seatback
Topic Author
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2002 3:00 am

Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:08 pm

Oakland is an interesting city for me. With it being so close to San Francisco you would think it could sustain the likes of UA and AA. It's interesting that Delta is choosing to stay in Oakland and battle it out with WN on their two nonstop routes (LAX and SLC). They can't be making any money. I understand the LAX flights could be used for connectivity to Mexico, Hawaii and Asia, but seven is a lot.

Why haven't they chosen to fly N/S to MSP, DTW, and/or ATL nonstop...where there's no direct nonstop competition?

I know OAK is low yield, but you would think there's less money lost going to those three cities versus seven CR7/9 flights.

The same question could be asked regarding US to PHL and CLT.
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3947
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:21 pm

Quoting seatback (Thread starter):
Why haven't they chosen to fly N/S to MSP, DTW, and/or ATL nonstop...where there's no direct nonstop competition?

DL did fly OAK-ATL 2-3/daily for a while. They also did SJC-ATL 2-3/daily. They dropped OAK-ATL and cut SJC back to one daily. To my knowledge, NW never flew to OAK. They did also do SJC-MSP - one of which still remains with an MD-90 under DL - but SJC-DTW didn't last very long.

That's a good question. If one lives near OAK or any other secondary airport, it's far better than having to go to a farther off large airport.

AA has cut a lot of the satellite airports. OAK, BUR and LGB are gone; SJC is just a tiny spoke now, and they've cut some of the other airports near New York. As you allude to, CO cut OAK-IAH about the same time that AA cut OAK-DFW.
 
User avatar
enilria
Posts: 6494
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:15 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:26 pm

Quoting seatback (Thread starter):
Why haven't they chosen to fly N/S to MSP, DTW, and/or ATL nonstop

I think OAK-MSP makes more sense than OAK-SLC, but my guess is that they consider OAK low-yield and are just putting their eggs in the SFO basket like everybody else.
 
burnsie28
Posts: 5042
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:49 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:26 pm

OAK used to have non-stop to ATL a few years ago.
 
seatback
Topic Author
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2002 3:00 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:26 pm

I know I fully don't understand the market, but with OAK a far more convenient choice for those in the East Bay and SJC for those in the South Bay and tech areas, those airports are way more convenient. You would think they could warrant at least a few nonstop to uncompetitive cities (MSP/DTW and ATL).

AA did the same thing when they chopped DFW-OAK.
 
User avatar
Alsatian
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 10:19 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:40 pm

Quoting seatback (Thread starter):
They can't be making any money. I understand the LAX flights could be used for connectivity to Mexico, Hawaii and Asia, but seven is a lot.

Not sure that this is money-looser route for DL as there will be a frequency increase starting may with the introduction of a 8th daily flight (all CR7)

OAK just like BUR LGB or ONT are unavoidable in the Delta' s SLC network, their west coast hub. BTW SLC - OAK route is operated by A32S.
Ok I am French but I am not on strike
 
modesto2
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 3:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:49 pm

DL's LAXOAK service derives its most value from connections in LAX, but it's no secret that a 7x schedule is also designed to attract much local traffic. With the carrier's growing commitment to LAX, this route (and other California markets such as SMF and SJC) will stay.

Quoting enilria (Reply 2):
I think OAK-MSP makes more sense than OAK-SLC

Unless there is some compelling reason to operate MSPOAK (such as a strong business traffic link), why overfly a major DL hub in SLC?

As others have mentioned, OAK is generally low-yielding as a result of intense competition from WN and B6 & NK to a lesser extent. ATLOAK's longer stage length makes it more challenging to turn a profit in a low yield environment, and this dynamic is reflected in DL's commitment to only shorter routes from OAK.
 
MIflyer12
Posts: 2014
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:58 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:19 pm

Quoting seatback (Thread starter):
Why haven't they chosen to fly N/S to MSP, DTW, and/or ATL nonstop...where there's no direct nonstop competition?

Just sticking with MSP, is there evidence of much demand OAK to MSP or the upper Midwest generally, other than CHI?

I suppose the 717 arrivals could free up a 319 for OAK-MSP.
 
seatback
Topic Author
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2002 3:00 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:47 pm

Quoting modesto2 (Reply 6):
Unless there is some compelling reason to operate MSPOAK (such as a strong business traffic link), why overfly a major DL hub in SLC?

Agreed. Good point with regards to MSP. But, ATL could offer a slew of connection opportunities for the Southest and Eastern seaboard. These cities aren't connected through SLC.

Generally, right now, if you're going to the East coast, you'll have to endure a double connection, which makes the drive to SFO not so bad.
 
slcdeltarumd11
Posts: 3284
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 7:30 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:14 pm

Delta doesnt seem to have too hard a time filling OAK-SLC. It might not warrant as high a fare as SFO but does appeal to a different group of people in an area with tolls and traffic. OAK and SJC are important for their network. Lets just say SLC-OAK breaks even i think its worth flying.
 
mikesairways
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:47 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:17 pm

DL is adding a second SJC-ATL this spring. So we'll have an afternoon departure in addition to the current red-eye only.
The red zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the white zone...(Ai
 
ANA787
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:00 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:23 pm

Watch for DL to add SEA-OAK in the next round of SEA expansion.
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3947
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:55 pm

Quoting mikesairways (Reply 10):
DL is adding a second SJC-ATL this spring. So we'll have an afternoon departure in addition to the current red-eye only.

Oh really? What equipment? I believe the red-eye alternates between a 737-800 and A319.

Quoting ANA787 (Reply 11):
Watch for DL to add SEA-OAK in the next round of SEA expansion.

That's what I've been wondering. Will DL add SJC, SNA and OAK from SEA? I still am an AS fan-boy. I won't even bother to look at DL when booking to those places. I pretty much just look at AS flights anywhere I go where they serve, without even looking at other carriers.
 
User avatar
exFWAOONW
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:32 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:05 pm

One other possibilty, though I doubt it is justified: an alternate to SFO with their own staff to handle the irregular ops for the times when SFO is socked in.
Is just me, or is flying not as much fun anymore?
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3947
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:19 pm

Quoting exFWAOONW (Reply 13):
One other possibilty, though I doubt it is justified: an alternate to SFO with their own staff to handle the irregular ops for the times when SFO is socked in.

DL has slightly more operations in SJC so I would think they could use that as an alternate.
 
johnboy
Posts: 2560
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 9:09 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:22 pm

IIRC, Delta OAK-ATL seemed to "mysteriously" appear and disappear when B6 started (then cancelled) their own flight(s) to ATL during the initial build-up of OAK.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's the distinct impression I got at the time.
Maybe i'm just cynical though.  
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3947
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:25 pm

Quoting johnboy (Reply 15):
IIRC, Delta OAK-ATL seemed to "mysteriously" appear and disappear when B6 started (then cancelled) their own flight(s) to ATL during the initial build-up of OAK.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's the distinct impression I got at the time.
Maybe i'm just cynical though.

OAK-ATL was operating before that. Maybe you are thinking of AA? They had OAK-JFK and ONT-JFK flights mysteriously appear and disappear when B6 entered that market.
 
93Sierra
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 12:34 am

Why did AA pull out of BUR? I remember seeing their Maddogs their not to long ago.
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3653
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:01 am

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 1):
To my knowledge, NW never flew to OAK.

Yes, NW served OAK from the early 1990's through the mid-1990's. They started out flying 2X daily 72S service OAK-MSP and quickly transitioned A320's. But they did discontinue service due to poor loads.

DL's OAK-SLC service is a hold-over from the WA days. After the merger, DL added MD-88 service to DFW. The DFW service was discontinued when DL dehubbed DFW.

Some other history. DL Express flew OAK-RNO for brief period using Metros and Brasilias. The OAK-LAX flights are the newest to DL at OAK. Seasonally, DL does fly OAK-ATL, usually just once per day using 738's.
 
modesto2
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 3:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:18 am

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 18):
Seasonally, DL does fly OAK-ATL, usually just once per day using 738's.

Point of clarification: DL does NOT operate ATLOAK, not even seasonally. The route previously operated, but is no longer offered.
 
User avatar
NOLAWildcat
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:14 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:30 am

It's too bad the legacies don't have more service to OAK. Oakland is far more convenient for much of the Bay Area, and while Oakland itself isn't particularly affluent, the Far East Bay, the Tri-Valleys area, and Fremont have wealthy communities and a size able tech industry presence. Southwest is the 800 lbs gorilla in the market, but I'm surprised AA and UA can't make a O'Hare or Texas route work with the connections available. Personally I'd like a red-eye to ORD, IAH, or DFW to make getting back East or down South by lunchtime feasible without having to drive over to SFO.
Wall-to-wall Football is ruining my weekend.
 
User avatar
RWA380
Posts: 4474
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:51 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:42 am

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 18):
Yes, NW served OAK from the early 1990's through the mid-1990's. They started out flying 2X daily 72S service OAK-MSP and quickly transitioned A320's. But they did discontinue service due to poor loads

Yep, here is the proof .....

http://www.departedflights.com/NW121592p17.html
Next Flights: PDX-HNL-OGG-LIH-PDX On AS, WP & HA
 
modesto2
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 3:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:55 am

Quoting NOLAWildcat (Reply 20):
Oakland itself isn't particularly affluent, the Far East Bay, the Tri-Valleys area, and Fremont have wealthy communities and a size able tech industry presence

Very true. Oakland has a rough reputation, but I can say with much confidence that most Americans cannot afford to live in the Oakland hills. As you mentioned, east of the hills include affluent neighborhoods such as Orinda, Moraga, Lafayette, Walnut Creek, Danville, Alamo, and San Ramon.

However, WN's dominance in the OAK market has priced most of the majors out of that market, and the legacies must now focus and defend their SFO and SJC services.
 
reality
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:22 am

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 1):
NW never flew to OAK.
Quoting RWA380 (Reply 21):
Yep, here is the proof .....

I recall that the MSP OAK flights lasted for only a few months or certainly for less than a year. I seem to remember that some other airline started to serve OAK-MSP (can't image who that would be) and that Northwest then and only then started this route. As soon as the competitor left, Northwest did too. Anyone else remember something like this? (Maybe I'm hallucinating.)

I had a cousin who was a pilot for Northwest. We made plans to meet. Before we could the service was discontinued!

[Edited 2013-11-12 18:32:32]
 
reality
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:31 am

Quoting modesto2 (Reply 22):
WN's dominance in the OAK market has priced most of the majors out of that market

Perhaps this is true, but whenever I check fares I find that WN is no cheaper than anyone else, including flights from SFO. If fact it seems that WN is often more expensive than the "majors." Is WN still considered a low-cost airline? Isn't it a "major." Doesn't seem much different these days than any other carrier.

I think people fly WN because they like it and it goes where they want to go, frequently, and without a lot of hassle. Not necessarily because of price.
 
modesto2
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 3:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:47 am

Quoting reality (Reply 24):
Perhaps this is true, but whenever I check fares I find that WN is no cheaper than anyone else, including flights from SFO. If fact it seems that WN is often more expensive than the "majors." Is WN still considered a low-cost airline? Isn't it a "major." Doesn't seem much different these days than any other carrier.

I think people fly WN because they like it and it goes where they want to go, frequently, and without a lot of hassle. Not necessarily because of price.

Keep in mind that WN now has more pricing power at OAK since most of the majors have moved out. Years ago, WN offered lower fares in the market and effectively priced out others. Now that WN has a majority of the market share, it can raise fares and enjoy its dominance.
 
n471wn
Posts: 1346
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:23 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:52 am

Quoting modesto2 (Reply 25):
Keep in mind that WN now has more pricing power at OAK since most of the majors have moved out. Years ago, WN offered lower fares in the market and effectively priced out others. Now that WN has a majority of the market share, it can raise fares and enjoy its dominance.

Agree that WN is now taking advantage of OAK and alienating its long time East Bay customers like me (Danville). But with the BART light rail soon to go to OAK, I think that the future looks bright for OAK. For instance Hawaiian Air and AS have increased flights to Hawaii and Norweigen is going to start service this summer.
 
FSDan
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:27 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:54 am

I'm sure DL is hoping to pick up some of the business traffic that is on the Oakland side of the bay, such as Kaiser Permanente and Clorox. Even just with CR7/9s, they can offer first class seats that WN doesn't have.

Also, there's bound to be some traffic from San Francisco that spills across the bridge, especially seeing as SFO is consistently one of the most delayed airports in the country and OAK is much smaller and easier to transit.
This is my signature until I think of a better one.
 
nutsaboutplanes
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:37 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:00 am

Quoting seatback (Thread starter):
The same question could be asked regarding US to PHL and CLT.

Its just more cost effective to funnel the traffic through PHX with a quick connection. Considering the yields, transcons would be prohibitive.
American Airlines, US Airways, Alaska Airlines, Northwest Airlines, America West Airlines, USAFR
 
User avatar
redzeppelin
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:30 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:35 am

Quoting seatback (Thread starter):
With it being so close to San Francisco you would think it could sustain the likes of UA and AA. It's interesting that Delta is choosing to stay in Oakland and battle it out with WN on their two nonstop routes (LAX and SLC).
Quoting seatback (Reply 4):

I know I fully don't understand the market, but with OAK a far more convenient choice for those in the East Bay and SJC for those in the South Bay and tech areas, those airports are way more convenient.

As I read this, it strikes me that DL is also the only "legacy" carrier serving MDW. I think a lot of the arguments presented here to support OAK service can also be used to explain continued MDW service. When you are competing with carriers with major hubs and extensive nonstop options at airports like SFO or ORD, and you are only offering flights to your own hubs, why not give flyers the flexibility of choosing a secondary airport like OAK or MDW. It at least gives you a slight competitive advantage with flyers who have reason to prefer that airport.
 
ridgid727
Posts: 931
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:58 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:54 am

Quoting reality (Reply 24):

Perhaps this is true, but whenever I check fares I find that WN is no cheaper than anyone else, including flights from SFO. If fact it seems that WN is often more expensive than the "majors." Is WN still considered a low-cost airline? Isn't it a "major." Doesn't seem much different these days than any other carrier.

While many think "bags fly free" more and more WN fares reflect that the actual "bags fly free" is really not so, as it is built into their fare structure and showing up more and more.
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3653
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 4:35 am

Quoting modesto2 (Reply 19):
Point of clarification: DL does NOT operate ATLOAK, not even seasonally. The route previously operated, but is no longer offered.

OAK-ATL fizzled out longer ago than I thought. But it doesn't mean they'll won't bring it back.

Quoting reality (Reply 23):
I recall that the MSP OAK flights lasted for only a few months or certainly for less than a year. I seem to remember that some other airline started to serve OAK-MSP (can't image who that would be) and that Northwest then and only then started this route.

Sun Country has never served OAK. Republic served OAK-RNO-SLC-MSP using DC-9-30 equipment, many years prior to NW. The NW service lasted longer than you think...on the order of at least a couple of consecutive summers in the early 1990's.

OAK lost AA, UA and CO all left OAK when the airlines were losing $millions and $billions. DL, CO and AA all have been known to leave OAK and then a few years later, re-enter the market.

There's plenty of gate space at OAK. Even G4 has scaled back significantly at OAK.

Quoting NOLAWildcat (Reply 20):
the Far East Bay, the Tri-Valleys area, and Fremont have wealthy communities and a size able tech industry presence.

The only "other" airports around the Bay Area that have had airline service, even to the smallest degree have been CCR (Concord, CA) with West Air and PSA/USAir, STS with UA Express, Westates and now Horizon. Even Vallejo and Napa County Airport had airline service back in the 1970's with Stol Air.

With Contra Costa County expanding so much and the Livermore/Pleasanton areas expanding leaps-and-bounds also, it's too bad CCR has regained airline service (you all know how that goes) and Livermore airport (probably the same reason as CCR).
 
User avatar
RWA380
Posts: 4474
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:51 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:35 am

Quoting n471wn (Reply 26):
Agree that WN is now taking advantage of OAK and alienating its long time East Bay customers like me (Danville). But with the BART light rail soon to go to OAK, I think that the future looks bright for OAK. For instance Hawaiian Air and AS have increased flights to Hawaii and Norweigen is going to start service this summer.

When I lived in the city, it was easier for us, to use OAK, but the BART to Bus transfer made it a wash as far as going the other way to SFO. Now that BART is going to be serving OAK directly, I'm guessing anyone on a BART line Concord and in will use OAK, and for those who drive, parking at OAK is less expensive anyway.

I 100% agree with you, Norwegian is just the beginning of low cost international airlines that will show interest in serving OAK as a gateway to San Francisco. I also think it is quite possible, we will see an up tick of domestic options as well.

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 31):
With Contra Costa County expanding so much and the Livermore/Pleasanton areas expanding leaps-and-bounds

My buddies in Fairfield/Birds Landing area use SMF, while my gal friend in Napa prefers OAK. But either way, all these new homes, mean more people are going to need air service from somewhere.
Next Flights: PDX-HNL-OGG-LIH-PDX On AS, WP & HA
 
deltal1011man
Posts: 4721
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:17 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:44 am

Quoting johnboy (Reply 15):

I don't remember B6 flying ATL-OAK.

Are you sure your not talking about when they tried LGB?
New airliners.net web site sucks.
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3653
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 6:42 am

Quoting RWA380 (Reply 32):
When I lived in the city, it was easier for us, to use OAK, but the BART to Bus transfer made it a wash as far as going the other way to SFO. Now that BART is going to be serving OAK directly, I'm guessing anyone on a BART line Concord and in will use OAK, and for those who drive, parking at OAK is less expensive anyway.

I 100% agree with you, Norwegian is just the beginning of low cost international airlines that will show interest in serving OAK as a gateway to San Francisco. I also think it is quite possible, we will see an up tick of domestic options as well.

SFO is also a lot more accessible with BART now serving SFO directly. I had heard that the monorail between OAK and the McArthur Station (I think that's right) will have a separate fare. It'll be a while before that monorail will be up and running. Does anyone have a timetable?

Before the last airline cyclic downturn, OAK started to get some substantial European charters. Martinair had been serving OAK forever. Then Corsair flew 747SP's on the PPT-OAK-ORY route. Lastly, Citybird used MD-11's on the OAK-Brussels route. Oh yeah and the OAK-Terceira 1X weekly flight during the summer.

I'm glad to see Norwegian making inroads to OAK. I hope they are successful. Now all OAK needs is an Asian carrier. They almost had one, Hong Kong Express or something like that.
 
mikesairways
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:47 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 6:44 am

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 12):
Oh really? What equipment? I believe the red-eye alternates between a 737-800 and A319.

Used to be 752 for a while, than became just seasonal 752 and now just 738. Daytime flight is 738 as well, don't think i've ever seen Airbus on that.

It's been spotted a 73G a couple of times as well. '

Incidentally, on December 13 they are running an extra section 763 ATL-SJC as a revenue ferry to pick up the 49ers for their game that week. It is bookable on DL's website, RT was about $900 to do it.
The red zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the white zone...(Ai
 
johnboy
Posts: 2560
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 9:09 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:42 am

Alright guys, you had me doubting myself but here's a USA Today blurb that states B6 pulled flights from both Oakland and Long Beach due to too-low fares.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/trave...oday/2003-11-07-archiveoct24_x.htm

Oakland was B6's first Bay Area destination and they were starting a modest-sized build-up.
 
User avatar
RWA380
Posts: 4474
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:51 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:00 am

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 34):
They almost had one, Hong Kong Express or something like that

Exactly, lets not also forget World Airways and Transamerica, both used OAK as the gateway to the bay area, but I think you got all the international airlines that I can remember.

Also it really depends on what part of the city you live in, as to SFO or OAK, I lived just off Market, at Guerrero, which is a little less than half way from the Castro to Downtown
Next Flights: PDX-HNL-OGG-LIH-PDX On AS, WP & HA
 
strfyr51
Posts: 2141
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:33 am

because BART goes directly into SFO manyy east Bay Passengers can avoid using OAK go straight to SFO and take a Non Stop to Wherever. If OAK generated the revenue Yield of SFO?? There wouldn't BE enough gates in Oakland They's be using Alameda as an airport (Alameda?? That's not a halg Bad Idea!! Just as close in as Oakland IS. )
 
seatback
Topic Author
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2002 3:00 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 12:28 pm

Quoting RWA380 (Reply 37):
Exactly, lets not also forget World Airways and Transamerica, both used OAK as the gateway to the bay area, but I think you got all the international airlines that I can remember.

Didn't PeoplExpress also serve OAK to BRU?

I think with the growth in the area, the future is bright for OAK. I wouldn't be surprised to see AA back, although I guess that is a certain with yesterday's DOJ agreement.
 
Flytravel
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:37 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:55 pm

Quoting NOLAWildcat (Reply 20):
But I'm surprised AA and UA can't make a O'Hare or Texas route work with the connections available.
UA has it's hub in SFO. I suppose it views akin to serving MDW or HOU with hubs in ORD and IAH. NYC is likely larger enough that UA knows JFK/LGA and EWR have different local catchments, large enough individually, that it can't just service NYC with EWR. Similarly, it knows it can't just service WAS with just IAD.

As for AA, it's probable that it figures that the closest usable hub, DFW is too far away for the a decent schedule to OAK. AA doesn't service markets like PVD either. The new AA will probably keep OAK-PHX though.

[Edited 2013-11-13 06:08:13]
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3653
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:50 pm

Quoting RWA380 (Reply 37):
Exactly, lets not also forget World Airways and Transamerica, both used OAK as the gateway to the bay area, but I think you got all the international airlines that I can remember.

True...How could I forget about those two airlines since they were BASED at OAK.

I wanted to mention that the first Mexican carrier that served OAK was Aerocancun. Did you know Laker Airways also served OAK back in the 1970's?

Quoting seatback (Reply 39):
Didn't PeoplExpress also serve OAK to BRU?

Yes...very briefly. It occurred right before their transition from OAK to SFO. I missing those the 2X daily 747 flights OAK-EWR...one at 9-9:30AM and the 2nd at around 4PM.

Quoting Flytravel (Reply 40):
UA has it's hub in SFO.

It's interesting that you say that because during the late 1980's and early 1990's, UA tried to make a mini connection complex at OAK with mainline flights to DEN, ORD, LAX, PDX, SEA, HNL and UA Express flights to FAT and SNA. It lasted two or three years before it was taken down.

Another airline that tried OAK was HP with nonstops to PHX, LAS, PDX, SEA and YYC. The HP effort only lasted during one summer season.

Quoting Flytravel (Reply 40):
As for AA, it's probable that it figures that the closest usable hub, DFW is too far away for the a decent schedule to OAK. AA doesn't service markets like PVD either. The new AA will probably keep OAK-PHX though.

AA did a lot of tag-ons to mainly SJC and SMF before continuing on to either ORD or DFW back in the 1980's and early 1990's. More recently and briefly, AA tried LAX with ERJ's and JFK with 757's. But that didn't last long.

As a kid, I used to hang out at OAK a lot since it was only a 15-minute drive from my house at the time. I started hanging out there back when the upper level of T1 only went to gate 8 and they had multi-colored jetways. The lower level of T1 was the home of PSA and Alaska.
 
timz
Posts: 6120
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 6:15 pm

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 41):
Another airline that tried OAK was HP with nonstops to PHX, LAS, PDX, SEA and YYC.

When?
 
BoeingGuy
Posts: 3947
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 6:36 pm

Quoting timz (Reply 42):
Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 41):
Another airline that tried OAK was HP with nonstops to PHX, LAS, PDX, SEA and YYC.

When?

I'm not aware that HP ever did OAK-SEA either. UA tried it around 1994 with that Shuttle by United service with 737-300s, and then later dropped it.
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3653
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:52 pm

Quoting timz (Reply 42):
When?
Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 43):
I'm not aware that HP ever did OAK-SEA either. UA tried it around 1994 with that Shuttle by United service with 737-300s, and then later dropped it.

I want to say late 1980's.
 
reality
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:01 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:42 pm

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 34):
I had heard that the monorail between OAK and the McArthur Station (I think that's right) will have a separate fare

The BART OAK Connector goes from Coliseum Station to OAK. There won't be a separate fare. You can use your BART ticket to exit. It will cost about $5 or $6 more to go to OAK than to Coliseum, just like it cost $5 or $6 more to exit at SFO compared to the adjacent BART stations. It is scheduled to open sometime in 2014.
 
luckyone
Posts: 2302
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:50 pm

RE: Delta In Oakland

Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:05 pm

Quoting redzeppelin (Reply 29):
As I read this, it strikes me that DL is also the only "legacy" carrier serving MDW. I think a lot of the arguments presented here to support OAK service can also be used to explain continued MDW service.

Different kettle of fish. Delta is now the only *legacy* that doesn't have a hub in Chicago.
 
modesto2
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 3:44 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Thu Nov 14, 2013 12:52 am

Quoting reality (Reply 45):
The BART OAK Connector goes from Coliseum Station to OAK. There won't be a separate fare. You can use your BART ticket to exit. It will cost about $5 or $6 more to go to OAK than to Coliseum, just like it cost $5 or $6 more to exit at SFO compared to the adjacent BART stations. It is scheduled to open sometime in 2014.

Even after the completion of the OAK connector, I'll still prefer BART's direct connection to SFO. The OAK connector still requires a transfer and additional fare. I much prefer the seamless nature of BART's SFO service, even as an East Bay resident.
 
ytib
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:22 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:07 am

Quoting reality (Reply 45):
The BART OAK Connector goes from Coliseum Station to OAK. There won't be a separate fare. You can use your BART ticket to exit. It will cost about $5 or $6 more to go to OAK than to Coliseum, just like it cost $5 or $6 more to exit at SFO compared to the adjacent BART stations. It is scheduled to open sometime in 2014.

Correct, It will be an addon fee to take the monorail when it opens just like it is now on AirBart.

Currently Powell Street (near Union Square) to
SFO is $8.25
San Bruno is $3.95 (the stop prior to SFO)

Coliseum/Oakland Airport is $3.85 (AirBart adds another $3)
 
rickabone
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 8:06 am

RE: Delta In Oakland

Thu Nov 14, 2013 3:15 am

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 14):
One other possibilty, though I doubt it is justified: an alternate to SFO with their own staff to handle the irregular ops for the times when SFO is socked in.

I know it would be a bit of a logistical/engineering headache, but I always thought it would be awesome to have post-security ferry service between OAK and SFO... Could come in especially handy when there are significant delays at SFO that warrant diverts to OAK. Maybe funded as a joint venture between UAL and SWA? I know it's a pipe dream, but it would be cool.