747400sp
Topic Author
Posts: 3833
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 7:27 pm

Should Had Goen With The 707 700 Program?

Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:54 am

The 707 700 was a program that called for 707's to get re engined it the late 70's early 80's. The program would replace the old JT-3 on 707 with CFM 56-2 like the ones on the DC-8 70's and KC-135's. In a article I readied about the 707, it said the reason why Boeing drop this program was the fact that it could hurt the 757 sells. They had tested a 707 700 but after the program was drop they turned in to a 707 300. Seeing how successful the DC-8-70's and KC-135 are with the engine and the fact that they still flying today make me thick if Boeing do not drop this program 707 700 would be hauling a lot of cargo today. So did make a good decision or a mistake.
 
FlagshipAZ
Posts: 3192
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 12:40 am

RE: Should Had Goen With The 707 700 Program?

Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:08 am

No mistake really. Just that the 707 was a great people hauler, but when in the freight business, the DC-8 is better.
I don't think Boeing pushed the 707-700 hard at all simply because the 767 was designed & built to replace it. The 757 was more of a 727 replacement. The DC-8-70s were re-engined because of 2 reasons...the aircraft was younger & more effective than the 707, and because when the airlines were finish with the DC-8, they were much more marketable to the freight carriers. Boeing made no mistakes on the 707, but the time had come for the 767 to make its debut then. Regards.
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TWA772LR and 12 guests