User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

A320 Freighter Conversion

Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:32 am

Why is there no STC for the Freighter conversion of the A320 series.Any reason for a delay in this.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
norcal
Posts: 1507
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:44 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:26 pm

I thought Airbus had some problems with the service life of the earlier versions (the ones ready for conversion) and that is why NW ended up scrapping some of their A320s before their DC-9s?
 
PhilSquares
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:51 pm



Quoting NorCal (Reply 1):
I thought Airbus had some problems with the service life of the earlier versions (the ones ready for conversion) and that is why NW ended up scrapping some of their A320s before their DC-9s?

The NW aircraft were leased. What happens to the aircraft is up to the leasing company, not the airline.
Fly fast, live slow
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9845
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:03 pm



Quoting HAWK21M (Thread starter):
Why is there no STC for the Freighter conversion of the A320 series.Any reason for a delay in this.

AFAIK the kit has almost finished design phase, and fist aircraft should be in service by 2010, the A321 P2F is also being worked on, from memory 20-30t payload range, around 4-5 million a conversion.

Quoting NorCal (Reply 1):
I thought Airbus had some problems with the service life of the earlier versions (the ones ready for conversion) and that is why NW ended up scrapping some of their A320s before their DC-9s?

More like A320s were worth more as parts than carrying out the required inspections, the DC9s are basically worthless as parts. Service life extensions of A320s are in progress, like Airbus did for the A300/A310.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:39 pm

Considering Boeing thought of the B737-700C after the B737-200C/B737-200QC.It was odd why Airbus never thought about the A320 family freighters earlier.I know the B737-200 freighters were a long time ago.But the NGs wern't.

regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9845
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:08 am



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 4):
Considering Boeing thought of the B737-700C after the B737-200C/B737-200QC.It was odd why Airbus never thought about the A320 family freighters earlier.I know the B737-200 freighters were a long time ago.But the NGs wern't.

No doubt the 700C uses much from the 200C.

The 737-200 is about 20 years older than the A320, that would be the main reason why that airframe saw freighter conversion first.

The first A320s have only been in service just over 20 years.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:40 pm



Quoting Zeke (Reply 5):
The first A320s have only been in service just over 20 years.

Exactly. 20yrs is a long time now for a freighter of that size to take on the competition.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:55 pm



Quoting NorCal (Reply 1):
I thought Airbus had some problems with the service life of the earlier versions

It's not really a problem with them, Airbus just used a (relatively) low design service life for the initial A320's. They did what they were designed and supposed to do. What they were designed to do was just different than a DC-9.

Tom.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:59 am



Quoting Tdscanuck (Reply 7):
just used a (relatively) low design service life for the initial A320's

How did they upgrade the service life of the later versions of A320s.what were the mods carried out.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:14 pm



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 4):
Considering Boeing thought of the B737-700C

Practically no 737-700Cs have been ordered.

NS
 
Tod
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:51 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:03 pm



Quoting Zeke (Reply 3):
AFAIK the kit has almost finished design phase,

Who is doing the design work, the OEM or an aftermarket company?

Tod
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:36 pm

Airbus and EADS EFW are doing the design work for the A320 P2F program/

EADS EFW are the aftermarket company in this case, although I see no reason why the program couldn't be extended to other qualified organizations. Certainly a competing program could also be developed.

NS
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:43 pm



Quoting Gigneil (Reply 9):
Practically no 737-700Cs have been ordered.


I thought the US Navy had ordered seven C40A [B737-700C]
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:01 pm

7 is practically none.  Smile

We're talkin bout modern freighters here, and there aren't any 737-700Cs in that service right now.

Not even Alaska ordered them.

NS
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:27 am



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 8):
Quoting Tdscanuck (Reply 7):
just used a (relatively) low design service life for the initial A320's

How did they upgrade the service life of the later versions of A320s.what were the mods carried out.

I'm not sure they moded anything...I think it just gone done by analysis. Damage tolerance is a tricky beast at best. You can do a much better job with 20 years of in-service data under your belt. Plus 20 years of improvement in NDT...

Tom.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:32 am

With numerous Freighter conversion on with older B732 & B733s.Its surprising why the B737-700C did not click.
As far as the A320 goes.after the A300/310 freighter conversion programmes,this will def be considered in time.

regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
Tod
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:51 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:47 pm



Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 15):
As far as the A320 goes.after the A300/310 freighter conversion programmes,this will def be considered in time.

Flight Stuctures Inc, a division of B/E Aerospace did the engineering for the first A300 conversions and is still doing them but so far has chosen not to get into the A320 conversions so far.

Tod
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:48 pm



Quoting Tod (Reply 16):
Flight Stuctures Inc, a division of B/E Aerospace did the engineering for the first A300 conversions and is still doing them but so far has chosen not to get into the A320 conversions so far.

Whats their official reasoning for this decision.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
a320211
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:50 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:45 pm

Apologies if this is a silly question - I dont pretend to be an expert at all. Would there be a demand for freighters of this size? I understand airfield limitations etc but I would have thought that with frieghters bigger would always be better? Economies of scale and all that.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17080
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:57 pm



Quoting A320211 (Reply 18):
Apologies if this is a silly question - I dont pretend to be an expert at all. Would there be a demand for freighters of this size? I understand airfield limitations etc but I would have thought that with frieghters bigger would always be better? Economies of scale and all that.

Yes, there is demand. There are plenty of smaller freighters. FedEx even has what I believe are Cessna Grand Caravans. Just as with self-loading cargo, not every route warrants a large aircraft.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:18 am



Quoting A320211 (Reply 18):
Would there be a demand for freighters of this size?

Absolutely.

Quoting A320211 (Reply 18):
I understand airfield limitations etc but I would have thought that with frieghters bigger would always be better?

If you have to fly 10,000 lbs from A to B, any airplane that can fly more than 10,000 lbs is just wasting resources.

Tom.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Topic Author
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: A320 Freighter Conversion

Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:20 am



Quoting A320211 (Reply 18):
Would there be a demand for freighters of this size

Out here the B737 freighter is doing well domestically.So no doubt that the A320 series would too.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests