MX757
Topic Author
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:38 pm

A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:24 pm

I'm sure all of you have been enjoying the NW/striking AMFA mechs threads on the civil aviation forum. I was wondering how you guys feel about the mechs striking and NW using "scabs" or "replacement mechs" if you prefer. I don't want to start a flame session. I would like to know how other people in my profession feel about it. Good or Bad.

This is how I feel about it:

I would never cross a picket line. It's doesn't matter if I was laid off and needed a job. It's something I could not and would not do. To me it's wrong and I would feel like crap knowing that I'm taking some guy's job. I can always find another job. It's harder to find your self respect again after you lose it. That's just me of course.

This is how everybody I work with feels about it.

Besides if I do get laid off I was thinking about taking a job as a prison guard at a women's corrections facility. Lousy pay but great benefits bigthumbsup 

It seems to me also that NW didn't give their AMT's no other alternative but to strike.

Your opinions on this would be greatly appreciated.  Smile
Is it broke...? Yeah I'll fix it.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11764
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:41 pm

Hey man....I'm not an AMT or airline employee. I'm not even remotely connected to the industry right now. But I did ask a similar question as a sidenote in a previous thread, and got nary a reply to that particular question. Here's the thread:
Takeoff Speeds/Other Question (by Vikkyvik Aug 21 2005 in Tech Ops)

Good luck.

~Vik
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
MX757
Topic Author
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:38 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:46 pm

Let's see what happens.

Thanks for the info........
Is it broke...? Yeah I'll fix it.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:03 pm

Quoting MX757 (Thread starter):
would never cross a picket line. It's doesn't matter if I was laid off and needed a job. It's something I could not and would not do

Same here.Got to feel for them too.They must be having a good reason.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
Fokker Lover
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 10:05 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:53 pm

I don't go to the civil aviation forum, and I haven't been following the strike.
I do have a few thoughts though.

Back in the 70's the Teamsters went on strike. They told the independant drivers that they were on strike also. They told them, "If we see you driving your truck we will shoot you", and then they did. Nothing moved for a week. When it was over ALL truckers benefitted.

We as aircraft mechanics are weak. We are afraid to stand up for ourselves, let alone anybody else. Instead of fighting for all mechanics, AMFA, and the IAM are more concerned about fighting with each other. The airlines love this. It shows them that we are not united, and they can do to us whatever they please. Every time we say yes to a concessionary contract, it shows the airline that they didn't ask for enough. We haven't been pushed to our limit and they will come back for more. A few years ago USAir told the IAM to give up everything or we will layoff your members. The IAM bowed down and said ok. We took paycuts, gave up holidays, vacation, our pensions, numerous work rule changes, and lost our dignity. In return the company got rid of the utility workers and most of us mechanics. Reservations and baggage handlers were wiped out also.

Unions are a necessary evil. Companies that have unions on their property have done something in the past to deserve that union.
Unions became powerful in the early 1900's because people had been pushed to their limits and had nothing to lose. Today, unions are big businesses that we pay to protect us from other big businesses. When they quit doing what we paid them to do, it was time to get rid of them. Unfortunately we didn't even have the balls to do that. That means that we will eventually lose everything that our grandfathers fought for. We will then reach our desperate limit, and start everything over again. The question is how many generations will it take, and how much blood will be spilled again?

P.S. Piss poor business practices is what hurt the airlines, not union benefits. (QUIT SELLING SEATS FOR LESS THAN WHAT IT COSTS TO FLY, AND QUIT BUYING NEW AIRPLANES WHILE IN BANKRUPTCY.)
Look at SouthWest Airlines as the shining example. They are the most productive and profitable airline going. They are also unionized, and the highest paid in the industry. People actually enjoy working there.
10,000 years ago we would have eaten you. Today, we drag you along and allow you to pollute the gene pool.
 
Buzz
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 1999 11:44 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:14 am

Hi MX757, Buzz here. I hear that NWA isn't a nice company to work for, and this strike has been a long time coming. I had been getting postcards for several months to come work for a company in DTW, MEM, MSP.... guess who that might be?
Any they'll pay up to 32 bucks an hour... reading Forbes magazine a couple weeks ago the pay was more like 26 bucks an hour. (less than they were willing to pay a union, no mention of benefits) If you can't take care of your regular people, why pay temporary people even more... then dispose of them in a few years. I'm not interested in the short term job.

If a company will take good care of their people, a union isn't needed. But i've seen enough "managment by intimidation" to need a union where i work.

Sure, i'm an expensive mechanic. Watch how productive i can be!
And Fokker Lover has a valid point that i've read other places: Sell the product for a price that covers the cost. You can only wage a "fare war" only so long before you start doing stupid things. "It's the Revenue, dummy".

g'day
 
User avatar
Jetlagged
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:00 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:37 am

Quoting Fokker Lover (Reply 4):
Back in the 70's the Teamsters went on strike. They told the independant drivers that they were on strike also. They told them, "If we see you driving your truck we will shoot you", and then they did. Nothing moved for a week. When it was over ALL truckers benefitted.

So much for the land of the free  Wink How long did they all benefit for I wonder? Picket lines are about intimidation and bullying. If action is justified enough the picket line would be unnecessary.

Southwest gets it right by keeping it's employees happy, so they don't feel the need to strike. Most other US airlines get it wrong because they are easily blackmailed by their staff, yet don't want to reward them properly for their work. Of course you can't ignore the corporate raider style of owner, everybody suffers with them.

Unions that use their power irresponsibly usually do more harm than good to their members long term. The same goes for employers and stockholders.
The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
 
ilikeyyc
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 8:09 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:38 am

Quoting MX757 (Thread starter):
I'm sure all of you have been enjoying the NW/striking AMFA mechs threads on the civil aviation forum. I was wondering how you guys feel about the mechs striking and NW using "scabs" or "replacement mechs" if you prefer.

The amount of Anti-unionism from armchair CEOs on the civil-av forum is amazing, funny, and sometimes sickening. Please tell me why I should care about your company when you want to eliminate my job and impose hard times on my family.

Quoting MX757 (Thread starter):
I would never cross a picket line. It's doesn't matter if I was laid off and needed a job. It's something I could not and would not do. To me it's wrong and I would feel like crap knowing that I'm taking some guy's job. I can always find another job. It's harder to find your self respect again after you lose it.

And that's pretty much how I feel about it, too. Years ago I thought unions were bad and antiquated. But over time I have come to realize that they really are a necessary evil. They have, unfortunetly, become a business themselves. Someone once told me to never be loyal to a company. Sure, when times are good they will sing praises for you. But when times are bad, most managers won't care what you have done for the company. If they need to cut jobs, they will drop you in a heartbeat. And the situation at NW proves this point.

I could never cross a picket line because I would feel guilty about messing with someone else's source of income. Ironicly, I will be starting my job next week as an A&P with a non-union shop. For me, now, I have no problem with this. My priority is finding a place where I can learn as much as I can so I can be the best mechanic I can be. But as time goes on, I will be more concerned with pay and benefits so I can take care of a future family and I will want job protection. While a union can't guaruntee that, they can put up a better fight than I can alone.
Fighting Absurdity with Absurdity!
 
LMP737
Posts: 4800
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 4:06 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:57 am

Where to begin. Guess I'll start with MX757's original query.

For the sake of the mechanics on strike at NWA I hope AMFA is successful in negotiating favorable terms. However it seems that NWA has no intention of doing that. It still amazes me reading some of what has been said regarding this subject on the civil aviation forum. One would get the impression that AMFA is asking for pay raises. It just proves that there are a lot of people out there who are making judgements on bad or incomplete information. Last week I read an article in Forbes that sounded like an NWA press release.

As for the "replacement mechs". Some of them will probably argue that "Hey I have a family to support". I question the logic of that argument. You take a job that you have no idea how long it will last or what part of the country it will take you. For all the "replacement mechs" know the strike may end next week. In which case they are out of a job and have to start the job search all over again. Logic would say ones family would be better served by staying close to home. IMO opinion it makes more sense to look for work closer to home base. A job that will be a bit more stable than what NWA has to offer.

Maybe they are wishing that NWA will prevail and they will be hired on fulltime. The thought of someone hoping others will lose their jobs so they can take it makes my skin crawl. When it comes right down to it they had better hope they get hired by NWA fulltime. Because if they don't they will find it difficult outside the gates of Northwest. Right now the only major carrier that seems to be hiring is Southwest and UPS. A manager at Southwest would probably be hesitant to hire a "replacement mech" considering the AMT's there are represented by AMFA. Even if they did they would find it rough going and probably would not make probation. As for UPS only one word needs be said, teamsters.
Never take financial advice from co-workers.
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 5:03 am

According to
www.the-mechanic.com

quite a few scabs have been identified as not being out of work mechanics, but people working for other airlines, who took vacations from their main job to work as scabs to earn a few grand extra.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
aogdesk
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:26 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:12 am

I'm genuinely concerned, VERY concerned with the practice of 100% outsourced maintenance. I try very hard to give both sides of the issue equal consideration; that being said, I don't think that outsourcing in and by itself is a bad thing. What worries me is a 100% replacement workforce, brought in under VERY questionable circumstances. Insiders KNOW for a fact that a good portion of these people are working at NW because they can't find employment elsewhere (due to incompetence or lack of integrity). Insiders KNOW the horror stories, and those horrors are entirely responsible for maintaining the NW fleet now. JMNSHO
 
caboclo
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:34 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:43 am

As several have said, if a company needs a union, that is proof that there is something wrong with the company. Therefore, I would just go find a better company, rather than go on strike. Yes, that's very optimistic; I do know that there are no perfect jobs, but I think the American major airlines are about the worst jobs today. Maybe the wages are still higher than other places, but they won't be for long. Anyone who is still counting on a pension needs to wake up and smell the roses. United was the first airline to dump the pension, but not the last, and aviation is not the first industry to suffer from pensions, and lose a few big companies.

The point about operating below cost is very true, and nothing new; for some strange reason these few airlines have always taken capitalism to it's illogical extreme. That is one of the fundamental problems, not the price of oil. As long as that practice continues, the majors will not be a good place to work, and I, for one, do not plan to waste any time either on the picket line or crossing it.
Freight dogs have more fun
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:22 am

The problem with looking for a new job in the industry is that often the airlines at a certain airport have confidential (because illegal, but very hard to prove in court) agreements not to hire somebody who quit at another airline at the same airport (at least in Europe). This is being done to prevent employees from freely chosing their employer, because the airlines figure that this would drive the wages up (like going to my boss and telling him that, if he doesn't pay me more, I'll quit and apply next door). Think of it like a cartell of the employers to drive the wages down by preventing free movement of workers.
This means that any change of a job means to move to another city, often quite far away (airports being used by big airliners are often far apart).
This in turn gives trouble if you have family, e.g. your wife has a job as well and she can't find one in the other place.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
IFIXCF6
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:06 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:34 am

Add my total agreement with the comment

Quote:
Piss poor business practices is what hurt the airlines, not union benefits. (QUIT SELLING SEATS FOR LESS THAN WHAT IT COSTS TO FLY, AND QUIT BUYING NEW AIRPLANES WHILE IN BANKRUPTCY.)

The MANAGEMENT is responsible for all. I say that because they agreed to the union contracts, work rules, benefits, ticket price, and, oh yea strategic planning/position. They are losing $4M a day? It is not the mechanics or any other labor that got them in this spot. The airlines might actually want to find out what is a realistic cost to fly people around and price accordingly.

O.K. I'll stop. No, I would not cross a picket line.

Mike
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 2:29 pm

Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 12):
The problem with looking for a new job in the industry is that often the airlines at a certain airport have confidential (because illegal, but very hard to prove in court) agreements not to hire somebody who quit at another airline at the same airport (at least in Europe). This is being done to prevent employees from freely chosing their employer, because the airlines figure that this would drive the wages up (like going to my boss and telling him that, if he doesn't pay me more, I'll quit and apply next door).

Thats Exactly whats starting to happen out here.In addition that all operators plan to Agree to need a No Objection Certificate [NOC] from the previous Employer before seeking Employement with the next Employer.
Almost modern day bonded labour.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
Whiskeyflyer
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon May 13, 2002 3:07 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:33 pm

I have just come back from the states and was visiting a very large airline maintenance facility (will remain nameless) so I mentioned the strike to one of the engine shops guys.... and he responds by saying basically they are crazy going on strike as there are a lot of unemployed A&Ps around to take up positions. This guy was an A&P and I was expecting some bit of support for the striking guys but all I got was basically fear for his own job.
Looks like US aviation run on fear and lack of job security.
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:39 pm

What do you expect if the head of the Fed, Allan Greenspan, openly states that a certain number of unemployed are needed in any economy to keep salaries and inflation down? My ex-boss also constantly quoted that there were "thousands of hungry young men outside, fresh from the military or after finishing their apprenticeship who could do our job for less". The thing was that they had neither the knowledge nor the experience to do anything beyond routine tasks, like changing wheels. Advanced troubleshooting or more complicated structural repairs were beyond their skills.
Still my ex company is trying to make the licenced and experienced guys leave, to replace them with cheaper new hires. In the end only the 4 supervisors will have A&P licences. They will spend most of their shift in the office, signing the log books brought in by the unlicenced mechanics and they will be called out for endless overtime if a plane goes AOG.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
mrocktor
Posts: 1388
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:57 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:20 pm

Good job bringing the topic to a place where dissenting opinions are a minority, and then restricting the discussion to those who are on one side of the issue.

Pathetic.

I'm not even going to bother with a reply. But then, I'm not a mech, so you wouldn't want me to anyway.

mrocktor
 
aogdesk
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:26 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:46 pm

Quoting Mrocktor (Reply 17):
But then, I'm not a mech, so you wouldn't want me to anyway.

Thank you for conserving bandwidth.
 
Dalmd88
Posts: 2390
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 3:19 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:02 am

Quoting Caboclo (Reply 11):
As several have said, if a company needs a union, that is proof that there is something wrong with the company

So what is wrong at SW? It is the most unionized airline with the best mechanics contract to boot. At the end of contract top out will be $85K a year.

I agree I would never cross the picket line. Even if you don't completly agree with the stike it can be career suicide. This is a very small profession.
 
Fokker Lover
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 10:05 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 2:33 am

Quoting DALMD88 (Reply 19):
So what is wrong at SW? It is the most unionized airline with the best mechanics contract to boot. At the end of contract top out will be $85K a year

There is nothing wrong with SouthWest right now. You are correct, they are the best thing going. I'd bet though, a long time ago, something happened to convince their employees that they needed to unionize.

Quoting Whiskeyflyer (Reply 15):
he responds by saying basically they are crazy going on strike as there are a lot of unemployed A&Ps around to take up positions. This guy was an A&P and I was expecting some bit of support for the striking guys but all I got was basically fear for his own job.
Looks like US aviation run on fear and lack of job security.

Absolutely correct. That is our main problem here. Hooray for me, screw everybody else.
If we could go off into a dream world for a moment, This is what I'd like to see. Every newly licensed mechanic would be told, "No matter where you work, you won't work for less than this amount. You won't cross a picket line, and you won't undercut your fellow mechanics. If we all stick together, they have to contend with us. If we fight amongst ourselves they will pick us apart." This would benefit everybody from new hires all the way up to retirees. I actually know of 2 professions that do this. Doctors stick together like glue. You have to be a major screwup and kill several people before other doctors turn on you. The other is elevator repairmen. To even touch an elevator you must first be accepted into their union. The union then provides your training, and job assignments. They managed to have laws passed in their favor because they stick together. Starting pay is $25 an hour. Top out after 5 years is in the $40 an hour range.

I know it doesn't sound like it, but I'm not a hardcore unionist. I have much disdain for my own union. I have never voted for any of the politicians that my union supported. I'm even a business owning Republican. I believe it is because my union has lost it's way and became a big business that is only interested in membership dues. When my union takes a lesson from the elevator repair union, I'll start supporting them. In the mean time I'll do my job to the best of my ability, and won't screw my fellow mechanics.
10,000 years ago we would have eaten you. Today, we drag you along and allow you to pollute the gene pool.
 
efohdee
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:52 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:59 am

I dont know how many of you are aware of what has been going on the Pemco MRO facility in Dothan, AL. The company locked out all of their regular employees and is doing airliner maintenance with just contractors. It's a smaller version of what's going on at Northwest. The irony is Pemco does alot of NW's maintenance.
 
LMP737
Posts: 4800
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 4:06 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 4:20 am

Quoting Mrocktor (Reply 17):
Good job bringing the topic to a place where dissenting opinions are a minority, and then restricting the discussion to those who are on one side of the issue.

Pathetic.

I'm not even going to bother with a reply. But then, I'm not a mech, so you wouldn't want me to anyway.

Before you went off on your rant did you stop and think for a minute? Did it cross your mind that MX757 wanted to know what other AMT's were thinking on this subject and this was the most effective way of doing it? Or did you expect him go through the entire list of airliners.net members looking for AMT's and send each one an e-mail or instant message asking for their opinion?

By the way did MX757 state that no one else was allowed to voice their opinion.
Never take financial advice from co-workers.
 
LMP737
Posts: 4800
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 4:06 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 4:22 am

Quoting Efohdee (Reply 21):
I dont know how many of you are aware of what has been going on the Pemco MRO facility in Dothan, AL. The company locked out all of their regular employees and is doing airliner maintenance with just contractors. It's a smaller version of what's going on at Northwest. The irony is Pemco does alot of NW's maintenance.

Is PEMCO a union or non-union shop?
Never take financial advice from co-workers.
 
mrocktor
Posts: 1388
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:57 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 4:55 am

Quoting LMP737 (Reply 22):
Before you went off on your rant did you stop and think for a minute? Did it cross your mind that MX757 wanted to know what other AMT's were thinking on this subject and this was the most effective way of doing it? Or did you expect him go through the entire list of airliners.net members looking for AMT's and send each one an e-mail or instant message asking for their opinion?

True enough and I apologize for the emotive and personal post. I would edit the offending post, but cannot.

In any case, should anyone be interested in my opinion about the issue, it is quite different from the majority of the posts here. A search of my posts in civil aviation will bring up the relevant posts.

mrocktor

[Edited 2005-09-09 21:58:22]
 
B744F
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:52 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:59 am

Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 6):
How long did they all benefit for I wonder? Picket lines are about intimidation and bullying. If action is justified enough the picket line would be unnecessary.

You see, there's this thing called history. And in it, you would see that the picket line has not only caused so much good for all industries, but it has been the ONLY weapon of the worker who is constantly intimidated and bullied by their employer.

So check this history thing out some time, maybe some people might learn from it eventually
 
LMP737
Posts: 4800
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 4:06 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:30 am

Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 6):
Unions that use their power irresponsibly usually do more harm than good to their members long term. The same goes for employers and stockholders.

Corruption in the executive suites at companies like Enron, Worldcom, Tyco, Fannie Mae etc have done more harm to employees and shareholders than any union could "hope" to achieve.
Never take financial advice from co-workers.
 
efohdee
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:52 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 2:40 pm

Yes they are unionized. IAM. The old contract expired, and the company locked them out in order to force them to accept the new one. I dont know much details. Rumor has it contractors and immigrant workers are being bused onto the field at remote gates. I know quite a few who used to work there, both as contractors and direct employees. That place is a total sweatshop, and that it has gotten worse since the new mananger took charge. He's a former Delta executive. Hmmmm.
Go here
http://www.iam1632.org/

Quoting LMP737 (Reply 23):
Quoting Efohdee (Reply 21):
I dont know how many of you are aware of what has been going on the Pemco MRO facility in Dothan, AL. The company locked out all of their regular employees and is doing airliner maintenance with just contractors. It's a smaller version of what's going on at Northwest. The irony is Pemco does alot of NW's maintenance.

Is PEMCO a union or non-union shop?
 
Venus6971
Posts: 1415
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:55 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:17 pm

it would be nice if all AMT's could join one union instead of competing unions that only care about dues and anything that DNC wants. If all AMT's/A&P's formed a trade union and got the newby's out of their school's we could be as united as the elevator guys and have steady wages and not be at the mercy of a union busting CEO.
I would help you but it is not in the contract
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:59 am

Quoting Venus6971 (Reply 28):
If all AMT's/A&P's formed a trade union and got the newby's out of their school's we could be as united as the elevator guys and have steady wages and not be at the mercy of a union busting CEO.

Out here its non Existing.Although the 9W guys are working on something.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
User avatar
Jetlagged
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:00 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:41 am

Quoting LMP737 (Reply 26):
Corruption in the executive suites at companies like Enron, Worldcom, Tyco, Fannie Mae etc have done more harm to employees and shareholders than any union could "hope" to achieve.

I agree, and many of those executives responsible were jailed or fined. But that doesn't mean that unions are guilt free.

Quoting B744F (Reply 25):
You see, there's this thing called history. And in it, you would see that the picket line has not only caused so much good for all industries, but it has been the ONLY weapon of the worker who is constantly intimidated and bullied by their employer.

So check this history thing out some time, maybe some people might learn from it eventually

If you want to go back to the beginning of the union movement and the hard won workers rights that were achieved then I agree with you, but the world has moved on. Union versus Management confrontation should be a thing of the past.

Picket lines doing good? You're having a laugh surely. An earlier post talked about threats to shoot strike-breakers. Another said he would not cross a picket line because it would threaten his job prospects. The democratic process has won those rights and improvements, not picket lines.

Perhaps you should study industrial relations history in the UK. I've grown up through a lot of it. The one good thing the Thatcher government did was break the power of the unions. Since then the UK has been relatively prosperous and yet workers have not been exploited to any greater degree.

Before Thatcher we had sympathy strikes, massive threatening picket lines, so called "flying pickets", etc. All about imposing the will of a minority on the majority. Often only a minority of union members were in favour of strike action, but they were vocal activists. The silent majority either went along with it or were intimidated into joining the strike by picket lines, threats, etc.

Sympathy strikes are now illegal, picket lines are limited to just a symbolic few people (six I think) and intimidation is greatly reduced. Closed shops are illegal (you don't have to join the union if you don't want to). The union can be sued by those affected if the strike is ruled to be illegal in court (e.g. no ballot held, sympathy action, etc.). Unions protect and improve their members conditions by negotiation and third party conciliation if necessary.

Union demarcation lines have virtually disappeared. They were supposed to protect jobs, but actually created massive inefficiency which ultimately lost jobs. Do they still exist in the USA? If so it confirms my view that the USA is still in the industrial relations dark ages.

Things aren't perfect here by any means and some less enlightened employers are still exploitative. But overall the demise of the strike has been of great benefit to workers. They finally realised they were losing more by striking than they might stand to gain.
The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
 
amtrosie
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:44 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:14 am

I can not speak to the U.K., so I will not. As to Mrocktor, You admit you know nothing of the industry, especially the AMT's and yet you speak up? Remember "a fool is considered a wise man till he opens his mouth."
I agree that charging less for a seat, than the cost to fly is pure stupidity, and yet it is rampant in the U.S. Where is it guaranteed that one WILL FLY regardless of ones ability to pay. All you have to do is look at the individuals that are flying and see their disgusting behavior! Flying is not a right, it is a privilege. Why the flying public thinks that they can demean the very individuals who ensure their safety has always baffled me.
I don't know that I could cross a picket line, it would have to depend upon the circumstances of that line. In the case of NW, no. For them to give up 25% pay while the pilots only give up 15%, smacks of pure discrimination. I'll stop now before I really get going.

I believe that SWA is still teamsters, not AMFA- which is the only union strictly for AMT's
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:32 am

Here enforcement strikes (opposed to warning strikes during negotiations, which only take place for a few hours or at maximum one day) are usually the absolute last resort.
Up to the 1990s, there has been a tendency here to have unions with reasonable, moderate demands and employers trying to keep their staff happy. This stems from a tradition of 19th century industrial tycoons like Siemens, Borsig and Krupp, who acted like the strict father of a big family. On one hand they demanded strict loyality and hard work from their workers, but on the other hand they e.g. built housing areas, where their workers could live in decent conditions for low rents, not in Victorian slums like e.g. in mid 19th century Britain.
Also, during the mid 19th century Germany's conservatives and industrialists realised that if the living conditions for workers would become as harsh as e.g. in Britain or the US, they would face a revolution, so the archconservative Bismarck started the whole social security and pension insurance system which is still more or less in place today.
This past largely shaped our employer / employee relationship, also that every business above 10 employees has to have a worker's representative elected and in big share companies these representatives are actually board members.

The result were reasonable demands from both sides. This of course, reduced the yield for shareholders. Unfortunately since the 1990s, the American ideology of unrestrained capitalism slopped over the Atlantic ocean, where the shareholder is everything and the employees are just seen as a cost factor and not as a asset of the company (having a happy, skilled and motivated work force, which is willing to walk the extra mile for the company if necessary).

Most workers are willing to make sacrifices if they are treated with dignity and the reason is being explained logically. But this requires that the shareholders and management will make sacrifices as well.

You can see this e.g. in the way how Airbus kept all their employees during the slump post 9/11, while Boeing was laying off ten thousands.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
 
mrocktor
Posts: 1388
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:57 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:35 am

Quoting Amtrosie (Reply 31):
You admit you know nothing of the industry, especially the AMT's and yet you speak up? Remember "a fool is considered a wise man till he opens his mouth."

I admit nothing of the sort, and the essential question is about the essence of capitalism not about a specific industry.

Re-read my previous posts on this thread (both of them, you may have missed the second), re-read the phrase you quoted. I hope it is as applicable to you as it is to me, not at all.

mrocktor
 
amtrosie
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:44 am

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:18 pm

Mrocktor, I confused your first post with the very first response to this thread, Sorry. That being said, you have no clue what goes on, on the floor or what AMT's deal with on a daily basis. As for the philosophical discussion on capitalism.... the mere fact that we ALL can compete for better wages and better paying jobs allows for a certain freedom and initiative not seen in a socialistic society. The ACTUAL human nature has never been factored into this philosophy. I digress from the subject at hand, which is the very real facts of working nights (to the point of constant exhaustion), and being pushed to make desicions in that mental state, and the desire to improve ourselves, all the while surrounded by individuals pushing to shortcut the very real safety issues.
 
MX757
Topic Author
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:38 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Thu Sep 15, 2005 3:45 pm

Thanks to everybody that posted your messages. It seems that almost everybody here has the same opinion on this matter.

It's really unfortunate that we can't stand together as a profession.
Is it broke...? Yeah I'll fix it.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A Question To My Fellow AMT's About NW Strike.

Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:25 pm

Quoting MX757 (Reply 36):

It's really unfortunate that we can't stand together as a profession.

We Have to Start Somewhere.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests