767-332ER
Topic Author
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2001 1:20 pm

BA From LHR-ATL

Mon Apr 09, 2001 9:37 am


BA currently operates a daily Boeing 777 flight from LGW, flight 2227 to ATL. Why doesn't BA fly from LHR instead of Gatwick, since Gatwick's distance from London is quite a pain in the rear.
Twinjets...if one fails, work the other one twice as hard!!!
 
N863DA
Posts: 1140
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:36 am

RE: BA From LHR-ATL

Mon Apr 09, 2001 9:44 am

Because the Bermuda II agreement makes no mention of Atlanta, it is not a permitted LHR- destination. Only certain US cities are permitted from LHR, for example JFK.

Thus, it is required that ATL be served from LGW. Besides, if BA flew LHR-ATL, then it would be required that Delta be allowed to fly into LHR too, and we all know how opposed the UK carriers are to that happening. (how partial is that?)

And for what it's worth, Gatwick is a MUCH nicer airport than Heathrow.

FLY DELTA JETS and sail UNITED STATES LINES



N 8 6 3 D A
 
767-332ER
Topic Author
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2001 1:20 pm

RE: BA From LHR-ATL

Mon Apr 09, 2001 9:48 am


Well, then screw that. I still think as a business traveler, it is much more convenient to fly into LHR and not having to ride an hour and a half to London.
Twinjets...if one fails, work the other one twice as hard!!!
 
Guest

RE: BA From LHR-ATL

Mon Apr 09, 2001 6:09 pm

N8,

I think you & me can understand why the UK airlines would like to keep *potential competitors* out.

Politics is still a game where he who can pull the most strings (BA & UK Gov't), gets what he wants.

The fact is though, until LHR expands, there is not much point in scrapping or amending Bermuda II, because LHR will not be able to handle any more new slots (at least the number DL and others would like).

Secondly, I beleive the *official* line (and I stand to be corrected), is that the UK Govt's impasse on Bermuda II with the US, is as a result of the US not permitting British carriers cabotage rights within the US.

(Apparently BA and others would like to exploit the juicy US Domestic market). Now, if the US Gov't says "no", I smell a whiff of protectionism on your side of the "pond" too! Tit-for-tat.

CP

Who is online