raffik
Topic Author
Posts: 1531
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:50 am

BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 11:49 am

Just read this article that BA left stranded 140 passengers at Venice when the cabin crew ran out of working ours and the aircraft departed without paying passengers.
People claim that medicine, children's toys and food were locked in suitcases that were locked away from the passengers and that they were locked into the airport without food or water and forced to sleep on the floor .
Sounds like a disaster. It seems like a shame that the aircraft couldn't carry all of the passengers back to London

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22717377
- Alec
 
User avatar
OA260
Posts: 21025
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:50 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 12:04 pm

Ok a few points from this article :

Quoting raffik (Thread starter):
People claim that medicine

They are stupid if they put medication in checked baggage. Sorry to be harsh but if your on medication you carry at least 48 hours extra supply in your carry on or sometimes even more.

Tech issues happen but its the way you handle them that makes the difference. Seems BA failed on a few things. When such an emergency happens then the local station manager should step up and take on the challenge to make sure his/her passengers are as comfortable as possible. No hotel rooms were available which is not BA's fault. If you have to keep them at the airport you get in food and drinks as a minimum even if you have to source them from a 24 hour mini market! There should be a clear charter of procedures for these instances within BA.

I think a decent compensation would be in addition to EU regs compensation a free ticket on any BA European route for future use.
 
offloaded
Posts: 900
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:56 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 12:35 pm

Quoting OA260 (Reply 1):
They are stupid if they put medication in checked baggage. Sorry to be harsh but if your on medication you carry at least 48 hours extra supply in your carry on or sometimes e

Totally agree on this point.

So the pilots were ok to fly, but the crew were out of hours. Would a special dispensation be appropriate from time to time, such as under exceptional circumstances crew were allowed to exceed hours but no more than once a month? I'm sure that the crew would rather have flown home than had to bunk down with pax in the airport.
To no one will we sell, or deny, or delay, right or justice - Magna Carta, 1215
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 1:11 pm

Quoting offloaded (Reply 2):
So the pilots were ok to fly, but the crew were out of hours. Would a special dispensation be appropriate from time to time, such as under exceptional circumstances crew were allowed to exceed hours but no more than once a month? I'm sure that the crew would rather have flown home than had to bunk down with pax in the airport.

The cabin crew flew also home!

If any BA personal would have had to stay with the passengers the story would have played differently, than somebody from BA would have been bothered too.

Station manager not aloud home with passengers on the airport, crew having to bunk down with the passengers on the airport.

The aeroplane flew home so the crew would get home or to there hotel.

Can anybody explain to me how the cabin crew runs out of working hours but not the pilots?
 
bwaflyer
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 12:48 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 1:19 pm

Quoting mjoelnir (Reply 3):
Can anybody explain to me how the cabin crew runs out of working hours but not the pilots?

The cabin crew would not necessarily be working the same trip as the pilots, they may have started work earlier.
 
GT4EZY
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:35 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 1:48 pm

Quoting offloaded (Reply 2):
So the pilots were ok to fly, but the crew were out of hours. Would a special dispensation be appropriate from time to time, such as under exceptional circumstances crew were allowed to exceed hours but no more than once a month? I'm sure that the crew would rather have flown home than had to bunk down with pax in the airport.

There is, it's called discretion but they may have already worked in to this and would no longer have been an option.
Proud to fly from Manchester!
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 2:04 pm

The flight to Venice was late, so I assume when the flight left LGW for Venice the time problem was known.

There are more than one solutions to the above problem.

1. No hotel in Venice, how far to the next hotel, hire two buses go to the next hotel even if it is one hour away.

2. Load everybody on board, fly to the next nearby airport with an empty hotel. Load the passengers again the next morning fly home. Air Atlanta did that with me once.

3. Piss on the passengers and do not trouble your on personal and schedule. Apologize afterwards.

Does really somebody agrees that this was a way to handle passengers? Apologies are cheap.
 
offloaded
Posts: 900
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:56 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 2:23 pm

Quoting mjoelnir (Reply 3):
The cabin crew flew also home!

According to the article neith pax nor cabin crew could be found hotels.

Quoting GT4EZY (Reply 5):
There is, it's called discretion but they may have already worked in to this and would no longer have been an option.

What is the maximum they can do if willing?
To no one will we sell, or deny, or delay, right or justice - Magna Carta, 1215
 
Pe@rson
Posts: 16003
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2001 6:29 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 2:28 pm

How many hours/year are cabin crew permitted to work in the UK?
"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
 
max999
Posts: 946
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:05 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 4:09 pm

Quoting OA260 (Reply 1):
Tech issues happen but its the way you handle them that makes the difference. Seems BA failed on a few things. When such an emergency happens then the local station manager should step up and take on the challenge to make sure his/her passengers are as comfortable as possible. No hotel rooms were available which is not BA's fault. If you have to keep them at the airport you get in food and drinks as a minimum even if you have to source them from a 24 hour mini market! There should be a clear charter of procedures for these instances within BA.

The way I see it is this is a management failure. From my experience working in different corporate cultures, some companies emphasize a top down management approach. Decisions tend to get made from up top and lower level staff are just expected to carry out orders. It's sort of like the military.

I would venture to guess that in this situation, the local staff were not empowered enough to help the passengers out. A possible scenario is that BA rules allow local staff to book hotels, but they weren't allowed to book ground transportation. So with all the hotels in Venice full, booking a hotel outside the area would be pointless as they couldn't get transportation.

I'm sure the local staff wanted to help out passengers, but for whatever reason, they couldn't. And I think it's management issue along with a top down culture that kept them from doing so.

[Edited 2013-05-30 09:12:12]
All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening.
 
aussiestu
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 7:32 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 4:15 pm

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 8):
How many hours/year are cabin crew permitted to work in the UK

EU regulations allow 900 hours flying time per year. Not a minute more.
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15689
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 5:17 pm

Quoting raffik (Thread starter):
People claim that medicine, children's toys and food were locked in suitcases that were locked away from the passengers and that they were locked into the airport without food or water and forced to sleep on the floor .
Sounds like a disaster.

This is a not a disaster. People dying is a disaster. Locked toys and food is just a minor inconvenience.

Anyone really inconvenienced could have taken a train to Milan and flown home the same day (at extra cost of course). So staying behind in Venice was a decision these passengers made on their own. Not much sympathy here.....
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
sw733
Posts: 5302
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 6:19 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 5:35 pm

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
Anyone really inconvenienced could have taken a train to Milan and flown home the same day (at extra cost of course). So staying behind in Venice was a decision these passengers made on their own. Not much sympathy here.....

Yeah, how dare they not spend the money to take the train to Milan and purchase a last-minute walkup fare to LHR from Milan. What fools.

[Edited 2013-05-30 11:21:46]
 
Boeing77W
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 6:27 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 5:40 pm

Quoting offloaded (Reply 7):
What is the maximum they can do if willing?

Usually an hour, can go to two hours if necessary. Paperwork and reports to the authorities if used.
 
robsaw
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 7:14 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 5:43 pm

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
This is a not a disaster. People dying is a disaster. Locked toys and food is just a minor inconvenience.

Anyone really inconvenienced could have taken a train to Milan and flown home the same day (at extra cost of course). So staying behind in Venice was a decision these passengers made on their own. Not much sympathy here.....

Oh puhleeaase! Do you own a bunch of shares in BA or something!?!

It is a disaster - a PR disaster. Let's not get overly pedantic with language. It wasn't a "minor" inconvenience, it was a badly mismanaged and avoidable inconvenience.

Of course someone could have made alternative arrangements at their own expense if absolutely essential - the question is WHY BA DIDN'T DO more?

[Edited 2013-05-30 10:44:43]

[Edited 2013-05-30 10:45:19]
 
User avatar
falstaff
Posts: 5575
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:17 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 5:49 pm

Quoting raffik (Thread starter):
locked into the airport without food or water

I find it hard believe they were locked into the airport. If somebody locked me into an airport I would spend my time draining the bar. I'd break into the snack bar too. If there were 140 people locked into an airport I am sure many of them me. I might be breaking the law but locking people into an airport against their will isn't legal either.

Quoting OA260 (Reply 1):
They are stupid if they put medication in checked baggage. Sorry to be harsh but if your on medication you carry at least 48 hours extra supply in your carry on or sometimes even more.

I agree and I always do, but some people on a.net feel that you aren't entitled to a carry on and you only need to carry what you will use on the flight itself.
My mug slaketh over on Falstaff N503
 
Pe@rson
Posts: 16003
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2001 6:29 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 5:51 pm

Quoting aussiestu (Reply 10):

I know 900 hours is the limit for pilots - but it is also the limit for cabin crew? Wow!
"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
 
EL-AL
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 8:29 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 6:08 pm

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
This is a not a disaster. People dying is a disaster. Locked toys and food is just a minor inconvenience.

Ever got stuck in an airport on another country far from home, tired after long day travelling with two screaming children who just want to get home after you bought a ticket with a major airline?

At that point i'm sure it was a disaster for passengers, and I totally understand why.
every day is a good day to fly
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 6:11 pm

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
Anyone really inconvenienced could have taken a train to Milan and flown home the same day (at extra cost of course). So staying behind in Venice was a decision these passengers made on their own. Not much sympathy here.....

Yes there are many night trains between Venice and Milan and many flights leaving from Milan to London around midnight.
 
David L
Posts: 8547
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:26 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 6:15 pm

Quoting max999 (Reply 9):
Decisions tend to get made from up top and lower level staff are just expected to carry out orders. It's sort of like the military.

I would hope that's not how the US military operates. In fact, I'm fairly sure it isn't. Although strategic goals might be set at the top, I would assume quite a bit of initiative is allowed, even expected, in how they're achieved. It was certainly a key difference between how the British military operated in comparison to the old Soviet Block military. I don't know what options the BA staff had but acting like the British military wouldn't necessarily have been a bad thing.  
 
AWACSooner
Posts: 1769
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:35 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 6:26 pm

Quoting falstaff (Reply 15):
I agree and I always do, but some people on a.net feel that you aren't entitled to a carry on and you only need to carry what you will use on the flight itself.

They're called "NK/G4 Supporters."

Quoting David L (Reply 19):
I would hope that's not how the US military operates.

Trust me...it's not. The big decisions? Sure, but they leave the day to day decisions to the officers and NCO's.
 
ely747
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:28 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 7:20 pm

Quoting max999 (Reply 9):

I think that BA's H&S regulations came into actions in this particular situation. Other European countries do not have such uptight policies. If something were to go wrong with one of he passengers during the transit from Venice airport they could have taken it up with the airline.

I would expect BA to have some kind of "contingency planning" in place or at least set up agreements with i.e. non scheduled or local airlines. Back in 2007 my flight from LHR to VIE got cancelled because of the fog at Heathrow. BA gave me a stand by ticket to AMS and then was flown on KL into VIE. I thought it was a bit strange since BA and KLM don't go buddy buddy as both airlines play in different fields.

[Edited 2013-05-30 12:23:05]
 
anstar
Posts: 2868
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 3:49 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 7:34 pm

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 16):
I know 900 hours is the limit for pilots - but it is also the limit for cabin crew? Wow!

Remember that is only the FLYING hours, not WORKING hours.


So take off 4 weeks for holidays per year and lets just say another week for the public holidays and then usually a week for their Emergency Procedure exams etc, then then that means around 20 hours a week flying. Of course that 20 hours per week flying doesn't take into account the pre flight briefings etc. Ie a longhaul airline may require crew to report 2 hours before to do briefings and then boarding.. whilst they are "working" they are not flying so the flying hours are not counted. Likewise for shorthaul... I am sure alot of the ground time is not calculated towards the 900 hours.
 
flyforever
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:36 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 8:31 pm

Guys, please, I'm Italia and Venice is the airport I fly from most of the time.

There are plenty of Hotels all around Venice (guys it's VENICE), I'm not talking about B&B, I'm talking about huge holiday Inn in Mestre!!
Furthermore, there are several hotels in Treviso and Padova (where I come from) and Abano Terme is a typical tourist place full of hotel like Ibiza. All these destinations are within an hour driving from Venice airport. Three coaches to move all the 140 passengers for sure would have been available (still talking about VENICE).

No trains from Venice to Milan during the night, so bad idea. No flights to London during the night.

Quoting falstaff (Reply 15):
I find it hard believe they were locked into the airport. If somebody locked me into an airport I would spend my time draining the bar. I'd break into the snack bar too. If there were 140 people locked into an airport I am sure many of them me. I might be breaking the law but locking people into an airport against their will isn't legal either.

Yeha, nobody stuck them into the airport, but... have you ever been there?? There in NOTHING around Venice airport, water on the right side and an highway on the left sidewith some parking spaces and probably a camping if I'm correct. Bar? Cafè? In Venice Aiport? At midnight? It's not Singapore, nor Dubai... it's Venice, the fourth or fifth airport in Italy......

From an airlines point of view IT IS a disaster IMHO.
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18971
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 8:36 pm

Quoting offloaded (Reply 2):
Quoting OA260 (Reply 1):
They are stupid if they put medication in checked baggage. Sorry to be harsh but if your on medication you carry at least 48 hours extra supply in your carry on or sometimes e

Totally agree on this point.

Excerpt from BA baggage guidelines in their website:

Carry medication, money and important documents in your hand baggage.
 
707lvr
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:41 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 8:52 pm

Quoting OA260 (Reply 1):
They are stupid if they put medication in checked baggage. Sorry to be harsh but if your on medication you carry at least 48 hours extra supply in your carry on or sometimes even more.

Unless they are unlucky enough to get a really cross Gestapo officer who decides to throw it away for some reason.
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 8:53 pm

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 24):
Quoting offloaded (Reply 2):
Quoting OA260 (Reply 1):
They are stupid if they put medication in checked baggage. Sorry to be harsh but if your on medication you carry at least 48 hours extra supply in your carry on or sometimes e

Totally agree on this point.

Excerpt from BA baggage guidelines in their website:

Carry medication, money and important documents in your hand baggage.

Oh, good it was possible to find something some passengers did wrong.

Guys we are not talking about an second rate charter line, here we are talking about a supposedly first tire airline with a normal scheduled flight. It seems no BA personal were there to inform passengers what was happening. Passengers trying to phone BA were not getting through.

So BA failed on all the things possible, did not provide accommodation, no hotel, no food, no beverages.
But worst of all they did not even provide information.
 
User avatar
OA260
Posts: 21025
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:50 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 9:08 pm

Quoting falstaff (Reply 15):
I agree and I always do, but some people on a.net feel that you aren't entitled to a carry on and you only need to carry what you will use on the flight itself.

Well they are not the Airlines so I would ignore them and read the airlines guidelines as stated below  
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 24):
Excerpt from BA baggage guidelines in their website:

Carry medication, money and important documents in your hand baggage.

Exactly .

Quoting 707lvr (Reply 25):
Unless they are unlucky enough to get a really cross Gestapo officer who decides to throw it away for some reason.

Well that is quite rare at least here in Europe. My Father is insulin dependant and is a very frequent flyer. A letter from his Dr along with the prescriptions/chemists printed stickers on medication is enough.
 
User avatar
PA110
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 1:30 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Thu May 30, 2013 9:56 pm

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
Anyone really inconvenienced could have taken a train to Milan and flown home the same day (at extra cost of course). So staying behind in Venice was a decision these passengers made on their own. Not much sympathy here.....

With that type of callous attitude, let's just hope you're not in customer service.   
It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
 
prebennorholm
Posts: 6418
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2000 6:25 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 12:09 am

This is just unbelievable. They knew already before leaving LGW that the cabin crew would run out of time, why didn't they change the cabin crew before departure from LGW? So stupid!

I thought that it would be impossible to beat Ryanair in this type of contest. And honestly, I would never have guessed that it would be BA taking 1st prize.
Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs
 
YLWbased
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 6:09 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 2:51 am

This is even worst that Cebu Pacific (5J), also known as the worst LCC in Asia when it comes down to crisis management and customer service.

I was once scheduled to fly MNL-MPH on one of their ATR-72 @4pm, it is about a 60mins flight, MPH is not equipped with any ground lighting, hence only day light operation is permitted.

We're left cooked inside the hot cabin for about 1.5 hrs without AC before the captain came it and said due to "runway congestion" we're unable to take off and make it into MPH with enough day light for the aircraft to turn around, so the flight is cancelled.

We than boarded and bus and the driver drove us to a far corner of MNL and exited the bus and disappeared into thin air... (Real professional, left a bunch of passenger in the restricted area unattended).

After about another 1.5 hrs (atleast with Air Con), some dude in Cebu Pacific Uniform shows up with PIZZA HUT! We were like OMG, Pizza! We all had at least a slice and a Can of soda, from 5J with complements :p

At 10:45pm, 5J arranged an A320, merged the 2 affected ATR flight passengers into one, and took off from MNL to KLO. KLO is a 24hrs international airport located about 1 hrs drive away from MPH. KLO station manager arranged us free shuttle bus and free burger for us upon our arrival, and drove us to MPH and drop us off at the ferry pier (most passengers heading to MPH is for the Boracay Island), since the ferry services stops at 10pm daily, 5J chartered 5 ferries for us and took us onto the island.

Now even a terrible LCC could provide that level of service, what is wrong with u BA?

YLWbased
Hong Kong is not China. Not better or worse, just different.
 
ggflyboy
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:10 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 4:48 am

This incident reminds me of my time stuck in Venice courtesy of BA back in 2003. That time the inbound flight from LGW was delayed due to an unfortunate collision between a tug and the 737.

All I remember is that there was precious little to do in the Venice airport. I think I sat in the administrative hall on the second floor and journaled.

I haven't been to the Venice airport since - maybe the amenities have improved.
 
vegas005
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 12:25 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 6:28 am

The work hour rule should have been waived in this case. Tell the customers there will be no inflight service and have the flight attendants sit at there assigned stations for the duration of the short flight. Many professions work crazy hours including doctors so I am sure the FA's could handle it...
 
User avatar
Aquila3
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:18 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 6:44 am

Well, MOL will be happy! Another bunch of customers for Ryan Air!
Shame on you BA!
chi vola vale chi vale vola chi non vola è un vile
 
AR385
Posts: 6741
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:25 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 6:47 am

Quoting prebennorholm (Reply 29):
This is just unbelievable. They knew already before leaving LGW that the cabin crew would run out of time, why didn't they change the cabin crew before departure from LGW? So stupid!

The logical thing would have been to simply cancel the flight at LGW. I assume finding a new cabin crew is probably an impossible endeavor for an airline like FR...Oh wait, it´s BA we are talking about, I forgot.

Still. Why did the plane left LGW in the first place?
 
YVRFlyer
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:19 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 7:33 am

Quoting vegas005 (Reply 32):
The work hour rule should have been waived in this case. Tell the customers there will be no inflight service and have the flight attendants sit at there assigned stations for the duration of the short flight. Many professions work crazy hours including doctors so I am sure the FA's could handle it...

I'm surprised no one, not even MOL has proposed amending safety laws to allow passengers to fly in planes without a cabin crew, or with minimal staffing. Certainly, it can be argued that a cabin crew is necessary in emergency situations, but what about for people who are willing/capable of accepting slightly higher risks, who do as they say in the tech world, "Read The Effin' Manual" and understand what to do in the slight chance of accidents.

Personally, I would be happy to fly in such a situation. Having flown in no-frills airlines, it's not something that would be uncomfortable for me. I do watch/read the safety instructions, and the lack of cabin service would not be a problem for myself. I would happily trade off some minuscule risk in exchange for a lower fare, or even better convenience, as there wouldn't be a risk of ending up booked on a flight where the cabin crew go over their limits.
YVRFlyer
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 8:18 am

Quoting AR385 (Reply 34):
The logical thing would have been to simply cancel the flight at LGW. I assume finding a new cabin crew is probably an impossible endeavor for an airline like FR...Oh wait, it´s BA we are talking about, I forgot.

Still. Why did the plane left LGW in the first place?
Quoting AR385 (Reply 34):
The logical thing would have been to simply cancel the flight at LGW. I assume finding a new cabin crew is probably an impossible endeavor for an airline like FR...Oh wait, it´s BA we are talking about, I forgot.

Still. Why did the plane left LGW in the first place?

I assume there were passengers from LGW to Venice.

Perhaps they could have included some extra cabin crew with the pax or switched over to a fresh crew.
 
Tristarsteve
Posts: 3362
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 11:04 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 9:09 am

Quoting prebennorholm (Reply 29):
This is just unbelievable. They knew already before leaving LGW that the cabin crew would run out of time, why didn't they change the cabin crew before departure from LGW? So stupid!

This B737 had a technical problem in Venice. It was not planned in advance. By the time the aircraft was fixed, the cabin crew could not work.

BA sent a replacement B737 empty to Venice the next morning to collect the passengers.
 
aussiestu
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 7:32 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 9:11 am

Quoting vegas005 (Reply 32):
The work hour rule should have been waived in this case. Tell the customers there will be no inflight service and have the flight attendants sit at there assigned stations for the duration of the short flight.

Nice idea but totally against EU flying regulations. It may all seem simple but those are the rules imposed by Brussels and the CAA.
 
babybus
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 5:07 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 9:59 am

Quoting anstar (Reply 22):
Remember that is only the FLYING hours, not WORKING hours.

You also have to factor into that equation that BA pilots are paid from the moment the leave their front door to the time they get back to it. Hence, you have pilots who live the maximum official commuting time from the airport of 2 hours.

It's not a bad gig really.

The same does not apply to the cabin crew.

Not sure if this anomaly has been changed in the last few years.
and with that..cabin crew, seats for landing please.
 
GLAGAZ
Posts: 1844
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 5:42 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 10:34 am

Quoting babybus (Reply 39):
You also have to factor into that equation that BA pilots are paid from the moment the leave their front door to the time they get back to it.

I find that hard to believe. So someone who lives 10 minutes from LHR/LGW will not get as much pay as someone who lives 2 hours away??? What do they do? Phone crewing each time they leave their front door? :P
Neutrality means that u don't really care cos the struggle goes on even when ur not there, blind and unaware
 
AirbusA6
Posts: 1491
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 5:53 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 10:55 am

A very poor show, one of the main reasons people might choose BA over U2 and FR is that they look after you if things go wrong, indeed I remember an advert a few years ago stating this.

And yes, not finding a hotel somewhere nearby is a very poor show, it's hard to believe something couldn't have been found on the mainland
it's the bus to stansted (now renamed National Express a6 to ruin my username)
 
LHRFlyer
Posts: 695
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:50 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 11:03 am

Quoting babybus (Reply 39):
You also have to factor into that equation that BA pilots are paid from the moment the leave their front door to the time they get back to it. Hence, you have pilots who live the maximum official commuting time from the airport of 2 hours.

It's not a bad gig really.

I don't think this is true at all. Pilots do, I believe, earn an hourly rate, but not from when they leave their homes.

As for the original story, it sounds like a horrible situation. But the press rarely give the whole story and I suspect there must be more to this than meets the eye.

[Edited 2013-05-31 04:04:14]
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 11:52 am

Quoting Tristarsteve (Reply 37):
This B737 had a technical problem in Venice. It was not planned in advance. By the time the aircraft was fixed, the cabin crew could not work.


Exactly there was no planing in advance!  banghead 

The technical Problem was earlier in the day, the plane was late arriving in Venice.
So BA should have know it before it became a problem.
But they got the aeroplane and crew safely home.  sarcastic 

BA statement: "The aircraft due to operate the flight to Gatwick was delayed into Venice because of a technical fault earlier in the day"

[Edited 2013-05-31 04:58:14]
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 12:01 pm

Quoting LHRFlyer (Reply 42):
As for the original story, it sounds like a horrible situation. But the press rarely give the whole story and I suspect there must be more to this than meets the eye.

Of course the airline can be at fault, lets find what the passengers did wrong.   
 
User avatar
usdcaguy
Posts: 1033
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:41 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 12:50 pm

It would appear that the expense of Venice matched with what I presume to be a normally inexpensive flight to LGW is what produced this situation. It's as though BA expected the passengers to look after themselves if only because their fares were so low. This could have happened with a US carrier as well, but Venice is an abnormally expensive place to travel to. It's not as though you could put people up at a Motel 6. It's high season, and the ability to respond would therefore be grossly hindered by logistical complications and expense. Perhaps BA could and should have paid for hotels somewhere regardless, but at any given time, matching cheap airfare with expensive, popular destinations could result in a negative experience for travelers if things do not go according to plan. Yet another reason to travel outside of high season and why cheaper places, like Romania or North Africa, may be more satisfying.
 
LHRFlyer
Posts: 695
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:50 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 1:01 pm

Quoting mjoelnir (Reply 44):
Of course the airline can be at fault, lets find what the passengers did wrong.

No-one is saying the passengers did anything wrong.

No-one has any evidence that hotel accommodation was not provided because BA wasn't prepared to pay for it.
 
tonystan
Posts: 1265
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:39 am

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 1:09 pm

Well one way or the other this was horrifically dealt with by BA and is most certainly not the norm.

The service standards at the airline specifically mention that an overnight cancellation should result in hotel accommodation. Now having had a look I cannot find in the directory a station manager for VCE which makes me think that BAs ground handling is totally outsourced in Venice and Ethan's this is a case of the ground staff just could not have been bothered. I'm not trying to pass blame but these things do happen. It's up to BA to ensure standards are being maintained and clearly this is not the case.

I expect an impending change in handling agents or at least a case of whoop-@ss
My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
 
offloaded
Posts: 900
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:56 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 2:02 pm

Quoting mjoelnir (Reply 26):
Oh, good it was possible to find something some passengers did wrong.

We were referring to the issue of packing medication in a suitcase rather than carrying it in hand baggage. Common sense says that this is not wise. Every airline in the world loses a suitcase now and then, so even if this BA flight had left on time with all is passengers, there is still a possibility that this pax bag would have got lost. I am in no way defending what was a situation badly handled by the airline, but yes, if you insist, the medication issue is someing the pax did wrong.
To no one will we sell, or deny, or delay, right or justice - Magna Carta, 1215
 
mjoelnir
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:06 pm

RE: BA Abandons 140 Passengers At Venice

Fri May 31, 2013 7:03 pm

Quoting LHRFlyer (Reply 46):
Quoting mjoelnir (Reply 44):
Of course the airline can be at fault, lets find what the passengers did wrong.

No-one is saying the passengers did anything wrong.

No-one has any evidence that hotel accommodation was not provided because BA wasn't prepared to pay for it.

Only the old, not the whole story.


BA operates 5 flights out of VCE, three to LGW and one each LHR and LCY.
The flight from LGW is late also today , about 1:30, so it will leave late today again.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AJCNL, ASFlyer, atlflyer, Baidu [Spider], cougar15, deltal1011man, sjudfwmco, StTim, whitefalcon, Ytraveller and 217 guests