Seyah
Topic Author
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:29 pm

Fuel Consumption Based On Incremental Drag

Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:44 pm

I'm trying to determine how much additional fuel would be consumed if an aircraft were to add a specific amount of drag. For instance, if an airline were to install an antenna on a B737-800, how much additiona fuel would the aircraft consume due to the incremental drag associated with the antenna. I know the amount of drag quoted by the manufacturer (~50 lbs) and I'm assuming that's at 0.8 mach and 35k feet. I understand it will be different depending on the operating characteristics of the aircraft, flight phase, etc. so I'm really just focusing on cruise and would use some industry averages for block hours, flights, etc. Thanks.
 
User avatar
jetmech
Posts: 2316
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:14 am

RE: Fuel Consumption Based On Incremental Drag

Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:24 pm



Quoting Seyah (Thread starter):

It's a tricky question as you noted. One reason is that a given increment of additional thrust from a jet engine does not necessarily equate to a given incremental change in fuel consumption. As you can see from the following chart, the change in the amount of fuel you need to get a particular additonal thrust increment depends on the operating point of the engine at the time.



http://www.aircraftenginedesign.com/pictures/fig_14e.jpg

To answer your question, you would need to know the thrust the engine is puitting out at your cruise scenario. You would than need to find a similar thrust vs. SFC chart for the CFM56-7B engine to find out how an additonal 50 lbs of thrust will affect the SFC.

Regards, JetMech
JetMech split the back of his pants. He can feel the wind in his hair :shock: .
 
Seyah
Topic Author
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:29 pm

RE: Fuel Consumption Based On Incremental Drag

Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:46 pm

JetMech,

Thanks for the quick response. I've found some of the info you're refering to for different engines and have run some numbers but due to the size of my results, I was thinking I might need to ask someone more "learned" than I. For example, for a CFM56-7B engine on a B737NG, I found the values of TSFC = 0.55 and Thrust = 5,960 lbs at cruise (0.8 mach and 35k feet). My calculations resulted in additional fuel burn of ~27 lb/hr for the 50 lb drag antenna; which seemed excessive. With the Thrust and TSFC values above, do you know how to generate a fuel number? Thanks.
 
User avatar
jetmech
Posts: 2316
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:14 am

RE: Fuel Consumption Based On Incremental Drag

Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:54 pm

Quoting Seyah (Reply 2):
TSFC = 0.55 and Thrust = 5,960 lbs

Assuming the SFC has the units of lb's fuel per hour per pound of thrust, the absolute magnitude of your fuel consumption is about 3,278 lb's / hr. It thus looks to me that your additional 27lb's / hr due to the antennae will bring this to 3,305 lb's / hr, which is an increase of about 0.824%.

This seems reasonable to me, as thrust equals drag in steady state cruise conditions. The aircraft drag would thus be 5,960 lbf not including the antenna. The additonal antenna drag is approximately 0.839% of the aircraft drag figure. Not sure if this helps!

Regards, JetMech

[Edited 2008-03-04 13:26:08]
JetMech split the back of his pants. He can feel the wind in his hair :shock: .
 
User avatar
Jetlagged
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:00 pm

RE: Fuel Consumption Based On Incremental Drag

Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:19 pm

It's a very simple sum, no need to make it complicated. If TSFC is 0.55 then the additional fuel flow for 50 lb of drag is:

0.55 * 50 = 27.5 lb/hr

The intermediate step of working out fuel flow from an assumed thrust is not necessary.
The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
 
Seyah
Topic Author
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:29 pm

RE: Fuel Consumption Based On Incremental Drag

Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:26 pm

Jetlagged,

Thanks for your input as well. I'd hoped it was as simple as you stated but when I factored in annual block hours (typical ~3,000), conversion of pounds to gallons (6.7 lbs/gal) and a fuel price of $2.50/gal, the annual incremental fuel cost of $30,784 seemed abnormally high.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CrimsonNL, Dalmd88, piciuuu and 17 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos