Airbus Lover
Topic Author
Posts: 3163
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2000 10:29 pm

Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 2:18 pm

hi! I am just wondering that why people said Qantas is the world's safest airlines with no fatal crashes. But all their incidents would be enough. Examples:

QANTAS
1. B734 engine failure_last year
2. BAe 146 fuel leak_recently
3. B744 BKK overshot
4. B743 Milan or somewhere gear problem
5. and a few that i have forgotten

But overall, Australasia's safety record is rather good.

CATHAY PACIFIC
1. according to airdisaster.com and others, CX has no fatal crashes. But I remember that they crashed some Russians planes they used to have on a website. To clarify, they have any Russian planes before? they crashed some of them? Well, is it one of their L1011 tristars crashed because of bomb detonation back in the 70's?

2. can someone tell me their incidents and/or crashes without claming lives

Conclusion: I think CX is one of the safest airlines in the world!

SINGAPORE
1. Very sad to mention that the SQ006. the only crash of SQ (not including SilkAir)

2. Can someone tell me more about their incidents and/or non-fatal accidents? I know one SQ A310 overshot rwy. in Kuching, borneo, MALAYSIA.

However, SQ is still one of my fav. airlines. I think the airport CKS is to be blamed. Don't bash at me, just my thoughts.!

thanx for the info
 
lahaina
Posts: 238
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2000 1:51 am

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 2:50 pm

Cathay Pacific:
No Russian planes in fleet in past. Had 880. One overshot the runway and ended up in the ocean. Another 880 exploded in sky due to bomb.

Singapore Airlines:
One fatal crash in Taipei (747). Silk Air, a subsidiary of SIA, crashed (737) in flight. Had multiple engine shut downs. I believe a few runway incidences.
 
AJ
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 1999 3:54 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 3:00 pm

QANTAS
1. B734 engine failure_last year - at least crews are trained to cope with the inevitable
2. BAe 146 fuel leak_recently - Qantas doesn't operate BAe146s
3. B744 BKK overshot - refer 1
4. B743 Milan or somewhere gear problem - Rome, manufacturing error
5. and a few that i have forgotten - ???
 
hkg_clk
Posts: 980
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 2:56 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 3:04 pm

As mentioned above, CX has never had Russian planes. One fatal crash due to a bomb longtime ago.

Recent incidents? They had a number of engine shutdowns in their 330s at one time which resulted in the grounding of the 330 fleet for a while. A really cautious move. A 777, just after delivery, had to be evacuated on the runway cos a fire warning light illuminated by mistake. Recently, I think there were some near misses mid-flight, but not due to their fault at all.

Now that SQ has crashed twice in three years (I treat SilkAir as part of SQ), and Qantas is having so many incidents, I think CX is my FIRST choice for safety!
See my homepage for a comprehensive guide to spotting and photography at HKG
 
User avatar
VirginFlyer
Posts: 3974
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2000 12:27 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 3:10 pm

Qantads Airlink DO operate the BAe146, and thee WERE problems with fuel vapour leaking into the cabin.
"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
 
Airbus Lover
Topic Author
Posts: 3163
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2000 10:29 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 3:13 pm

Lahaina
thanks for the info.

Aj
it's Qantas Airlink, sorry.

Hkg_clk
again, thanx. I agree with you. CX!

by the way, how do we pronounce Qantas?

People pronounce it Quan-tas but spell Qantas
If it's Qantas-> something like Can-tas?!
 
AJ
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 1999 3:54 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 3:15 pm

Just "Airlink", crewed by National Jet crews. We pronounce it like there's a 'u' in Qantas. Have fun  
 
Guest

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 3:24 pm

Just thougt of something else. Although CX no longer has 747 Classics (i.e. 200 and 300s), I remember that they were once praised for their maintenance standards even on their old planes. Apparently, they had been constantly upgraded with new safety devices (I assume perhaps TCAS etc). New owners of these planes (i.e. Virgin and PIA) are really lucky to have them!

By the way, I read on this page: http://www.bird.ch/bharms/asr_sh00.htm that one of the 747-200s was scrapped (B-HKG). I was quite shocked to read this cos if itwere so well maintained, it should have been quite easy to sell. Anyone has any idea why this happened?
 
CX 4ever
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2000 3:06 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 3:43 pm

But do you know why PIA only leased 5 of the 6 B747-300s, instead of all six of them? B-HON is still stored at the dessert waiting for its next owner...POOR...

Also in around 1994-1995, a CX B744 heading for Frankfurt aborted t/o because of an engine fire, it returned to HKG, and all pax escaped thru the sliderafts.
 
v jet
Posts: 757
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 9:04 am

RE: Airbus Lover

Sun Jan 07, 2001 5:22 pm

Pls answer me just one question. Do you seriously think that the airlines you mentioned other than Qantas dont have things like engine failures and fuel leaks from time to time? The sweeping generalisations on this forum astound me.
 
Guest

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 5:37 pm

As AJ mentioned, Airlink is NOT QANTAS.

Airlink is a division of National Jet http://www.nationaljet.com.au which is sub-contracted by QANTAS to operate the BAe-146 on regional services. All Airlink aircraft are owned, maintained and operated by National Jet pilots, f/a's, engineers, etc.

It is the same as saying that Comair in South Africa IS British Airways, when the only connection Comair has with British Airways, is that aircraft carry BA colours, and flight numbers. The same as Airlink.
 
tim
Posts: 672
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2000 12:25 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 5:48 pm

I agree 110% with V Jet

Tim
Perth, Australia
 
User avatar
VirginFlyer
Posts: 3974
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2000 12:27 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 5:51 pm

Huh??? Then how come they say that Qantas New Zealand is Qantas's first franchise operation?
"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
 
airnewzealand
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 6:00 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 5:57 pm

I agree with V Jet....
 
Guest

VirginFlyer

Sun Jan 07, 2001 6:23 pm

QANTAS NZ is actually QF's first franchise operation.

The Airlink (National Jet) is a sub-contract operation, whereby QANTAS pay National Jet to provide the Airlink service.

With QANTAS New Zealand, the risk takers are the owners of QANTAS New Zealand (which is South Pacific Airlines isn't it?), and no financial risk is undertaken by QANTAS. Further QF NZ pay QF for the right to operate under the QF banner and flight numbers.

Different types of airline operations.
 
Guest

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:06 pm

It's pronounced QUAN-TAS because:
Queensland
And
Northern
Territory
Aerial
Service

That's why, but now its based in Sydney...
I still like QF and SQ
 
aduum
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2000 5:24 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:09 pm

Tell me more about the L1011 CX bombing?
 
QFTJT
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 7:56 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 8:34 pm

Guys,

Qantas has had it's fair share of incidents over the passed year. Because of this, the Australian Government, audited the Airline to find only a 747-200 training manual out of date! This would have to indicate only bad luck and other variables contributed to the incidents, not mechanical or management problems within Qantas.

QFTJT
 
Oz777
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 9:48 am

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Sun Jan 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Just to update the information further.

Qantas has never had a fatal accident involving it's jet fleet, but has lost a number of aircraft and passengers when it was flying piston types.

When Qantas first purchased Australian Airlines the then Chief Executive John Ward stipulated that all subsidiary, franchise and regional operations were to be painted with a red triangle on the vert stab, and only the main stream aircraft were to carry the full QF livery.

The reason was that there was a greater chance of incidents on the smaller aircraft and he did not want the possibility of the QF safety and maintenance record being compromised. That edict was changed when James Strong took the reins.

To say that QF's standards have not slipped is wrong. Prior to the FCO and BKK incidents no major problems had occured with the 742 or 743 fleet, and they were flying more cycles per a/c at that stage. Ask the QF LAME's if the standards have not slipped as a result of cost savings. (That is the ones who are still employed by QF - not the ones they contract in from Forstaff)

OZ777
 
n949wp
Posts: 1398
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2000 3:45 pm

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Mon Jan 08, 2001 2:14 am

Five fatal accidents in Cathay's history:

July 16, 1948; PBY-5a Catalina; VR-HDT
The Catalina flying from Macau to Hong Kong, and presumably carrying a cache of gold bullions, was hijacked by a group of gunmen. Shots were fired, and apparently the flight crew were hit. The plane went out of control and crashed into the sea. Twenty-two killed and one survived, ironically one of the hijackers.

Feb. 24, 1949; Douglas DC-3 (C-47); VR-HDG
The DC-3 coming in from Manila made a missed approach, flew into a fog bank, and crashed into a hill on Hong Kong Island. All 23 aboard killed.

July 23, 1954; Douglas DC-4 (C-54); VR-HEU
Flying from BKK to HKG, VR-HEU was in international airspace about 90 miles off Hainan Island when it was shot down by Chinese fighters. Eight of the 18 on-board survived. The Chinese government later apologized, paid compensation, and claimed that their fighters mis-identified the DC-4 as one of the C-54's from the Taiwanese Air Force that spied regularly in that region.

November 5, 1967; Convair CV-880M; VR-HFX
Taking off on runway 13 at Kai Tak for BKK, a nose tire exploded around V1 and the plane veered starboard off the runway and into the waters of the harbor. One fatality out of the 127 on-board.

June 15, 1972; Convair CV-880M; VR-HFZ
The aircraft was destroy by a bomb over Pleiku, South Vietnam while flying BKK-HKG. No survivors from the 81 on-board. A Thai policeman was later charged with planting the bomb in his wife's luggage in an attempt to collect the insurance payout. He was never convicted.


'949

 
SInGAPORE_AIR
Posts: 11619
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2000 4:06 am

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Mon Jan 08, 2001 3:19 am

Very old news. Nobody will take that into account when flying will they. But news nonetheless.
Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
 
oxygen
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 1999 12:27 am

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Mon Jan 08, 2001 8:20 pm

Just for your information, the wife of the Thai Policeman was actually his mistress. He's a very bad person. He told the mistresses to go to Hong kong first and wait for him, and to make her believe he's not lying, he sent his REAL daughter to accompany her.

This policeman was NOT convicted in the end.
 
Guest

RE: Safety Issues:- Qantas, CX And SQ

Mon Jan 08, 2001 9:27 pm

May I add that Qf has been around a very long time. It's policies and regement of maintenance have been above so called "world practice" for a very long time.

Australian aviation is far above so called world standards and to compare QF with SQ or CX is ridiculous.

Call me arrogant all you like, but Australian aiviation is respected world wide.

mb