hamad
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2000 6:29 am

UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:42 am

I might sound stupid, but i will start by saying, that before anyone thinks and bash me, if you don't like my question, don't answer it.

i have been checking and seeing that united operates an evening flight from IAD to DEN (UA903) on a 777-200. i know that when united operates the early morning flight (301) on a 777-200 its to rotate the airplane instead of sitting at IAD, and by the time those big planes return, its time to go international. my question is, why does united operate a 777 on the evening flight when its time for international departure? for instance they could use if for the frankfurt flight instead of the 767 that is currently being operated. what happens to the airplane after it lands in denver? does it stay over night or does it continue some where else?
PHX - i miss spotting
 
UA772IAD
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 7:43 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:02 am

The aircraft flys UA903 to DEN then is parked overnight. It usually returns as 902 to IAD (at 10:30) or 932 to IAD (at 12:45). The aircraft might also fly one of the 3 ORD flights.

The aircraft in question doesn't go to FRA because there is enough service already- 4:30PM A343 (LH), a 5:15PM 744 (UA), a 5:50PM 744 (LH), a 6:40PM 763 (UA) and a 9:45PM 777 (UA). The 763 was only recently added. I would say that's quite a lot of seats to FRA, especially considering there's a flight roughly every 45 minutes between 4:30 and 7 PM, with 2 744s within the same hour.

UA has transcon widebody service to its hubs and focus cites (763/ORD, 777/DEN, 763/SFO, 777/LAX, 763/SEA) during the international departure timebank (5-7pm) to accomodate those traveling into the US from Europe, as well as those passengers who need close to a full day in the DC area before departing (you can go to work for almost the whole day).
These flights are typically nearly full Sunday-Friday, so the use of widebodies is justified.

Plus, IAD does not have a lot of parking for widebodies, compared to SFO, LAX or DEN. If these A/C didn't go somewhere, they would be taking away from the space needed for morning flights (NRT, PEK, KWI arrival, S. America arrivals, Widebody AM domestic flights-SFO, LAX, DEN, ORD).
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:02 am

United has some 777s on domestic routes that could otherwise be used for international flights. The 5pm departure ORD-LAX is traditionally an internationally configured 777. I've flown it before. The plane is flying a domestic route followed by another domestic route. UA could put these international planes on international runs, but still operates them domestically. For this reason, I believe UA could continue further international expansion, but I personally hope that they don't because I really enjoy the opportunity to fly on a three class plane on domestic flights. I've flown ORD-DEN, ORD-SEA, ORD-LAX on international 777s and it's an awesome experience.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
MakeMinesLAX
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 4:22 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:08 am

It's likely this is operated by a domestically configured aircraft (i.e., a 772A) which is not appropriate for the transatlantic hop and is eventually needed somewhere else (e.g. Hawaii). UA's domestic 777 flights have historically employed both 772As and -ERs, based on availability.
 
hiflyer
Posts: 1270
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:38 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:13 am

Y'all every thought about the fact UA has a 777 sized hangar at DEN and does mtc there? No big barns at IAD so this would give a sked chance for routine stuff. Just a thought...  Wink
 
UA772IAD
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 7:43 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:15 am

Quoting MakeMinesLAX (Reply 3):
It's likely this is operated by a domestically configured aircraft (i.e., a 772A) which is not appropriate for the transatlantic hop and is eventually needed somewhere else (e.g. Hawaii). UA's domestic 777 flights have historically employed both 772As and -ERs, based on availability.

IAD-DEN flights are 3 class aircraft. IAD-SFO, DEN-SFO, ORD-SFO and rarely ORD/DEN-LAX utilize domestic 777s mostly on a seasonal basis. The domestic 777s (6 of them) are primarily reserved for SFO-HNL/KOA/OGG, DEN/ORD-HNL, ORD-OGG-KOA, and then any domestic flights that anticipate a heavy load (such as DEN-SFO/SFO-ORD). It's all a shuffle game. 777ERs typically only fly domestic routes to reposition the aircraft at its destination, or if there's nothing else available.

[Edited 2007-04-06 01:16:44]
 
Bicoastal
Posts: 2446
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 1999 5:56 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:16 am

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 2):
United has some 777s on domestic routes that could otherwise be used for international flights. The 5pm departure ORD-LAX is traditionally an internationally configured 777. I've flown it before. The plane is flying a domestic route followed by another domestic route. UA could put these international planes on international runs, but still operates them domestically. For this reason, I believe UA could continue further international expansion, but I personally hope that they don't because I really enjoy the opportunity to fly on a three class plane on domestic flights. I've flown ORD-DEN, ORD-SEA, ORD-LAX on international 777s and it's an awesome experience

United needs that lift between it's hubs in addition to international flights. If they didn't have the big planes making positioning flights between hubs, they'd have to take their short supply of narrow-bodies off of spoke flying and add additional frequencies between hubs to take up the slack. And they need the belly lift to move freight in and out of domestic locations. None of these planes, other than the two class Hawaii aircraft, stay on domestic runs all day long. Ask a friend at United to pull up the routing of just one of its widebodies. You'd be amazed and impressed on how they are scheduled in and out of the courtry day after day after day.
Airliners.net has many forums. It has spell check and search functions. Use them before posting!
 
UA772IAD
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 7:43 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:18 am

Quoting Hiflyer (Reply 4):
Y'all every thought about the fact UA has a 777 sized hangar at DEN and does mtc there? No big barns at IAD so this would give a sked chance for routine stuff. Just a thought...

This is true, however heavy maintence and overhall is done at SFO only.

Bicostal touched upon something else I left out- cargo lift.
 
UA772IAD
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 7:43 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:20 am

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 6):
Ask a friend at United to pull up the routing of just one of its widebodies. You'd be amazed and impressed on how they are scheduled in and out of the courtry day after day after day.

This is an intersting idea. When I go to work this evening, I'll pull a sample 777 (domestic v. international config) as an example.
 
Bicoastal
Posts: 2446
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 1999 5:56 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:27 am

One other thing specific to DEN. Without any United flights to Asia and Europe from its Denver hub, they have hundreds of people from Denver's huge catchment area flying to IAD, ORD, LAX and SFO (and return) to make those international connections. They need the widebody lift on key flights timed to make those international connections just to meet the demand. Maybe someday.....for those DEN fans.....United will add a few international flights from there and lessen the need for widebodies to and from its other hubs.

[Edited 2007-04-06 01:28:38]

[Edited 2007-04-06 01:29:29]
Airliners.net has many forums. It has spell check and search functions. Use them before posting!
 
hiflyer
Posts: 1270
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:38 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:29 am

Quoting UA772IAD (Reply 7):
This is true, however heavy maintence and overhall is done at SFO only.

Yes..heavy and overhaul are done at the MOC but DENMM has line capability on the 777 and the aircraft is given over 12 hrs at DEN to have it performed. FYI it's quite easy to get the parts enroute from MOC to DEN to meet the bird without having to fly the bird 2 hrs more to get it to SFO....and 2 more hours to get it back to IAD reducing available ground time. FYI they get 2 a night for that...one from ORD and one from IAD....and send them back ready to go the next morning to ORD and IAD....as 2 of the 8 777 birds they handle a day currently. Goes down to 6 in May for the spotters...and 7 during the summer.

But lot of you had great thoughts on other reasons...good to see!

[Edited 2007-04-06 02:56:48]
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18831
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 10:19 am

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 6):
And they need the belly lift to move freight in and out of domestic locations.

AA also has a daily 777 MIA-DFW-MIA. I recall lthe recent CNBC special "A Day in the Life of American Airlines" where they were interviewing one of AA's cargo managers at MIA. He said the 777 on MIA-DFW was mainly operated to handle containerized and palletized cargo from South America.
 
IC408
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:51 pm

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:25 am

As mentioned earlier, line maintenance is likely the main purpose but the number of inbound pax from Europe through IAD are pretty high and UA903 is the first flight with legal/realistic connections to DEN and the ability to sell F/J/Y seats to those pax probably helps with revenue as well. So the Intl 777 makes a lot of sense esp since its the second to last flight of the day to DEN with UA933 being an A320 and catering more to O/D traffic.
Opinions expressed within my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of United Airlines, Inc.
 
User avatar
LTU932
Posts: 13069
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 12:34 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:46 am

Quoting MakeMinesLAX (Reply 3):
It's likely this is operated by a domestically configured aircraft (i.e., a 772A) which is not appropriate for the transatlantic hop and is eventually needed somewhere else (e.g. Hawaii).

The 772A is frequently used for Transatlantic flights out of IAD and possibly also from ORD (everything depending on the distance, if it's too long, then a -200ER will fly the route). Just because it's a 772A, doesn't mean it doesn't fly internationally.  Wink
 
b52murph
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:02 pm

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:23 pm

Quoting MakeMinesLAX (Reply 3):
It's likely this is operated by a domestically configured aircraft (i.e., a 772A) which is not appropriate for the transatlantic hop and is eventually needed somewhere else (e.g. Hawaii). UA's domestic 777 flights have historically employed both 772As and -ERs, based on availability.

Nope...as already mentioned, it's a 3 class 772A. I have flown this flight several (at least 4) times and am scheduled to do so again the end of this month. Each time, the aircraft has arrived from MUC; not sure how long it's been that way, but this has been the case going back at least 3-4 years. It's almost always full in Y going out from IAD, with many pax needing departure mgt cards to confirm seats at the last minue.

When I last flew this flight last November (right after Thanksgiving), it seemed as if half the pax load was in line with departure management cards at the gate trying to get seats. The gate agent wasn't pleasant about it either....but that's a long story for another day.
 
UA772IAD
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 7:43 am

RE: UA 903, Why A 777?

Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:08 pm

Quoting B52murph (Reply 14):
It's almost always full in Y going out from IAD, with many pax needing departure mgt cards to confirm seats at the last minue.

When I last flew this flight last November (right after Thanksgiving), it seemed as if half the pax load was in line with departure management cards at the gate trying to get seats. The gate agent wasn't pleasant about it either....but that's a long story for another day.

That would be stand by passengers/ employees.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests