DC10Tony
Topic Author
Posts: 991
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 9:51 am

Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 11:06 am

I've always wondered why American Airlines and Delta no longer operate 747s. I know Delta had a few in the 70s, and American had a few SPs. Do Delta and American believe they're too much money to keep up?
 
TOMASKEMPNER
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed May 02, 2001 3:21 pm

RE: Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 11:20 am

DL & AA get rid of the 747´s because they hadn´t enough passengers to fly profitable.

Besides DL got rid of them when they had almost none intl. presence and their European routes were flown in Tristars.
When DL start operating Asia in 1987 they started using Tristars but later they went for the MD11 and stil today they use it for all their Asian destinations.

AA got rid of them in the 80´s, the same as DL and they trusted on the MD11 as a replacement. Now the trust the 777 as a replacement of both the M11 and the 747.

Today UA and NW are the only US airlines that use 747.
CO also dropped them in the 90´s.

I would love to see a 747-400 in the latest DL color scheme.
 
UAL747
Posts: 6725
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 1999 5:42 am

RE: Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 11:33 am

Most people Im sure will disagree with me, but with the recent aquisition of TWA, I am starting to see how AA might invest in a 747-400 size aircraft, or more likely the 777-300. A lot of their 777 flights to Europe, esp. LHR/LGW flights are oversold and full. Also, AA is on the way to Asian expansion, so with the new -300ER model coming out, I wouldnt be surprised if AA bought a few. However, I would LOVE to see a 744 in AA's colorscheme, would be AMAZING!

UAL747
"Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy. Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy.....Okay, fine, we'll just turn 190 and Visual Our Way
 
boeing 747-311
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2001 10:29 am

RE: Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 11:35 am

Why wouldnt they go back to them, now that the 747-400 entitles less money to run?
Come fly with US
 
United Airline
Posts: 8766
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 11:43 am

If AA expands into Asia, I wouldn't be surprised if they get the B 777-300ER or even the B 747-400.
 
FlagshipAZ
Posts: 3192
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 12:40 am

RE: Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 3:31 pm

Amercian is pretty much committed to an all twin-engined fleet in the near-term future. If AA needs a larger aircraft than the 772s, look for them to order 773s. Their experience with the 747 had been "less than favorable"...like the MD-11. Regards.
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
 
Guest

RE: Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 3:43 pm

i hear DL dropped them because they were to much money for mx and fuel
 
milemaster
Posts: 994
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 10:19 am

RE: Why No 747s?

Mon Jul 30, 2001 3:57 pm

AA has tried a couple times with the 747... Last of which was an SP (DFW/NRT?). It's pretty unlikely AA will consider the 747 again since they pretty much told Boeing what they were looking for in a ER aircraft (ie. 777).

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 76er, 777klm, AsiaTravel, Baidu [Spider], cchan, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], HALFA, klwright69, oldannyboy, overcast, shamrock350, SInGAPORE_AIR, steex, wezgulf3 and 240 guests