Vimanav
Topic Author
Posts: 1448
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:33 am

### A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Apart from the fact that the A320-214 has CFM56-5B4 or -5B4/P engines and the -216 has CFM56-5B6 engines is there a higher take off weight (77000kgs) for the latter model? Which other 320 variant with CFM engines has a 77000kgs MTOW?

brgds//Pran
Sarfaroshi kii tamannaa ab hamaare dil mein hai, Dekhnaa hai zor kitnaa baazu-e-qaatil mein hai

Starlionblue
Posts: 17837
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

AFAIK the only other 320 variant with CFM engines is the -212. Don't know the MTOW.

-212 = CFM56-5A3
-214 = CFM56-5B4/P or CFM56-5B4/2P
-216 = CFM56-5B4/p (Uprated by 300 lb)
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

A342
Posts: 4017
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:05 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

 Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 1):AFAIK the only other 320 variant with CFM engines is the -212

Ah, how dare you forget the -211 with the 5A1!    On top of that, there's the -215 with the -5B5/P engine.

Information about each model and the corresponding weight options can be found here:

http://www.easa.europa.eu/ws_prod/c/...0Iss%204%20dtd%2017%20Jul%2008.pdf
Exceptions confirm the rule.

Starlionblue
Posts: 17837
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

 Quoting A342 (Reply 2): Ah, how dare you forget the -211 with the 5A1! biggrin On top of that, there's the -215 with the -5B5/P engine

Heh. People forget to send me updates. I can hardly be blamed for this.

http://www.rosboch.net/aviation.htm#Codes
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

A342
Posts: 4017
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:05 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

 Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3):Heh. People forget to send me updates. I can hardly be blamed for this.

No problem. Apart from that, there never was an A320-100 with IAE engines, so the -131 version doesn't exist. And using the link I provided, you can add data for the A321-212/213.
There's also the A380-842 with the Trent 970B (or so I think).
Some HGW versions of the A345/6 use more powerful engines, the -643 has the Trent 560 and the -542 has the Trent 556.
Exceptions confirm the rule.

Starlionblue
Posts: 17837
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Thanks man! I'll update again later.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

LASoctoberB6
Posts: 1936
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:23 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

 Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 1):-212 = CFM56-5A3

Is that the engine the older HP birds use?
[NOT IN SERVICE] {WEStJet}

Starlionblue
Posts: 17837
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

All updated thanks. I'll double check the existing ones with that pdf some other day. No time now. Sick kid x2 in da house.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

TS-IOR
Posts: 3533
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 9:44 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Rare are the 215 and 216 variants ! The most commons are -211, -212, -214. Difference remains in the appelation, and the power !

For A32S, IAE engines are most powerful.

A342
Posts: 4017
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:05 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Hi, I noticed a glitch with the A320-216. It is actually powered by the -5B6/P. Compared to the -5B4/P, it actually has less thrust, hence the lower takeoff weights.

And I feel guilty for not giving the exact designations for the A340-643, which is powered by the Trent 560A2-61. Same goes for the -542, it is powered by the Trent 556A2-61.
Exceptions confirm the rule.

A342
Posts: 4017
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:05 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Whoops, a mistake on my part. The A380-842 is actually powered by either the Trent 972-84 or Trent 972B-84, the -841 is powered by either Trent 970-84 or Trent 970B-84.
Exceptions confirm the rule.

Starlionblue
Posts: 17837
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Thanks for the updates. I'll fix that later.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

LH707330
Posts: 1718
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:27 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

 Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3): Heh. People forget to send me updates. I can hardly be blamed for this. Wink

Based on my read of this, it looks like the last number meaning a certain engine only works within a type (A3XX), not types within the family, which doesn't quite make sense to me. For example, An A340-313 and an A340-213 have exactly the same engine, the CFM56-5C4, whereas an A319-112 and an A320-212 have different engines. Structurally, these two sets of planes are rather analogous (one of each pair is a slight shrink), so why not keep the same engine designation numbers? If I were in a MX team, I would find it much easier to memorize one set of last numbers that correspond to an entire family (e.g. A32X-X33 always has a V2527) than have to get it for each of the different members.

Also, I've read a number of seemingly conflicting things regarding the HGW/non-HGW designations about the A340-500/600. On your site, the A340 500/600 appear to have a consistent designation for engine types, as follows:
A340-541: T553
A340-X42 (where X can be 5 or 6): T556
A340-643: T560

I've seen in numerous posts that the HGW variants have an "X" appended to their designation, and that both have the 380 ton MTOW and more powerful engines. Thus, I would expect the entire family to look like this:

A340-541: T553, 372 t MTOW
A340-542X: T556, 380 t MTOW (HGW version)
A340-642: T556, 368 t MTOW
A340-643X: T560, 380 t MTOW (HGW version)

Now, there are plenty of pictures of LH A340-600s in the a.net database, and as far as I can see they're all labeled "A340-642." On LH-taufnamen, the last 10 of them (D-AIHP-D-AIHZ) are listed as A340-642X. Does this mean that LH bought 380 t A340-600s with T556 engines, or is there an inconsistent labeling format? If so, what's the correct one?

strfyr51
Posts: 2451
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

the A320 models 211-214-216 231-232-233 can be ordered with any variation of weight variations or engines either CFM56-5B
for the 21X or v2500 for the23X. the highest weight variants were wv7,10,12 77T mgwt, 15 and 17 with 78T
I paged thru the SRM and found NO wv-17's , a few -15's, and a L:OT of 10's 77T, (mostly ordered by UAL and AmWest (now American via USAir).
The Problem with the A320 is the Life limit of 48K Hrs and 37.5K cycles unless the life extension si done for 80K hrs and 48K cycles. This might rule out A320's as freighters in the coming years.

LH707330
Posts: 1718
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:27 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Thanks! Does this same pattern hold true for the A340s as well, where the MTOW and engine combos can be swapped around? IIRC, the T500 is the same engine anyway, and the thrust level is a software issue, do you know if you can buy a 380 ton frame with the weaker engines?

Starlionblue
Posts: 17837
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

 Quoting LH707330 (Reply 14):Thanks! Does this same pattern hold true for the A340s as well, where the MTOW and engine combos can be swapped around? IIRC, the T500 is the same engine anyway, and the thrust level is a software issue, do you know if you can buy a 380 ton frame with the weaker engines?

Certainly you can get engines at different ratings, so I assume you can get different MTOW options.

A340
-211/311 = CFM56-5C2
-212/312 = CFM56-5C3
-213/313 = CFM56-5C4
-541 = Trent 553-61
-542 = Trent 556A2-61
-642 = Trent 556-61
-643 = Trent 560A2-61
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

LH707330
Posts: 1718
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:27 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

Does this mean that a LH A340-642X has the T556 and the 380 t MTOW?

Starlionblue
Posts: 17837
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

### RE: A320-214 & -216 Differentiation Question

 Quoting LH707330 (Reply 16):Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 15): Does this mean that a LH A340-642X has the T556 and the 380 t MTOW?

All I can tell you is that it had the 556-61. I don't know about the MTOW.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: md11forever and 3 guests

### Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos