MD11Fanatic
Topic Author
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:54 am

Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:15 pm

I was talking to a DC-10 pilot from Omni the other day and he mentioned that planes from the original KSSU configuration were a lot less capable due to more primitive avionics and autopilot capabilities as compared to the later ATLAS configurations.

Can anyone add to this?
 
VC-10
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 1999 11:34 am

RE: Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:28 pm

From a maintenance POV ATLAS & KSSU were two different airline consortium's that pooled their resources to maintain the DC10. All I can remember about the ATLAS group was AF did the CF6 overhauls.

It would be reasonable to assume all the operators within a group would have all their a/c with the same avionic fit.
 
bwaflyer
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 12:48 am

RE: Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:43 am

KSSU - I believe was KLM, Swissair, Sabena, and UTA
 
cdekoe
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:14 am

RE: Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:25 am

I don't know about KSSU vs. ATLAS, but the KLM & Martinair DC-10-30's were CAT IIIc certified and the FMS systems were state of the art. Compared to the B747-200's in the fleet the DC-10 was far more sophisticated.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
 
User avatar
xms3200
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 7:13 am

RE: Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:39 pm

KSSU - KLM, SAS, UTA, Swissair

ATLAS - Aitalia, Lufthansa, Iberia, Air France, Sabena

The avionics in all the KSSU a/c were top notch compared to the ATLAS a/c in my opinion
 
TimT
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 1:38 pm

RE: Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:30 pm

NWA's DC-10 were all KSSU. They tried to get the Cat III thing going and never made it. I've spent 8-10 hours getting one to pass the tests, and on the first flight it would fail. Everytime. As far as differences? I think the part numbers are the same for all the pitch & roll computers. Maybe a different dash number. NWA also disabled the CWS and TURB modes on the A/P. Atlas did not.
 
MD11Fanatic
Topic Author
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:54 am

RE: Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:34 pm

KSSU aircraft sound like they're a lot less capable. Who'd want that?
 
User avatar
TZTriStar500
Posts: 856
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 1:33 am

RE: Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s

Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:43 am

ATLAS and KSSU also translated to galley standards and became the major industry specifications for galley carts, carriers, trays, etc. ATLAS has now become the majority galley standard for most airlines, though some still use KSSU while some others use their own custom specifications which are modifications of the ATLAS or KSSU standard.
35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Channex757, jakef and 13 guests