Ansett767
Topic Author
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 9:33 am

BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:42 pm

Hi all,

Which would you take? And why?

Choices between BA, Virgin and NZ (via LAX)

Ive flown BA's Y+ twice and enjoyed it but am leaning towards Virgin or NZ....

Any big plus' of flying these over BA?

Thanks in advance
 
CXfirst
Posts: 2882
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:13 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:31 pm

Virgin definantly, they pioneered it, and seem the most interested to win premium Y passengers (therefore they will probably be the best). Also, you'd rather transfer through Hong Kong than through AKL and LAX.

However, I havn't flown any of these carriers in Y+ before.

-CXfirst
 
Demoose
Posts: 1891
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2001 8:06 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:37 am

Flew Virgin's Premium Economy (and Upper Class) in February and would deffinately recommend them.

Mark
Take a ride...fly across the sky
 
IFEMaster
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:17 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:18 am

NZ over VS or BA anyday. I've flown the Premium Economy product on all three between LAX and LHR, and NZ wins hands down.
Delivering Anecdotes of Dubious Relevance Since 1978
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 7448
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:58 am

NZ U Class now has Business Class meals & Drinks and noise canceling headphones.
Flown to 120 Airports in 44 Countries on 73 Operators. Visited 55 Countries and counting. Wanderlust is like Syphilis, once you have the itch it's too late for treatment.
 
Ansett767
Topic Author
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 9:33 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:14 am

cool thanks - meals are number 2 for me.

no, 1 is seat comfort and room - more about sideways room then length but extra legroom is good - but I think theyre all at 38" ???

no. 2 is food

no. 3 is entertainment.

So would VS still be tops? I just don't wanna end up ont he upper deck or NZ in the 3-2 config on the LHS!
 
IFEMaster
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:17 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:37 pm

I'd still go with NZ. I wasn't impressed at all by the VS width of seat, so that leaves BA and NZ, and NZ have the better all round experience...good room width and length, good food, AVOD...still NZ.
Delivering Anecdotes of Dubious Relevance Since 1978
 
tz757300
Posts: 2725
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 6:21 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:41 pm

I say VS, they usually always offer a pretty superior service wherever they fly to
LETS GO MOUNTAINEERS!
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 7448
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:36 pm

Quoting Ansett767 (Reply 5):
I just don't wanna end up ont he upper deck or NZ in the 3-2 config on the LHS!

So travel on the bottom deck in the 2-across configuration. As TG992 said the other day, the bottom deck is very popular for the bizjet feel.. NZ U class is 39-40" on board the 744 I believe. My feeling is that the NZ AVOD is very good compared to many carriers. I have only ever sat upstairs in U class, and I really enjoyed the experience.

The issue for you is more do you want to transit AKL and travel transtasman on NZ or take direct out of Oz?
Flown to 120 Airports in 44 Countries on 73 Operators. Visited 55 Countries and counting. Wanderlust is like Syphilis, once you have the itch it's too late for treatment.
 
Ansett767
Topic Author
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 9:33 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:45 pm

Quoting AerorobNZ (Reply 8):
The issue for you is more do you want to transit AKL and travel transtasman on NZ or take direct out of Oz?

Either is fine, if it was a problem I would have listed a criteria so it doesn't matter for me. Don't mind the extra few hours spent trans tasman or at Auckland airport.

Thanks for your suggestions though.
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:03 pm

Quoting CXfirst (Reply 1):
Virgin definantly, they pioneered it, and seem the most interested to win premium Y passengers

Sorry but you are wrong - BA pioneered World Traveller Plus before Virgin copied them and rolled out Premium Economy in February 2000. At that time BA was already operating World Traveller Plus on flights to Australia - Virgin Atlantic's first flight to SYD did not even take off until 7 December 2004. By this time BA World Traveller Plus had been operating for nearly four years, and airlines like United, All Nippon and SAS all had a separate enhanced economy cabin on the majority of their long-haul flights.

It is debatable whether or not Premium Economy/World Traveller Plus etc were themselves innovative, as in the 1980s some airlines did offer a separate economy cabin for those passengers who had paid the full fare. One such airline was British Caledonian, who not only offered a separate cabin with wider seats offering more legroom, but also a superior service and use of dedicated executive lounge at LGW, their main hub.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
FlyKev
Crew
Posts: 1295
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:34 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:49 pm

Id recommend VS PE.
Here's a great mini site about their new improved cabin:
http://www.alotmorespace.com/

Quoting BCAL (Reply 10):
Sorry but you are wrong - BA pioneered World Traveller Plus before Virgin copied them and rolled out Premium Economy in February 2000.

Hmm, Im going to have to disagree with you again BCAL,
VS did roll out a Premium Economy service before BA, however it was not called premium economy. This was rolled out in 1992, as mid class you can read all about it here http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/tridi...economy_fact_sheet_tcm4-426060.pdf

Oh and since when did length of running a route really prove anything.

Have a good flight!

Kev.
The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only
 
Ansett767
Topic Author
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 9:33 am

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:23 pm

Quoting FlyKev (Reply 11):
Id recommend VS PE.
Here's a great mini site about their new improved cabin:
http://www.alotmorespace.com/

OMG that site is awesome!!  Smile
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:07 pm

Quoting FlyKev (Reply 11):
Hmm, Im going to have to disagree with you again BCAL

FlyKev we love to disagree but debate is healthy!

Thanks for the link to mid class but my recollection is that BOAC even had a class, situated between First and Economy, on their 707s and VC10s that was generally reserved for frequent flyers and business passengers paying the full fare. It did not offer any improved service (although there might have been a higher ratio of cabin crew members to passengers) but the middle seat could, if unused, be folded down to make a work table and extend the armrests for seats on either side, rather similar to the current seating arrangements for today's Club Europe. Now BOAC disappeared when it became BA and by my reckoning that is ten full years before Virgin Atlantic was founded.

The question really is which airline offered an enhanced economy class with not only dedicated cabin but increased legroom, seat pitch and better catering? To refine the question to deal with the thread is, "Which airline was first to offer it between the UK and Australia?" and much as Virgin would wish to claim the title, unfortunately it was BA who offered World Traveller Plus four years before Virgin entered the route.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
starguy
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:44 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:08 pm

Quoting BCAL (Reply 13):
To refine the question to deal with the thread is, "Which airline was first to offer it between the UK and Australia?" and much as Virgin would wish to claim the title, unfortunately it was BA who offered World Traveller Plus four years before Virgin entered the route.

I think I'm a little confused as to what BA flying to SYD before VS has got to do with anything. Enlighten me.
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:23 am

Quoting StarGuy (Reply 14):

Someone (maybe spin from Virgin themselves) claimed somewhere that Virgin was the first airline to offer a Y+ service between the UK and Australia. BA flying to SYD before VS has nothing to do with this, but BA offering World Traveller Plus on the route four years before VS started services proves that WTP was first.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
starguy
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:44 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:34 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 15):
Someone (maybe spin from Virgin themselves) claimed somewhere that Virgin was the first airline to offer a Y+ service between the UK and Australia. BA flying to SYD before VS has nothing to do with this, but BA offering World Traveller Plus on the route four years before VS started services proves that WTP was first.

You are correct in that BA were the first to offer the Premium service on the LHR-SYD route. If Virgin introduced Premium when they started the SYD route, you would also be right, but they didn't, VS offered Premium way before flying to SYD, so your statement doesn't really prove anything.
 
User avatar
BNE
Posts: 2921
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2000 9:37 pm

RE: BA Or VS Or NZ Premium Economy SYD To LHR

Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:24 pm

I would choose the flight on frequent flier allegiance.. I would probably go with BA. NZ is too long to go the wrong way.
Why fly non stop when you can connect

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: SCQ83 and 9 guests