2H4
Topic Author
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:14 pm



This was forwarded to me today. I think many TechOppers will appreciate it:

=====================================================

TURBINE ENGINES ARE RUINING AVIATION

We gotta get rid of turbines, they are ruining aviation. We need to go back to big round engines.

Anybody can start a turbine, you just need to move a switch from “OFF” to “START,” and then remember to move it back to “ON” after a while. My PC is harder to start.

Cranking a round engine requires skill, finesse and style. On some airplanes the pilots are not even allowed to do it.

Turbines start by whining for a while, then give a small lady-like “poot” and start whining louder. Round engines give a satisfying rattle-rattle, click-click BANG, more rattles, another BANG, a big macho fart or two, more clicks, a lot of smoke and finally a serious low pitch roar.

We like that. It’s a guy thing. When you start a round engine your mind is engaged and you can concentrate on the flight ahead. Starting a turbine is like flicking on a ceiling fan: useful, but hardly exciting.

Turbines don’t break often enough, leading to aircrew boredom, complacency and inattention. A round engine at speed looks and sounds like it’s going to blow at any minute. This helps concentrate the mind.

Turbines don’t have enough control levers to keep a pilot’s attention. There’s nothing to fiddle with during the flight.

Turbines smell like a Boy Scout camp full of Coleman lanterns. Round engines smell like God intended flying machines to smell.

=====================================================



2H4


Intentionally Left Blank
 
xv408
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:24 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:30 pm

Add V shaped engines to round ones... Difficult to beat a Merlin (with 4 in a Lanc???)
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11806
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:37 pm

Quoting 2H4 (Thread starter):
Turbines don’t break often enough, leading to aircrew boredom, complacency and inattention. A round engine at speed looks and sounds like it’s going to blow at any minute. This helps concentrate the mind.

Turbines don’t have enough control levers to keep a pilot’s attention. There’s nothing to fiddle with during the flight.

 rotfl 

Those two paragraphs cracked me up!

Suppose it's sort of like when I drive an automatic transmission....there's nothing for me to do. And I have a hand free to operate the radio at all times! I don't get it.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
Blackbird
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 1999 10:48 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:48 pm

LOL!!!

I drive stick
 
miamiair
Posts: 4249
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:42 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 12:23 am

There is an art to starting the big round ones, and nothing sounds like one (maybe a Merlin).
Molon Labe - Proud member of SMASH
 
Buzz
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 1999 11:44 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 12:55 am

Hi 2H4, Buzz here. I had a good laugh when I read that one a few years ago. I made a few additions to mine.... wonder if I can cut and paste from a Word document?
Death To Turbines! Ver. 2c

We’ve got to get rid of these turbine engines, they are ruining Aviation. We need to get back to Round Engines.
(Dave says turbines are as round as you can get. What ARE you complaining about?)
(hey Dave, these guys know what kind of airplane stuff I’m talking about)

Anybody can start a turbine, you just move a switch from “OFF” to “Start” and then remember to move it back to “Run” after a while. My PC is harder to start.

Cranking a Round Engine requires skill, finesse, and style and at least 2 hands. On some aircraft (B-29) the pilots aren’t even allowed to do it. The Flight Engineer gets to start engines.

Turbines start by whining for a while, then give a small, lady-like poot and start whining louder.

Round Engines give a satisfying rattle-rattle, click-click, BANG, more rattles, another BANG, a big macho fart or two of oil smoke, and finally a serious low pitch growl. We like that, it’s a visceral, guy kind of thing.

When you start a Round Engine, your mind is engaged and you are forced to concentrate on the flight ahead. Starting a turbine engine is like switching on a ceiling fan: Useful but hardly inspiring.

Turbines don’t break often enough, leading to flight crew boredom, complacency, and inattention. A Round Engine at takeoff power looks and sounds like its going to blow apart at any minute. This helps keep your mind sharp.

Turbine engines don’t have enough levers, dials, and switches to keep a pilot’s attention. There’s nothing to fiddle with during long flights. A round engine airplane needs a flight engineer: BMEP, spark advance, mixture leaning, prop synch, mag drop, oil temp, cowl flaps – CHT.

Turbines smell like a Boy Scout camp full of Coleman Lanterns. Round Engine airplanes smell like God intended flying machines to smell: Avgas is an elixir. And when a Round Engine airplane stops dripping oil, it’s empty.

Turbine engines drink oil by the quart, and jet fuel by the barrel. Round Engines sip Avgas by the quart and drink oil by the barrel. And Avgas comes in more than one color – red, blue green, purple depending what mood you’re in today.

I think I hear the shrink coming down the hall, gotta go now.

g'day
 
lowrider
Posts: 2542
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:09 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:00 am

Turbines for work, pistons for pleasure. When I am shooting a circling approach to some short, slippery runway at Haystack regional at 0 dark 30, simplicity and reliability are a good thing. The radial engine is the aviation equivalent of the Harley-Davidson. Nostalgic, historic, and pleasing to the senses, but not always practical.

Quoting Buzz (Reply 5):
Turbine engines drink oil by the quart, and jet fuel by the barrel.

Unless it is a Rolls that has been taxing for a couple of hours
Proud OOTSK member
 
KELPkid
Posts: 5247
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:33 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:10 am

Quoting 2H4 (Thread starter):
2H4

Amen!  Wink

Although, wasn't there a little more to turbine operation in the days before FADEC (like watching for hot starts, not overtemping or overtorqueing the engine and moving condition levers?). Also, don't many older turboprops (like the King Air) have prop speed adjustments (like a complex single)?
Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
 
WrenchBender
Posts: 1662
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:59 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:12 am

Quoting 2H4 (Thread starter):
Turbines don’t have enough control levers to keep a pilot’s attention. There’s nothing to fiddle with during the flight.



Quoting Buzz (Reply 5):
Turbine engines don’t have enough levers, dials, and switches to keep a pilot’s attention. There’s nothing to fiddle with during long flights. A round engine airplane needs a flight engineer: BMEP, spark advance, mixture leaning, prop synch, mag drop, oil temp, cowl flaps – CHT.

I have to concur, round engines had Flight Engineers. Woe betide the Pilot that dared to touch a control lever on the engineers pedestal. (he'd probably draw back a bloody stump).
The CP-107 Argus was phased out shortly after I joined the forces(4- Wright Cyclone R-3350 18 cylinder), and the CP-121 Tracker operated from my first base for several years (2× Wright R-1820-82WA 9 cylinder).

WrenchBender
Silly Pilot, Tricks are for kids.......
 
Areopagus
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2001 12:31 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:32 am

Old steam locomotives are full of cool levers and valves. Maybe we should adapt one of those engines to fly. (And why not? Doc Brown did it!) And it would satisfy those pilots nostalgic for the old days of "steam gauge" instrument panels.
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:56 pm

But seriously, older aircraft (in the days before EICAS, ECAM, CFDS, BITE checks... etc.) required more maintenance skills. Even on a 727 the systems were not yet integrated and for troubleshooting you usually had to get out the multimeter and chase wiring. Today most avionics related snags are just computer crashes, which get usually rectified by reseting the right circuit breaker.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
Buzz
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 1999 11:44 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:41 pm

Hi MD11 Engineer, Buzz here. I think you're half right, recycling the power does seem to cure many problems (Win95 for airplanes?)

But the bulk of the odd problems I work on an Airbus (to use an example from tonight) "fmu-hc-eec1" In this case it's finding resistance out-of-limits between the #1 engine EEC and fuel metering unit. Of course when I rang out the wires all the numbers were nominal.

And yes, finding the problem on Tri-jets and Diesel 10's was "challenging" But maybe there was a few miles less wire to contend with.

g'day
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:34 am

Ya know, nostalgia just ain't what it used to be.

In my heart I agree with the sentiments above but as the old mariner says "Sails are for yatchs! Give me a fair wind in the stoke hold when there's cargo to move."

In heaven I think I'd park my DC-4 on a rain puddled apron, say goodnight to my copilot and stewardess, walk across the ramp (cue the "High and the Mighty music) to my 1936 oldsmobile four-door sedan, parked (magically) in the sunshine. I'd drive home over two-lane blacktop with no white stripe down the edges and the white-lead painted wooden guardrails, under the passing Baldwin 4-8-2 pulling a line of wooden boxcars, grateful for the underpass they built with wooden piling, to my home where I cannot even smell my neighbor's fireplace smoke. I could spend my days off puttering around in my blacksmith shop or splitting wood for the winter.

Might even be fun to crank up the Victrola and drop that 100-count for 35¢ solid steel needle on a 78 and listen to Bunny Berrigan hit those incredible notes in "I can't get started" but only after I help the missus with the dishes.

But here I am with a cup of coffee that was beans five minutes ago and a bowl of microwaved oatmeal; pecking away at cordless keyboard for the benefit of friends I've never even met.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
HaveBlue
Posts: 2107
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:01 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 3:21 am

Slam, that is one of the best and most poetic posts I've yet read. Thanks for pecking away my ethereal friend.  Smile
Here Here for Severe Clear!
 
Airgypsy
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 1999 11:02 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:58 am

Anyone that yearns for the "Good Old Days" doesn't own a tool box. I've maintained working aircraft radials and they will suck up your time and blood quick engough for you to miss the sound of a satifying thump of a turbine enigne starting up.
Change plugs every 25 hours? Change 25 gallons of oil every 50? Break your back pulling through the prop before every cold start?
Give me the good new days of turbine aviation.
 
2H4
Topic Author
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:15 am




Quoting SlamClick (Reply 12):
But here I am with a cup of coffee that was beans five minutes ago and a bowl of microwaved oatmeal; pecking away at cordless keyboard for the benefit of friends I've never even met.

Thank you.  thumbsup 


2H4


Intentionally Left Blank
 
AirframeAS
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:56 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:10 am

Quoting 2H4 (Thread starter):
Turbines start by whining for a while, then give a small lady-like “poot”

Not for a CFM-56 on a 734!! LOL!!
A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
 
Curmudgeon
Posts: 682
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:19 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:33 am

Having served my apprenticeship journeyman years toiling behind various R-985, R-1820, R-2000 and R-2800 I can wholeheartedly agree that the Radials are serious fun, and do concentrate the mind wonderfully.

I'm saving up for a 985 of my own, but do like the mindless convenience of a nice new CFM.

By the way, Slammer...parking the DC-4 in the rain was great, but not so cute driving away in the '74 Datsun B-210 to the airport Gas 'n' Go for 2 gallons and a grease burger, almost getting creamed by the Budd Dayliner at the level crossing on the way home. Waking up six hours later for another trip to Shittsville. I would have liked the High and Mighty version much better Wink
Jets are for kids
 
flametech21
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:08 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:46 am

Well, I cant comment too much on radials as I was born in the turbojet days. (1980, if you're really inclined to know Big grin ) Of course by the numbers, radials are a nightmare. Less speed, less thrust, more noise, more maintenance, more smoke, more oil, more failures and fires, and the list goes on and on.

But there is just some magical quality about them that makes aviation lovers just drop to their knees. I recently got to fly on an ex-AA DC-3 that was restored to near mint condition, and here I will share my thoughts:

Upon startup, I thought the engine was going to fall off the damn wing. Really, for the first few seconds I was scared. But then all that fear went away as I stared out the window at it. Now I fly rear-engines, and I've had more than my share of rides on the rear airstair door jumpseat, next to those god-awful JT8Ds, and I thought I knew the definition of loud. But this beastly DC-3 puts those pitiful old turbines to shame. It was so loud I at first thought I would need earplugs, but I quickly grew accustomed to it. Upon takeoff I was grinning ear to ear.

The flight was wonderful, and I swear the ride was smoother than on any modern airliner. I finally got the nerve to go up to the flight deck about half way through. No reinforced cockpit door on this bird, just a curtain. I guess they had no need for it in those days.

The pilots were extremely friendly, and the captain (a real greybeard, I might add), instantly gave up his seat and insisted I take it. It was a truly amazing view at about 8,000 feet. The FO saw my DFW ID dangling out of my pocket, and promptly asked to see it. What was I to say? So I gave it to him, he scanned it over for a second, and was shocked to find out I was a pilot. "Why didn't you say so?" he said. "You have control" he exclaimed, taking his hand off the yoke.

Well, I couldn't resist. I grabbed the yoke and sheepishly asked him how to engage the autopilot. They both got a hearty laugh out of this one. "There isn't one" the captain smirked. Flight director? Autothrottle? I asked. The FO shook his head no. "You are the autopilot" he chuckled.

Well, this post is getting long enough, so I'll sum it up. I hand flew us to our VFR approach to KTUL with a lot of help from them both. We chatted about aviation in general, and about the many differences yet the many things the same about working for AA and the aviation industry, then and now. It was the most amazing experience. I let the Captain land the thing, as I have no experience on taildraggers and didn't want my first experience to end up in the mud.

After we parked and the others on board exited, we stayed and chatted for almost an hour. We exchanged email addresses (ironic, I know) and I still keep loosely in touch with them. The FO even took me up on an offer to ride as an observer on an md80 ferry flight back to DFW. Made for an interesting trip back, and he had the same flabbergasted look on his face as I did when I flew with him.

I will never forget that flight on the DC-3. It had a profound effect on me that no turbine could ever recreate. And believe me, if I ever get the chance again, I would take it in a heartbeat.

Sorry about the long post. Hope you had as much fun reading it as I did writing it!  bigthumbsup 
They build them to a higher standard at Long Beach!
 
Molykote
Posts: 1237
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 8:21 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:43 pm

Quoting 2H4 (Thread starter):
Turbines don’t break often enough, leading to aircrew boredom, complacency and inattention. A round engine at speed looks and sounds like it’s going to blow at any minute. This helps concentrate the mind.

Turbines don’t have enough control levers to keep a pilot’s attention. There’s nothing to fiddle with during the flight.

Who is the Englishman that wrote this?
Speedtape - The aspirin of aviation!
 
2H4
Topic Author
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:55 pm




Quoting Curmudgeon (Reply 17):
I'm saving up for a 985 of my own

Whatcha gonna hang it on?  eyebrow 


2H4


Intentionally Left Blank
 
Curmudgeon
Posts: 682
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:19 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:02 pm

I have this fantasy of building a Waco at home, a upf-7 preferably, and hanging a fully cowled Wasp Jr. with chrome spinner. My six year old daughter has been around the world in jets, ho-hums her way onto a 737 every couple of months. Last week a Stearman barked its way past the house and she just stood there with her mouth open, then turned to me, eyes shining with excitement. If she has the family disease I'd like her to start on radials. Taildraggin' radials.

I might start off with a Bellanca Cruiser or PA-12 just to get re-aquainted with it.

Cheers

Cur.
Jets are for kids
 
ThirtyEcho
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2002 1:21 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:57 pm

I hold the same view of radios in airplanes. I learned to fly in a Luscombe 8E; hell, it didn't even have an electrical system. What more juice do you need beyond dual magnetos?

Pilotage is the best system of navigation. If you can't see waypoints, how did you drive to the airport in the first place?

Flaps? Flaps are for rescuing a botched approach. No real pilot ever touches the damned things because he knows how to sideslip. You might get your ticket lifted if you are seen using flaps.

Unusual attitude recovery? Now, really, since your instructor taught you loops, rolls and spins before solo, what is that all about?

Fuel gauges? You dipstick the tanks before takeoff and you have calculated your comsuption with a safe margin. A lying fuel gauge is the last thing that you need.

Attitude Indicator? That is really a forget-it item; needle-ball-airspeed relies on only raw air-data and won't send you into the ground by precessing.

Gyro compass? Same precession factor and very unsafe. Since you have perfected your ability to lead and lag a magnetic compass and compensate for accelleration errors, you always know where Santa Claus lives.

That is what it was REALLY like when radials shook the earth.
 
2H4
Topic Author
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:13 pm




Quoting Curmudgeon (Reply 21):
Last week a Stearman barked its way past the house and she just stood there with her mouth open, then turned to me, eyes shining with excitement.

Sounds like she's got the proper genes.  yes  Perhaps a trip to an airshow or fly-in is in order....

Quoting ThirtyEcho (Reply 22):

I'll just add:

Airspeed indicator? What can that tell you that the sound (and feel) of the wind through the wires cannot?  Smile


2H4


Intentionally Left Blank
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:35 am

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 23):
Perhaps a trip to an airshow or fly-in is in order....

Perhaps this is a topic for a whole new thread but here goes.

Opposed-engine, midwing monoplanes stressed for 12 Gs in each direction, capable of square outside snaploops are ruining airshows. They are all the same. Dare I say it? At Reno, when Sean Tucker launches, it is time to head for the porta-potties. Bor-ing!

Give me Frank Tallman bravely attempting barnstormer loops in his Grumman J-2F Duck. "pontoonovers"

Give me Bob Odegaard doing a whole airshow at "thirty-twenty" (30"hg and 2000 RPM) lazily up and over then whispering past the crowd in a flash of red and white bent-wing super Corsair. Or the late Bill Fornof doing the same thing with his Cadillac-bronze Bearcat.

Give me Cliff Howard doing flawless rolling circles to the outside in his anemic Taylorcraft.

Maybe it is time for Burt Rutan to design an airshow airplane. It could have ten horsepower for every pound of gross weight, be stressed for 40G in each direction and come with a G-suit that embraces your heart and the arteries to your brain. He could call it the "way too-eze" and it would serve to illustrate the relative pointlessness of modern airshow acro.

Like I said, nostalgia ain't what it used to be.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
Curmudgeon
Posts: 682
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:19 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:02 am

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 23):
Sounds like she's got the proper genes. Perhaps a trip to an airshow or fly-in is in order....

I'm almost afraid to do that to her. My old man, the Lancaster pilot, took me to an airshow at Selfridge AFB when I was six, and I couldn't catch my breath for months afterward. She's been drawing planes a lot since that Stearman went by, so maybe the genes are kickin' in. There's a DC-3 scenic service here that might be a cool Christmas present too... Smile
Jets are for kids
 
2H4
Topic Author
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:18 am




Quoting Curmudgeon (Reply 25):
There's a DC-3 scenic service here that might be a cool Christmas present too...

Great idea. Years from now, not too many kids her age will be able to say they've flown on a DC-3.


2H4


Intentionally Left Blank
 
Soku39
Posts: 1731
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2000 7:16 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:20 am

This thread has brought the largest smile to my face. This is seriously making me reconsider if I really want a job at a regional a year or two after I graduate from college. Maybe I'll move to Canada or South America hell Alaska somewhere where I can do some none auto pilot / non perfect instrument runway situations, pretty much real flying before I start the whole ERJ or CRJ thing (I'm really thinkin twin/otters). I swear the other kids in my program here at school don't love it half as much as any of you guys here in tech ops.

PS. Somedays I feel sorry for my accountant parents and non aviation friends wh have to put up with my passion...
The Ohio Player
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:40 am

Quoting Soku39 (Reply 27):
This is seriously making me reconsider if I really want a job at a regional a year or two after I graduate from college.

I would not presume to advise you on how to manage your career - I made such a hash of my own. But as I entered the waning years of my airline career (and made my first couple trips to Alaska) it occurred to me what a dunce I'd been.

I sat here for three years after leaving active duty (and the big Vietnam wind-down in hiring) seriously unemployed or under-employed and never thought to take myself to Alaska. I sat here with three thousand hours of miscellaneous STOL and taildragger, and radial, and even helicopter time and never thought to take it to Alaska. The time was logged in Beavers, Otters, Helio Couriers and Super Cubs and later, DC-3 and Twin Beech time. Somewhere up there was an overworked chief pilot hoping a guy like me with some taildragger time, a guy who'd scared himself and gotten himself out of it a time or two would knock on his door.

Now I'm too old, placid and comfortable to care if sixty gallons of kerosene and a Winchester model 70 get delivered to Umchukkalukk today. I'll never do it it now.

I don't have many regrets but this might just be one.

On the other hand if I'd cratered on a snowy mountainside somewhere I might have regretted that.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
WrenchBender
Posts: 1662
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:59 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:45 am

When I was posted to Yellowknife, NWT a few years ago. We had a French Airforce Transall do an RON. As soon as the chocks were in, the props were still coasting down and the entire crew came charging off the A/c with their cameras headin to our neighbours ramp area
http://www.buffaloairways.com/fleet.htm
http://www1.airliners.net/search/pho...falo%20Airways&distinct_entry=true
Still running Sched Pax and freight service s with radials.
Geez I miss that sound.

WrenchBender
Silly Pilot, Tricks are for kids.......
 
Soku39
Posts: 1731
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2000 7:16 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:27 am

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 28):
On the other hand if I'd cratered on a snowy mountainside somewhere I might have regretted that.

Well I'm 19, on the verge of my instrument rating, and invincible, I'm sure I'll still be invincible when I'm 23.   (and back in your day you guys didn't have the GPS crutch. ooooh what a crutch)

[Edited 2006-12-10 18:29:29]
The Ohio Player
 
GQfluffy
Posts: 3072
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:25 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:01 am

Quoting 2H4 (Thread starter):
then give a small lady-like “poot” and start whining louder.

Sounds just like my gf....but I don't think there's anything small or ladylike about her "poot"...

Quoting Blackbird (Reply 3):
I drive stick

 checkmark 
This isn't where I parked my car...
 
User avatar
Scooter01
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:06 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:13 am

Don't know if this is the right forum to post this, but it seems to be a lot of young ( wanna-be young) people out there that write comments aboout the good old days and what they believe the future is going to be like.

My father was part of the airline industry from 1946 working with DNL (which became SAS) and flew as an onboard passenger service agent (purser?) on Sandringhams up and down the coast of Norway. He stayed with SAS another 12-13 years untill he was hired by a foreign airline to represent them in Norway, a position he held untill retirement 20 years ago, completely burned out.
What I fondly remember are stories about his travels and experiences from the late '40es when he was young and feisty.

On July 29, 1988, I had the exquisite pleasure of watching G-BJHS take off from the harbour in Toronto on its way to retirement in a museum in Florida.
It was documented with stills and video and later shown to my father.
His first comment was: "It sounds like a Sandringham but it's a Sunderland, just look at the nose and the rear half of the fuselage."
The Old Man still had the grip, but tonite, when I showed him how to make airline bookings on the internet, he just could not care less.

What I would like to say with this story is that there comes a time when you don't really care anymore about something that really keeps you going today, and I hope for my own sake that that day is still far away. I run to the window and look out/up when I hear a round engine -usually a Harvard or the Broussard from nearby ENKJ, but if one of the countless, boring twin (jet) engine airliners pass by, it's not really worth the time and effort to interrupt whatever I'm doing. (I have been known to react when a 747, AVACS or DC 10 flies over on its way to ENGM.)
 twocents  Scooter
There is always a good reason to watch airplanes
 
lowrider
Posts: 2542
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:09 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:28 am

Quoting Soku39 (Reply 27):
Alaska

Era or Frontier Flying Service would be two places to look. Alaska Cargo Express pays a little better, but is requires a little more time. Bering Air is interesting, but likes prior Alaska experience, as does Arctic Circle Air. There are many many other operators up there, some good, some otherwise. A big part of getting a job there is showing up. Walking in your resume in person goes a long way towards making the necessary impression regarding your commitment to the job. Many people start out doing scenic tours and flight instructing in Anchorage to get thier foot in the door and make connections before moving on to other operators.

If you go, do your homework before hand. The experience is great, but the environment is not to be taken lightly.
Proud OOTSK member
 
ex52tech
Posts: 553
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:28 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:54 pm

Quoting Soku39 (Reply 27):
I swear the other kids in my program here at school don't love it half as much as any of you guys here in tech ops.

That could be because they don't have the experience, or the memories with airplanes that were once plentiful, and are now almost extinct.
They don't see the historical signifigance of the airplanes that got us to where we are today, they see airplanes only as a way to make money.

From a mechanics stand point the new airplanes tell you whats wrong with them, and require some computer skills, but the mechanics that I respect the most are the ones who can fix the airplanes that can't tell you a thing, and the guys that can fabricate parts from nothing more than a twisted, destroyed part, or a blue print, and some sheet metal.

I helped put an A-26 on static display at the base I was stationed at, I was there when it flew in and went out to see it, the engines were still hot and dripping oil.
The whole process of puting the airplane on static display was sad, I felt like we were killing it, I quit before we finished.
I'll never do it again.
"Saddest thing I ever witnessed....an airplane being scrapped"
 
User avatar
Scooter01
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:06 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:47 am

Quoting Scooter01 (Reply 32):
On July 29, 1988

Sorry -got a little bit mixed up there, thr year was 1993.
Wonder why some of the more than 260 readers didn't catch that.
There is always a good reason to watch airplanes
 
DC8FriendShip
Posts: 235
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:35 pm

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:40 am

Quoting Soku39 (Reply 27):
PS. Somedays I feel sorry for my accountant parents and non aviation friends wh have to put up with my passion...

Amen, brother, Amen.

Quoting Ex52tech (Reply 34):
From a mechanics stand point the new airplanes tell you whats wrong with them, and require some computer skills, but the mechanics that I respect the most are the ones who can fix the airplanes that can't tell you a thing, and the guys that can fabricate parts from nothing more than a twisted, destroyed part, or a blue print, and some sheet metal.

Last week I Fabricated (not replaced) an entire set of aileron cables for a CRJ. That was real fun, something that required brains, art, and work. Not just remove bolts, replace part, install bolts. This is What A&P work should be.....
Come fly the Friendly Skies of United
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:20 am

Quoting Ex52tech (Reply 34):
I helped put an A-26 on static display at the base I was stationed at, I was there when it flew in and went out to see it, the engines were still hot and dripping oil.
The whole process of puting the airplane on static display was sad, I felt like we were killing it, I quit before we finished.

I know how you feel. What you were doing seems more like taxidermy than anything else.

Airplanes on a stick! Always kind of a sad reminder that they are not really flying but this is as close as they'll ever get again. I guess we can just appreciate that they are not beer cans now.

[Edited 2006-12-16 23:20:40]
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:23 am

During my apprenticeship at the LH base in SXF (formerly East German Interflug) I worked under several grizzled old engineers with 40+ years of experience.
One I remember best was an old sheet metal worker. He was quite traditional and usually insisted that all apprentices should use the formal form of adress "Sie" to him instead of the informal "Du". Only when the qualified they were allowed to adress him in the informal way of "Du".
Give this guy a sandbag, a ball peen hammer, a blue print and a sheet of aluminium and he could manufacture the most complicated shapes.

At Shannon Aerospace in Ireland, where I worked later, we once had a problem with an A320 3 days before the end of a d-CHECK:
Upon inspection of a previous kin repair it was discovered that the people who had carried out the skin repair had missed cracks in the underlying frame.
The frame could not be spliced and getting a new frame from Airbus would take several weeks.
Fortunately we had some Filipino and South African sheeties who were used from their own countries to actually manufacture structural parts instead of just riveting in factory made parts.
Working in three shifts, they removed the damaged frame, and using this as a pattern, together with a blue print, first manufactured a hardwood template.
On this they manually bent a new frame section using wooden mallets.
This part went then for heat treatment, which took about 12 hours. Then it was provisionally installed to drill all the rivet holes, upon which it went to our paint shop for anti-corrosion treatment and painting. After another 12 hours the part was finally installed and the cockpit floor was closed, followed by installation of the cockpit furniture. We got it finished on time, but the young Irish sheeties, who only could install predrilled factory made parts had never seen something like this before.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
atct
Posts: 2472
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2001 6:42 am

RE: Turbine Engines Are Ruining Aviation

Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:12 am

2H4,

I have to say that was pure joy to read. I am sad to say that we are a dying breed my friend. Give me a Dc-4 over an ATR anyday. I hope that when I retired that Everts and NAC are still flying the DC's so I can go fly for them.

ATCT

Long Live the Radial
Trikes are for kids!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests