sdq777
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:43 pm

Why no GE CF6-32 on 757s?

Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:28 am

I was curious as to why GE didn't install the CF6 engine on the 757 aircraft. Some of the A300's, 747's, and DC-10's have them. Any feedback would be great.
 
User avatar
CCA
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 7:29 pm

RE: GE CF6-32

Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:19 am

From Wiki

Quote:
The CF6-32 was intended to be a stripped-down version of the CF6-80 for the Boeing 757. It was never launched due to lack of interest from airlines following the success of the PW2000 and RB211-535 engines.





Also
Why Did The GE CF6-32 Engine Fail? (by 1337Delta764 Mar 30 2006 in Civil Aviation)

[Edited 2009-06-09 22:26:21]
P1 in A330, A340, A346, B742, B744, B748.
 
EA772LR
Posts: 1285
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:18 am

RE: Why No GE CF6-32 On 757s?

Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:02 pm

I wonder if there is info available as to why the airlines showed no interest in the CF6? It would have certainly been interesting had the CF6 joined the PW2000/RB211.
We often judge others by their actions, but ourselves by our intentions.
 
User avatar
Jetlagged
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:00 pm

RE: Why No GE CF6-32 On 757s?

Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:33 am



Quoting Sdq777 (Thread starter):
Some of the A300's, 747's, and DC-10's have them. Any feedback would be great.

Those aircraft have CF6-50 engines, not CF6-32s. The CF6-32 never went into production. I can't answer why the CF6-32 engine didn't get any orders, maybe the economics just weren't competitive.
The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
 
jetlife2
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 11:32 am

RE: Why No GE CF6-32 On 757s?

Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:05 am

Oh this is a great story.

You should appeal to ex-GE or ex-RR folk to tell it.
My views are not necessarily the views of the GE Company
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: Why No GE CF6-32 On 757s?

Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am

I guess the success of the P&W2000 & RB211-535 series did not require a third alternative.
Anyone aware of the theoritical details of the CF6-32 in comparism to the former two powerplants?
regds
MEL.
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests