Winglet
Topic Author
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:24 am

Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:36 am

Recently flew from Stockholm to Newark, aboard a CO 757-200 with those beautiful winglets. Due apparently to strong headwinds we had to make an emergency landing in Bangor Maine as we ran out of fuel. The pilot made it sound routine on the intercom but when we landed, my curiosity and small hobbish knowelegde from airliners.net took me up to the cockpit where the pilots where standing outside chatting with a TSA agent as we refulled. I asked several questions, showed off the little knowledge I had of which i got that this was the first time this had ever happened to them and we almost didn't make it to this airport.

My question is, if a 757 cant make the route from Stockholm to Newark with strong headwinds, isn't it a risk to use these aircraft on such long routes?

If of interest to anyone I can dig up the flight info from the ticket stub and itenary I might still have somewhere.
 
rendezvous
Posts: 534
Joined: Sun May 20, 2001 9:14 pm

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:01 pm

My understanding would be that (I assume it's an ETOPs flight) that the aircraft would be fairly close to alternate airports along the route. In the 757/767 aircraft (and probably all others) the FMC will give you a fuel estimate for your destination, saying how much it thinks you'll have left. That's based on forecast winds and actual winds calculated by the aircraft. This can be crosschecked with the paper flight plan with proposed fuel useage. If there is any major discrepencies then you need to monitor more closely and take action if need be.

I guess the only real danger is if the crew do not pay attention to what they're being told.
 
Winglet
Topic Author
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:24 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:20 pm

It seems though the 757 is pushing it to make it across the water when there is headwind, I guess whats up for discussion here, is the 757 a suitable choice for this route by Continental? after my experience I would say absolutely not as our aircraft is one of the only if not the only? 757 with winglets so far?
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 30007
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:42 pm

Quoting Winglet (Thread starter):
Due apparently to strong headwinds we had to make an emergency landing in Bangor Maine as we ran out of fuel

Wouldn't that be taken into Account for the Route concerned.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
Lemurs
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:13 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:44 pm

It's appropriate if you take these factors into account. It's not unusual for CO's 757's to divert for a fuel stop depending on headwinds and traffic conditions at EWR. On most of the flights, this causes no problem, but on some it will call for a tech stop. If you can run the route without problem 95% of the time, there's no reason not to.

I'm curious exactly how "critical" fuel was at the time...it seems to me that it could be critical problem if they had tried to continue on to EWR, but if it was really critical at Bangor those must have been some incredible headwinds since that's a full 400nm short of EWR, and they already build in reserves to the full flightplan.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary, and those that don't.
 
bri2k1
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:13 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:38 pm

Smart pilots. Declare an emergency and get on the ground before you have a REAL emergency. I'm sure once they were into the calculated reserve fuel, it was emergency time. Private pilots, take note.
Position and hold
 
JHFLYER
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:12 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:32 pm

Quoting Bri2k1 (Reply 5):
I'm sure once they were into the calculated reserve fuel, it was emergency time. Private pilots, take note.

I think that is a wake up call to all pilots not just private ones.
It doesn't matter how many hours under the belt if you don't take notice of what the aircraft or you caculations are telling you, you will die eventually. I think it is good to see pilots with the courage to say NO we are landing and NO we can't make it.
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Mon Oct 17, 2005 6:31 pm

So was this a real "emergency landing" with fire trucks, ATC priority, drama, call to the chief pilots office, etc or was this simply an unscheduled tech stop for fuel? There is a difference.

It sounds like an unscheduled tech stop for fuel.....
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
Winglet
Topic Author
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:24 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 2:48 am

Quoting Lemurs (Reply 4):
I'm curious exactly how "critical" fuel was at the time...it seems to me that it could be critical problem if they had tried to continue on to EWR, but if it was really critical at Bangor those must have been some incredible headwinds since that's a full 400nm short of EWR, and they already build in reserves to the full flightplan.

They said they were the strongest headwinds they have encountered on this new route and Bangor was nearly not possible.

It was a tech stop not an emergency landing as SATL382G points out the differences. However, it was too close for comfort and this time of year when the headwinds are getting stronger the CO 757's seem a little weak. However splendid business class in comparison to SAS a330's.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17896
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 3:09 am

Quoting Winglet (Thread starter):
Due apparently to strong headwinds we had to make an emergency landing in Bangor Maine as we ran out of fuel.

It's not an emergency landing if it's not a fuel emergency, which I doubt it was. It was most probably a technical stop.

Quoting Winglet (Thread starter):

My question is, if a 757 cant make the route from Stockholm to Newark with strong headwinds, isn't it a risk to use these aircraft on such long routes?

Not really. There are plenty of diversion airports within range if you don't quite have the legs on that day. As stated, if you can make 95% of the flights non-stop, you've still opened up a market too small to be served with a 762 or 332.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 3:28 am

Quoting Winglet (Reply 8):
However, it was too close for comfort and this time of year

Either the aircraft was legally dispatched to EWR, and then redispatched to it's fuel stop, or it wasn't. There is no "too close for comfort". In fact I'd say it's a safe bet that the aircraft probably had sufficient fuel to make EWR, but not enough to make it "legally" i.e. with IFR reserves.
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
Alias1024
Posts: 2324
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:13 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:20 am

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 10):
Either the aircraft was legally dispatched to EWR, and then redispatched to it's fuel stop, or it wasn't. There is no "too close for comfort".

I doubt the aircraft was actually dispatched to EWR originally. The flightplan would have been filed to EWR, but the flight given a dispatch release to Bangor, with a redispatch point somewhere over the Atlantic. Once reaching that redispatch point the crew looks at the fuel. If they have enough fuel for redispatch they are redispatched to EWR. If not they change their flightplan and land at Bangor. The dispatcher completes an new dispatch to EWR and files a new flight plan.
It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems with just potatoes.
 
Winglet
Topic Author
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:24 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:17 am

The captain said there was no way we would make it to EWR, it wasn't a matter of legal reserves, as we barely made it to Bangor he said. The co-pilot was chattering away on his mobile and after he finished I discussed with him the point of the winglets being added and this was the first 757 to have the winglets added. To my suprize he didn't know that fact and also didn't know why they were added? I said I read they were added as they increase fuel efficentcy by something like 5% on long haul operations, he said, "oh".
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:36 am

Quoting Winglet (Reply 12):
The captain said there was no way we would make it to EWR, it wasn't a matter of legal reserves, as we barely made it to Bangor he said.

Were that true than it would have been an emergency landing vs a tech stop. Are you sure the crew wasn't just playing stupid for an annoying passenger?
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
Alias1024
Posts: 2324
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:13 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:27 am

Winglet,

I'm curious as to what date this happened. Maybe I can do a little digging if I have the date.
It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems with just potatoes.
 
cancidas
Posts: 3985
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:48 am

there is no way that the flight would have been dispatched if they did not have enough fuel to reach EWR according to the wx available at the time of dispatch. however, as we all know wx can change very rapidly. now, while landing to get gas is not normal it is definately not an emergency. as pointed out earlier, the airplane would more than likely not made it back to EWR with legal reserves, therefore it landed to tank up and make it back without further incident. even in the days of rising fuel costs, a few thousand pounds of gas are cheaper than an FAA fine!
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
 
User avatar
Crosswind
Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:34 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:50 am

Quoting Winglet (Reply 12):
The captain said there was no way we would make it to EWR, it wasn't a matter of legal reserves, as we barely made it to Bangor he said.

Sorry, but I don't buy this for a second. When it becomes appearent that an aircraft will not have sufficient fuel to reach it's destination on Trans-Atlantic flights it is usually due to winds not being as forecast, optimum levels not being granted by ATC or an inflight re-route by ATC.

In these instances the crew will plan to make an en-route tech stop somewhere convenient well before a critical fuel situation is reached. The pilots will not fly the aircraft on past Goose Bay, Gander, St Johns, Halifax and a host of other airports and then declare a fuel emergency to land in Bangor with below minimum reserves.

If that actually was the case, and there were no other mitigating factors such as every other en-route airport being closed due weather, then the crew would almost certainly have been grounded on arrival in BGR pending an investigation of why they flew an aircraft into a fuel emergency.

I've had aircraft make en-route fuel stops from time to time - it's never been a fuel emergency - just a case of choosing and planning a convenient fuel stop.

Regards
CROSSWIND
 
ltbewr
Posts: 12922
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 1:24 pm

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:14 am

It has been discussed here a number of times that 757 ops by CO and others westbound to the eastern USA having to make a fuel stop in Bangor or Eastern Canada airports like Gander. Perhaps another reason was the possibilities of weather related delays at EWR. That would mean that combined with the severe headwinds, probably the leftovers of a tropical depression/storm, would push the limits of fuel range. Last week and part of the previous week, we had in the Northeastern USA, major rainstorms, with something like 30 + cms/12 inches of rain over 8 days, with most of that over 2 days. We also have had days because of those heavy rains, heavy morning fog on other days, also causing multi-hour delays at EWR for landings and takeoffs. (EWR is only about a mile from NY Harbor, and only a few miles from the Atlantic ocean, only a few feet above sea level).
 
A346Dude
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 11:23 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Thu Oct 20, 2005 9:39 am

Quoting Winglet (Reply 12):
The captain said there was no way we would make it to EWR, it wasn't a matter of legal reserves, as we barely made it to Bangor he said.

Perhaps he was implying there was no way they would have made it legally to EWR. While I cannot know for sure, it would seem to me that barely making it to Bangor would have been an extreme emergency, and certainly the final flight for that pilot!
You know the gear is up and locked when it takes full throttle to taxi to the terminal.
 
mandargb
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:04 am

Actually on a similir note
Once my relative was travelling on SFO-HongKong in SQ in a 747-400 and they made a Fuel halt in Taipei (Taiwan)!

I was bit surprised when she told me that.
If they made it to taipei, they would have made it to hong kong also. Mind you this much after Kaitak was closed. So they were to make it to Chek Lap Kok.)

They remained on apron without opening the exits for an hour and started off for Hong Kong immediately.

Does anybody know if it is a common thing from SFO/LAX to HKG in SQ or CX
 
PhilSquares
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:16 am

Quoting Winglet (Thread starter):
Due apparently to strong headwinds we had to make an emergency landing in Bangor Maine as we ran out of fuel.

Is this like "almost pregnant"?

I wasn't there, so all I can do is give my opinion. It sounds a little strange to me!

As has been pointed out, it's most likely a case of a re-dispatch flight plan, and a tech stop.

I don't know what date this was, but certainly the aircraft could have been dispatched with a certain alternate(s) and enroute the alternate weather could have changed making the original selection unusable. There is a host of things that could have prompted the tech stop. However, the implication that this is somehow "unsafe" is just a little over the top!

Quoting Mandargb (Reply 19):
Does anybody know if it is a common thing from SFO/LAX to HKG in SQ or CX

Common, no but it does happen. Things change and the forecast isn't always spot on. Again, SQ flies this as a re-dispatch flight. If you don't have the fuel to make it to HKG then you continue on to TPE which is your original destination (even though the flight is supposed to go LAX-HKG). It's not really that big of a deal.
Fly fast, live slow
 
HT
Posts: 5857
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 6:20 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:20 pm

Thinking about that the alternates at closer distances like Gander, Halifax, Moncton etc. are all located in Canada, how likely is it that CO´s pilots are "instructed" to "make it" to Bangor (= "home soil") for a fuel stop ? Are there differences in fuel prices between BGR and those "remote" locations in Canada ?

BTW, would a fuel stop in Canada make any differences on all those security issues ?

Maybe just wild guesses, but those came to my mind while reading through all the replies.

-HT
Carpe diem ! Life is too short to waste your time ! Keep in mind, that today is the first day of the rest of your life !
 
User avatar
litz
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2003 6:01 am

RE: Our 757-200 Doesn't Make It From STO-EWR

Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:20 pm

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 7):
So was this a real "emergency landing" with fire trucks, ATC priority, drama, call to the chief pilots office, etc or was this simply an unscheduled tech stop for fuel? There is a difference.

No drama or anything involved, I'm sure ... but remember, there's a full-out MAYDAY emergency landing where they roll all the emergency equipment; the expectation there is the plane is in serious trouble and there's a good likelihood of crash/fire/rescue. So they roll the kitchen sink.

Then there's a FUEL emergency ... means "we're almost out of gas" and "we need down NOW". No crash trucks needed, just a runway ASAP.

If you remember several years back, Avianca's 707 that crashed in New York went down because the crew never stated they had a FUEL emergency (there was a language barrier) ... the controllers, not realizing their dire circumstances, didn't give them a priority vector, and the plane ran dry and crashed.

An unscheduled tech stop is just that, a diversion to an airport other than ones intended destination ... no emergency declared, and plane lands normally (presumably slotted normally into traffic). Such things are always planned for and accounted for in flight plans.

(all IMHO mind you, so if I made any mistakes, please comment and correct)

- litz

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beefstew25 and 1 guest

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos