Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
KarelXWB wrote:MSN 112 AD #2 has been moved to the next phase of assembly.
3rdGen wrote:Does anyone have Weight and Range specifications for the -1000? Fuel quantity and tank layouts? The wings are the same as those on the -900 so I suppose that fuel quantity in those will remain the same.
3rdGen wrote:Does anyone have Weight and Range specifications for the -1000? Fuel quantity and tank layouts? The wings are the same as those on the -900 so I suppose that fuel quantity in those will remain the same.
StTim wrote:It is currently at 165,000 litres and that is the same as Airbus now plans for the -900 ULR.
WIederling wrote:StTim wrote:It is currently at 165,000 litres and that is the same as Airbus now plans for the -900 ULR.
used to be 156,000 litres for the -1000. Did Airbus change that recently?
mjoelnir wrote:I think you are right 156,000 l, but of course Airbus could do a A350-1000LR with 165,000 l.
WIederling wrote:mjoelnir wrote:I think you are right 156,000 l, but of course Airbus could do a A350-1000LR with 165,000 l.
I'd be more interested about the tanks being "hard" full at 165,000 litres or not
KarelXWB wrote:Qatar's A350-1000 will feature 327 seats (46 J, 281 Y). For comparison, their 77W features 335 seats (42 J, 293 Y). Looks like they swapped 2 economy rows for 1 row J seats.
https://twitter.com/A350_Production/sta ... 1403780096
Qatara340 wrote:KarelXWB wrote:Qatar's A350-1000 will feature 327 seats (46 J, 281 Y). For comparison, their 77W features 335 seats (42 J, 293 Y). Looks like they swapped 2 economy rows for 1 row J seats.
https://twitter.com/A350_Production/sta ... 1403780096
While that is the old configuration, interesting how the A350-1000 is almost a true 77W replacement! I'm sure if 42 J seats were placed instead of 46 J seats the plane would eventually have more pax than the old 77W configuration.
hkcanadaexpat wrote:Also I believe (TBC) that MSN 72 (Cathay #12) completed its RTO on Feb 14th and was trying (but failed) to do its FF yesterday.
KarelXWB wrote:Qatara340 wrote:KarelXWB wrote:Qatar's A350-1000 will feature 327 seats (46 J, 281 Y). For comparison, their 77W features 335 seats (42 J, 293 Y). Looks like they swapped 2 economy rows for 1 row J seats.
https://twitter.com/A350_Production/sta ... 1403780096
While that is the old configuration, interesting how the A350-1000 is almost a true 77W replacement! I'm sure if 42 J seats were placed instead of 46 J seats the plane would eventually have more pax than the old 77W configuration.
If we swap one J row for 2 Y rows, the A350-1000 would have 341 seats in Qatar's configuration.
Anthonys wrote:KarelXWB wrote:Qatara340 wrote:
While that is the old configuration, interesting how the A350-1000 is almost a true 77W replacement! I'm sure if 42 J seats were placed instead of 46 J seats the plane would eventually have more pax than the old 77W configuration.
If we swap one J row for 2 Y rows, the A350-1000 would have 341 seats in Qatar's configuration.
How is it possible ?
Their 77W are in 10 abreast and the A350 in 9 abreast.... Are they going to put 10 seats in a row like Air Caraïbes ?
Qatara340 wrote:While that is the old configuration, interesting how the A350-1000 is almost a true 77W replacement! I'm sure if 42 J seats were placed instead of 46 J seats the plane would eventually have more pax than the old 77W configuration.
Polot wrote:Qatara340 wrote:While that is the old configuration, interesting how the A350-1000 is almost a true 77W replacement! I'm sure if 42 J seats were placed instead of 46 J seats the plane would eventually have more pax than the old 77W configuration.
Well the A350-1000 is basically the exact same size as the 77W except for fuselage width of course. 9Y 77W configurations (like QR's old one) can essentially be copied and pasted into the plane.
Qatara340 wrote:KarelXWB wrote:Qatar's A350-1000 will feature 327 seats (46 J, 281 Y). For comparison, their 77W features 335 seats (42 J, 293 Y). Looks like they swapped 2 economy rows for 1 row J seats.
https://twitter.com/A350_Production/sta ... 1403780096
While that is the old configuration, interesting how the A350-1000 is almost a true 77W replacement! I'm sure if 42 J seats were placed instead of 46 J seats the plane would eventually have more pax than the old 77W configuration.
I cant wait to see the new Super-J seats. The A350-1000 will have the second largest business class in QR fleet, only 2 less than on an A380! I am positive they will be used to premium heavy destinations, like LHR, CDG, JFK, IAD, ect...
Cebo29 wrote:N501DN (DAL#1) updated delivery date 7/2017...
hkcanadaexpat wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:Also I believe (TBC) that MSN 72 (Cathay #12) completed its RTO on Feb 14th and was trying (but failed) to do its FF yesterday.
As it turns out, MSN 72 just completed its RTO (today Feb 16).
BobMUC wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:Also I believe (TBC) that MSN 72 (Cathay #12) completed its RTO on Feb 14th and was trying (but failed) to do its FF yesterday.
As it turns out, MSN 72 just completed its RTO (today Feb 16).
Now preparing for its FF: https://www.flightradar24.com/AIB01NA
KarelXWB wrote:MSN 65 has been ferried to XFW this morning to perform the A350-1000 evacuation trials.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/airc ... v/#c83c68e
moo wrote:KarelXWB wrote:MSN 65 has been ferried to XFW this morning to perform the A350-1000 evacuation trials.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/airc ... v/#c83c68e
I find it interesting that Boeing can get an exemption on the entire 787 with regard to evacuation tests, but Airbus cant get one for an A350 derivative...
StTim wrote:moo wrote:KarelXWB wrote:MSN 65 has been ferried to XFW this morning to perform the A350-1000 evacuation trials.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/airc ... v/#c83c68e
I find it interesting that Boeing can get an exemption on the entire 787 with regard to evacuation tests, but Airbus cant get one for an A350 derivative...
I suspect that there are quite a few detail level differences between what the FAA allows and the European agency doesn't (and vice versa).
This test is always a tricky one as in any emergency evacuation you can get minor injuries and so to require this test does put the Airbus staff used at a level of risk exposure.
moo wrote:KarelXWB wrote:MSN 65 has been ferried to XFW this morning to perform the A350-1000 evacuation trials.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/airc ... v/#c83c68e
I find it interesting that Boeing can get an exemption on the entire 787 with regard to evacuation tests, but Airbus cant get one for an A350 derivative...
KarelXWB wrote:MSN 82 TX #1 and MSN 84 SQ #11 have been moved to the delivery centre.
pabloeing wrote:¿Someone know the delivery IB A350 dates?