bigphilnyc
Posts: 3874
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 10:43 pm

JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Thu Aug 01, 2002 5:55 pm

I don't understand why I never seem to see planes departing on 31R, which from what I understand is because of noise abatement.

There is nothing there for which to abate noise!!!!

LGA has houses all over near it, and they only divert traffic when the stuck up rich people at the US Open whine about it in late August.

What's the deal with JFK departures and noise abatement? Why 31L and not 31R?
Phil Derner Jr.
 
CPH-R
Posts: 6058
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 5:19 pm

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Thu Aug 01, 2002 8:05 pm

Quite simple: 31L is 11,248 ft. long, while 31R is 8976 ft. long.
It makes most sense to use the longest runway for takeoffs.

About the noise abatement, you don't have to rich in order to have the right to protest if the noise levels grows to high. There ARE plenty of houses around JFK, and since the 31L Canarsie Climb departure almost at once takes you out over the oceans, it makes more sense, in my view, to use 31L over 31R.
 
EastCoast
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue May 16, 2000 12:50 pm

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Thu Aug 01, 2002 8:35 pm

Phil -

LGA very rarely use RWY 22 for departures for the same reason.
 
Jeff G
Posts: 438
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2002 9:56 am

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 1:53 am

The departure procedures for 31L and 31R are the same: a left turn towards Canarsie. So there would be no point in sending traffic off of both runways if the traffic had to be staggered anyway. Typically, 31L is used for departures and 31R for arrivals. Also, there is little room for taxiing aircraft near the departure end of 31R, while there are long parallel taxiways leading to 31L. Looks like geometry more than noise is the issue.
 
FrequentFlier
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2000 10:45 am

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 1:59 am

I think it might also have something to do with the restrictions put into place after the Belle Harbor crash last year. Apparently, they were going to get rid of most of the air traffic over that spot to ease peoples' worries.
 
H. Simpson
Posts: 933
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 7:30 am

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 2:24 am

Frequentflier, even before the crash of AA587, Belle Harbor was always under the departure route of JFK. 31R is occasionally used for departure, but only limited to Saab 340 (American Eagle). After the departure, most Saab 340 are vectored toward NE bound byt the tower, so you won't be able to see their departures.

On 13R, it's whole other story! Big grin
 
bigphilnyc
Posts: 3874
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 10:43 pm

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 2:47 am

Simpson, sayign that Belle Harbor is under the departure route is like saying that planes should not fly over Ohio. Have you ever seen how high up the planes are by the time they reach Bele Harbor? The noise at that point is almost nil.

I'm not expert at measure altitude by sight, but those planes have to be at least 2 or 3 thousand feet up already. It takes the plane a couple minutes to even get over Belle Harbor.

East Coast, yes, granted for LGA Rwy22, but what about from August 26th to September 8th, during the US Open, when planes departing on 13 will be making a SHARP left turn upon liftoff and going directly over College Point (my town). THAT is because of the US Open people being rich.

Diverting air traffic from over 10,000 whiny rich people to go over a town over 100,000 instead?

Yeah, that sounds fair.
Phil Derner Jr.
 
bigphilnyc
Posts: 3874
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 10:43 pm

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Mon Aug 05, 2002 9:02 am

I'm love to hear feedback in regards to the situation I posted i my previous post.

Anyone?

(This was moved here form Civil Aviation. I don't understnad how Noise Abatement is Tech Ops, I think this is as technical as airline peanuts, but oh well)
Phil Derner Jr.
 
jcxp15
Posts: 989
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 12:05 pm

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Mon Aug 05, 2002 11:56 am

Phil, it's simple. Us rich white folk do not particularly like the engine noise from airplanes, let alone at a tennis match while sitting there sipping our tea. You see, once you we leave the Upper East Side, we need to travel around with personal bodyguards in our Lincoln Towncars, because, frankly, the city has become too dangerous to get around alone. Getting back to the airplane noise, you see, it is more beneficial to have the airplanes affect the 100,000 so called "College Pointians" who live in shacks along the crime ridden streets, than affect the level of play at the US open, and the 10,000 people watching. This is the reason for the plane diversions. It's always such a task to enlighten the less "fortunate" people, but it gives me such a special feeling.
 
Leftypilot79
Posts: 446
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 6:47 am

RE: JFK Rwy31R Noise Abatement?

Tue Aug 06, 2002 3:53 am

Jcpx  Laugh out loud

That is very funny. And you know thats exactly how they feel too. Classisim....you have to love it.  Yeah sure

aaron

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests