randyh3253
Topic Author
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 4:30 am

U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 4:23 pm

Breaking on CNN right now: US Airways says jet from Paris to Charlotte, N.C., diverted to Bangor, Maine, because of unspecified "security issue."
 
randyh3253
Topic Author
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 4:30 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 4:27 pm

Looks like its flight 787 operated by a B767
 
tp1040
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:30 pm

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 4:38 pm

On the ground met by security.
 
FlexJetOKC
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:05 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 4:38 pm

Here is Flightawares link
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/A...7/history/20120522/0910Z/LFPG/KCLT

CNN just announced it landed in Bangor, Maine.

LIVE link via CNN

http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/cvplive/cvpstream2&hpt=hp_t1

Big version: Width: 1680 Height: 1050 File size: 939kb


Edited to attach link/pic



[Edited 2012-05-22 09:54:09]
Above the planet on a wing and a prayer, my grubby halo, a vapour trail in the empty air...
 
tp1040
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:30 pm

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 5:22 pm

Local tv reported that it was due to a mentally unstable female.
 
phishphan70
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:23 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 5:25 pm

CNN now says NORAD scrambled (2) F-15's to escort the 767 to Maine
 
blast
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:25 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 6:49 pm

Apparently, one of the flight's passengers, a Cameroon-born woman, said she had some device surgically implanted. "Out of an abundance of caution the flight was diverted to Bangor where it was met by law enforcement", said Transport Security Administration spokeswoman Jonella Culmer to the BBC.

The F15 inteception seems like the right thing.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18162230

[Edited 2012-05-22 11:52:40]
 
D L X
Posts: 11639
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 7:17 pm

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/...ause-security-issue-163233786.html


"Naw, you got it all wrong! Dude asked me if they were real, and I said, 'no, but aren't they da bomb?'"

Seriously, who tells people they have a surgically implanted device just for the heluvit?
 
MDCJets
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2001 10:06 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 11:09 pm

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/...ause-security-issue-163233786.html

According to this article, the TSA instructed the captain to lie to the passengers, telling them that they were stopping for fuel due to "uncharacteristically strong headwinds." I have not heard of this happening before (being told to lie to passengers). Is this standard procedure? What if the captain had refused to lie? Would he face punishment from the TSA? I can imagine when passengers heard the truth, many of them must have been quite angry.

Also, the picture appears to be an A330, but the article says 767. Anyone know for sure?
 
B6JFKH81
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:35 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 11:28 pm

Quoting MDCJets (Reply 8):
Also, the picture appears to be an A330, but the article says 767. Anyone know for sure?

Flightaware and the articles indicate 767. Also, the picture above is very much so a 767. There are no winglets, the empennage is tapered, MLGs are not spaced apart as far, that is definitely a 767. I have a feeling it is just elongated because it was a screen shot off of a wide-screen monitor.
"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
 
A320ajm
Posts: 587
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 11:57 pm

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 11:34 pm

Quoting MDCJets (Reply 8):
According to this article, the TSA instructed the captain to lie to the passengers, telling them that they were stopping for fuel due to "uncharacteristically strong headwinds."

In my opinion, ignorane is sometimes bliss. The passengers not knowing this probably saved them from a lot of panic and anxiety. A plane full of panicked, scared people does not help the situation in the slightest.

A320ajm
If the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, 'This was their finest hour.'
 
User avatar
seabosdca
Posts: 4921
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:33 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Tue May 22, 2012 11:38 pm

Perhaps coerced into transporting drugs internally?

Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 9):
I have a feeling it is just elongated because it was a screen shot off of a wide-screen monitor

   Quite definitely a 767-200ER.
 
User avatar
stasisLAX
Posts: 2924
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:04 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 12:09 am

Quoting D L X (Reply 7):
Seriously, who tells people they have a surgically implanted device just for the heluvit?

Testing our defenses, perhaps? Wanting to see what actions the airline and Homeland Security would take in this type of situation. Admittedly, a surgically implanted explosive on a passenger is TSA and Homeland Security Department's worst nightmare. Thus, the F-15 scrambled and diversion to BGR to get the plane down as quickly as possible.

According to CNN, passengers heard an annoucement inquiring if there was a doctor onboard. Later, there was an announcement from the captain that the plane was making an unscheduled stop for fuel due to unexpectedly strong headwings, but the captain did NOT disclose where they would be landing. Once the plane was on the ground, security authorities and ICE came on board the plane and removed the person from the rear of the aircraft. Passengers reported that the removal happenned very quickly and quietly. Bizarre situation, but kudos to the US crew involved.

[Edited 2012-05-22 17:12:34]
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety!" B.Franklin
 
boeingfever777
Posts: 1990
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:35 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 12:09 am

Passenger should be charge with interference, billed for the diversion, and deported.
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre.
 
Navion
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 1:52 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 12:13 am

What is the registration number of this 762?
 
georgewall42
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 1:46 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 12:39 am

Quoting MDCJets (Reply 8):

I'd say the #1 priority of the crew in this situation is to get the plane safely and securely to the diversion airport. Keeping passengers calm is the best strategy, and mentioning a security issue while the plane is still in the air doesn't add to the safety of the aircraft. It's also possible the passenger in question had severe mental health issues, and there's no need to add extra stress to her situation either at that point in time either.

Hopefully, the captain came on after the situation was resolved and explained everything. Most passengers would probably understand. And, as for the few that don't, it ain't a democracy on board.
 
71Zulu
Posts: 1605
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:42 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 12:48 am

Av Herald says reg was N251AY
Clickable links only please!
 
User avatar
chrisnh
Posts: 3331
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 3:59 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 3:16 am

The F-15s scrambled from Barnes in western Massachusetts, the only deployed F-15s in New England, I believe. These planes were based in the Cape Cod area, at Otis, before the whole wing was repositioned in Westfield, MA. These F-15s (when they were based at Otis) were the ones scrambled (albeit a bit late through no fault of their own) on 9/11.

As for the stop in Bangor for more fuel, that's a semi-regular happening at KBGR...although obviously for the 757s facing stiff winds. But I do recall many times that Delta's Stuttgart-Atlanta flight had to stop at BGR and it was a 763. That's because of a 'hill' near the departure end of the Stuttgart runway that prevented the plane from climbing over it with full fuel. So, they 'tech-stopped' at BGR many times...mostly in the winter.

In today's case, I wonder whether passengers were able to clear customs and/or immigration. Usually to pass through customs you need your luggage in your possession. In today's event I'm not sure they went to the extreme of removing all the luggage, too. Although the plane was on the ground for over 3 hours which might have given them enough time to do that.
 
affirmative
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 3:25 am

Same story is going on Avherald.

Consider this, that I read on the Avherald site.

If you have a pacemaker or similar "device" implanted and you suffer from heart attack symptoms you need to tell people if your able since a defibrillator will most certainly kill you if used. And if you think you're having a heart attack I can assure you you don't feel calm and composed. If you're also from cameroon that really doesn't help your case flying into the US these days. Sad but true.

Could also be that while setting 7700 on the transponder the flight crew accidentally flipped by 7500 and thus ringing the big bell. It happened not too long ago in the UK and some fighters were scrambled too.

cheers.
I love the smell of Jet-A1 in the morning...
 
BE77
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:15 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 9:56 am

Quoting MDCJets (Reply 8):
I have not heard of this happening before (being told to lie to passengers). Is this standard procedure? What if the captain had refused to lie?

  Pilots having to lie is quit common, actually..."We expect maintenance to have us fixed and going in 10 minutes", "The ride today will be smooth without many bumps", and of course, all of the obvoius ones like "Of course I will respect you in the morning" and "I had 8000 hours PIC in lear jets by the time I was 24", etc.
A fuel stop fib is a pretty easy sell for a security diversion, if the cause wasn't obvious in the cabin already. Only someone reallly geeky about airliners (ie. anyone reading this) would wonder why a 767 was short on fuel if the flight was on time for arrival.

Quoting stasisLAX (Reply 12):
Thus, the F-15 scrambled and diversion to BGR to get the plane down as quickly as possible

Not sure on when the decision to land was, but it doesn't sound quite 'as soon as possible' since YYT, YHZ, and YQX are generally all 'gotta land now' options (as we know, it doesn't happen every day, but those airports do get some unexpected spotting opportunities). F15's are fast, but they were there for the landing so they must have had some notice to get there from Cape Cod, suggesting the flight was not in a panic to land.
Bangor would of course be a better choice for US Air on a US bound flight if the landing is precautionary, not an emergency (customs / immigration, legal reasons, much easier to reroute pax, etc.).
Tower, Affirmitive, gear is down and welded
 
boeing773W
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:03 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 1:26 pm

Quoting D L X (Reply 7):
"Naw, you got it all wrong! Dude asked me if they were real, and I said, 'no, but aren't they da bomb?'"

  
 
YULWinterSkies
Posts: 1266
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 11:42 pm

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Wed May 23, 2012 2:44 pm

Quoting BE77 (Reply 19):
Only someone reallly geeky about airliners (ie. anyone reading this) would wonder why a 767 was short on fuel if the flight was on time for arrival.

No. Any aircraft can run unexpectedly low on fuel if the amount of fuel necessary to cover the flight is miscalculated. Or if the refueling guy screws up. Even with a 787.

Quoting boeingfever777 (Reply 13):
Passenger should be charge with interference, billed for the diversion, and deported.

What a beautifully uninformed comment and accusation without evidence. (read quote below). She might also very well have a bad English and no idea how what she was saying got interpreted. This has happened before. Notably to a French guy who was sick on a toilet on an AA flight and ended up in prison for it...
That's why I recommend anybody who is not comfortable enough with English to avoid flying into the US on a US airline.

Quoting affirmative (Reply 18):
If you have a pacemaker or similar "device" implanted and you suffer from heart attack symptoms you need to tell people if your able since a defibrillator will most certainly kill you if used.
Quoting BE77 (Reply 19):
Pilots having to lie is quit common, actually..."We expect maintenance to have us fixed and going in 10 minutes",

Yup.
When I doubt... go running!
 
jporterfi
Posts: 463
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:25 am

RE: U.S. Airways Flight Diversion

Thu May 24, 2012 8:48 am

Quoting boeing773W (Reply 20):
Any aircraft can run unexpectedly low on fuel if the amount of fuel necessary to cover the flight is miscalculated. Or if the refueling guy screws up.

Absolutely true. Remember the Gimli Glider (AC 143) back in July of '83?

Quoting YULWinterSkies (Reply 21):
That's why I recommend anybody who is not comfortable enough with English to avoid flying into the US on a US airline.

Sad, but true in this age of heightened security. I sincerely wish that this wasn't an issue, but agree that the flight crew did what it had to do given that situation.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests