Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 1999 11:03 am

Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 9:11 am


I'm writting a business plan to start a new airline. I plan to flight in Eastern Canada only.

I'm looking for a very fuel efficient aircraft not bigger than 19 px. The leg should not be longer than 400-500nm. as exemple YQB-YYZ or YYZ-YOW-YQB.

Pilatus PC-12 looks very efficient. and it's not too risky ($$$) for a start-up.

What do you think?

Thank for your input, I really appreciate.

Posts: 2064
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 1999 9:49 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 9:21 am

I would have to agree with you however from a passenger stand point itis not the most pleasent aircraft to fly in. Have you thought about metro II/III's?
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 1999 11:03 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 10:44 am

Thank for your input,

I did. Metro II/III not enough fuel efficient...plus they have two engines. That means more operating expense.

Air Montreal tried, without success, to operate Metro II/III and they failed.

Max Q
Posts: 5902
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 11:22 am

You might want to check on the legalities of operating a
single engine aircraft for hire.
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
Jean Leloup
Posts: 1954
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2001 10:46 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 11:24 am

Luc, I think the PC-12 looks great. It seems like a great aircraft. The 1 prop does not seem to give a really good image, but I'm sure you can't beat it for efficiency. I hope it happens for you and tell us if you get started! I'd love to fly on your airline, if i could afford it!

good luck
Next flight.... who knows.
Posts: 1488
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2000 3:04 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 11:30 am

What about the Cessna Caravan? Those I believe are available with EFIS cockpits, and FedEx operates hundreds of them, so they must not be to hard to get your hands on.
Posts: 7616
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 3:12 pm

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 12:04 pm

The PC-12 is a really great aircraft, I think it fits about 10 or 12 in a high density seating arrangement. But there may be legalities flying it for a scheduled airline... if you were running an air taxi service I'd say no problem... I just wonder if it is certified for the CAAs equivilant of FAR 121.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
Posts: 2064
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 1999 9:49 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 1:32 pm

what about a compair 10?
Posts: 226
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 6:24 pm

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 4:54 pm

you seem like a funny guy, in your first post in this forum you say the almost new PC-12 is not as comfortable as a 30 year old flying cigar called metro III,....I would say that there is no way a Metro could compare to the PC-12 in terms of passenger comfort and I am sure many other aspects as well.

AAd65, as for your airline, my best suggestion would the King-air 350, its a twin turbo, so no problem in flying scheduled passenger operation (from FAA viewpoint) and it is a good performance aircraft all round,....things like MLW is the same as the MTOW, certified up to 17 pax...etc

Have fun planning your own airline
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 10:12 pm

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 5:14 pm

PC12 has a major advantage: excellent shortfield performance (plus lower operating cost, as it is single engined).
If regulations are not an issue (as seems to be the case, others in the area obviously also operate it in similar settings) and you like her (I sure do like the looks and specs, don't have a license so don't ask about handling  Smile ) it becomes a matter of price and availability of both aircraft and staff (pilots, mechanics mostly).
Given the small size, what do you envision your planned feeders using? An operation with PC12s is likely to be a feeder itself, as the aircraft can go almost anywhere.
I wish I were flying
Posts: 335
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2000 1:45 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 10:31 pm

The PC-12 is very popular here in Western Canada. SmartAir, PeaceAir, Northern Sky and Montair are all using the PC-12 for scheduled operations in Alberta and BC. I think it is very popular on the Calgary to Edmonton Municipal route as the Muni has the 10 passenger restriction.

Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Wed May 23, 2001 10:37 pm

There are a lot worse aircraft to pick up then the PC-12.

Posts: 1496
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 10:52 am

RE: Pilatus PC-12:Right Aircraft?

Thu May 24, 2001 12:35 am

The PC-12 seems to be quite popular in Canada for small airlines. In addition to those mentioned by S'dawg, they're also operated in as charter, scheduled, and private aircraft by Bearskin, Wasaya, RJM, Chartright, Kelner, Pascan, Thunder Air, North American Charters, Ontario Government, Nova Steel, the RCMP, Keewatin Air, Expressair, and Nakina. I also believe there's other carriers planning on using them.

The PC-12 has several advantages. I heard (can someone confirm???) that at 9 seats it only needs one pilot, not 2. And being under 20 seats it doesn't need flight attendants. As a single-engined aircraft, it's cheap to operate. It has a high degree of flexibility because it can get into lots of airports. And although I've never flown one, I understand it has reasonable comfort levels.

The principle disadvantages of the PC-12 are that it doesn't match the appeal of jets, and it's also a fair amount of money to purchase (new aircraft have that tendency).

Personally I like the idea of using PC-12's. Compared to larger aircraft, they're lower risk. But be careful of competitors flying larger aircraft in the event they start up YQB. Flying niche market routes, however, that may not be a problem. I don't think you'd be working with connecting traffic to other carriers, so you could also use convenient alternative airports, such as Toronto Island or possibly even other alternatives to Pearson. There's also Ottawa-Rockcliffe, and Montreal-St.Hubert. I don't think it's wise to fly entirely to secondary airports, but by using some of them it might help reduce landing fees.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos