Jawed
Topic Author
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:47 am

Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:34 am

I'm considering flying somewhere random just to do an interesting trip report. Do you guys have any suggestions for interesting routes? I'm sure that SFO to JFK on NWA is not going to be particularly exciting. Again, I'm looking for interesting flight routes on an interesting airline, which is not necessarily the same thing as just going to interesting destinations.

[Edited 2007-11-22 21:35:08]
 
kstatepilot
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:23 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:54 am

What I like to do is a flight in an aircraft I've never been before. There was a TR earlier this week where a guy flew on a 727 from LAS to TUL (or was it OKC)

Maybe try that
 
xjramper
Posts: 2318
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:10 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:56 am

If you have the money, fly into Orlando. Half way between Tampa and Orlando there is a place called Fantasy of Flight. You cannot miss it, its right off of I-4. I don't know how much it costs but you can get a bi-plane ride or a balloon ride.

Also this sounds more geared for Av polls and prefs.

XJR
Look ma' no hands!
 
WesternA318
Posts: 4465
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:55 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:58 am



Quoting Jawed (Thread starter):
I'm sure that SFO to JFK on NWA is not going to be particularly exciting.

Try SFO-JFK on VA!!
Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
 
san747
Posts: 4344
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:03 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:06 am

It'll be interesting if you fly a new airline, aircraft type or to a new destination.
Scotty doesn't know...
 
MadameConcorde
Posts: 9197
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:08 pm

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:26 am

I would have recommended the Concorde experience but the Ladies are no longer flying...  Sad

You should go on the Singapore Airlines A380 from Singapore to Sydney with the return flight.

Do one flight on the main deck and one on the upper deck. Choose window seats. There is no surcharge in Economy.
This is the very best Economy Class I have ever been in through all my years of flying.
There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
 
User avatar
BNE
Posts: 2921
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2000 9:37 pm

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:40 pm

Singapore Airlines A380 flight Singapore to Sydney and return is a good one,

Last month I flew from Cairns to Townsville via Mt Isa just to get on the ATR42.

ATR-42 flys Mt Isa Cairns.
Why fly non stop when you can connect
 
ALexeu
Posts: 1444
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:01 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:04 pm

Where ever you fly, you could also visit the destinations. It doesn't cost you a lot to go out of airport  Smile
I understand your need, but if you are already spending the money, why not see the place?

If I was you (living in USA), i would probably go for NW DC-9  Big grin
 
Transpac787
Posts: 1349
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:47 pm

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:25 pm



Quoting MadameConcorde (Reply 5):
I would have recommended the Concorde experience but the Ladies are no longer flying...

You should go on the Singapore Airlines A380 from Singapore to Sydney with the return flight.



Quoting BNE (Reply 6):
Singapore Airlines A380 flight Singapore to Sydney and return is a good one,

I'm sure those would be very cheap trips considering the OP lives in the USA  Wink


I know I'll look like an idiot saying it in light of my above comment, but it seems the TR's of flights in premium cabins seem to get the most views. So, if you're after the "popularity factor" with your TR, fly somewhere in First Class (or Business).

Also, there are already like 11x TR's running about SQ A380 flights, so another would just be a boring addition to the forum. If you want to get a ton of hits, try to get on something like an L-1011, DC8, 707 (Iran has the last couple I think), DC10, etc etc.
 
BMED
Posts: 722
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 11:01 pm

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:56 pm

I did EDI - INV just to fly on the SAAB 340 and also Loganair. Spent a couple of hours in INV whilr waiting for the train and then headed back. couldn't afford at the time a return.
Living the jetset life! No better way to be
 
bok269
Posts: 1568
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 10:19 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:49 am

EAS routes have always interested me. What about AS in the far North of Alaska or out in the Aleutian Islands? IN keeping in line with what Transpac787 said, you could fly FIrst class to one of the smaller AS destinations. THat would make for an interesting report. A comparo of interisland service in Hawaii would be cool, but getting there could be expensive.
"Reality is wrong, dreams are for real." -Tupac
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 7411
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:28 am

I love doing that.
Plans for DEC include
AKL-HKG this weekend.
AKL-SYD
possibly one more, maybe NRT,LAX,YVR

I could well change my plans, but the idea for those destinations is to spend 1 night and see everything I can before coming home.
Flown to 120 Airports in 44 Countries on 73 Operators. Visited 55 Countries and counting. Wanderlust is like Syphilis, once you have the itch it's too late for treatment.
 
MSYtristar
Posts: 7543
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:52 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:07 pm

Oh, I've done several "for love of flying" trips...I was constantly on the go, never had a hotel anywhere...

MSY-IAD-LAX-SEA-MCO-IAH-MSY
MSY-ORD-DUB-LHR-ORD-MSY
MSY-IAH-HNL-IAH-MSY
MSY-CLT-SFO-ATL-MSY
and others.

My advise: go to orbitz.com, enter the multi city option, and just put in random city pairs. I saw one the other day that I was tempted to get: ATL-FRA-SFO-PHL-ATL for less than a normal roundtrip ATL-FRA.
 
Jawed
Topic Author
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:47 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:40 pm

MSYtristar, so you actually flew MSY-ORD-DUB-LHR-ORD-MSY without any hotels in between? So you were on various planes, or at airports for the whole time? Wow... that takes some endurance!
 
Osprey88
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:13 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Sun Nov 25, 2007 5:10 am

I'll throw out some flights I would like to take some time, most of them in the North of Canada.

7F-- YUL-Kuujjuaq on a 722 Combi
7F or 5T--YFB (Iquliut)-YRT (Rankin Inlet)-YZF on a 732

Believe it or not, both of these carriers will serve hot meals on these flights so you will get even better service then most domestic US or Canadian carriers!
"Reading departure signs in some big airports reminds me of the places I've been"
 
MSYtristar
Posts: 7543
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:52 am

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:05 pm



Quoting Jawed (Reply 13):
So you were on various planes, or at airports for the whole time? Wow... that takes some endurance!

Yeah, the whole trip took about 32 hours. I was just in airports and airplanes. I guess i'm crazy.
 
RAFVC10
Posts: 1344
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:48 pm

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:24 pm

Strange flights:

- LB flight from MAD to VVI in a L10 aircraft (when I had the chance to reach the destination in an A7 313);
- EO flight from BRU to FIH in a L10 aircraft (when I had the chance to reach the destination in a SN 333).
- BA flight from GLA to BRR in a DH6 aircraft (I wanted to know what was to land in a beach...)
- Saha Air from IKA to KIH in a 703 (amazing flight in the last Boeing 707 scheduled passenger flight)

(...)

And this Christmas, my wife and I, will spend our last days of holidays and the last 2007 and new 2008 days at La Gomera (one of the small islands of Canary archipelago).

We will fly to TFN with XG in a 320 and then we will take a BEH aircraft of NT to GMZ. Will be a short flight but I promise to make a trip report if I have free time.

Regards,

Gerard
El dia que los gilipollas vuelen, no podremos ver la luz del sol!
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 7411
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: Flying Purely For The Flight (not Destination)

Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:53 am

I just booked a business class round trip for the day.
29NOV07 AKL-HKG NZ39 744
30NOV07 HKG-AKL NZ82 772
Flown to 120 Airports in 44 Countries on 73 Operators. Visited 55 Countries and counting. Wanderlust is like Syphilis, once you have the itch it's too late for treatment.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests