A330
Topic Author
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed May 19, 1999 12:31 am

Flying Cruise Ship ? Haha!

Fri May 21, 1999 4:10 am

It is soooooo... unrealistic to think that Airbus is going to build a plane "with shops,restaurants..." people,an airplane has a very fragile stability, and pax. should be seated all the time except when really needed (bathroom).
Creating a "flying cruise ship" is just not possible at the moment.
In my opinion, the image of such a mega-plane is invented by media, surely NOT by Airbus or Boeing.
By the way: An airplane has to make the most out of a very little amount of space...
Shiek!
 
DL757
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 11:47 pm

RE: Flying Cruise Ship ? Haha!

Fri May 21, 1999 5:01 am

I agree.
Fly Delta Jets | DL757
 
CX747
Posts: 5576
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:54 am

RE: Flying Cruise Ship ? Haha!

Fri May 21, 1999 6:09 am

I agree whole heartedly with you A330. What a fabrication all of that is.
"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
 
Guest

RE: Flying Cruise Ship ? Haha!

Fri May 21, 1999 6:30 pm

Not only is it not structurally feasable, but does anyone HONESTLY think that airlines will be content to provide hotel-style rooms to anyone when first-class seats like the ones that SIA and BA use are in existence?

And not only that, but shops and what-not take up room that airlines could be using cramming in passengers like sardines and making revenue. No way will the A3XX ever be a flying cruise ship. A bigger flying sardine can, sure, but not a cruise ship. If you want a cruise ship...take a cruise!

-Mike
 
cedarjet
Posts: 8101
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 1:12 am

RE: Flying Cruise Ship ? Haha!

Mon May 24, 1999 2:34 am

Reports of future Airbus aircraft having shops, cabins, gymnasiums etc are absurd, and if it is seriously being considering it means that the projected design is too big. The obvious parallel is the early days of 747s when there was a cocktail lounge (or, occasionally, dining room) upstairs and even a piano bar in zone E (rearmost) for the economy passengers (!) on some airlines, notably American Airlines. These were (especially in the case of the economy lounge) because there were not the load factors to necessitate the full complement of seats. Also, the configuration in Economy was 2-4-3, ie 9 abreast instead of today's 10. As soon as loads improved the airlines dumped the lounges without blinking.
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
 
CV990
Posts: 4224
Joined: Sat May 22, 1999 3:49 am

RE: Flying Cruise Ship ? Haha!

Mon May 24, 1999 3:49 am


That's what I call a "Flying Mall"!!!
CV990, the Maserati of the skies!
 
Guest

RE: Ha Ha Indeed!

Mon May 24, 1999 4:04 am

The guy that posted that on the favorite airplanes thread said that the width would be twice the length of a 747. A 747 is 231 feet long. So this "flying Titanic" is supposed to be 462 feed WIDE? It would never get off the ground. Plus, airlines would never find pilots crazy enough to fly something so huge. Existing wide-body jets aren't exactly the most responsive aircraft in the world, so who knows how bad this aircraft would be.

Now, I did hear rumors about a 2-level Airbus A340, but nothing to the extent of restaurants, shops, and 462 feet of fuselage width. For years, Boeing has been studying the feasibility of extending the 747's upper deck to the tail of the fuselage, but it's extremely unlikely that Boeing would ever build something like that.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adipasquale, ASMD11, Baidu [Spider], chrisp390, CrimsonNL, dk44, floorrunner, Joolde, MattSYD, OA940, pedrinch, SCQ83, slinky09, Someone83, SyeaphanR, Wingtip1005, Yahoo [Bot], zknzf and 243 guests