Topic Author
Posts: 2587
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 12:17 pm

Aircraft Wingspan Effects

Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:39 pm

It surprises me to see that the 777, A330, and A340 all have greater wingspans than the 747 question to you is why...the 747 classic is a wider, much heavier aircraft than all three of these...and with the exceptions of the A346 and 773 is longer than all three of these types. Why was decided that these three aircraft have a greater wingspan than the 747 Classics? I'm just not quite down to this concept yet...I always thought the smaller the plane, the less wingspan you needed. Yet the 772ER is 23 feet shorter than the 747 Classic and has a wingspan greater than the 747 Classic's by about 3 feet.
Fly one thing; Fly it well
Posts: 2166
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 9:51 pm

RE: Aircraft Wingspan Effects

Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:24 pm

A higher aspect ratio (wing span/mean chord) is beneficial for aerodynamic efficiency. On the other hand, a long, slender wing will require thicker beams meaning more weight per unit wing area. As always, it is a compromise. Progress within construction and materials make it possible to build slender wings without as much of a weight penalty and the wings get longer.

Have a look at gliders. They are very light and small and yet have very long wings.
I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:24 pm

RE: Aircraft Wingspan Effects

Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:51 am

I agree with FredT. Additionally, the third dimension to span and chord is the cross-section. Remember, the 747 classic was designed during the mid-late 60s when computational power was still in it's infancy and a predominant amount of aerodynamic data was obtained by testing in the wind-tunnel. With improvements in computing power, Computational Fluid Dynamics software has yeided much more sophisticated aerofoil sections tailored for different phases of flight. The trend on commercial airliner wing design has been to move toward slender, longer wings made possible by the wing cross-section. I know this is a rather simplistic answer to a very complex subject, but I hope it helps.

Nec Dextrorsum Nec Sinistrorsum
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:13 am

RE: Aircraft Wingspan Effects

Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:04 am

Also remember that "span" is from tip to tip in a straight line, not the line of the leading edge... and the 747 has a much more swept wing than the 777. This means from leading edge to tip is a longer distance on the 747, which along with the the other features of the wing would give it a greater area for the same "span".

747-400 = 37.5 degrees sweep
777-300 = 31.6 degrees sweep
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those that don't.
Posts: 6725
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 1999 5:42 am

RE: Aircraft Wingspan Effects

Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:24 am

The 747 has a greater wing area than the 777. The MD-11 and DC-10 also feature a wing sweep greater than that of the 777. (Not sure about the L-1011).

Also, doesn't the greater sweep of the wing allow for a higher crusing speed? IIRC, the MD-11, DC-10, 747 and 727 have a greater cruising speed than later Boeings.

"Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy. Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy.....Okay, fine, we'll just turn 190 and Visual Our Way
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:24 pm

RE: Aircraft Wingspan Effects

Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:19 am

Quoting UAL747 (Reply 4):
Also, doesn't the greater sweep of the wing allow for a higher crusing speed?

That is my understanding as well. IIRC (this is from my foggy memory, so if I'm wrong, please correct me), the B-47, 367-80 and the 707 were built with wings swept back at 35 deg. Initially, for the 747, Boeing wanted the aircraft to cruise at M0.87 or so. Initial designs put the wing sweep angle at around 40 deg. However fears of Dutch roll and other aerodynamics related gremlins tempered the design and a compromise sweep angle (splitting the difference) of 37.5 deg was implemented. With this sweep back angle the 747, even today, has the highest cruising speed of all commercial airliners of M0.85. Unfortunately, higher cruising speeds also leads to higher fuel burn so for the sake of better trip economics, newer airliners cruise between M0.81 and M0.84.
Nec Dextrorsum Nec Sinistrorsum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: StereoTechque and 1 guest

Popular Searches On

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos