tsufang@CI
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:38 pm

Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Thu Oct 31, 2002 3:24 pm

i've visit the boeing site to see the information about commercial airplane data
one interesting different between 744 and 744 domestic version that's no wing let on domestic version
why?as i know wing let is to reduce the effect of lift reduction cause by wing span too wide and large then the pressure under the wing large than the pressure on upper surface of the wing and on the most outboard position on the wing produce a down wash force let the lift reduce
and the wing let just like a wall to against this situation occur
so how do u think about no wing let on 744 domestic version?thanks
 
PPGMD
Posts: 2398
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2001 5:39 am

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Thu Oct 31, 2002 3:54 pm

:bangs head on desk: read the Why no Winglets in 717 thread that was a while back.
At worst, you screw up and die.
 
Guest

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Thu Oct 31, 2002 4:37 pm

Dear Tsufang@ci -
xxx
PPGMD did mention it - for the 717, and I remember there had been about the same type of explanations about 747-400D a few months in the past as well...
xxx
The 747-446D (JAL) and 747-481D (ANA) are optimized for typical 90 to 120 minutes-long sectors, so they spend very little time in cruise, which is the only time winglets can be justified for economy...
xxx
I heard (or read) that - in addition, the 400D do not have the extra tank in the tail - and I also learned that if the airplane, at a later time, is used on longer sectors, the winglets can be installed... I think I read something about 2 of ANA's airplanes, retrofitted with winglets to operate on longer sectors.
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper
 
ybacpa
Posts: 1080
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 5:39 am

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Fri Nov 01, 2002 12:11 am

Without getting too technical, B747Skipper has it correct- the winglets only improve performance during extended cruise. By removing them they have slightly better takeoff performance.

And yes, this is retrofitable- either the addition of winglets, or, conversly, the removal of winglets to convert the plane to a -400D.

The fuel tank I understand is technically still possible to order with a 400D, but due to the short distances the airlines intend to operate them, this is not justified, and are therefore not ordered. I'm not sure what happens, though, if an airline converts a -400 to a -400D.
SkyTeam: The alliance for third rate airlines finally getting their act together!
 
User avatar
CCA
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 7:29 pm

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Fri Nov 01, 2002 4:06 am

It costs fuel to have the additional weight of winglets but the reduction in drag from the winglet saves fuel, so there is a balance point at which the winglet starts saving fuel over the amount it costs to carry them and this point is about 2 hours into the flight so 400D's flights of less than 2 hours save fuel due to the fact of they aren't paying for the weight of the winglets.
Now I just checked the MEL and a missing winglet causes an increase of 2.5% in fuel burn now that isn't entirely the benefit of the winglet as the end of the wing is a little untidy without the winglet which will cause some drag.

Now the stabilizer is a normal 400 stabilizer except it has none of the plumbing for the fuel tank. As an example on this -400F you can see the two blank plates on the underside of the stabilizer towards the tip on the pick below. Freighters don't usually have the stabilizer fuel option like the 400Ds


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Banyai-Riepl

P1 in A330, A340, A346, B742, B744, B748.
 
SSTjumbo
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 3:29 am

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:01 pm

I always thought this was why:


Basically, you have two winglets adding significant mass and not providing the aerodynamic benefits to rebuke the negative benefits of the winglets on short range flights, to put it in a nutshell for you. Please refer to the above picture for some sort of analogy Big grin Big grin Big grin.

Cheers
Mike
I don't know, so this is my signature.
 
N503JB
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat May 13, 2000 3:49 am

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Tue Nov 12, 2002 12:39 am


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ryan Chow



This photos I was taken in Kai Tak. What's about the happen like this? Will improve performance or TOW will reduce?

Thanks~!
HKIA Ramp Spotters
 
bio15
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2001 8:10 am

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Thu Nov 14, 2002 5:18 am

Are winglets a MEL??
 
AJ
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 1999 3:54 pm

RE: Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic?

Thu Nov 14, 2002 7:10 am

Winglet's are an MEL, normally requiring entry on the configuration deviation list.
I would imagine the lack of winglets on a Jumbo at Haneda has saved many a grazed paint job!
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Philippe Gindrat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], GloomyDe and 22 guests