Okay, some of this asked in the DC-10-30/DC-10-40 thread, but basically does anybody have any info regarding Rolls Royce power plants on McDonnell Douglas widebodies?
I believe that BA
was offered a RR
RB211 powered DC-10 (to be the -50) when it was looking for a long haul widebody smaller than its 747s. In the end it opted for the L1011-500, which offered commonality with the existing short haul TriStars, and used the same powerplants as the 742s. Argument for offering a -50 to BA
would be similar to NW
with the -40 - engine commonality. But what was the proposed range, payload, etc of this model? The Ian Allan ABC's on BA
suggest that it was superior to the L1011-500 but that BA
opted for the Lockheed aircraft on the grounds that it already operated a version of that aircraft, whereas the DC-10 would be another model in the fleet.
It's well known that developing the RB211 for the TriStar bankrupted Rolls Royce in the 70s, and nearly did for Lockheed too. But given the engine had a moderate success on the 747 (CX, BA
) why did it not so with the DC-10?
Secondly, another book I have states that Air Europe had MD
-11s on order to be powered by Rolls Royce Trents. When the carrier went belly-up the orders lapsed. Nobody else selected RR
for engine supply on the MD
-11. How would the RR MD
-11 have compared with the GE
/P&W engined models? Any noticeable differences in payload, range, etc? Also, how many orders/options did Air Europe have on the MD
-11? With the various issues effecting the MD
-11 in the late 80s/early 90s it can't have helped McDonnell Douglas to lose two UK customers (The BCal order being cancelled by BA
upon their takeover).
If somebody drops me a message who has some spare webspace I can send a scan of a drawing of the Air Europe MD-11 from the book I read it in (To give an idea of when it was written it has colour impressions of a TW RR Trent powered A330 and a CO 'Meatball' liveried A340!)
[Edited 2004-03-19 22:11:35]