User avatar
fxramper
Topic Author
Posts: 5837
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:03 pm

SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 3:37 am

Have read on this site SQ will discontinue their SIN-EWR-SIN flight. It's on an Airbus A345 in all business class. This flight goes out full pretty regularly. Curious why SQ is dumping this route. Seems prestigious to the company as the longest revenue flight in the world at present. Thoughts appreciated.
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 4:49 am

The A345 fleet is going bye-bye.

Due to the ULH nature of the flight, I doubt even full loads produce profits.

SQ has struggled with these flights having changed configurations more than once on the aircraft, and even announcing they would put economy back on planes the last year, before changing course and pulling the plug completely now.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
Cipango
Posts: 1451
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:55 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 4:59 am

The main problem is the deadweight on this flight. They need to carry all the fuel at once during departure and the aircraft is fuel heavy until around 50-/75% of the flight when the benefits of a reduced load can then be felt.

I remember reading that SQ would lose less money by operating these flights than they would by grounding them, mainly due to the fact that no one wants to buy an A345.

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 1):
SQ has struggled with these flights having changed configurations more than once on the aircraft, and even announcing they would put economy back on planes the last year, before changing course and pulling the plug completely now.

This is the one route I really wanted to try out. Unfortunately I never found the reason nor the money to travel from SIN-EWR.
Let's fly! Unless it's on a CRJ 200, then I'll stay down here.
 
infinit
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:12 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 5:01 am

This was discussed in the following thread awhile back:
SQ Publishes A345 SIN-LAX/EWR Nonstop End Dates (by LAXintl Dec 20 2012 in Civil Aviation)

The A345s are going to be decommissioned in line with SQ's policy to decom their planes when they're 8 (or was it 9?) years.
Airbus is stopping the A345 program
There is no other model that can do this route profitably from what I hear.

Despite the yields being good, some have questioned the profitability of these flights in light of present-day fuel costs.
 
qf340500
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:22 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 5:07 am

what a sad day! One of the best looking planes ever!

Any idea if SQ plans to do a "last flight" ceremony or lucky draw or a farewell flight to HKG as they did with the 747 or a few short runs to CGK? Would love to make a trip on this machine before it disappeares...  
 
VC10er
Posts: 2234
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:25 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 12:34 pm

Can a 787 in all business class do the trip? It would be ONE thing United could do that would add some sizzle to it's image...and given United's big EWR hub and it's virtual ownership of APac market. But for over 20 hours I'd hope they would use the GlobalFirst seat. Their Bf seat wouldnt be premium enough to command the fare needed.

I guess I am just curious if a smaller thinner approach on a 787 would make it more feasable? Or perhaps 2 holes can't do it.

After SQ stops it, what will be the best way to SIN from NYC area? Via FRA?
The world is missing love, let's use our flights to spread it!
 
falkerker
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:53 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 1:09 pm

Quoting infinit (Reply 3):
SQ's policy to decom their planes when they're 8 (or was it 9?) years.

So the A380 have 3 years left??? Weird...

Quoting VC10er (Reply 5):
After SQ stops it, what will be the best way to SIN from NYC area? Via FRA?

It would be the only way to fly SQ all the way. Other options would be NYC-HKG-SIN or NYC-LAX/SFO-NRT/HKG-SIN. Obviously not as practical and comfortable as a direct, non stop.
 
airbazar
Posts: 6955
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 1:38 pm

Quoting falkerker (Reply 6):
So the A380 have 3 years left??? Weird...

Hard to believe right, but that's been pretty standard. I think back when the 744's made up the majority of the fleet the average age was 5 years old. There's a reason why they've been ordering additional A380's.
 
LY777
Posts: 2284
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:58 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 1:52 pm

But some of their 777s are quite "old" (777-200/200ER/300)
Flown:717,727,732,734,735,738,73W,742/744/748,752,762/2ER/763/3ER,772/77E/773/77W, 788, D8,D10,L1011, A3B2,A320,A321,A332,A343,A388
 
KaiTak747
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:08 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 3:38 pm

For getting pax from SIN-EWR, flying them directly by A340-500 is an extremely inefficient way of doing so.

As people have stated earlier, ULH haul flights are flying fuel tanks for the first half of the flight.

SQ will not lose many passengers by cancelling these ULH flights. LAX passengers will be routed via NRT and EWR passengers via FRA.

Quoting airbazar (Reply 7):
Hard to believe right, but that's been pretty standard. I think back when the 744's made up the majority of the fleet the average age was 5 years old. There's a reason why they've been ordering additional A380's.

The 747s left the fleet because a new VLA with far better economics came out. The A380s will not be going anywhere soon as there is nothing better to replace them with.

Of course operating young fleets saves money on fuel and m/x, but capital costs often outweigh these savings.
 
thegivenone
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:05 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 4:31 pm

Yup, very sad to see this route go. But I am glad to have secured a seat on SQ 22 SIN-EWR at the end of June to experience one of the last of these record-breaking flights. I'll be doing JFK-FRA-SIN on the outbound.

Quoting KaiTak747 (Reply 9):
As people have stated earlier, ULH haul flights are flying fuel tanks for the first half of the flight.

This is an interesting concept which I hadn't really thought of before. Does anyone know what the average yields on this flight are? Tickets go for around $8000-9000 roundtrip, which might not be bad at an ~85% load factor.

Quoting VC10er (Reply 5):

Can a 787 in all business class do the trip?

Interesting proposal – an extension of the Premium Service into long-haul routes. United certainly needs to do something to sizzle up its image. Yesterday's new uniforms didn't quite do it  
 
EWRkid1990
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:12 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 5:33 pm

So does this mean that SQ is leaving EWR for good? or are the going to be operating EWR-FRA-SIN flights? If they do begin to operate the flights via FRA, which aircraft would be used? 777-300?
 
bthebest
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:35 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 5:39 pm

Quoting LY777 (Reply 8):
But some of their 777s are quite "old" (777-200/200ER/300)

Oldest is 15 at present

Quoting infinit (Reply 3):
The A345s are going to be decommissioned in line with SQ's policy to decom their planes when they're 8 (or was it 9?) years.

Looking back at 747s (-400 at least) the retiring age is between 10-14 years. Could the policy be to keep and average fleet age of 8/9 years?
 
KaiTak747
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:08 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 7:27 pm

Quoting Bthebest (Reply 12):
Looking back at 747s (-400 at least) the retiring age is between 10-14 years. Could the policy be to keep and average fleet age of 8/9 years?

The A340-500s are an exception. When they were brought fuel prices were a fraction of what they are today. The increase in fuel price has widened the gap between the 777 and the A340 economics to the point where the A340-500 now serves zero purpose.

I would have loved to have flown on one of SQ's ULH flights, and the A340-500 is one of the best looking planes out there!
 
skipness1E
Posts: 3400
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:18 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 7:35 pm

Quoting falkerker (Reply 6):
So the A380 have 3 years left??? Weird...

They just don't do D Checks on anything, the late A380 meant some of the B744s got one though. The B777-200ER fleet is not in the first flush of youth and not all are being replaced by A333s.
 
cedarjet
Posts: 8101
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 1:12 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 7:36 pm

I am sure it's not why SQ are pulling the plug but I always wondered, why EWR and not JFK. And I guess when the A340-500 goes, EWR will go with it. Hoping to take a ride in September.

Quoting VC10er (Reply 5):
Can a 787 in all business class do the trip? It would be ONE thing United could do that would add some sizzle to it's image...and given United's big EWR hub and it's virtual ownership of APac market.

It makes sense for SQ cos at the end of the flight is...NEW YORK CITY! While I like Singapore* I don't know if it's worth United configuring a subfleet to operate ULH. I would say, if they are looking to do something along these lines (they're not, and they won't), New York to Sydney makes more sense, it's 400 mi further but in the same ballpark. But Singapore? Meh, there isn't enough there there!

* it's fashionable to say it's bland etc but I think it has a lot going for it, nothing glamourous about the ghetto!
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 7:40 pm

I did this route back in 2005. I flew ORD-EWR-SIN. It came out as an option that was cheaper than UA ORD-HKG-SIN, so my travel agent was able to book it at $5000.

The EWR-SIN flight wasn't bad in business class leaving at 11pm and arriving at 5am. You eat a late dinner, watch a movie, get 10-11 hours of sleep in time to enjoy a nice breakfast and movie and you are in SIN with little jetlag ready to start your day.

The SIN-EWR flight is a different story. The flight leaving at 11am makes jetlag rather bad. You are up for the first half of the flight, and then you go to sleep. You wake up at what feels like 5am Singapore time, but it is 5pm in Newark, so you get a sleepless flight.

The service was always good. I was impressed they could keep up the attitude and service on such a flight.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
ETinCaribe
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:57 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 8:32 pm

Quoting infinit (Reply 3):
The A345s are going to be decommissioned in line with SQ's policy to decom their planes when they're 8 (or was it 9?) years.

Is that from an accounting perspective (i.e. depreciation) or fleet retirement perspective? A quick look at average fleet age says it is 6.9 years and some 37 planes are 9+ years old.

Surely, they have a relatively young fleet by most standards.
 
MesaFlyGuy
Posts: 3820
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:36 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Thu May 23, 2013 9:00 pm

Quoting KaiTak747 (Reply 9):
EWR passengers via FRA.

I wonder if this means the a380 will be permanently brought back to the SIN-FRA-JFK route, instead of the current seasonal 77W/a380 mix?
The views I express are my own and do not reflect the views and opinions of my company.
 
cedarjet
Posts: 8101
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 1:12 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 1:58 am

Quoting infinit (Reply 3):
The A345s are going to be decommissioned in line with SQ's policy to decom their planes when they're 8 (or was it 9?) years

The age of the hardware isn't relevant. No aircraft can make money on sectors like these. Fuel prices are too high. The aircraft have very low cycles and are well taken care of. Sure SQ like a young fleet but these planes have life in them even by those standards. It's the economic model that doesn't work.
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
 
blueflyer
Posts: 3657
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:17 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 2:01 am

Quoting cipango (Reply 2):
I remember reading that SQ would lose less money by operating these flights than they would by grounding them, mainly due to the fact that no one wants to buy an A345.

Singapore Airlines is not known for operating loss-making routes out of prestige and grounding a plane isn't that expensive. My guess is the flights are profitable still, but the profits so thin that it wouldn't justify the expense of a major overhaul (think D check) and Singapore Airlines was able to use them to get a discount on their Airbus order instead.

Quoting KaiTak747 (Reply 9):
SQ will not lose many passengers by cancelling these ULH flights.

They will probably lose a significant section of the connecting traffic, of which I know there is always a decent number for having flown SIN-EWR/LAX in both directions several times and talked to other passengers or seen them re-check bags after customs.

Take me, for example. Flying non-stop between SIN and LAX/EWR let me do my journey with a single connection. Once these flights are over, I have a number of other one-stop options left to/from Singapore, none of which involving a plane liveried Singapore Airlines. I prefer SIA over others, but not enough to add another stop.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has no clothes.
 
AngMoh
Posts: 750
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:03 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 4:02 am

Quoting LY777 (Reply 8):
But some of their 777s are quite "old" (777-200/200ER/300)

Quite a number of 772s and some 773s have been replaced by A333s. The remaining regional 777s seem to fly on either high volume routes (CGK, HKG, DEL, BOM) or where 1st class is still required.

Most of the 77Es are gone, but they just started refurbishing of the remaining ones as these fly on routes with less J demand where a 77W in SQ config is overkill and the A333 can not do the job (e.g. AMS, CPH, MXP and a few others). I expect these to be among the first routes for the A359 after initial introduction on some high profile routes. I think the 77E is the only one suitable for these routes today.

By the end of this year, all remaining 772/773/77Es should have been refurbished. They were getting quite run down before they were refurbished.
727 732 733 734 735 73G 738 739 739ER 742 743 744 752 762 772 773 77W A300 A310 A319 A320 A321 A332 A333 A343 A345 A346 A359 A388 DC-9 DC-10 MD11 MD81 MD82 MD87 F70 ERJ145 E175 E190 E195 ATR72 CRJ200 CRJ700 CRJ900 BAE146 RJ85
 
karan69
Posts: 2699
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:57 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 10:06 am

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 15):
and not JFK. And I guess when the A340-500 goes, EWR will go with it. Hoping to take a ride in September.

All the best for that mate, i was fortunate enough and got myself to ride from SIN-EWR this month, burnt a lot of miles doing so

Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 18):
I wonder if this means the a380 will be permanently brought back to the SIN-FRA-JFK route, instead of the current seasonal 77W/a380 mix?

Yes, thats what SQ said they intend to do

Quoting AngMoh (Reply 21):
By the end of this year, all remaining 772/773/77Es should have been refurbished. They were getting quite run down before they were refurbished.

AFAIK, there are two refurbished 77E, one which gets the 77W interior in J and F, which as you said will do AMS CPH and the morning SIN-BOM flight, and the other refurbishment is just the J cabin which gets the same J as the 333s, this is the aircraft i got from BOM-SIN SQ 425, the Y cabin was untouched J was same as the 333

Karan
 
Cipango
Posts: 1451
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:55 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 11:27 am

Quoting blueflyer (Reply 20):
Singapore Airlines is not known for operating loss-making routes out of prestige and grounding a plane isn't that expensive. My guess is the flights are profitable still, but the profits so thin that it wouldn't justify the expense of a major overhaul (think D check) and Singapore Airlines was able to use them to get a discount on their Airbus order instead.

Its nothing to do with what SQ normally does, it's called business! I have heard numerous times that the routes are loss making.
Let's fly! Unless it's on a CRJ 200, then I'll stay down here.
 
AngMoh
Posts: 750
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:03 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 12:07 pm

Quoting Karan69 (Reply 22):
AFAIK, there are two refurbished 77E, one which gets the 77W interior in J and F, which as you said will do AMS CPH and the morning SIN-BOM flight, and the other refurbishment is just the J cabin which gets the same J as the 333s, this is the aircraft i got from BOM-SIN SQ 425, the Y cabin was untouched J was same as the 333

All 772/77Es for SQ are in fact 77Es, where the 772 are 77Es which are de-rated. The long distance 77E is 2 class only and is getting the same J and Y as the 77W and no F. The regional 772/77E are designated 77A and get the same J and Y as the A333.
727 732 733 734 735 73G 738 739 739ER 742 743 744 752 762 772 773 77W A300 A310 A319 A320 A321 A332 A333 A343 A345 A346 A359 A388 DC-9 DC-10 MD11 MD81 MD82 MD87 F70 ERJ145 E175 E190 E195 ATR72 CRJ200 CRJ700 CRJ900 BAE146 RJ85
 
airbazar
Posts: 6955
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 12:47 pm

Quoting LY777 (Reply 8):
But some of their 777s are quite "old" (777-200/200ER/300)

Thanks to A350 and 787 delays. A lot have been replaced by A333's or newer 77W's. But you're right the 772's are some of the oldest frames in the fleet but they won't be around much longer.

Quoting KaiTak747 (Reply 9):
The 747s left the fleet because a new VLA with far better economics came out. The A380s will not be going anywhere soon as there is nothing better to replace them with.

The A380's will be replaced by newer A380's. It is widely believed that the latest top-up order for A380's is to replace the oldest frames. Nevertheless the A380s will probably last longer than anything else.

Quoting Bthebest (Reply 12):
Looking back at 747s (-400 at least) the retiring age is between 10-14 years. Could the policy be to keep and average fleet age of 8/9 years?

They had to keep a few 744's longer than they wanted to because of the A380 delays and that screwed up the average age for the fleet.

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 14):
They just don't do D Checks on anything

  
The current fleet age is 6.9 years old.
http://www.planespotters.net/Airline/Singapore-Airlines
 
karan69
Posts: 2699
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:57 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 7:20 pm

Quoting AngMoh (Reply 24):

I know that very well, have flown SQ a lot and it is my fav airline,

My point of contention is that my aircraft on SQ 425 was a 772 with the regional J product of the 333, however the Yclass was the same

karan
 
SIA747Megatop
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:36 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 8:19 pm

Sad to see these flights go as I was the youngest unaccompanied minor on the inaugural SQ22 flight back in 2004 at age 9.

Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 18):
I wonder if this means the a380 will be permanently brought back to the SIN-FRA-JFK route, instead of the current seasonal 77W/a380 mix?

The A380 is permanent on SQ26/25.

Quoting Karan69 (Reply 22):
AFAIK, there are two refurbished 77E, one which gets the 77W interior in J and F, which as you said will do AMS CPH and the morning SIN-BOM flight, and the other refurbishment is just the J cabin which gets the same J as the 333s, this is the aircraft i got from BOM-SIN SQ 425, the Y cabin was untouched J was same as the 333

There are 3 refitted 77Es at the moment. The refitted 77Es are currently flying to AMS, BOM, CPT and SYD. At present, the only 772s in SQ's fleet with F are 9V-SQE and 9V-SQF, both of which are fitted with the 1997 F cabins.

All the refitted aircraft feature the same Y class product which utilises the original 1997 seat with new seat covers and 9" monitors. Whilst the J seat of the refitted 77As is the same as the ones fitted on the 333, the latter features the new Panasonic eX2 IFE system whereas the 77As and 77Es have the old Wiseman 3000 system with a new UI.
"I do not yet know of a man who became a leader as a result of having undergone a leadership course." - Lee Kuan Yew
 
N62NA
Posts: 4011
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:05 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 9:18 pm

Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 18):
I wonder if this means the a380 will be permanently brought back to the SIN-FRA-JFK route, instead of the current seasonal 77W/a380 mix?

Apparently the answer is yes. I really (really) don't understand why SQ (a Star Alliance carrier) chooses to abandon service at a Star Alliance hub that offers hundreds of connections on anothe Star Alliance carrier (UA at EWR) and instead moves their operations to JFK. Could you imagine a SkyTeam or OneWorld carrier dumping JFK in favor of EWR?
 
User avatar
Polot
Posts: 4960
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:01 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 9:24 pm

Quoting N62NA (Reply 28):

Since they are on completely different sides of the world, the fact that EWR offers more Star Alliance connections is rather meaningless as most of their passengers are likely not connecting in EWR anyways.
 
N62NA
Posts: 4011
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:05 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 9:30 pm

Quoting Polot (Reply 29):
Since they are on completely different sides of the world, the fact that EWR offers more Star Alliance connections is rather meaningless as most of their passengers are likely not connecting in EWR anyways.

But what proof do you have of that? Not trying to be argumentative, just curious. I would think that at least a somewhat significant amount of the pax on EWR-SIN where connections from UA at EWR.
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Fri May 24, 2013 9:34 pm

Besides the JFK vs EWR debate, going to a "Star hub" is not much value for some companies like SQ.

SQ does zero with UA. Domestically it codeshares with Virgin America, JetBlue and US Airways instead.

And SQ is not the only Star partner that prefers JFK and to work with other carriers then UA.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
blueflyer
Posts: 3657
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:17 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Sat May 25, 2013 8:49 am

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 31):
SQ does zero with UA.

Singapore may not code-share with United, but that doesn't mean they do "zero." Every connection I've had at EWR to/from SIA, they were very happy to sell me a United flight on the same ticket to complete my itinerary... Connecting at LAX, they put me up on American for my domestic leg. I don't recall ever being offered a code-share on one of three carriers you mentioned, but the reason is probably that their code-share partners would usually (though not always) require an extra connection somewhere.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has no clothes.
 
AngMoh
Posts: 750
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:03 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Sun May 26, 2013 9:38 am

Just some question which popped up in my mind: what are the number of cycles and what are the number of flying hours for the SQ A345s? They must be the highest average hours per cycle of any aircraft.
727 732 733 734 735 73G 738 739 739ER 742 743 744 752 762 772 773 77W A300 A310 A319 A320 A321 A332 A333 A343 A345 A346 A359 A388 DC-9 DC-10 MD11 MD81 MD82 MD87 F70 ERJ145 E175 E190 E195 ATR72 CRJ200 CRJ700 CRJ900 BAE146 RJ85
 
nickofatlanta
Posts: 1272
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 1:06 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Sun May 26, 2013 10:27 am

Any further news on whether SQ is likely to keep the EWR station open and launch a route via a third country? I know in the past, the EWR was routed ia AMS.
 
VC10er
Posts: 2234
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:25 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Sun May 26, 2013 1:06 pm

"Interesting proposal – an extension of the Premium Service into long-haul routes. United certainly needs to do something to sizzle up its image."

My point EXACTLY! United needs as many feathers in it's cap as possible. I would assume given; Star Alliance members, EWR, UA's Asia Pac domination and United (exCO) fliers, that this should be a big win for United and an opportunity to capture the NYC to Singapore route (except for SQ loyalists). If United could do a non-stop with an ac they have, or even if it's a all premium ac with a quick stop for gas (ala South African at Dakar) they ought to grab it.

However the United BF seat is woefully sub par to SQ, my only thought is United's Global First Suite is the only hard product that could suffice for a 23 hour flight.
The world is missing love, let's use our flights to spread it!
 
dennys
Posts: 664
Joined: Tue May 08, 2001 11:19 pm

RE: SQ At Newark.

Sun May 26, 2013 9:22 pm

Quoting qf340500 (Reply 4):

what a sad day! One of the best looking planes ever!

Any idea if SQ plans to do a "last flight" ceremony or lucky draw or a farewell flight to HKG as they did with the 747 or a few short runs to CGK? Would love to make a trip on this machine before it disappeares...


Thank You . It is what i am expecting too !
 
avek00
Posts: 3160
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 5:56 am

RE: SQ At Newark.

Sun May 26, 2013 11:12 pm

Quoting fxramper (Thread starter):
Have read on this site SQ will discontinue their SIN-EWR-SIN flight. It's on an Airbus A345 in all business class. This flight goes out full pretty regularly. Curious why SQ is dumping this route. Seems prestigious to the company as the longest revenue flight in the world at present. Thoughts appreciated.

Short answer -- prestige doesn't pay the big fuel bills.
Live life to the fullest.