SiouxATC
Topic Author
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:17 am

Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:48 am

Now to start off, I have flown LH many times in Europe but never over the pond. I have always found there product to be alright, never had a problem. I have heard just horror stories from a lot of people on A.NET about thier long-haul services and later on in the year I will be doing the following routing:

LH 969
Depart: MUC 10:30 AM
Arrive: FRA 11:40 AM
A300

Connecting to

LH 418
Depart: FRA 01:00 PM
Arrive: IAD 03:45 PM
747-400

Connecting to

UA 953
Depart: IAD 05:00 PM
Arrive: PHX 07:55 PM
A320

After reviewing all of my options I might think about changing my itinerary. I am not looking forward to my connection in FRA & IAD, I think I may be cutting it close at IAD, 1 h 15 min to clear customs only. Having never connected in FRA what can I expect? Please tell me it wont be anything like LHR..... Depending, I may call and change to the AC flight out of MUC connecting in YYZ onto PHX I believe, with a 6 hour layover, also not very fun. Or maybe the non-stop MUC-DEN flight then to PHX. Or even MUC-SFO/LAX. Please share your expirences. What adivce can you give? Thanks in advance!

SiouxATC
 
OHLHD
Posts: 2903
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:02 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:09 am

IMHO, No LH is not that bad. I have flown them to MEX and GRU and I have to say that they are good. Personally I prefer AF over them but they are by no way bad.

People tend to not like them because of the lack of PTV but that is no reason for me to avoid them. Considering that they made a billion dollar profit you made a good choice.  Smile
 
icarus75
Posts: 751
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:18 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:43 am

I've flown economy with LH as follow :

CDG-FRA-LAX & SFO-MUC-CDG. All I have to say is that the service was not bad at all, the F/A are in fact really friendly as soon as you speak few words in german when you ask something.

In fact, I'd say that LH is better on long haul than on intra-european flights.

Regarding the connection at FRA on the way to IAD, I'd try to have a little longer one.
FRA can be a nightmare walking wise between two flights and if you flightfrom MUC is on late, you may have to run!!!!
Flying is amazing!
 
HT
Posts: 5857
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:20 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:43 am

Quoting SiouxATC (Thread starter):
Having never connected in FRA what can I expect?

A connecting time of 1h20min at FRA would not be a problem.
Depending on the actual departure gate you might have to use the tunnel between Piers A and B, but still you will stay airside. Of course expect a second security check.
If your flight to IAD should depart form "A", things are even better.

Quoting SiouxATC (Thread starter):
I am not looking forward to my connection in FRA & IAD, I think I may be cutting it close at IAD, 1 h 15 min to clear customs only.

I would be a bit worried about the one at IAD, too. Plus the long flight IAD to PHX ...
The same comments would be for a connection via ORD.

Quoting SiouxATC (Thread starter):
Or maybe the non-stop MUC-DEN flight then to PHX.

This would have been my first choice to fly from MUC to PHX, but allow about 2 hours for the connection at DEN.
Good timings for the longhaul flight; no unnecessary transfers. Might take a moment to get through immigration and wait for the luggage, then re-clear security hence the "2 hour" recommendation based on own experience.
Finally a short 2-hour hop to PHX.
Overall, this should be the quickest and most convenient travel.

Quoting SiouxATC (Thread starter):
Or even MUC-SFO/LAX.

If you want to max out on miles accrual and the price is alright (and so are the timings), the detour via SFO or LAX might be a thing to consider. But if you want to fly home quick, go for the connection via DEN.

Quoting SiouxATC (Thread starter):
I have heard just horror stories from a lot of people on A.NET about thier long-haul services

Service is best described as "basic but reliable".
I can live without personal IFE.
Seating is cramped as with almost any other carrier - at least too cramped for my body in Y, but that is my personal problem.
-HT
Carpe diem ! Life is too short to waste your time ! Keep in mind, that today is the first day of the rest of your life !
 
OHLHD
Posts: 2903
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:02 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:57 am

I forgot to mention that I usually use them when flying all over Europe. These 2 were my only longhauls on them.  Smile
 
StefanPAD
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:15 pm

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:47 am

I've flown LH from FRA to LAX and it was really a good service. For further informations read my Trip Report: Lufthansa FRA - LAX - FRA + ORD / Pics (by StefanPAD Feb 26 2006 in Trip Reports)

Last year I checked AF on the route HAJ - CDG - JFK and back. Service was too robotic, but ok for it's price.

This year I'll do my JFK-trip on LH. I'm looking really forward to it.

Stefan
 
Avianca
Posts: 5283
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:33 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:16 am

Quoting HT (Reply 3):
Service is best described as "basic but reliable".

well I am back from an 10leg trip on LH including CCS-FRA and back.... I have to say the service was very good.... even if the food on the CCS-FRA leg was not really good... and the entertainment system was done...
Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia
 
Leskova
Posts: 5547
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 3:39 pm

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Thu Aug 02, 2007 3:35 pm

I guess "basic but reliable" covers it quite well - they're usually somewhat on-time, the service is usually efficient but only sometimes truly friendly (though very rarely truly unfriendly). The seats are, in my opinion, amongst the best - but the pitch is awfully smal, which ruins any comfort gains that the seats could offer.

As for connecting in FRA - I still don't understand why so many make such a big fuss about it, because it really is quite easy. The distances can sometimes be a bit long, but since there are moving walkways throughout the concourses, it's usually not much of a problem.

The airport is really rather easy to get through.
Smile - it confuses people!
 
dfwmzuri
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:34 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Sat Aug 04, 2007 2:15 am

I've flown LH several times: ORD-FRA-DEL and DFW-FRA-DEL. I've never had a bad experience with them. I also enjoy going though FRA.
 
ca228
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:17 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:50 pm

Re: your 1 hr 15 min connection time in IAD

If possible, I would go one flight later. I went through IAD's US customs in 2004, and while I wouldn't say it was extremely slow, it wasn't quick either. But the line going back to the departure area through the security x-ray machines were long and slow, even at 8AM on a weekend. Then, you have to catch a bus to go to the terminal building where your connecting flight is (because IAD has lots of terminal buildings). All in all, lots of waiting time, and it could make you very nervous if you get held up anywhere along the process.
 
SiouxATC
Topic Author
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:17 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:37 am

Quoting CA228 (Reply 9):
Re: your 1 hr 15 min connection time in IAD

If possible, I would go one flight later. I went through IAD's US customs in 2004, and while I wouldn't say it was extremely slow, it wasn't quick either. But the line going back to the departure area through the security x-ray machines were long and slow, even at 8AM on a weekend. Then, you have to catch a bus to go to the terminal building where your connecting flight is (because IAD has lots of terminal buildings). All in all, lots of waiting time, and it could make you very nervous if you get held up anywhere along the process.

Thanks for taking the time to share. I did deside to change my intinerary, here is the new one:

United 903
Depart MUC 11:15 am
Arrive IAD 2:46 pm
777-200

connecting to

United 953
Depart IAD 5:00 pm
Arrive PHX 7:55 pm
A320
 
stevesdream69
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:37 pm

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Hi there,
how about this routing? You would arrive in PHX some 3 hours earlier.

Flight Number: LH434
Departs: 09:05 MUC
Arrives: 11:40 ORD
Airline: Lufthansa (LH)
Aircraft: Airbus Industrie A340-600

Flight Number: LH9168
Departs: 15:10 ORD
Arrives: 16:55, PHX
Airline: UNITED AIRLINES
Aircraft: Airbus Industrie A318/A319/A320/A321
 
wilco737
Posts: 7279
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 12:21 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:47 pm

hi guys,

I was trying to take a non rev standby flight on one of the LH flights to the US a few weeks ago and I regularly check for the loads on LH flights. Well, the flights are full! Very hard to get on as standby when you non rev!
And why is that so? Because LH is so bad?  scratchchin  because there is no PTV  scratchchin 
People fly with LH all over the world and of course sometimes the service sucks (like at every other airline) but maybe people look at other things than just having PTV or the best IFE system.... Maybe reliability or being on time (mostly) is more important...
Most a.netters care more about PTV, so LH sucks in their opinion...

WILCO737 (MD11)
 airplane 
 
SiouxATC
Topic Author
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:17 am

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:17 pm

Quoting Stevesdream69 (Reply 11):
Hi there,
how about this routing? You would arrive in PHX some 3 hours earlier.

Flight Number: LH434
Departs: 09:05 MUC
Arrives: 11:40 ORD
Airline: Lufthansa (LH)
Aircraft: Airbus Industrie A340-600

Flight Number: LH9168
Departs: 15:10 ORD
Arrives: 16:55, PHX
Airline: UNITED AIRLINES
Aircraft: Airbus Industrie A318/A319/A320/A321

Thats leaving a bit early, however I am staying at the Keminski Hotel Munich Airport I would like to sleep in a little bit tho! Generally I would rather connect at IAD than ORD.

Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 12):
Most a.netters care more about PTV, so LH sucks in their opinion...

WILCO737, I totally agree with you. In my opinion a PTV does not matter to me. As long as I have a book and my iPod, I have everything I need for a long-haul flight! But I have noticed that a.netters seem to complain about the lack of PTVs. But to each his own, If PTVs make or break thier flights so be it.
 
Elite
Posts: 2296
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:31 pm

RE: Is LH Really That Bad?

Tue Aug 14, 2007 4:25 pm

LH isn't that bad, but the lack of IFE sometimes is drawn into having bad service.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos