ACA330
Topic Author
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 1999 4:13 am

737-200 Service Ceiling

Fri Feb 23, 2001 12:13 am

First of all I am non-technical.

I always thought that the maximum service ceiling for a 737-200 was FL350.
Yesterday I was tracking my girlfriend's flight from IAH - YYZ on Air Canada(operated by CP), and it was reporting at FL370.

I was tracking this flight at flightview.com. Is this possible, or do you think there was a reporting error ?

Thanks.
 
OldMan
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:38 am

RE: 737-200 Service Ceiling

Fri Feb 23, 2001 1:12 am

Hi, Most likely a reporting problem, I "think" you are correct at 35,000' But the real issue is why it was shown at 37,000'. I have used something similar and it is called flight tracker. There have been several times where I have known that the aircraft type was a B757 and on the site it is listed as B752! Sent them email but all 757's are still shown as 752's Humm, must be a new one out there  Laugh out loud
 
777X
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:44 am

RE: Oldman

Fri Feb 23, 2001 1:33 am

B752 is short for B757-200, which is what most of those 757's are, or are you referring to a flight which you know was a 757-300?

 
OldMan
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:38 am

RE: Oldman

Fri Feb 23, 2001 4:23 am

777X
Do you know that for a fact? The reason I ask is after "talking" to the Flight Tracker site in DEN they were not aware of it. In addtion, if that is the case and it may well be, why is B737 equipment not shown as B732 or 733 734etc etc ?
 
KALB
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2000 12:33 pm

RE: Oldman

Fri Feb 23, 2001 8:58 am

777X is correct. 752 is shorthand for 757-200. Travel agents use this short hand for inteneraries. 732=737-200, 733=737-300, 737=737-700, and so forth. Flight Tracker uses this same nomenclature.
 
OldMan
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:38 am

RE: Oldman

Fri Feb 23, 2001 9:38 pm

KALB I was not aware of that. Thankyou
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: 737-200 Service Ceiling

Fri Feb 23, 2001 11:14 pm

Back to the original question, the ceiling of the 737-200 can be either FL350 or FL370, depending upon the type of cabin pressure controller installed, along with all the supporting paperwork from Boeing, etc. Two of the airlines I've worked for had -200s, and we could go to FL370 with one, but the other was only good up to FL350.

As far as aircraft types go, all the positiong data comes from FAA's aircraft situation display (ASD) which uses (in its "raw" form) FAA radar data, including the data tags with FAA contractions as far as aircraft types. The treip.com uses the FAA versions, i.e. B733, B734, etc. for respective -300 and -400 variants, and my guess is that some other tracking sites "dumb down" this aspect to a simplistic "B737" for their customers in order not to confuse them.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
Guest

RE: 737-200 Service Ceiling

Mon Mar 12, 2001 12:12 pm

The nomenclature issue reminds me of a recent trip I took from BGR (Maine) to Kodiak, Alaska. On my itinerary, the flights were listed as Saab 340, B-762, B737, B737, and B737. The 762 was operated by AA and the 3 737s were operated by AS. I don't know why the 737s weren't abbreviated as 2 734s and 1 732 (as I had known them to be). Oldman, it seemed that you experienced something similar with the 757 and 737. This is a stretch, but does it have anything to do with the 737-700. Either way you look at it, that is a 737. I don't know.
 
goboeing
Posts: 2433
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 5:31 am

RE: KALB/737-700

Tue Mar 13, 2001 7:37 am

I believe I'm correct, since "737" could be used either way, the 732,744,etc. method of naming a 737-700 is 73G. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's correct.
Nick
 
A330300
Posts: 508
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:06 pm

RE: 737-200 Service Ceiling

Thu Mar 15, 2001 2:44 pm

Usually these days, 737 refers to the 737-200.
 
BlatantEcho
Posts: 1820
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 10:11 am

GoBoeing

Thu Mar 15, 2001 3:00 pm

Goboeing is correct. 737-700 is hte 73G. Just curious A330300, how do you figure that all 737s refer to 737-200???

BlatantEcho
They're not handing trophies out today

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PITingres, StereoTechque, sunrisevalley and 19 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos