaper ticket, but when they're sitting at their gate, looking at the aluminum tube they're getting on, and it's got plain, shoddy, dirty looking paint, they'd likely be quite hesitant to book that airline again.

That's why SMI/J painted the UA battleship planes first, right away. They looked like crap, and likely scared some people.
Doesn't help your brand much, when you got a plane that looks like it has skin cancer.
 
infinit
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:12 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:43 pm

Even if it is post-purchase, many still look out the window at lounges or out the aerobridges at boarding. Think of these airlines- United, Southwest, KLM or Thai.. I bet the first mental image you had was of their liveries. That's its marketing and branding importance. It conjures up a mental image and turns something as intangible as an air transport service into a tangible product.

Some years back SQ insisted on using their Keris logo on the tail of their StarA-scheme aircraft rather than the StarA logo. They threatened to leave StarA otherwise.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © JCAM

Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 24):

Well said!
 
BMI727
Posts: 11093
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:29 pm

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Tue Apr 02, 2013 3:14 pm

Quoting EaglePower83 (Reply 46):
Most "flying rubes" will go for the cheaper ticket, but when they're sitting at their gate, looking at the aluminum tube they're getting on, and it's got plain, shoddy, dirty looking paint, they'd likely be quite hesitant to book that airline again.

That's true, but in that respect it matters more to have a plane that doesn't look bad rather than one that looks good. Airlines are realizing that, so you see Finnair and JAL for example going to exceedingly simple, or boring, paint schemes.
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
 
cgnnrw
Posts: 1044
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 3:11 am

RE: Aircraft Liveries - Are They Still Necessary?

Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:38 pm

Quoting Ben175 (Reply 22):
It really frustrates me when people on this site believe that the average person with no substantial aviation interest can show no knowledge or comprehension of the airline marketing and branding. It's pretty much saying aviation geeks can't tell the difference between a Daewoo and a Maserati, or Wal Mart and Nordstrum for example. I'd actually argue that to the vast majority, air travel is an interesting conversation and liveries, aircraft products, aircraft types/age, different flying experiences etc are commonly discussed amongst people.

I agree 100%.

Two short stories: In the 1990s I often flew KLM to the States when they still served BWI. One time I was met by my dad and my little nephew and when I came through the exit my nephew said "we saw you land in that big blue plane" (it was a B747). The next timeI flew home I was asked "so, does KLM still fly blue planes?" Then once I flew NW into PHL and on the way home my dad asked if there was a difference flying on a NW DC-10 or KL B747.

Another trip back to the US took me to PHL on LH. Some friends were taking me back to the airport and as we were approaching the parking garage someone said "well, there's a huge Lufthansa 747 still sitting there so it looks like we got you here on time.

So I agree the general public probably does know more about airlines, paint schemes, etc.
A330 man.