modesto2
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 3:44 am

Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:56 am

My understanding of mode C transponders is that they send the controller pressure altitude. Of course, this often differs from indicated altitude. Once reaching the controller's computer, that computer then adjusts the pressure altitude for the current barometric pressure. Therefore, the indicated altitude should equal the altitude displayed on the controller's screen. Is this correct? Earlier today, my mode C was apparently adding 300 feet to the indicated altitude so controllers kept asking me to verify my altitude (i.e. indicated = 6000 but controller's screen showed 6300).

On a side note, the more I fly, the more I want to know about air traffic control and ATC procedures. Are there any good websites or books re: air traffic control procedures. Understanding the "other" side should hopefully make me a better and well-informed pilot. Thanks.
 
BigJimFX
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 2:25 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:06 am

As far as I know that is true. All the planes I've flown with Mode C xponders show a press. alt. on it. ATC will probably ask to verify altitude if it differs by 100-300 ft. Part of my checklist in a C172 was to make sure that the altimeter, after adjusting for Baro. press. indicated feild elevation within 7 ft.

If you have any questions about ATC procedures, check out the FAA website. All of the regs on there.

Happy Flying airplane 
I'd like to thank me for flying Me Airways...
 
Mir
Posts: 19108
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Sun Feb 19, 2006 2:20 pm

Quoting BigJimFX (Reply 1):
Part of my checklist in a C172 was to make sure that the altimeter, after adjusting for Baro. press. indicated feild elevation within 7 ft.

Did you perhaps miss a 5 in there? I've been taught 75 feet.

Quoting Modesto2 (Thread starter):
On a side note, the more I fly, the more I want to know about air traffic control and ATC procedures. Are there any good websites or books re: air traffic control procedures. Understanding the "other" side should hopefully make me a better and well-informed pilot. Thanks.

Listen to some live feeds (many available at www.liveatc.net ), and give it a shot, either on FS multiplayer or with a dedicated ATC sim (ATC Simulator 2 is out, at www.atcsimulator.com ). I've learned a lot from the feeds, and doing some ATC in multiplayer FS sessions has really allowed me to put what I hear into perspective.

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
BigJimFX
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 2:25 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:41 pm

Quoting Mir (Reply 2):
Did you perhaps miss a 5 in there? I've been taught 75 feet

Yeah... Sorry about that, I was in a hurry to get out of the house. But yeah, I ment 75ft from field elevation.
I'd like to thank me for flying Me Airways...
 
jspitfire
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 2:50 pm

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:50 am

Quoting BigJimFX (Reply 1):
ATC will probably ask to verify altitude if it differs by 100-300 ft.

I decided to look this up in the Canadian Regulations, and now I'm rather confused. It says:

VERIFY YOUR ALTITUDE - This phraseology may be used when it is necessary to validate altitude readouts by comparing the readouts value with an altitude reported by the aircraft. An altitude readout is considered valid if the readout value does not differ from the aircraft-reported altitude by more than 200 ft, and invalid if the difference is 300 ft or more.

So what if the difference is 250 ft? Is that valid, or not?

Jason
 
romeomike
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:06 pm

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:54 am

ATC radar reports altitude in hundreds of feet, and pilots report it in hundreds of feet, so I doubt 250 would come up that often  Smile
 
Mir
Posts: 19108
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:00 am

Quoting Jspitfire (Reply 4):
So what if the difference is 250 ft? Is that valid, or not?

A transponder only reports altitude in hundreds of feet, so it can't send a difference of 250ft. It's either 200 or 300.

ATC reads your altitude in hundreds of feet as well. (5,000ft is 050, 19,000ft is 190, etc.)

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
pilotpip
Posts: 2821
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 3:26 pm

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:40 pm

If you want to learn more about ATC, tour a Tracon facility. I've toured STL tracon twice now and it's really neat to see things from their side. The controllers I've met have been very friendly and very informative. You'll be a better pilot after being in the room and watching a controller vector an aircraft around for a few minutes and follow the view they see. They are paid to help you out, and understanding why they do what they do goes a long way.

I'm also reassured that the voices I've heard in my head for the last 5 years are real people  Smile Putting faces and names with the voices was really a highlight. 35 minutes after getting vectored all over town I got to ask the controller why she did it and it just so happened that a similiar scenario was playing out with some bizjets and a couple little guys shooting approaches so I got a real time example as it developed.
DMI
 
bri2k1
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:13 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:37 pm

By the way, Mode C transponders only report pressure altitude calibrated to 29.92". The ATC decoding system which receives the Mode C reply automatically applies the appropriate correction for local barometric pressure.
Position and hold
 
dw747400
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 8:24 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:37 pm

It could be a problem with the calibration of your transponder. My transponder went haywire once while under the BWI bravo rings and announced I was at 14,000 feet. According to ATC, we managed to scare a WN flight enough that he took evasive action.

Needless to say, ATC figured out pretty fast that our 172 hadn't made it to 14,000 within three minutes of takeoff, but not quite fast enough for the 737 that was apparently passing through 14,000!
CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
 
IAHFLYR
Posts: 3944
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:56 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:28 am

The altitude verification can and is used often when a controller is looking to validate that you are in fact level at your assigned altitude should there be an issue where the altitude displayed was different for a few radar sweeps and it set off the error alter that centers have and no terminal facilites are getting.

Mode C altitude can be off up to 300'! At the 300' point the pilot is asked "to verify altitude" and if it is in fact 300' or more off from the altitude the pilot says then the next thing is "stop altitude sqwakkkkkk, altitude differs by more than 300'" and then you get the "ya gonna get that fixed anytime soon"!  Smile
Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
 
bri2k1
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:13 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:48 am

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 10):
stop altitude sqwakkkkkk

Funny to hear on the radio, too. Most encoding altimeters in light aircraft are blind (they provide no visual readout of their indicated altidue.) "Seeing" encoding altimeters are available, though, and that's why it's a good idea to spring for one. They can also serve as a backup to the primary altimeter in case of a failure, provided you can do a little math to compensate for non-standard atmospheric pressure.
Position and hold
 
Mir
Posts: 19108
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:07 am

Quoting Bri2k1 (Reply 11):
They can also serve as a backup to the primary altimeter in case of a failure, provided you can do a little math to compensate for non-standard atmospheric pressure.

Don't they work off of the regular altimeter? And thus, wouldn't they be useless if that were to fail?

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
dw747400
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 8:24 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:49 am

Quoting Mir (Reply 12):

Don't they work off of the regular altimeter? And thus, wouldn't they be useless if that were to fail?

At least in the 152s and 172s I fly, they are connected to the pitot static system. Nonetheless, if the altimeter itself fails through no fault of the pitot-static system, it could, in theory, be used as a backup altimeter.
CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
 
bri2k1
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:13 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Wed Feb 22, 2006 10:26 am

Most advanced planes will have redundant pitot-static systems, too. Of course, they will also have multiple altimeters to go along with them.
Position and hold
 
julesmusician
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:25 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:59 am

Hot Air Balloon flying in controlled airspace you need a transponder and ideally a C sqwaker in order to be seen. Some airports allow you to fly in their airspace giving updates of your height and position without a transponder, but that has gone wrong and the consequences are messy....
African Civil Aviation Commission president "You don't want to fly out as a passenger and come back as cargo."
 
bri2k1
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:13 am

RE: Mode C Altitude Reporting And ATC

Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:14 am

In the US, a transponder with mode C capabilities is required in class A, B, and C airspace, and within 30 NM of the primary class B airport, but not in class D, E, or G. Class D and E are considered controlled airspace, and mode C is not required.

The transponder reply appears on the controller's screen next to the radar return, but a radar echo can be detected without a transponder. I believe manned free balloons fall into that category.

That being said, there are "legal but stupid" minimums. For example, flying in class G airspace VFR is legal during the day with 1 SM visibility and staying clear of clouds, but it's not smart to be flying around at 120 knots, 600 feet AGL, maneuvering around clouds, with less than 30 seconds of forward visibility. Operating a balloon in busy airspace without mode C may be legal, but not smart.
Position and hold

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: akiss20, flapsdown40 and 14 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos