TWA85
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:06 pm

What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:38 am

Hello everybody!

Now that the new AA will have operating costs that are more competitive with UA and DL, and should the new AA decide to re-open former AA and US focus cities, what markets would make the most sense for the new AA. Also, what destinations and frequencies would make the most sense to be served from the re-opened focus cities?
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:49 am

Moving the PHX hub to somewhere sensible like SJC gets my vote.   
International Homo of Mystery
 
User avatar
IrishAyes
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:04 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:12 am

The AA will not re-open some focus cities for several reasons:

1. The merger will ADD new hubs to the map that further create redundancy for re-instating mass at cities like SJC (with LAX and now PHX nearby) or BNA/RDU (with PHL, DCA and CLT serving the same region).

SJU lost its importance once AA could fly nonstop to the Caribbean markets from its MIA and JFK hubs with suitable aircraft.

2. In some cases of focus city closure, AA's cost structure relative to DL and UA was NOT the reason for the pull-down, but rather growing LCC infiltration. This was the reason for BNA (WN) and BOS (B6). Even post-bk, AA will not be cost-competitive with these carriers.

3. Other former focus cities are economically depressed/non-viable to return to status, such as STL or SJU.

However, what the AA-US merger WILL do is create more travel options for OneWorld fliers out of the former focus cities, as well as other spoke markets, by adding more capacity to stay competitive with UA and DL. It's actually a huge win for fliers, IMO and contrary to popular belief, I don't believe it will cause airfares to rise a ton.
confidence is silent. insecurities are loud.
 
warden145
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:36 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:27 am

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 1):
Moving the PHX hub to somewhere sensible like SJC gets my vote.   

I would love nothing more than to see that, but with the history of both of these airlines (AA/Reno Air/AirCal and US/PSA come readily to mind), I would expect the merger to result in closed/gutted focus cities and hubs, not expansion.  
ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
 
PRAirbus
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:59 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:31 pm

SJU also became a low cost destination after NK, B6 and now WN contaminated the market. The Puerto Rican economy is also very depressed.
 
commavia
Posts: 9744
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:48 pm

I don't know if a new, larger, reinvigorated AA would "reopen" former focus cities per se, but I do expect AA to bulk up its presence in some non-hub markets where the combined AA-US presence is already strong and concentrated. The three markets that come to mind most prominently are BOS, RDU and PIT.

All three are places where the combined airline will be the largest (or among the largest) single competitors, with a very strong and comprehensive network focused on hubs but with at least some point-to-point flying. And in all three markets there are further opportunities for growth that will position AA as an even stronger force in the local market with an extremely attractive value proposition for business travelers. Specifically, in BOS, priority #1 needs to be reestablishing a nonstop connections to SFO, and beyond that RDU and possibly YYZ. In RDU, just adding the single route to BOS would give AA the strongest network to all the major northeast business markets (BOS, NYC, PHL, WAS) and nicely compliment AA's already-substantial schedule to its hubs (which, not coincidentally, happen to be some of the nation's largest business travel markets). And in PIT, a nonstop 757 (or maybe even 767 in the summer) to LHR would give AA coverage of many if not most of the market's most important domestic and international business destinations and, again, compliment the combined carrier's already-huge presence on key business routes.

Beyond BOS, RDU and PIT, I think there are some limited opportunities for other nonstop growth outside of hubs - but it's much more limited and targeted. But BOS, RDU and PIT should most definitely be the priorities - because those are the three large non-hub cities where the combined carrier will have sufficient scale to be a major force.
 
User avatar
AVLAirlineFreq
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:31 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:25 pm

In what context is the term "focus city" being used here? Cities like RDU, BNA, PIT and SJC were full fledged hubs and almost certainly aren't coming back.
 
FlyPeoria
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 7:30 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:11 pm

Kind of ironic that AA orginally established its BNA (1986) and RDU (1987) hubs after becoming envious of PI's success with its large and growing hub at medium-sized CLT. Soon, CLT might be AA's!
 
BigGSFO
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:27 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:46 pm

Wishful thinking: reopen SJC as a focus city. Tech and the Silicon Valley is flourishing again and having a mid-coast TPAC gateway (Tokyo, China) would be beneficial.
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3935
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:57 pm

Quoting BigGSFO (Reply 8):
Wishful thinking: reopen SJC as a focus city. Tech and the Silicon Valley is flourishing again and having a mid-coast TPAC gateway (Tokyo, China) would be beneficial.

NH has SJC-NRT covered. I think it can support one flight profitably, but I doubt there'd be room in the market for two carriers. Even though I personally don't do Star Alliance (I'm an AS frequent flier person), I'm pulling for NH to be the one to succeed on this flight. They are a good airline and they were apparently the only airline willing to step up when SJC was trying to get someone to restart NRT.

AS seems to have stopped their SJC build-up dead in it's tracks. SJC is ripe for some additional service though: a second carrier SJC-SNA, resumption of some more east coast non-stops: EWR, IAD, BOS, JFK, MIA or FLL.
 
BigGSFO
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:27 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:38 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 9):
AS seems to have stopped their SJC build-up dead in it's tracks. SJC is ripe for some additional service though: a second carrier SJC-SNA, resumption of some more east coast non-stops: EWR, IAD, BOS, JFK, MIA or FLL.

I am curious how much of the higher yielding tech traffic uses SFO instead of SJC due to the frequency and choices of premium service.
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3935
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:53 pm

Quoting BigGSFO (Reply 10):
I am curious how much of the higher yielding tech traffic uses SFO instead of SJC due to the frequency and choices of premium service.

I agree with that. People have cited that the PDEW on some SJC routes like ORD or BOS is very small (for the very few flights from SJC). I contend that is because of the lack of service to SJC, so people drive to SFO. It's not because there is really that low of a demand from SJC to other destinations, if such service existed.

You can say there is no demand for, say, SJC-MIA but lots of daily passengers between SFO-MIA, so therefore all the demand must be from SFO. I think that's BS. It's because all the available service is from SFO, not because SJC couldn't support it.
 
steeler83
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:33 pm

Quoting AVLAirlineFreq (Reply 6):
In what context is the term "focus city" being used here? Cities like RDU, BNA, PIT and SJC were full fledged hubs and almost certainly aren't coming back.

I would think "focus city" in this context would mainly involve a series of non-stop flights from these cities to many of the top business centers. I would think limited connections would be available, but this will mainly focus on the business origin/destination traffic.

To reference PIT here -- AA will soon start its LAX service, which is a market that I feel is lacking from PIT. UA flies the route only a few times a week, and over 400 people a day travel between PIT and LAX.

AA is also building up ORD-PIT with larger aircraft.

PIT-LHR would be very nice. It would give international PIT travelers an option if they don't want to fly DL to CDG. A 767 would be awesome, but I think a 757 might be more suitable if LHR is ever launched...

In addition to the markets mentioned above, I wonder if AA might beef up PIT-STL, RDU, and BDL (I think anyway, I forget which other NE market is "at risk" flying). US serves those with either Beeches or Dash 8s. I know that STL and RDU are AA strongholds...

My one concern is that pax who were once loyal to US might switch over to UA if they want to stay flying with Star Alliance, therefore rendering PIT to be overserved by over 60-some daily departures. I've flown on AA before, and I think they're awesome. I'd fly them again and again if I could. I hope the PIT travelers will be loyal to AA...
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
 
USPIT10L
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:24 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:46 pm

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 12):
UA flies the route only a few times a week, and over 400 people a day travel between PIT and LAX.

PITLAX has been daily all summer on UA.
It's a Great Day for Hockey!
 
MIflyer12
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:58 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:03 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 11):
I contend that is because of the lack of service to SJC, so people drive to SFO. It's not because there is really that low of a demand from SJC to other destinations, if such service existed.

Do you know of any entity that is doing origin location (office or residence) of departing SFO passengers? This isn't going to show up in DOT data.
 
steeler83
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:29 pm

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 13):
PITLAX has been daily all summer on UA.

Did not realize that. I thought they dropped that to 3 or 4x weekly, or is that only from Sep/Oct thru April or May?
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
 
USPIT10L
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:24 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:48 pm

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 15):
I thought they dropped that to 3 or 4x weekly, or is that only from Sep/Oct thru April or May?

That was a temporary seasonal reduction, planned long before the AA/US merger became public. I would expect UA to keep PITLAX and PITSFO at daily levels, maybe even add service down the road. Even though they're likely losing some of the US FF base here, LAX and SFO are huge with UA elites, especially SFO. I've seen less PITLAX itineraries booked by US lately, and that will continue to decline the further the merger proceeds.
It's a Great Day for Hockey!
 
ckfred
Posts: 4715
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:50 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:29 pm

Quoting warden145 (Reply 3):
I would love nothing more than to see that, but with the history of both of these airlines (AA/Reno Air/AirCal and US/PSA come readily to mind), I would expect the merger to result in closed/gutted focus cities and hubs, not expansion.

Remember that AA/Air Cal and US/PSA made sense, until WN entered the West Coast. Everyone bailed on the West Coast. DL dropped what was left of Western's point-to-point flying on the West Coast, focusing on moving traffic via SLC. What was left of the Hughes Air West route structure was dumped by NW.

Even Shuttle by United, launched to fight WN, eventually retrenched its West Coast service to LAX and SFO, and maybe a tiny bit out of SEA.

As for AA/Reno Air, it was bad timing. AA bought QQ just before the tech/dot.com bubble burst. According to a friend of mine at AA, there was a lot of tech traffic flying because of Y2K. Once Y2K was behind us, a lot of tech flying disappeared as consultants were no longer needed and tech buying declined. Dot.com executives were flying a lot, buying walk-up tickets, often in first, because they were flush with IPO cash. When investors started to realize that many of the dot.coms weren't making money and weren't going to make money, businesses failed.

By the same token, hubs like RDU, BNA, STL, and CMH were located in metro areas that didn't have enough traffic to support a hub city. We're seeing that CVG and MEM are having the same fate, and one has to wonder how long the old CO hub at CLE will last.

You will probably find that at any former hub or focus city of AA and US, there are still plenty of F/F flyers. In STL, you might see not so much expansion but rather shifting of flights. I could see some moving of flights from ORD and STL to PHL and PHX.

PIT is a place where I would see some increases. I suspect that US F/F flyers have been flying UA to ORD, and that will probably lead to additional seats on AA.
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:42 pm

Quoting ckfred (Reply 17):
Remember that AA/Air Cal and US/PSA made sense, until WN entered the West Coast.

As Kelleher states in his book "Nuts", and I recall directly living there at the time and flying intrastate often, WN only entered the California market because US pulled out. If that hadn't happened, WN probably wouldn't be the force within California it is today.
International Homo of Mystery
 
cschleic
Posts: 1226
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 10:47 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:39 pm

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 18):
As Kelleher states in his book "Nuts", and I recall directly living there at the time and flying intrastate often, WN only entered the California market because US pulled out. If that hadn't happened, WN probably wouldn't be the force within California it is today.

  

Although Kelleher didn't write it, Kevin Freiberg and Jackie Freiberg did, even though Herb is on the cover. But your point is correct... PSA and Air California/Air Cal created and dominated the intrastate California market until they were acquired. Neither new owner did well in the market, which had expanded to the full western U.S., and WN moved into the vacuum. AA had the brilliant idea of using a hub at SJC to compete against point-to-point service with other carriers. USAir slowly pulled down the former PSA route structure. Taking the smile off the planes had to be one of the dumber brand management moves in corporate history. Yes, the PSA name went away, but the smile was a different story, and was almost iconic.
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3935
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:49 pm

Quoting cschleic (Reply 19):
Although Kelleher didn't write it, Kevin Freiberg and Jackie Freiberg did, even though Herb is on the cover. But your point is correct... PSA and Air California/Air Cal created and dominated the intrastate California market until they were acquired. Neither new owner did well in the market, which had expanded to the full western U.S., and WN moved into the vacuum. AA had the brilliant idea of using a hub at SJC to compete against point-to-point service with other carriers. USAir slowly pulled down the former PSA route structure. Taking the smile off the planes had to be one of the dumber brand management moves in corporate history. Yes, the PSA name went away, but the smile was a different story, and was almost iconic.

People often forget that PSA taught WN how to be a successful LLC. Most people think that WN was the original LLC. Not so. PSA was doing that in the 1950s and literally taught WN that business model.

US buying PSA and gutting them still makes me mad to this day. I think a well run PSA would have done very well today in the expanded west coast market.
 
brilondon
Posts: 3018
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 9:42 pm

They won't be opening any hubs. If the very least they will be rationalizing their operations and may keep most of their new hubs open. Lets face it, most of the airlines that have merged have closed the redundant hubs or at the very least reduced their flying from those hubs. Look at what UA did to CLE, DL has done to both CVG and MEM, and AA has done to STL. Opening hubs just doesn't fit into the merger track record, wishing is nice but probably is just that.
Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:12 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 20):
I think a well run PSA would have done very well today in the expanded west coast market.

Yup, one only has to look at how well AS has done to see that the west coast has the capacity for a well-run regional carrier within the west. Even without meals or a First Class, PSA was a very convenient and comfortable way to fly.
International Homo of Mystery
 
User avatar
psa1011
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:37 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:50 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 20):
People often forget that PSA taught WN how to be a successful LLC. Most people think that WN was the original LLC. Not so. PSA was doing that in the 1950s and literally taught WN that business model.

US buying PSA and gutting them still makes me mad to this day. I think a well run PSA would have done very well today in the expanded west coast market.

Agreed.
 
PITrules
Posts: 2109
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2000 11:27 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:15 pm

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 12):
UA flies the route only a few times a week, and over 400 people a day travel between PIT and LAX.

As USPIT10L mentioned it is daily in the summer; however this winter it will be 6x weekly as opposed to the 3-4x weekly last winter. No doubt a response to AA entering the market.

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 12):
In addition to the markets mentioned above, I wonder if AA might beef up PIT-STL, RDU, and BDL (I think anyway, I forget which other NE market is "at risk" flying). US serves those with either Beeches or Dash 8s.

They are served with E145s, not Beeches or Dashs.

I wonder however if there might be room for some more "at risk" flights from PIT under the US/AA banner to unserved or under served destinations, possibly by Republic Airlines? They seem to be adding quite nicely to their PIT maintenance and crew base (see the latest PIT update #27). Perhaps IND, PVD, or MCO?
FLYi
 
steeler83
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:24 am

Quoting PITrules (Reply 24):
They are served with E145s, not Beeches or Dashs.

Oops, I didn't realize those were on CRJs...

Quoting PITrules (Reply 24):
I wonder however if there might be room for some more "at risk" flights from PIT under the US/AA banner to unserved or under served destinations, possibly by Republic Airlines? They seem to be adding quite nicely to their PIT maintenance and crew base (see the latest PIT update #27). Perhaps IND, PVD, or MCO?

I'm wondering that myself. Given that it would be serviced with E175s in a 2-class layout, I wonder if that would even bolster O&D between the two markets. IND and PVD are not exactly small markets. Does anyone fly to MCI from PIT?

It would be nice to see PIT-IND/PVD etc. served again. I did see that RP is adding to their crew base at PIT. It would be nice to see what (if anything) that could translate to.
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
 
floridaflyboy
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 3:26 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:37 am

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 25):

Still not quite right. ERJ-145, not CRJ.

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 25):

RP is Chautauqua, which does not have a crew base at PIT. YX (Republic Airlines) has a large crew base at PIT supporting US Airways Express (E70/E75), United Express (DH4), and American Eagle (E75).

All such airplanes in Republic's fleet are accounted for in long term capacity purchase agreements, so you won't be seeing Republic doing at risk flying with them. So unless AA or US makes the call to start those routes on their own dime, you won't see them. The only at risk flying done in the entire RAH system is the E90 flying for F9, which is really more an accounting exercise.
Good goes around!
 
USPIT10L
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:24 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:00 am

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 25):
Does anyone fly to MCI from PIT?

Not nonstop. It is served through hubs here, mostly ORD/CLE/EWR by UA, ATL/MSP/DTW/CVG by DL and PHL/CLT by US.
It's a Great Day for Hockey!
 
USAirALB
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:46 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:29 am

US still operates several P2P routes in the Northeast from BOS: MDT, BUF, SYR, ROC, RIC. This is in addition to CLT, PHX, DCA, LGA, PHL, PIT, CUN, GCM, PLS, MBJ and PUJ.

So together, AA/US fly to MDT, BUF, SYR, ROC, RIC, CLT, PHX, DCA, LGA, PHL, PIT, CUN, GCM, PLS, MBJ, PUJ, ORD, DFW, MIA, JFK, LAX, STT, CDG.

While both US and AA are shadows of their former selves at BOS, I believe the new AA will possibly resume BOS-LHR/RDU.
E135/E140/E145/E70/E75/E90/CR2/CR7/CR9/717/732/733/734/735/73G/738/739/752/753/762/772/77W/319/320/321/333/343
 
TWA85
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:06 pm

Quoting USAirALB (Reply 28):
While both US and AA are shadows of their former selves at BOS, I believe the new AA will possibly resume BOS-LHR/RDU.



How big were AA and US in BOS and where did they fly from BOS during the peak of their operations there? Same question for BWI and SJC?
 
commavia
Posts: 9744
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:43 pm

Quoting USAirALB (Reply 28):
While both US and AA are shadows of their former selves at BOS, I believe the new AA will possibly resume BOS-LHR/RDU.

I agree that RDU is a necessity from BOS, along with SFO. Beyond that, I don't think a return of at least 1 AA-operate LHR flight is totally inconceivable, nor is YYZ. I also wouldn't be shocked to see STL return with EMB170/175s.

Quoting TWA85 (Reply 29):
How big were AA and US in BOS and where did they fly from BOS during the peak of their operations there?

At its zenith around 10 years ago, AA's schedule at BOS was substantially larger, with nonstop flights to far more places (ALB, BUF, BTV, BGR, PWM, YHZ, YUL, YYZ, YQB, YOW, ISP, HPN, LGA, DCA, EWR, RDU, LHR, CDG, SFO, SJC, SEA, BWI, PHL, MCO, FLL, SJU, MSY, STL, SAN, LAS, AUS, CUN, PLS, SDQ, PAP, etc.). Not all of those were necessarily served concurrently - although most were - and I likely missed a few, too. I believe at one point AA was BOS' largest single carrier. However, a variety of economic and competitive factors including the fuel spike, recession, collapse of regional economics, legacy bankruptcies, and the entrance of JetBlue all conspired to drive AA almost entirely out of non-hub markets from BOS. Ironically, now, post-merger, AA will once again be a huge force in BOS (a close #2 overall in capacity) with a relatively strong portfolio of hub and non-hub routes.
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3935
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:45 pm

Quoting TWA85 (Reply 29):
Same question for BWI and SJC?

IIRC AA had about 77 departures a day from SJC. Let me see if I can do this from memory: NRT, HNL, OGG, SEA, YVR (but not concurrent with some other destinations), CDG (for a short time), TPE (for a short time), PDX, RNO, DEN, SAN, SNA, LAX, PHX (I think), DFW, AUS, ORD, MIA (for a short time), COS (QQ route they kept for a short time), JFK, BOS.

One of the SEA flights went SJC-SEA-ANC.

EDIT: I forget STL that was inherited from TWA.

[Edited 2013-08-07 07:46:56]
 
commavia
Posts: 9744
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:55 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 31):
PHX (I think)

Yes - several daily MD80s (along with the several daily MD80s PHX-LAX) - incredible to think about that now. Ah, the heady days of the late 1990s and early 2000s.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 31):
COS (QQ route they kept for a short time)

I do not believe AA ever flew SJC-COS. The only COS routes AA picked up from QQ were COS-LAS (short-lived) and COS-LAX. And AA certainly never flew SJC-COS pre-QQ.
 
USAirALB
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:46 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:59 pm

Quoting TWA85 (Reply 29):
How big were AA and US in BOS and where did they fly from BOS during the peak of their operations there? Same question for BWI and SJC?

AA at one time served: ALB, LHR, BRU, MAN, BDA, SJC, SFO, SAN, BGR, PWM, CUN, PBI, SNN, MSY,AUA, BNA, BTV, BWI, CMH, DCA, EWR, FLL, HPN, ISP, YYZ, YHZ, MCO, ORF, PHL, RDU, RIC, ROC, PAP, SEA, SDQ, SJU, STL, TPA, YQB, YUL, YOW in addition to today's operations.

Remember AA even applied for BOS-NRT on a MD11.

US at one time served: ALB, ACK, ABE, ATL, AUG, BWI, BGR, BHB, BDA, BTV, MDW, CLE, ELM, FLL, HYA, ITH, ISP, MVY, MSY, MCO, PWM, PQI, PVD, RDU, RUT, RKD, TPA, IAD, PBI, HPN, AVP, CHM, DAY, YYZ, ORF, RSW, LGW, LAS.

I can't remember if US flew BOS-FRA or not.
E135/E140/E145/E70/E75/E90/CR2/CR7/CR9/717/732/733/734/735/73G/738/739/752/753/762/772/77W/319/320/321/333/343
 
commavia
Posts: 9744
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:12 pm

Quoting USAirALB (Reply 33):
AA at one time served:
Quoting USAirALB (Reply 33):
BRU

When did AA fly BOS-BRU? Certainly not in the last 10-15 years, if ever. AA did, however, codeshare with SABENA on BOS-BRU for several years until SABENA went out of business in 2001.
 
TWA85
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:12 pm

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 31):
EDIT: I forget STL that was inherited from TWA.



Agreed! If it wasn't for the fact that TWA was very influencial during my early life, I would even forget that AA inherited STL from TWA. Today one would not know the difference between pre-TWA AA and post-TWA AA as there is almost nothing left of the former TWA assets.
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3935
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:18 pm

Quoting commavia (Reply 32):
I do not believe AA ever flew SJC-COS.

Well QQ did SJC-COS, so maybe it was already gone before the takeover?

QQ also did SJC-RDM and SJC-IFP for a short time with MD-80s.
 
TWA85
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:38 pm

Quoting commavia (Reply 30):
Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 31):
Quoting USAirALB (Reply 33):

What about AA at JFK during there peak and US at BWI towards the end of their hub at BWI?
 
User avatar
psa1011
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:37 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:40 pm

Quoting TWA85 (Reply 37):
What about AA at JFK during there peak and US at BWI towards the end of their hub at BWI?

BWI info. is on departedflights.com
 
steeler83
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:03 pm

Quoting floridaflyboy (Reply 26):
Still not quite right. ERJ-145, not CRJ.

  

Wow, I am just full of faux pas lately...

Well, in any event, so much for my and Pitrules' thinking of them possibly adding more city pairs from PIT other than LAX, potentially LHR, and the current at risk flying US does to STL, RDU, etc -- if AA chooses to go for those on their own or not...

We shall see tho!
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
 
ckfred
Posts: 4715
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:50 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:33 pm

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 18):
As Kelleher states in his book "Nuts", and I recall directly living there at the time and flying intrastate often, WN only entered the California market because US pulled out. If that hadn't happened, WN probably wouldn't be the force within California it is today.

When did WN buy Morris Air? It seems to me that WN's move into California was somewhere near that time in the early 1990s.

And when UA started Shuttle by United, WN decided to start flying longer routes to compete with UA. So, instead of needing several connections to get to LAS, PHX, or LAX from MDW, UA started non-stops, directly competing with UA's operation at ORD.
 
cschleic
Posts: 1226
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 10:47 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:24 pm

Quoting ckfred (Reply 40):
When did WN buy Morris Air? It seems to me that WN's move into California was somewhere near that time in the early 1990s.

That's correct. December 1993. Morris started as a travel company doing public charters. I recall Kelleher calling it a "unique opportunity" as Southwest wasn't an acquiring type of company. Interestingly, David Neeleman came from Morris, then left Southwest. IIRC, his non-compete only applied in the U.S., so he co-founded WestJet. After the non-compete expired, he moved on to JetBlue.
 
uberflieger
Posts: 1418
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:22 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:10 pm

Quoting commavia (Reply 5):

e x c e l l e n t   

American will regain corporate contracts & frequent flyers in many spokes AA & US lost to Delta and United over the last few years, which in return will strengthen their hubs and overall network
Thank you Khizr Khan
 
SANMAN66
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:37 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:30 pm

RDU re-invented themselves after the AA hub days. The old terminal (used for hub operations)was demolished and a new terminal-2 was built in it's place. The new terminal was not designed as a hub terminal.
I don't think RDU could go back to being a hub.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 20):
US buying PSA and gutting them still makes me mad to this day.

     

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 20):
I think a well run PSA would have done very well today in the expanded west coast market.

I wonder what type of aircraft PSA would be flying if they had survived today?
They were flying MD-80s, BAe-146s (Smiliners),and old DC-9's before US acquired them.
PSA Gives you a lift!
 
777STL
Posts: 2770
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:22 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:32 pm

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 12):
I know that STL and RDU are AA strongholds...


Not anymore. AA is down to three gates and 30 some odd flights/day, all to hubs with the exception of DCA. I know they're at least the #3 carrier at STL now behind WN and DL.
PHX based
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3935
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:57 pm

Quoting SANMAN66 (Reply 43):

I wonder what type of aircraft PSA would be flying if they had survived today?
They were flying MD-80s, BAe-146s (Smiliners),and old DC-9's before US acquired them.

Yes, I've speculated the same thing. My guess is a nice fleet of 737-700s and 737-800s.

PSA had retired the 727s, 737s and Electra's before the US Air gutting. The took four DC-9s from AC for commonality with the MD-80s, but a lower seating capacity.
 
flyguy89
Posts: 1931
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:43 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:53 pm

Quoting brilondon (Reply 21):
They won't be opening any hubs.

With all due respect, the OP wasn't arguing for hubs to be reopened but rather focus cities. As far as that's concerned, I could see a couple possibilities, though not many. With better costs and the combination of the US and AA frequent flier bases, I could definitely see AA stepping up in RDU. DL has made inroads there of late, but AA still retains the "crown jewel" RDU-LHR. Similarly the combined carriers could probably do more with LGA post-merger as well as BOS perhaps, although BOS does have B6. Outside of those areas, I wouldn't be so sure.
 
steeler83
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:06 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:02 pm

Quoting 777STL (Reply 44):
Not anymore. AA is down to three gates and 30 some odd flights/day, all to hubs with the exception of DCA. I know they're at least the #3 carrier at STL now behind WN and DL.

Ok. I guess "strong hold" was not the choice word here. Do both markets still have a loyal AA following?

Man did STL fall hard and fast, not quite as fast as PIT though. US at PIT went from some 400 or more daily flights in 2003 down to under 100 in a span of about 6 years. PIT is "somewhat" a US stronghold, but barely with fewer than 50 flights primarily to hubs plus STL, RDU, BOS, LGA (still?) and BDL. I think coming in at a close 2nd is DL, followed by WN and UA.

How many flights did TW/AA have at STL in 2001? When did they start to close it down? Sorry, I remember seeing posts here and there about AA at STL, but I don't recall what happened at any given time...
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
 
AeroWesty
Posts: 19551
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:37 am

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:26 pm

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 47):
How many flights did TW/AA have at STL in 2001? When did they start to close it down? Sorry, I remember seeing posts here and there about AA at STL, but I don't recall what happened at any given time...

Ask and ye shall receive:

http://www.departedflights.com/TWSTLhub.html

In the 400 departures range beginning around 1987 and the 500 departures range beginning around 1995.
International Homo of Mystery
 
User avatar
psa1011
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:37 pm

RE: What If The New AA Re-opens Former Focus Cities?

Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:28 pm

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 48):
In the 400 departures range beginning around 1987 and the 500 departures range beginning around 1995.

Do you happen to know if AA maintained this number all the way til 11/2003, or if there was already a gradual pull down? I think HNL was gone pretty early.

Who is online