ArmitageShanks
Topic Author
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 5:30 am

Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Tue Mar 30, 2004 4:46 am

After seeing some of these aircraft with massive wing flex I was wondering does this upward flex cause rubbing, stress on the jack screws or flap tracks? Would the manufacturers design the wings to operate more efficiently with the flex or is it not that big of a deal?
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11860
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Tue Mar 30, 2004 7:07 am

Can't answer your specific questions exactly, but can tell you that wings are designed to flex. If they didn't, there's a good chance they'd just snap off. Remember, the wings are carrying the whole plane through the air - in the case of a 747, that could be 800,000 lbs. That's a lot of stress to put on the wings, and the flex helps them deal with it.
~Vik
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
dw747400
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 8:24 am

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Tue Mar 30, 2004 9:24 am

I'm sure that the flex puts stress on components, but like all design features, there is a tradeoff to be made. To keep a wing from flexing would require a lot more, heavier structure. By designing a wing to flex, the manufacturer saves a lot of weight. When properly designed, I'd assume the manufacturer is able to minimize the amount of stress the wing flexing puts on sensitive components.
CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
 
SkyGuy11
Posts: 532
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2001 7:09 am

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Tue Mar 30, 2004 9:39 am

Picture jumping off your roof. Hurts a bit, huh!? Now picture doing it with your knees locked... ouch.  Big grin
.
 
QantasA332
Posts: 1473
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 5:47 pm

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Tue Mar 30, 2004 10:17 am

Sure wing flex stresses various structures and structural components, but as Dw747400 said, aircraft wings are designed with that in mind. Simple proof are all sorts of statistics reassuringly telling you the 8 to 10-odd meters a wing can be displaced from it's normal position without breaking...

Aircraft can certainly be designed with minimum stress from wing flexing in mind, but the way in which wings are designed and reinforced doesn't necessitate any drastic measures at all. Further-outboard engines are very useful wing flex counters, but moving engines specifically for that purpose isn't common (or necessary, usually) at all...

Cheers,
QantasA332
 
zak
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 12:17 pm

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Tue Mar 30, 2004 10:50 am

actually wing flexx makes wings more stable.
a good example would be the spokes on the wheel of a bike.
if you have an identical set of wheels(rims hubs etc) but on one set you use 2mm spokes that are straight and on the other one spokes that are only 2mm at the last 2cm on both ends and only 1.8mm in the middle, the wheel with the thinner spokes will be more stable.
the reason is simple: the thin spoke will flexx under peak forces and react more or less elastic. the 2mm straight spoke will not allow the wheel to flexx and you will have one or two spokes flexx forever, i.e. break.
i would guess that with wings it is a similar concept.

with material flex in mind during the design phase, you will end up with a more rugged and lighter wing. and i do also think that the wear and tear is actually lower due to the fact that peaks of stress are softened by flex, hence reducing stress.
10=2
 
Klaus
Posts: 20622
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Tue Mar 30, 2004 6:32 pm

Are there known flex-related maintenance issues?
(Wing tank leakage, flap mechanisms, piping...)
 
FredT
Posts: 2166
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 9:51 pm

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:06 pm

Periodic maintenance of structural members and checking for crack could be said to be flex related.

However, wings will flex. The question is how much, and that's where a trade-off has to be made.

Cheers,
Fred
I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17117
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Wed Mar 31, 2004 7:28 pm

Klaus, among those maintenance issues you forgot cleaning up vomit and brown-trouser residue from scared pax  Big grin
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
FredT
Posts: 2166
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 9:51 pm

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:17 pm

Checking for crack... LOL. Checking for cracks, of course. I doubt wing flex has much to do with what they do in customs...  Big grin

Cheers,
Fred
I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
 
buckfifty
Posts: 1278
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2001 4:05 pm

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Wed Mar 31, 2004 11:04 pm

On the Airbus, we keep fuel in the outboard tanks for as long as possible to reduce wing loading in turbulence. Also, the ailerons themselves will counteract the wing loading during these moments to keep the wings from touching each other.

I know the latter is an extreme example, but it has happened, like that firefighting C-130 did a couple of years ago.

And as for checking for cracks, all I can think of are plumbers, for some reason...
 
Klaus
Posts: 20622
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:41 am

RE: Wing Flex= More Wear And Tear?

Thu Apr 01, 2004 11:40 pm

Starlionblue: Klaus, among those maintenance issues you forgot cleaning up vomit and brown-trouser residue from scared pax

Hadn´t thought of that... I´m usually not all that bothered by a few bumps in the road. (Other than a peculiar accumulation of cases where it started just after I had received my first beverage...  Wink/being sarcastic)

Buckfifty: And as for checking for cracks, all I can think of are plumbers, for some reason...

Okay, that´s an image I didn´t really need... Big grin


I was just thinking that it must be a challenge to keep the tanks and all the control surfaces and subsystems intact even with the wings flexing all the time. The high reliability in practice speaks to the quality of wing design and maintenance...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 22 guests