LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:36 pm

Maybe not a surprise, but the high profile expansion with China Southern and receipt of A380 has not achieved the companies desired results per its CEO

While loads are strong, yield are low, and he terms long haul operations as "very difficult".

One area being explored is removing first class product which would also align the carrier with recent national austerity climate in China.
While economy products have sold satisfactorily, the carrier feels considerable pressure in first class such on routes to LAX.

Story:
http://centreforaviation.com/analysi...as-new-government-austerity-103059

I guess such moves would make sense - Chinese carriers have always been weak in international marketing and their premium products compared to foreign carriers, so in an environment where more and more airlines continue to shrink or eliminate first class, it stands to reason Chinese carriers should also be part of the movement.

Also suppose CZ with its Guangzhou base would especially be vulnerable as it lacks benefits of more the upscale demand that markets like Beijing and Shanghai can drive.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15212
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sat Mar 30, 2013 8:02 pm

That's kinda what you get when your fleet planning is state planning. Chinese carriers aren't particularly good at anything; of course they'd quickly get in shape if they were allowed to compete and the state pulled back but that is not going to happen any time soon.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 11734
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:26 pm

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
One area being explored is removing first class product

I never understood why CZ had a 1st class product. To sell it, one must be one of the top premium airlines in the world and that usually means hubbing at a top premium market (London, Frankfurt, etc.)

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 1):
That's kinda what you get when your fleet planning is state planning.

   While I'm a huge A380 fan, CZ wasn't ready. Time to take off the training wheels and let the Chinese airlines 'Duke it out.' Everyone will benefit in the long run.

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
MCOGVADCA
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 3:05 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:32 pm

They are HEAVILY discounting their First and Business class products. I just booked ICN-CAN-LAX-CAN-ICN in business for $2000 US.

However, I think they might be jumping the gun on dumping first class; right now, a significant factor as to why high-end travelers aren't opting for CZ is the reputation of Chinese carriers' premium products as substandard at best, shoddy at worst. That being said, initial reviews of the A380's soft product have been fantastic. Perhaps, once more discerning customers realize that the new CZ first and business seats are nothing like that of the old CZ, first might gain some traction.
12 months: mdl heh rgn kmg nng sha gmp icn can pvg sfo mco lwc sin dps cdg gva
 
LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:01 am

Looking at CZ A380 seat map if they dump F class they can probably easily add 40+ economy seats in its place.

For the A330 and B777, the same thing. Rebrand the zone as business class instead, or add more things like premium economy seats instead.

Quoting MCOGVADCA (Reply 3):
They are HEAVILY discounting their First and Business class products. I just booked ICN-CAN-LAX-CAN-ICN in business for $2000 US.

Certainly not helping the yields the CEO is complaining about.

The same happens here in the US. Even online distribution options like Expedia sometimes come up with some bizarrely low premium fares on CZ.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
davidho1985
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:27 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 3:27 am

CA has intention to lease 2 A380 from CZ.
 
TC957
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 1:12 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:00 am

That to me seems a great move and hopefully leads eventually to CA ordering their own A380's. Wonder if MU might be thinking of leasing a couple as well ?
 
IndianicWorld
Posts: 2770
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2001 11:32 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:18 am

Leasing the A380s to CA will be a much wiser move. They have the route authorities to operate from PEK and PVG, the former being where CZ wanted to operate from.

Just why they had First in their aircraft makes no sense. Strange decision but likely one dictated upon them by others at the time. Making a move to reconfigure their aircraft may make it easier to make routes work.
 
justinlee
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:08 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:24 am

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Also suppose CZ with its Guangzhou base would especially be vulnerable as it lacks benefits of more the upscale demand that markets like Beijing and Shanghai can drive.

True. Guangzhou is a large domestic hub indeed, but has very little premium traffic. Even the nearby Shenzhen has better premium demand.

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 2):
I never understood why CZ had a 1st class product. To sell it, one must be one of the top premium airlines in the world and that usually means hubbing at a top premium market (London, Frankfurt, etc.)

I just checked the recent booking for CAN-LAX.

CZ327 CAN-LAX Available Seats C:70 Y:424 (No F!)
3-31 25/410
4-1 24/379
4-2 26/407

CZ328 LAX-CAN Available Seats C:70 Y:412
3-31 26/330
4-1 20/372
4-2 23/340
 
G-CIVP
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 6:38 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:44 am

So does this mean we could see the first A380 disposal to another operator?
 
covert
Posts: 1498
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 1:02 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:46 am

Quoting MCOGVADCA (Reply 3):
I just booked ICN-CAN-LAX-CAN-ICN in business for $2000 US.

Excellent pricing. I just dummy booked the ICN-LAX roundtrip in C. A consistent $2110 USD all around. It's a pity that this J fare on CZ doesn't earn MQMs on Delta, or else I would have already done a mileage run!
none
 
AnsettB727
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:19 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:23 pm

My travel agent, part of a world-wide chain, says they have had very bad feedback re; longhaul on many of the Chinese airlines, and they now won't book on them.

Marketing to western people needs the input of a westerner, and the copywriting must be checked by a native-speaker. Some of the examples I have come across in both Australia and the UK make you do a double-take because it's just not idiomatic English. If they can't write properly in English on a long-planned piece of advertising, I do wonder what their on-board experience is going to be like.

Like Chinese cars, give them 10 - 15 years, and maybe you'll find me on board. It's cheap, but I think it's a case of getting what you pay for.
 
mercure1
Posts: 2731
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:13 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sun Mar 31, 2013 4:26 pm

What happen with plan to use A380 to Paris from PEK ?

It seems CZ grow rapidly overseas flights without proper market need behind it.
 
jfk777
Posts: 5816
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:56 am

China Southern is flying A380's to LAX, is there a reason they do not fly them to Sydney since its seems almost any airline with A380 does ?
 
LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:54 am

Quoting covert (Reply 10):
Excellent pricing. I just dummy booked the ICN-LAX roundtrip in C. A consistent $2110 USD all around. It's a pity that this J fare on CZ doesn't earn MQMs on Delta, or else I would have already done a mileage run!

The A380 is simply too much capacity from LAX.

CZ took a a massive leap from year after year of 60% load factors on the 777 to double the size using the A380.

You can clearly see they are trashing fares to fill seats. Even in economy they have continued to offer $760 (380 o/w) tickets to various places in Asia when competitors are often in the $1200 range. A while back they were actually selling unheard of $600 tickets to HKG.

Quoting mercure1 (Reply 12):
What happen with plan to use A380 to Paris from PEK ?

Seems that idea is still stalled as CZ and CA can't come to an agreement.

Story from last week.

China airlines in deadlock over A380s
http://www.scmp.com/business/china-b...china-airlines-deadlock-over-a380s

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 13):
China Southern is flying A380's to LAX, is there a reason they do not fly them to Sydney since its seems almost any airline with A380 does ?

Dont know how accurate this is, but according to below link from a few weeks ago, CZ is looking to bring the type to SYD by Oct/Nov as part of its attempt to capture Europe - Australia traffic via CAN.

China Southern A380 for Sydney looks more likely
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalk...a380-for-sydney-looks-more-likely/

=
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
jfk777
Posts: 5816
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:38 pm

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 14):
Quoting jfk777 (Reply 13):China Southern is flying A380's to LAX, is there a reason they do not fly them to Sydney since its seems almost any airline with A380 does ?
Dont know how accurate this is, but according to below link from a few weeks ago, CZ is looking to bring the type to SYD by Oct/Nov as part of its attempt to capture Europe - Australia traffic via CAN.

Singapore Airlines and Emirates fly many A380 daily to Sydney, they are the biggest A380 operators. Qantas obviously does too.
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15212
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:12 pm

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 15):

Singapore Airlines and Emirates fly many A380 daily to Sydney, they are the biggest A380 operators. Qantas obviously does too.

I'm skeptical that anyone anywhere along the kangaroo route is making any money longhaul to Australia.

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 14):
CZ is looking to bring the type to SYD by Oct/Nov as part of its attempt to capture Europe - Australia traffic via CAN.

Probably just a case of monkey see, monkey do, but it'll likely lose less money than CANLAX.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:13 pm

CAPA has interesting long story about A380 at CZ and the challenge the carrier faces deploying the A380 which have become a financial burden having accumulated losses the last 18-months.

Redeployement of the type onto more international services continues to be problematic. CZ has still not been able tor reach agreement with Air China for a PEK-CDG service as Air China instead insist on wet-leasing the aircraft instead of a codeshare while the type is deemed too big for other international services to Europe or South Pacific.

Also as we discussed above, in order to fill the LAX services, CZ seeks to offer 6th freedom connections albeit often at very low rates with about 55% of the flight connecting to 3rd countries.

Full story:
China Southern's A380 problems may not be solved by possible Air China partnership
http://centreforaviation.com/analysi...sible-air-china-partnership-103063

=
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
Rara
Posts: 2296
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:41 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:34 pm

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 1):
Chinese carriers aren't particularly good at anything; of course they'd quickly get in shape if they were allowed to compete and the state pulled back but that is not going to happen any time soon.

You mean like US airlines in the last decade?
Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15212
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:53 pm

Quoting Rara (Reply 18):

You mean like US airlines in the last decade?

No, the US airlines actually have been leading the industry in terms of dealing with competition, technology, and network optimization. Just look at everything the EU carriers are doing--it's what the US carriers were doing a decade ago. The Chinese carriers just take government ordered planes, stick them in unecessary hubs in government built airports, starting pointless subsidiaries, and it all goes predictably kablooey when they have to compete internationally.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
vfw614
Posts: 3164
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 12:34 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:37 am

Just been on CZ flights in Y from AMS to/from PEK/CAN with onward connections to SE Asia. I monitored their fares for quite some time and they were always considerably cheaper than all the competition - be it European, Asian or Gulf carriers.

The Y-product was not too impressive. Food was barely edible, the cabin crew spoke very poor English and was a bit rude sometimes. Seat pitch was okay, IFE did not work properly on one flight (happens with other airlines as well, of ocurse), IFE did not have a working map function (which is, I learned to my surprise recently, the most popular IFE feature of all). Connecting at PEK is very difficult (although I must credit them for providing a CSA who chaperoned those with a short connection through the terminal, immigration, customs, security etc.). An email inquiry to their AMS station before the flights was never answered.

In short: Not surprised to hear about their longhaul troubles. Now I understand that they by now have 5 or 6 A380, but only use them on one int'l route, with the rest of the capacity used on domestic runs.
 
LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:55 pm

CZ says it will introduce the A380 to Sydney later this year.

Also as part of its "Canton" route of linking Australia with London via CAN, the carrier expects local authorities to soon implement a 72-hour, visa-free policy.


China Southern ramps up expansion
http://www.theage.com.au/business/ch...s-up-expansion-20130414-2htq6.html

=
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15212
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:14 pm

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 21):
Also as part of its "Canton" route of linking Australia with London via CAN, the carrier expects local authorities to soon implement a 72-hour, visa-free policy.

Ha. When your best option for the 380 is to jump into the Kangaroo route, I think you've lost before you started.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
N14AZ
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:19 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:26 pm

Quoting AnsettB727 (Reply 11):
Some of the examples I have come across in both Australia and the UK make you do a double-take because it's just not idiomatic English. If they can't write properly in English on a long-planned piece of advertising, I do wonder what their on-board experience is going to be like.

I just left China (central China + Inner Mongolia). I saw huge traffic signs with mistakes in the English translation and I wondered that when you invest in such large traffic signs, wouldn't it be appropriate to let somebody check the translation first? Then again, life will go on even with such translation mistakes and - like always - it was a great trip and people were so extremely kind to me (gained almost 3 kg weight because of all these dinners including "Gambej" every minute).

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 21):
Also as part of its "Canton" route of linking Australia with London via CAN, the carrier expects local authorities to soon implement a 72-hour, visa-free policy.

Does anybody have experience with this 72-hour-visa for PEK? I have to use it when travelling back from Vietnam via Beijing to Germany but never did this before and I would appreciate if anybody could let me know how it works and how much it costs (maybe as PM since it might be too much off-topic).
 
dtfg
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:17 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:26 pm

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 21):

CZ says it will introduce the A380 to Sydney later this year.

Also as part of its "Canton" route of linking Australia with London via CAN, the carrier expects local authorities to soon implement a 72-hour, visa-free policy.


China Southern ramps up expansion
http://www.theage.com.au/business/ch...s-up-expansion-20130414-2htq6.html

=

So they will operate their double daily CAN-SYD by one 777 and one 380?

I highly doubt the demand would be that high...
 
User avatar
TheRedBaron
Posts: 3081
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:17 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:32 pm

Some questions:

Why these guys loose money on the LAX CAN route if they charge 1300 us D roundtrip and KE uses an a380 from LAX to ICN for almost the same amount ?

Their website is abysmal and their record on reviews about overbooking the flight... so It made me cautious on buying a ticket, (flying for MEX to LAX only to find you have no space on the AC and will lose the connection to Siem Reap is not something I look forward to.... better use KE and be done with it right? does anyone knows if those reports are true?

Also they say the 380 is packed on Y class... and halfway on C.... I wonder if overbooking also happens in C?

TRB
The best seat in a Plane is the Jumpseat.
 
Lufthansa747
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 7:45 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:31 am

Quoting N14AZ (Reply 23):
Does anybody have experience with this 72-hour-visa for PEK? I have to use it when travelling back from Vietnam via Beijing to Germany but never did this before and I would appreciate if anybody could let me know how it works and how much it costs (maybe as PM since it might be too much off-topic).


I believe it's 24h for PEK, 48 for Shanghai, same day connection in CAN. I've done Shanghai twice with no problems, they just ask for your onward ticket at immigration. And it has to be an ONWARD CONNECTION, if you show a return to where you came from, you'll be refused.
Air Asia Super Elite, Cebu Pacific Titanium
 
IndianicWorld
Posts: 2770
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2001 11:32 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:46 pm

For the SYD route I would suspect it will just go Daily a380 year round. If the demand warrants it, maybe a few extra frequencies can be added each week of the peak period.

I have my doubts that it will work that well given the constant fluctuations in their frequencies currently into SYD but who knows.
 
bennator
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:20 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 17, 2013 1:29 pm

Quoting Lufthansa747 (Reply 26):
I believe it's 24h for PEK, 48 for Shanghai, same day connection in CAN. I've done Shanghai twice with no problems, they just ask for your onward ticket at immigration. And it has to be an ONWARD CONNECTION, if you show a return to where you came from, you'll be refused.

It changed as of 01/01/2013. It is 72 HRs at PEK or SHA (SHA/PVG), but still must be an onward connection. I haven't used it, but have used the 48 hrs in Shanghai in the old system, with no problems (well, okay, at first the immigration officer had trouble counting 48 hrs, but after that, there was no problem).
 
User avatar
huaiwei
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:36 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 17, 2013 1:37 pm

Quoting vfw614 (Reply 20):
Just been on CZ flights in Y from AMS to/from PEK/CAN with onward connections to SE Asia. I monitored their fares for quite some time and they were always considerably cheaper than all the competition - be it European, Asian or Gulf carriers.

From where I am in SIN, airfares on Chinese airlines are relatively high. In fact, the airlines who dump the cheapest air tickets on intra-Asia flights are usually the American carriers. American carriers here face a reputation not much better than the Chinese carriers, but that is from an East Asian perspective.

Quoting N14AZ (Reply 23):
I saw huge traffic signs with mistakes in the English translation and I wondered that when you invest in such large traffic signs, wouldn't it be appropriate to let somebody check the translation first?

After years of being a highly modernised country, bad English prevails all over Japan, including downtown Tokyo. I am sorry, but not everyone considers it important to be proficient in English especially when their main clientele will remain largely domestic for decades to come. If Japan could not be bothered, China with its massive self-sustainable market certainly would not either.

Quoting N14AZ (Reply 23):
including "Gambej" every minute)

It is ganbei. Ironic that this mistake is coming from someone who just criticised them over linguistics?   So if you guys cannot be bothered to check the correct pinyin transciption for the world's most spoken language, why would you expect them to check their spellings and grammar for the world's most widely spoken language? 
It's huaiwei...not huawei. I have nothing to do with the PRC! :)
 
EddieDude
Posts: 6166
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 10:19 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:53 pm

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 21):

CZ says it will introduce the A380 to Sydney later this year.

Also as part of its "Canton" route of linking Australia with London via CAN, the carrier expects local authorities to soon implement a 72-hour, visa-free policy.

There was yet another story on Bloomberg yesterday about CZ and CA's inability to reach an agreement to fly jointly PEK-CDG using CZ's A380s. That story also pointed towards CZ launching A380 flights to SYD later this year as a "Plan B" considering the impossibility of flying that bird to CDG from PEK.

Quoting TheRedBaron (Reply 25):
Why these guys loose money on the LAX CAN route if they charge 1300 us D roundtrip and KE uses an a380 from LAX to ICN for almost the same amount ?

Well, for starters, LAX-CAN is several more hours long, which means the cost of fuel, crew, catering, etc. is higher.
Next flights: MEX-LAX AM 738, LAX-PVG DL 77L, SHA-PEK CA 789, PEK-PVG CA A332, PVG-ORD MU 77W, ORD-MEX AM 738
 
nizolidas
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:28 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:55 pm

Quoting Rara (Reply 18):
Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 1):
Chinese carriers aren't particularly good at anything; of course they'd quickly get in shape if they were allowed to compete and the state pulled back but that is not going to happen any time soon.

I recently flew PEK-FRA on CA's new 77W. The service, seat and food were in no way inferior to the offerings BA/LH/AF etc. have.
 
davidho1985
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:27 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Wed Apr 17, 2013 4:12 pm

Quoting N14AZ (Reply 23):
I just left China (central China + Inner Mongolia). I saw huge traffic signs with mistakes in the English translation and I wondered that when you invest in such large traffic signs, wouldn't it be appropriate to let somebody check the translation first? Then again, life will go on even with such translation mistakes and - like always - it was a great trip and people were so extremely kind to me (gained almost 3 kg weight because of all these dinners including "Gambej" every minute).

No need to suprise. Numbers of mis-translated sign can be find from supermarket to airport in China.
 
User avatar
KarelXWB
Crew
Posts: 19463
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:13 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:10 am

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 21):
CZ says it will introduce the A380 to Sydney later this year.

CZ is expected to announce the schedule at a press conference being held tomorrow morning, April 27, at the Australian Tourism Exchange conference being held at Sydney's Darling Harbour.

More here.
Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
 
rwy04lga
Posts: 1976
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:21 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:44 pm

Quoting huaiwei (Reply 29):
So if you guys cannot be bothered to check the correct pinyin transciption for the world's most spoken language, why would you expect them to check their spellings and grammar for the world's most widely spoken language?

Because he's writing on an airline forum directed at a few hundred planefans and they're spending a LOT of money on signs directed at a LOT more people under more important circumstances. Incidentally, both spellings in English can be pronounced the same way. You chose to end with 'i', he chose to end with 'j'. Both would be correct.
Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
 
Cerecl
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:22 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:25 pm

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 34):
Because he's writing on an airline forum directed at a few hundred plane fans and they're spending a LOT of money on signs directed at a LOT more people under more important circumstances.

Errors are errors and you can't argue with that. There is definitely room for improvement. Hopefully it will come with time.

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 34):
Incidentally, both spellings in English can be pronounced the same way. You chose to end with 'i', he chose to end with 'j'. Both would be correct.

Really? The phrase is supposed to be pronounced as "Gan-Bay". I think you will have a hard time convincing people that 1. “bej" is actually English and 2. it can be pronounced in English as "Bay".

Quoting AnsettB727 (Reply 11):

My travel agent, part of a world-wide chain, says they have had very bad feedback re; longhaul on many of the Chinese airlines, and they now won't book on them.

I just flew CA twice, one longhaul and one regional flight. I wouldn't say they are horrible. Yes, English announcements were made with a heavy accent and yes, food was nothing special (but not bad either). However, the flight attendants were almost always eager to help and courteous. They are not SQ, but they certainly don't deserve "very bad feedback". CZ and MU lag a bit in terms of hardware.
In the end, it really depends on what one wants. If nothing less than 100% accent free English and absolute state of the art hardware can be accepted, sure, stay away from Chinese airlines but be prepared to pay at least one third more.

[Edited 2013-04-26 06:26:01]
 
rwy04lga
Posts: 1976
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:21 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:09 am

Quoting Cerecl (Reply 35):
Really?

Yep, really! Pronouncing it 'bedge' did not even occur to me. 'Bay' was the correct 'wej' to pronounce it.   

English has all sorts of odd letter combinations. Add the 'gh' in 'enough' to the 'o' in 'women' and the 'ti' in 'motion' and you get 'ghoti' which can be pronounced 'fish'. Does it look right? No. But English pronunciation rules allow it.
Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
 
LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:56 pm

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 33):
CZ is expected to announce the schedule at a press conference being held tomorrow morning, April 27, at the Australian Tourism Exchange conference being held at Sydney's Darling Harbour.

Yup - here it is - effective October 27th.

Chinese super jumbo bound for Australia
http://www.ausbt.com.au/china-southe...380-flights-from-sydney-in-october

=
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Fri May 10, 2013 5:04 pm

Here is a story that CZ has given up on trying to reach and agreement with CA to jointly utilize the A380 on routes out of PEK. Besides regulatory issues the CEO says there were too many issues that simply could not be resolved.

http://goo.gl/lxOej

=
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
B2443
Posts: 586
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 2:28 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Fri May 10, 2013 6:47 pm

Quoting dtfg (Reply 24):
So they will operate their double daily CAN-SYD by one 777 and one 380?

I highly doubt the demand would be that high...

They will flood the market with low fares, which seems to be the way they are doing on the LAX route.
 
Planesmart
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:18 am

RE: China Southern - Longhaul Hurting; Might Dump Fcl

Sat May 11, 2013 8:12 pm

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 19):

In which aviation best practices standards for service, technology and competition do US airlines score well?

When reviewed by passengers who fly internationally (to Europe, Asia, ME), how do US-based airlines rate in customer service standards (ground and inflight), aircraft age, inflight technology, food, lost & damaged baggage, long v short duration flights, etc?

How well do they rate when passengers who predominantly fly thru Asia and ME score them?