NWA320
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:06 am

DC-10 Tail Exhaust Design

Mon Dec 30, 2002 8:15 am

Read the caption on this photo:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Howard Chaloner


It says "note the original tail exhaust design on No. 2 engine." Did McDonnell Douglas change the exhaust design? If they did why?


Thanks
 
VC-10
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 1999 11:34 am

RE: DC-10 Tail Exhaust Design

Mon Dec 30, 2002 8:28 am

They removed the Turbine Reverser to improve reliability & save weight
 
NWA320
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:06 am

RE: DC-10 Tail Exhaust Design

Mon Dec 30, 2002 10:21 am

Thanks, VC-10  Big thumbs up

F I L L E R
 
broke
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 8:04 pm

RE: DC-10 Tail Exhaust Design

Tue Dec 31, 2002 4:01 am

All of the early 747's, DC-10's, and L-1011's had the capability to reverse both the fan air (cold stream) and the gas generator (hot stream) air. In all applications the system was terribly unreliable for the hot stream portion of the reverser. I worked at EAL and inoperative thrust reversers on the L-1011 in the early 1970's were a common occurrence, often after shedding parts of the hot stream deflectors on the runway.
For EAL operations into LGA, all 3 reversers have to be operative. This was an EAL requirement and not regulatory. Since most of our LGA-Florida operations were L-1011's, we have a lot of reverser related delay and cancellations at LGA.
A big problem with the design of the L-1011 reverser system was that the sensors indicating the status and operation of the system were all tied to the hot stream portion of the system; so converting to a cold stream only system required some major redesign and modification work in order to accomplish it.
In addition, if you look closely at the tail cone angle on the L-1011's through the early years of operation (1972 on), you will notice that the angle changes. The early tail cones were the 22 degree configuration, later they went to the 15 degree design. The reason was drag reduction, but not much of an improvement was ever actually seen.
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: DC-10 Tail Exhaust Design

Tue Dec 31, 2002 2:52 pm

You can see the difference I think... one is straight and one is bubbled at the back.

N
 
NWA320
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:06 am

RE: DC-10 Tail Exhaust Design

Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:11 am

gigneil: Yes I can see the difference. The old one looks strange to me because I have never seen one like that at an airport.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests