Topic Author
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 1999 2:41 am

The Benefit Of Winglets

Fri Jun 22, 2001 4:26 pm

What is the technical benefit of winglets? Fuel saving? Less inertia?

If the benefit is real, why some new aircrafts (i.e. 777, some new 737 versions, etc) do not have them?

Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2001 8:10 am

RE: The Benefit Of Winglets

Sun Jun 24, 2001 5:25 am

Winglets basically help destroying vortices that are generated at the wingtip and create drag (thus they reduce drag), and they increase lift a bit.

I'm not sure why they are not implemented on 777s and 737NGs. They both share similar wing profile, so I guess they must be very effective and don't show need for using winglets. Still it's puzzling since the Boeing Business Jet (BBJ) has 8-foot-tall winglets and has 5% fuel saving and a 300 nautical mile increased range.

There has been some discussion on this topic, try the forum search thing.

Posts: 1907
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 10:11 am

RE: The Benefit Of Winglets

Sun Jun 24, 2001 2:59 pm

777s advanced wing doesn't need them at this point.

738's have been certifed and some are already fitted wih them, 73G's will be certifed for winglets in July of this year.

Boeing is also working on winglets for the 742 and 737 Classics.

Posts: 692
Joined: Wed May 19, 1999 12:31 am

RE: The Benefit Of Winglets

Mon Jun 25, 2001 7:43 am

Winglets decrease wingtip vortices which are the biggest causes of lift induced drag (induced drag).
But at the same time, parasite drag is increased, so you have to look if the net result wil be an advantage.
For long flights, winglets are a good thing, short haul flights really do not need a winglet equipped plane.
Posts: 3549
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 1999 11:34 am

RE: The Benefit Of Winglets

Mon Jun 25, 2001 10:32 am

The following is taken from an article published in the Putnam Aeronautical Review in May 1989 :-

Wing tip drag has been known about since the early days of flight. This drag can be reduced by increasing the wingspan, however this has the negative effect of increasing the bending moment at the wing root. To overcome this you have to build a heavier structure which counterbalances the benefit of reducing the vortex drag.

Interest in Vortex drag didn't really happen until the late 1940's when the US found the solution by fitting simple end plates to the wing tips. Unfortunatly it was found that to be efficient these end plates had to be quite large which induced drag of their own which once again negated the reduction in vortex drag.

Interest then waned again until the oil crisis focused everyones attention on fuel consumption. At this time NASA took a look at the subject and developed what are now known as winglets

As we know, the winglet operates in the circulation field around the wingtip. Airflow in this area is spanwise with the air below the wing spilling round to the upper surface. The winglet tends to produce a large side force and because the side force vectors are approx perpendicular to the local flow, the side forces produced have a forward (thrust) componant which reduces the a/c trailing edge vortex. This is similar to the principle that enables sailing boats to travel upwind by tacking.

The side force produced by a winglet, and so the thrust generated, depends on the strength of the circulation flow around the wingtip. Now since the circulation strength is a product of the amount of lift in the wing tip area, winglets are most effective on a/c requireing high lift such as exec jets & heavy commercial transports.

Some practical figures.

Fitting winglets to the Cessna 421C produced a payload increase of 50 Lbs and a 25% increase in max ROC. Cruise speed is increased by 10 kts and the a/c is more stable.

On a Cessna 414A Chancellor the drag reduction gives an 300 Lbs payload increase with no loss of climb or cruise performance. Alternatively with a standard payload the time to climb to 18000 Ft is reduced by 25%. Additionally winglets have been found to reduce the tendancy to dutch roll.

Moving up the scale to the 747-400 the 6 Ft winglets on this a/c can either provide a fuel burn improvement of 2% or, if extra range is required, a range increase of 1%.

On a A300-600 the tip fence gives a fuel saving of 1% @ cruise speed and on the A310-300 1.5%. The 1% fuel saving equates to 36,000 galls over a 1 year period.

The addition of tip fences to the A320 produces a fuel reduction of 1.5%

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Woodreau and 4 guests

Popular Searches On

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos