philhyde
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 2:16 am

BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Ques?

Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:48 am

Not sure if this is a pure Tech/Ops question, but here goes.

Here at IAH we've noticed that the BA flight originating in LHR (BA295 LHR-ORD-IAH) normally has Trent 800 engines, while the flights coming from LGW (BA2025) normally have GE-90's. Is this an issue of range or is there some other explanation?

thanks,
Phil
Canon junkie - Aviation Nut
 
BA777
Posts: 2048
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 11:40 pm

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Q

Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:13 am

Phil,

Not really a tech/ops q but im happy to answer it for you  Smile

The RR 777s are by default based at LHR, thats the YMM? registered ones.

The GE 777s are mixed between LHR and LGW. There are the following LGW based ones (AFAIK and from memory, but they can change all the time):

G-VIIA, G-VIIB, G-VIIC, G-VIIR, G-VIIO, G-VIIP and either M or N

I know G-VIIG, G-VIIM, G-VIIS, G-VIIT, G-VIIU, G-VIIV, G-VIIW, G-VIIY and G-VIIX (no G-VIIZ or IIQ) are based at LHR. G-VIIK and G-VIIL have been at LHR a bit recently following their repaints from their World Tails too. G-RAES and the G-ZZZ? ones are also LHR based (these are the non-IGW models with less powerful engines).

Basically, if I've confused you...RRs from LHR, GE's from LGW although there are about 8 LHR based GE ones  Smile

Hope this helps?

Henry
 
User avatar
Crosswind
Posts: 2536
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:34 am

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Ques?

Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:45 am

BA's RR-powered 777ERs do have more range (higher MTOW) than their GE-powered 777ER aircraft, but that isn't an issue for LHR-ORD-IAH, either can very comfortably complete the flight.

As BA777 said, all the RR-powered fleet are LHR based, but you'll also find there are several different interior configurations within British Airways B777 fleet; First/Club/WT, 2 different First/Club/WT+/WT layouts and the new Club/WT+/WT configuration.

As a result certain aircraft continually fly certain routes depending on what configuration is sold for that service, for example routes where First has been withdrawn will rarely see a First-configured aircraft!

Regards
CROSSWIND
 
philhyde
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 2:16 am

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Q

Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:12 am

So is it really just an issue of maintenance for the RR-powered a/c being based at LHR?

Do much longer flights originate from LHR that would explain the need for the increased MOTW?

Thanks!
Canon junkie - Aviation Nut
 
A350
Posts: 1010
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:40 am

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Q

Fri Dec 24, 2004 7:25 pm

Can anyone tell me why they acquired both RR and GE? Which of them came first and why did BA change?

Thanks and merry Christmas

A350
 
BA777
Posts: 2048
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 11:40 pm

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Q

Fri Dec 24, 2004 8:26 pm

BA went with GE initally but then IIRC RR offered them a very good deal on the Trents. Don't forget that it'd be easier to maintain the RRs because the 757/767/747s had them, and the only BA ac with GE's was the 737 Series. The GEs were first (ZZZ?, RAES and VII? regs), then the Trents for the YMM? regs.

Henry
 
Rick767
Posts: 2613
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2000 8:11 pm

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Ques?

Fri Dec 24, 2004 8:59 pm

BA had awful problems with the GE's on introduction to service with the 777 as well, must have factored to some extent in the decision to accept the RRs.
I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Q

Sat Dec 25, 2004 1:20 am

The horrible problems with the GE90 was part of it, but also deposits on RB211s for cancelled 744s could be turned into Trent 800s so they elected to do so rather than lose the money.

N
 
DfwRevolution
Posts: 8545
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:31 pm

RE: BA 777 W/GE-90 And Trent 800 Engines - Route Q

Sat Dec 25, 2004 3:12 am

BA had awful problems with the GE's on introduction to service with the 777 as well, must have factored to some extent in the decision to accept the RRs.

Rolls Royce was also ready to offer an uprated Trent 895 while GE was not prepared to offer an uprated GE90. With the Trent 800's lighter weight, this uprated engine offered significant payload advantages over the GE90 powered aircraft. Given the other reasons listed, buying a subfleet of Trent-powered 777's made a good deal of sense IMO.

Don't forget that it'd be easier to maintain the RRs because the 757/767/747s had them, and the only BA ac with GE's was the 737 Series.

ASAIK, the RB211 and Trent 800 have little in common other than coming from the same manufacturer. They are both three-spool turbofans, but their design philosophies are very different. I've always equated the two powerplants to the difference in the CF6 and GE90... one descended from the other.

A common supplier might allow some cost reduction, but not the major cost savings of mechanic training, maintenance spairs, ect.....

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: agill and 51 guests