BWIA330
Topic Author
Posts: 821
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2001 10:22 am

Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:20 pm

Hey,

Is the Md-80 series a costly aircraft to maintain and operate? Does it burn alot of fuel? How does it compare to a 737 NG or A320 family aircraft?

Regards,

BWIA330
 
September11
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:49 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:33 pm

I'll say cheaper to use 1999-built MD-83 on ORD-SFO route than 1990-built A320. I hope I am correct.
Airliners.net of the Future
 
NW747-400
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 1999 4:42 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:26 pm

September11: not necessarily correct from a powerplant standpoint. Even the new MD80 series use JT8 series engines, all of which are medium bypass with a ratio of 2:1 (1:1 in 727). Lower bypass ratios are less efficient at subsonic cruise speeds. The A320 series utilize high bypass turbofans (4:1 bypass ratio or higher) and are much more efficient.

There are other factors of course, just my 2 cents though.
 
PIA747
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 10:46 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:59 am

I believe MD83 is equipped with the upgraded JT8 which is lighter and more fuel effecient.

How ever i am very interested in getting some numbers on this comparrison.
 
su184
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 9:48 pm

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:22 am

PIA747: Don't get your point, why would airlines like Austrian, old-Swissair, Alitalia,... and others replace their MD80's with A320 family or 73G's if they were not more efficient and cheaper to operate in the longer term, add to their efficiency the noise level of the MD80's, some airports charge their fees taking into consideration the noise category, you cannot operate MD80's from several airports during the night curfew that is imposed, in certain cases you can take-off but you have to pay extra noise fees.
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:46 am

I believe MD83 is equipped with the upgraded JT8 which is lighter and more fuel effecient.

The JT8D-200 series found on all MD-80s is a relatively low bypass turbofan. The A320's engines, and the 737NGs, are significantly more efficient.

N
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15260
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:12 am

The MD-80 has a narrower cross section which could make it more efficient than the A320.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
N1120A
Posts: 26467
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:39 am

>The JT8D-200 series found on all MD-80s is a relatively low bypass turbofan. The A320's engines, and the 737NGs, are significantly more efficient.<

While the MD-80's are lower bypass, they are also lower powered and lighter. Also, the MD-80's frame is lighter. There really is no comparison on range and cargo carriage, where the 737/A320 win hands down.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
FLY777UAL
Posts: 4830
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 3:49 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:00 pm

I found here: http://www.icao.int/icao/en/ro/allpirg/allpirg4/wp28app.pdf that the MD-80 and A320 have roughly the same direct operating cost per hour (as of summer 2000), while the 737G has a little lower, and the 738 even lower DOC/hr.

MD-80: $2,285
MD-87: $1,827
A320: $2,273
A319: $2,156
737G: $1,993
738: $1,583

Fuel consumption seemed to be the main factor in determining the differences between DOC/hr.

MD-80: 799 gal
MD-87: 741 gal
A320: 886 gal
A319: 821 gal
73G: 690 gal
738: 564 gal

As that list was done in 2000 before fuel shot up, jetfuel prices were pegged at $.70, so while the operating cost order remains the same, double the fuel costs listed on the website to find a more accurate DOC.

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L

 
CPDC10-30
Posts: 4681
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2000 4:30 pm

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:06 pm

If those figures were true, no airline would ever buy the 73G
 
FLY777UAL
Posts: 4830
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 3:49 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:10 pm

Well they're from the ICAO, and the 73G is still cheaper to operate than its direct competitor, the A319...

The 73G is a little misleading as it is lumped together with the 733 for whatever reason (none of the other planes are joined like that).

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L
 
captaingomes
Posts: 6251
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2001 1:33 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:23 pm

Actually, the MD-80 has a slightly higher cost per hour according to the above figures, compared to the A320, but the A320 carries a few more passengers, and substantially more cargo. Therefore, the revenue potential for the A320 is greater than with the MD-80.

The fuel efficiency of the 73G is quite impressive, and I'm wondering if that's mainly a factor of its higher cruise altitude thanks to its larger wing?
"it's kind of like an Airbus, it's an engineering marvel, but there's no sense of passion" -- J. Clarkson re: Coxster
 
PIA747
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 10:46 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:46 pm

Considering the low lease rates of MD80, particularly the MD83 make it an attractive choice for start up low cost operation. This can be seen in airlines such as jetsgo, Kalula, Lion air and several more in Indonesia.
 
mandala499
Posts: 6458
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 10:59 pm

End of 2003, MD82s would be about 1600USD/H ACMI based on 250hrs per month...

Anyways, Lion seems to be the only one in Indonesia that is going big with the MDs... Bouraq gave up their MDs, Star seems to be the only other one here... Airfast also recently began using MD80s, but mainly for charters/732 supplement...

Mandala499
When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
 
AUAE
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 4:41 am

RE: Md-80 Operating Costs Compared To A320

Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:48 pm

For 12 months ending Mar 2004 for US based reporting airlines....from Eclat

Average Block Hour costs (ave seats):

MD80 - $2,725 (134)
A320 - $2,387 (147)
737-800/900 - $2,498 (153)

Each of these had at least 5 airlines reporting. Keep in mind that stage length differed, so it still isn't a 100% accurate comparision.

Shawn
Air transport is just a glorified bus operation. -Michael O'Leary, Ryanair's chief executive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests