factsonly
Topic Author
Posts: 2008
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:08 pm

US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 2:45 pm

The Chicago Tribune recently published the article below, telling readers to fly foreign airlines as they regard the on-board service superior to US carriers.

Do you agree with the Chicago Tribune?

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...ion-yiddish-books-flight-attendant
 
SonomaFlyer
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:47 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 2:51 pm

Sadly, the U.S. airline industry has focused more on cost cutting than focusing on their international products. As a result, I fly on foreign carriers 80-90% of the time for my international trips. The prices are similar and the experience is almost always better.

The problem of course can be remedied and AA has a chance to reinvent itself with the merger. They have plenty of examples within OneWorld of outstanding customer service to emulate.
 
WA707atMSP
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:16 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 2:59 pm

Quoting factsonly (Thread starter):
The Chicago Tribune recently published the article below, telling readers to fly foreign airlines as they regard the on-board service superior to US carriers.

Do you agree with the Chicago Tribune?

I think United Airlines should respond by telling their passengers to read The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times instead of the Chicago Tribune, because cost cutting by the Tribune's owners has resulted in the Tribune becoming inferior to newspapers from out of town publishers  
Seaholm Maples are #1!
 
PHX787
Posts: 7877
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:46 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 3:06 pm

Well I don't agree with the wording of this article, but if more people fly the apparently superior *** products of foreign airlines, maybe the US airlines will see this as a need to imrpove their competitiveness....

****I say "apparently," because I haven't flown any international airlines, other than AF.
Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
 
Spacepope
Posts: 3151
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 1999 11:10 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 3:39 pm

I make it a point to fly foreign airlines whenever I go international. The last 2 legs back from ICN I've been stuck with UA and DL. The service did not come close to comparing with the KE and OZ service going the other direction.
The last of the famous international playboys
 
cgnnrw
Posts: 1045
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 3:11 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 3:46 pm

I generally go out of my way to fly foreign carriers (AF/KL) when I go to the US. Whereas up to a few years ago one could really see the difference in the onboard economy product, the foreign carriers were always above US carriers; the past few years the foreign carriers have started lowering their standards to those of US carriers.
- paying for bags
- cheapening their inflight meals
- use of plastic cutlery
- use of plastic cups

These small differences put the foreign carriers in another league. Now, there really isn't much difference except price.
A330 man.
 
Curiousflyer
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:19 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 4:44 pm

AA and DL have upped their game in business class, they compete well with AF, KL and BA in my view, although for the same price I would still rather take AF, KL or BA because of:
- better food and drinks
- better lounges
- generally, a better style
Now, seat-wise, the newest seat of DL and AA beat AF, KL or BA... for now. But the new seats are not in all planes. Also the Americans are usually cheaper.

In coach, it is a completely different story, the Europeans beat the Americans flat out. Food, drinks, service, airport amenities, efficiency, there is just no comparison. The Americans can only compete on price.
 
acabgd
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:55 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 4:46 pm

Quoting cgnnrw (Reply 5):
These small differences put the foreign carriers in another league. Now, there really isn't much difference except price.

If you take only AF (and possibly KL) into account, then yes, your above statement might be true. However, there are other international carriers flying to the US with far superiour service which you didn't take into account.

For me, I always fly on international carriers except when really impossible.
CSud,D9,MD8x,D10,Trid,BAC1,A30,31,319,320,321,33,346,B71,72,73,74,75,76,77,L10,S20,A42,A72,T13,T15,F50,F70,F100,B146
 
ordbosewr
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:30 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 5:36 pm

What is funny is that almost the single biggest factor for american consumers is price.

If the US airlines are competing on the one metric that their consumers care about then who is really winning. Hint, it is the customer.

But remember you get what you pay for. You can't have it both ways. You can't want Porsche-like service when buying a Yugo. If you do then you are sadly setting yourself up for failure.

I am not going to even go into the various reasons why, but the European legacies are actually in worse financial shape than most of US legacies. I would bet a post-backruptcy AA/US combo plus UA and DL are much more stable than AF/KL, LH and IAG.
 
rwy04lga
Posts: 1976
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:21 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 5:53 pm

If I were an employee of either UA or AA, I'd never again pick up another issue of CT. Whether there's merit in the article or not, you don't kick you neighbor in the face. CT should have had one of their affiliates in a town that's NOT a hub for the 2 largest airlines in the US publish this article. AA/UA employees should mount a protest.
Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
 
aklrno
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:18 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 6:16 pm

I flew UA HKG to SFO a few days ago, my first US carrier international flight in years. I was pleasantly surprised. I could find nothing wrong with the experience except that the UA lie flat business class seat is not as comfortable as the ones on NZ. I'll be on UA LAX-LHR in a few weeks. If it is as good then my fear of UA international will be gone.

It's the domestic flights where I find US service to be far worse than most other countries, but as someone pointed out, if you demand the lowest price you can't expect the highest service. Still, some airlines (like WN) do a good job with minimal resources.
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 6:20 pm

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 9):
AA/UA employees should mount a protest.

Talk about shoot the messenger! How about they just improve their on-board product to match that of those "goddam forners"?   
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
 
rampbro
Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:00 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 6:22 pm

What a poor piece of writing. It seems like it was written by an 8 year old who had just been on their first flight. The reference to a domestic carrier at the end of the article is confusing and smacks of a cheap 'planted article'. Then this whopper:

'Other corners of the globe certainly have faced similarly lean economic times, but their airlines have remained civil for perhaps no reason other than cultural expectations.'

Yes, I'm sure it has nothing to do with, you know, labour laws or lack of union organization, or the fact that the boilerplate 'tough global economic times' actually hides the fact that some regions are serious decline while other are growing rapidly. Cultural expectations my rear-end. Thats like saying Coke brought the Original flavour back because they got 'nostalgic'.

The only people who ought to protest this article are subscribers to the Chicago Tribune, who have to read drivel like this.
 
777ord
Posts: 677
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 12:04 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 6:30 pm

Looks like an article by a guy who writes for the Tribute who just had a not stellar experience on a US Carrier.... As stated since the beginning of time- YOU get what YOU pay for. And, in our cost driven economy, we demand the silver platter, and whine when we get the Hefty paper plate and can't explain why.

That being said, I had to wait in line in security flying out of LAX last week (UA lax ord) and the guy in front of me was complaining to his wife how he should have drove to Boston because it was cheaper than the $560 he paid for he and his wife to fly... unexpectedly his wife goes, "please tell me honey how a 2,500 mile drive twice at 4.00/gallon is cheaper than this?" He ate that humble pie and loved it lol!
 
Doona
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:43 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 6:44 pm

Quoting factsonly (Thread starter):
Do you agree with the Chicago Tribune?

Hailing from Scandinavia, my legacy carrier doesn't offer much in the way of service not seen on its American counterparts. At least on most American carriers, they'll throw in a complimentary soda. On my last flight over the pond with SAS in Y, there wasn't even a meal choice (although the meal served was indeed very decent).

I supposed I've been lucky, I've always enjoyed good service on carriers from the US (UA, AA, DL, and even the old NW and TW), both on and off the ground. Back in the late 90's I traveled a lot as a UM between the US and Europe, mostly on US carriers, and was treated like a prince (at least in my mind). But I don't need to see F/As or ground staff smiling at me every second, I don't need to be pampered. All I require is to be treated politely and respectfully, and I'd say that in my experience, I've been just that. I'd also say that F/As on US carriers tend to be friendlier, at least to me.

The only bad experience on an American carrier that stood out was on a UAX flight, operated by Skywest, where the only F/A was tired and grumpy. But then again, I think his frustration was more directed at his own life than at us passengers.

Cheers
Mats
Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
 
ckfred
Posts: 4713
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:50 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 7:01 pm

Quoting WA707atMSP (Reply 2):
I think United Airlines should respond by telling their passengers to read The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times instead of the Chicago Tribune, because cost cutting by the Tribune's owners has resulted in the Tribune becoming inferior to newspapers from out of town publishers

I read both the WSJ and the Chicago Tribune. While true that cost cutting at the Tribune means no local auto section editor and more outsourcing of articles for the Sunday Travel section, the local news section of the Tribune is still head and shoulders above most other major city papers.

By the same token, I've been hearing from friends who travel overseas that the major U.S. carriers don't compare to the likes of BA, Air France, or Lufthansa, but they are better than KLM and Iberia.
 
User avatar
Dreadnought
Posts: 9832
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:31 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 7:03 pm

Quoting factsonly (Thread starter):

The Chicago Tribune recently published the article below, telling readers to fly foreign airlines as they regard the on-board service superior to US carriers.

Do you agree with the Chicago Tribune?

For international flights, American-flagged carriers have been horrible for years, compared to most foreign airlines (well, at least european and far-east airlines). Flight attendants tend to be more rude and surly - like they really don't want to bother with you. Cleanliness is hit or miss - They seem to clean the plans once a week whether the plane needs it or not, and if you are lucky you board one that isn't too bad.

The only reason I ever fly them is that they generally have the cheapest fares. But if the price is similar, off I go.
Forget dogs and cats - Spay and neuter your liberals.
 
User avatar
DeltaMD90
Posts: 8245
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:25 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 7:15 pm

I do feel for American carriers. They are criticized for "lousy service" yet, at least for most Americans, they only care about low price. So what are the airlines to do?

Though I can't take all the blame off US airlines, they caused a lot of their own woes
Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
 
BA0197
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:09 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 8:02 pm

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 17):

I do feel for American carriers. They are criticized for "lousy service" yet, at least for most Americans, they only care about low price. So what are the airlines to do?

The problem is that people see the upfront cost and don't think about baggage charges/ seat assignment/ boarding card cost etc when they purchase their ticket. I would like to think that if some airline started an advertizing campaign that stated they were going to add the cost of one baggage, a snack/meal, free bar and newspaper that the public would take note and start to think about those benifits. (BA has a value calculator on its website showcasing how flying them may be cheaper than EZ or FR) But it appears that after you unbundle, you cannot rebundle (or it hasen't been done yet anyway).

Just imagine if we had an airline (al BA) here in the US. IAH-DFW with breakfast onboard, free booze, a free bag, choice of newspaper, assigned seats before the flight, and they don't charge you for every little thing you want onboard. I would be the first to buy a ticket on them.

But unforutnatly it seems consumers are more worried about cost than service. Shame.
 
citationjet
Posts: 2258
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 2:26 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 8:11 pm

Quoting factsonly (Thread starter):
Do you agree with the Chicago Tribune?

I have flown AA, UA, DL, LH, AF, SQ, SAS, and Austrian on overwater flights in the past few years. Based on my experience I would have to agree with them.
Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
 
blueflyer
Posts: 3633
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:17 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 8:17 pm

In the premium cabins, I think US carriers, at least the ones I fly (AA, UA, US) have made significant improvements and have narrowed the gap, especially on the hard product. The quality of the soft product can be good, but it is too much of a lottery still.

What does hurt US carriers the most, in my opinion, is the poor quality of their premium domestic service. It doesn't matter much if you live at a hub, but if a significant amount of total travel time is spent getting to the hub, it does matter greatly. Why would I want to spend three hours from DFW flying to a US carrier's hub in domestic First when I can just as well take Lufthansa or Korean (for example) and enjoy greater comfort earlier, even in Business. I am aware intra-European Business class is little more than a slightly improved coach cabin, but distances are much shorter and, to me, it is an acceptable trade-off to spend much more time in greater comfort.

Of course, the best option for Europe remains Air Canada whenever available. Their North American Executive class is far better than any domestic First offering, and their Executive First class is as good as any over the Atlantic.

Bottom line, unless passengers live at a hub, US carriers will not be as good as foreign carriers until they significantly improve their domestic service, and since the majority of passengers seem to think they're entitled to free seats upfront, I see no improvement any time soon.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has no clothes.
 
User avatar
IrishAyes
Posts: 2151
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:04 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 8:35 pm

It really depends.

Honestly, there is such a high degree of granularity involved in these decisions when it comes to fulfilling customer expectations, balancing cost of goods added vs. derived value of services added, and all while trying to incorporate aspects that give off uniqueness representing the cultural standards of the country and the individual airline.

I would say that yes, on the whole European carriers TEND to be nicer than US ones across the pond, at least in Y. In F and C, the differences are probably a little more negligible, but it also depends on so many different aspects.

There are certain categories where international airlines will win, hands down. Politeness of FAs is definitely one of them. I don't think I would ever come across a rude FA on All Nippon flying Seattle to Narita, but on United, that is usually the norm (read my most recent TRs for more detail).

Whereas in other categories, things differ, and US carriers win. I personally have found United (legacy Continental's) IFE system to be revolutionary, with SO many options, and superior to BA, AF and ANA. Lufthansa and SWISS basically serve old lettuce for salads in Y, whereas Delta adds tomatoes and feta cheese.
confidence is silent. insecurities are loud.
 
User avatar
DeltaMD90
Posts: 8245
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:25 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 9:02 pm

Quoting BA0197 (Reply 18):
I would like to think that if some airline started an advertizing campaign that stated they were going to add the cost of one baggage, a snack/meal, free bar and newspaper that the public would take note and start to think about those benifits. (BA has a value calculator on its website showcasing how flying them may be cheaper than EZ or FR) But it appears that after you unbundle, you cannot rebundle (or it hasen't been done yet anyway).

You'd have the airlines doing the new pricing show up after the airlines using the current pricing on websites like expedia. You'd have to have an extremely wide reaching campaign that would be expensive and might not work. Plus, what about the tons of people that don't check bags? I never do, I always carry on. The one time I absolutely had to check a bag it got lost, go figure.

Don't get me wrong, I wish it was all more straight forward, I just don't think what you said would necessarily work
Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
 
bastew
Posts: 741
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:21 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 9:05 pm

I totally disagree with the article.

From a J class POV anyway.

Having just flown four sectors on AA J class (two domestic First, two longhaul) I found on every sector the service was second to none, the food was amazing and I was made to feel a valued customer. The First Class domestic flights were way ahead of what you will experience on any short haul flight within europe. On the longhaul flights I have not had better food (in terms of quality or quantity) on any european carrier. AA's was far superior.

The only thing letting the whole thing down was AA's rubbish angled-flat seats on the longhaul flights and the pretty limited IFE (a walk down through coach revealed ceiling mounted monitors - no PTV). But both of these issues are being addressed with the newer aircraft.

I was not expecting much of the lounges at all, but was really impressed with the space and decor in the lounges. If they added in free food and drink, they would be comparable to the likes of BA's lounges.

The asian and middle eastern airlines may still be in a league of their own but tbh given the choice between AA and AF/KL/BA etc etc J I would choose AA hands down - provided I was on one of their newer aircraft.
 
jayunited
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:03 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 9:45 pm

I completely agree with this article. The last few international trips that I have taken I have actually bought tickets because I was traveling with a group of my friends and we did not fly UA. Instead we have flown on LH, LX, and BA in coach of course (I work for an airline I can't afford business class) But these airlines service is coach in some cases is better than the service I received flying standby in business class on UA. Their flight attendants are friendly the service is always with a smile and the food in coach on these carriers is better than the food on UA. Now if I am taking a trip by myself I'll fly standby on UA but when its a group of my friends and we all are taking an international trip 9 times out of 10 we are on a international carrier not a US carrier. US carriers have a long way to go to catch up to what their international counterparts are doing in terms of on board service, friendliness, and food and drink options.
 
PRAirbus
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:59 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 9:47 pm

BA, LH, LAN, TAM are most or all of the Asian carriers are far SUPERIOR!
 
User avatar
AmricanShamrok
Posts: 1803
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 2:03 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 10:02 pm

I regularly (once/twice a year) fly EI or UA across the pond in Economy and honestly I find little difference between the two in both soft and hard products. Both offer seat-back AVOD, complimentary soft drinks, snacks and a choice of main meal. The main difference for me is the aircraft I'm flying (A332 vs. B752).

Although EI are currently rolling out transatlantic Wi-Fi and it'll be a while before UA catches up in this regard. DL offers it though.
 
airfrancejfk
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2002 1:05 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 10:07 pm

This information is nothing new. The disparity in service on international sectors is appalling. Flew the JFK to LHR route several times with VS, BA and DL and the DL service is clearly substandard in every way possible. From JFK to the Caribbean, fly JM/BW compared to AA/DL and you will see the difference. No fees for a first or even a second bag and complimentary meals (not peanuts and certainly not food for sale) served on every flight.
 
User avatar
zippyjet
Posts: 5089
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 3:32 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 10:10 pm

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 1):
The problem of course can be remedied and AA has a chance to reinvent itself with the merger. They have plenty of examples within OneWorld of outstanding customer service to emulate.

How about Pan Am version 5 or wherever this next venture would be? I haven't read the article but is it inferring that foreign carriers should crack the comestic market in the USA? Does this also take into account flying Air Generic (Ryan Air) where they are contemplating charging you to poop at 35,000 feet and offering stand up flying?
I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
 
bohica
Posts: 2303
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:21 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 10:41 pm

Quoting factsonly (Thread starter):
The Chicago Tribune recently published the article below, telling readers to fly foreign airlines as they regard the on-board service superior to US carriers.

Do you agree with the Chicago Tribune?

About a year ago, I downloaded the Chicago Tribune app for Android. It was so bad I deleted it after about a week. The Chicago Tribune needs to get their own act together before they can tell someone who to fly on.
 
freakyrat
Posts: 865
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:04 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 11:47 pm

I have flown DFW-AMS on KLM in World Business Class and also have flown AMS-IAH on United in Business First. Both airlines products were very good. Each product had it's own distinction but both were comparable.
 
shufflemoomin
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:04 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Tue May 21, 2013 11:50 pm

I prefer non-US airlines because most of their staff still remember that they're in the service industry and don't act like self-important, wanna-be law enforcement like some US airline staff.
 
SPREE34
Posts: 1561
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:09 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 12:13 am

I agree with the writer. I compare BA, V Aus, Virgin Atlantic, DL, IB, and AA. The recent AA only because I had no choice of carrier at the time. I avoid AA.

Quoting curiousflyer (Reply 6):
I would still rather take AF, KL or BA because of:
- better food and drinks
- better lounges
- generally, a better style

All true. The Delta lounge at LAX is a sad joke. All it offers is a spot away from the noise in the terminal.

Quoting curiousflyer (Reply 6):
In coach... the Europeans beat the Americans flat out. Food, drinks, service, airport amenities, efficiency, there is just no comparison. The Americans can only compete on price

Agree. I avoid coach, yet recently rode BA coach class. It matched your observation.

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 9):
If I were an employee of either UA or AA, I'd never again pick up another issue of CT.

Why. Because they printed the truth? Why not take the article to the next Board meeting and use it as a "to do" list of product improvement?

Quoting scbriml (Reply 11):
Talk about shoot the messenger! How about they just improve their on-board product to match that of those "goddam forners"?   

  

Quoting rampbro (Reply 12):
The only people who ought to protest this article are subscribers to the Chicago Tribune, who have to read drivel like this.

They don't "have to read" the alleged drivel, and are free to fly on the substandard product. Some people like their heads in the sand.

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 17):
Though I can't take all the blame off US airlines, they caused a lot of their own woes

Yup. When you don't like where you are, start in the mirror. The Legacies didn't adapt to the marketplace or derugulation in a reasonable way.

Quoting bastew (Reply 23):
If they added in free food and drink, they would be comparable to the likes of BA's lounges.

On a recent outbound BA flight, the AA Admirals Club was the lounge available to BA customers. They just don't compare. BA, Virgin, even Alaska's Board Room domestically beats DL and AA's lounges into the ground. BA has two lounges in T5 at LHR, plus the Concorde Room. The BA LHR and LGW lounges are among the best I've ever seen. Virgin at Sydney is awesome. The US carriers either know and don't care, or are truley incompetent.
I don't understand everything I don't know about this.
 
hoons90
Posts: 3124
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 10:15 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 12:24 am

I just stepped off an AA 772 a few hours ago from a 13 hour flight and it was great. Couldn't ask for a better crew. Smiles everywhere and frequent drink runs.

Never had a bad experience with AA so far, but punctuality couls improve.
The biggest mistake made by most human beings: Listening to only half, understanding just a quarter and telling double.
 
dfambro
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:32 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 12:36 am

I agree with the article, but I think many here overstate the difference. Compared to my "normal" airline UA, my transpacs on NH and JL were superior service-wise in Y and in hard product, new 77Ws and 787 vs refurbed 772s and the AVOD-less 744s (what were they thinking!).

Across the Atlantic, my LH and BA experience is not that different from UA, but that's a sleeper flight anyway.

What makes me stick with UA is that a good percentage of the time I can get myself upgraded to J on UA, but it's much harder to manage that on NH and LH even though they are Star Alliance like UA. And comparing UA business class to economy on NH of LH, well there's really no comparison there.
 
atsiang
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:40 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 12:37 am

Would have to agree with the article 100%. I frequently fly from SFO to HKG. There are three airlines which offers non-stop service between SFO and HKG: Singapore, Cathay and United. Among these three airlines, I would never fly UA, never never. For economy class, Singapore by far offers the best service and amenities. Cathay comes next. I've flown UA internationally from SFO to SYD on economy and it was an unpleasant experience with inadequate food portions and disinterested flight attendants and archaic entertainment system.
 
freakyrat
Posts: 865
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:04 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 12:46 am

Rode Coach on BA last December from LHR-HAM. The service on the A320 was remarkable. We were served these little chicken taco like roll ups which were very good plus drinks and this was on a short flight. The crew was wonderful. It reminded me of the old days of flying in the US.
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18971
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 1:32 am

Quoting atsiang (Reply 35):
Would have to agree with the article 100%. I frequently fly from SFO to HKG. There are three airlines which offers non-stop service between SFO and HKG: Singapore, Cathay and United. Among these three airlines, I would never fly UA, never never. For economy class, Singapore by far offers the best service and amenities. Cathay comes next. I've flown UA internationally from SFO to SYD on economy and it was an unpleasant experience with inadequate food portions and disinterested flight attendants and archaic entertainment system.

I can see your point if all 3 carriers charge the same fare, but when I checked some random dates in June SFO-HKG-SFO for a 2-week stay, UA's lowest round trip Y class fare for a 2-week stay is a few hundred dollars lower than CX, and SQ's lowest fare is much higher than CX. Many passengers in Y class would rather save the money than pay hundreds of dollars for improved service.
 
dfambro
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:32 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 1:38 am

Quoting atsiang (Reply 35):
I frequently fly from SFO to HKG.

UA flies the 744s on that route, without seatback screens. The product there is really behind the times. It's a bit better on their 772s.
 
atsiang
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:40 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 1:57 am

Quoting dfambro (Reply 38):

Yes, I agree that UA charges a lower fare. However, in my experience of flying this route many times, the flights on SQ 001 are always nearly full. Passengers see the value that SQ and CX offers and are willing to pay a couple of hundreds more for better service, food, flight attendants who can speak both Mandarin and Cantonese. It's simply worth it.

[Edited 2013-05-21 18:58:20]
 
N62NA
Posts: 4006
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:05 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 2:03 am

Quoting HOONS90 (Reply 33):
I just stepped off an AA 772 a few hours ago from a 13 hour flight and it was great. Couldn't ask for a better crew. Smiles everywhere and frequent drink runs.

Never had a bad experience with AA so far, but punctuality couls improve.

I've logged over 1 million miles with AA and agree with you 100%. My only complaint with AA is that we NEVER leave on time!
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15252
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 2:28 am

Sure foreign carriers are generally better, but US carriers have had a 2+ decade head start on deregulation. When those Asian and EU carriers have 40 years of deregulation under their belt, then let's compare notes.

What's more interesting, is that a newspaper that is in bankruptcy, in a hyper union town, is telling people not to support the hometown carriers. People want quality journalism and great airline service, but have zero interest in paying for either. The irony would be so delicious if it weren't so sad. US pax (and readers) are getting exactly what they want to pay for.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
TomFoolery
Posts: 423
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 9:10 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 2:44 am

I must say that I tend to avoid most US carriers due to the fact that my department only pays for Y (we do get to earn and keep our miles). I have found that DL has really improved their product, and is well on thier way to being nearly on-par with some of their international peers.

With that said, I have found that the US carriers treat their passengers right, provided they have the right level of status. Some carriers I avoid because I have no status. But, when one does have the right level of FF status, it is the US carriers who really go out of their way to help when things go wrong. I have not found this to be the case with any of the European majors (LH and AF). For example, if one finishes up a meeting early, and goes to the airport early, that little 'same day confirmed' perk will allow you to trade up to an earlier (or later) flight if seats are available at no charge.

Tom
Paper makes an airplane fly
 
SPREE34
Posts: 1561
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:09 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 2:46 am

Quoting shufflemoomin (Reply 31):

I prefer non-US airlines because most of their staff still remember that they're in the service industry and don't act like self-important, wanna-be law enforcement like some US airline staff.

Yes! The Air Nazi attitude sets a poor attitude among the PAX right off. I'll stop here before I rant.
I don't understand everything I don't know about this.
 
traindoc
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:35 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 2:49 am

Last month I flew 22,000 miles on UA, SAT-EWR-HKG-SIN-NRT-EWR-SAT. I was on both former CO and pre merger UA flights. The service was very good, with very little difference in on board product, except that the J seats on the former CO 777 are wider. UA is really getting its act together, and I applaud them.

As to flying foreign carriers, I just booked SAT-LIS, in Business on UA. They wanted $ 4800, while LH wanted $6500! Does LH give $1700 more service than UA for a 12,000 mile trip? Not hardly!

Lastly, the U.S. public wants Walmart airfares, but Nieman Marcus service. So the average passenger is getting what they are willing to pay for. By the way, has the CT writer priced inter European air fare? Our fares, by and large are much better for the same distance travelled, than those in Europe. (I am excluding EasyJet and Ryanair.)
 
ASA
Posts: 1003
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:12 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 3:23 am

Quoting ORDBOSEWR (Reply 8):
You can't want Porsche-like service when buying a Yugo.

Poor YUGO ... still feeling the end of the stick after all these years 
 
christao17
Posts: 902
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:14 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 4:48 am

Living in Bangkok and returning to the United States a few times a year, I will most of the time choose to fly TG, OZ, KE, or BR. The service (hard and soft products alike) is leagues better than on DL or UA for a similar and often lower price.
Keeping the "civil" in civil aviation...
 
flyhigh@tom
Posts: 345
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 7:58 pm

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 4:52 am

Quoting SPREE34 (Reply 43):
Quoting shufflemoomin (Reply 31):

I prefer non-US airlines because most of their staff still remember that they're in the service industry and don't act like self-important, wanna-be law enforcement like some US airline staff.

Yes! The Air Nazi attitude sets a poor attitude among the PAX right off. I'll stop here before I rant.

I second that!!!!!         
 
F9Animal
Posts: 3647
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:13 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 5:26 am

I think it is time for those in denial to accept the truth. US airlines have gone downhill in terms of service. I don't see it as an insult, nor do I think the writer is trying to insult US airlines. Competition, economy, deregulation, and cuts have taken its toll on service, especially in coach. Foreign airlines have kept the bar high, while US airlines have lowered that bar to cut weight, remove lavs, and add seats to compete with counterparts.
I Am A Different Animal!!
 
Passedv1
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:40 am

RE: US Newspaper Tells Public To Fly Foreign Airlines

Wed May 22, 2013 5:40 am

Quoting BA0197 (Reply 18):
Just imagine if we had an airline (al BA) here in the US. IAH-DFW with breakfast onboard, free booze, a free bag, choice of newspaper, assigned seats before the flight, and they don't charge you for every little thing you want onboard. I would be the first to buy a ticket on them.

That has been tried and failed. Look at all the Northeast US shuttle service improvement attempts that have been made and scaled back because not enough passengers are willing to pay a premium for the service.

But if you think about it, this makes sense. Do you pay an extra $20 for a selection of "FREE" newspapers you want or do you save $20 and stop by the newsstand on the way to the plane and pay an extra $5 for the newspaper you ACTUALLY want...and then for every person like you that are willing to pay to have a free selection of newspapers, there is another that woud rather save the money because they already subscribe to everything they read on their ipad (like me) or already have too much crap to read as it is and would just rather save the $20.

It is not fair to compare the service of US airlines to foreign carriers. Foreign carriers usually are guranteed at least a virtual monopoly, if not an actual monopoly on one end of the route map that allows them to get higher fares then they otherwise would. Korean Airlines doesn't have to compete with 3 or 4 other Korean Airlines once it gets it's passengers back to Seoul.

I won't even get into the state support of their flag carriers.

Who is online