User avatar
747classic
Topic Author
Posts: 2050
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

747-200B SUD Questions

Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:08 pm

In 1984 KLM and UTA decided to convert their 747-200's, powered with GE CF6-50 engines, to the SUD (stretched upper deck) configuration. The converted aircraft became 747-200(SUD) aircraft, however on the 747 Type Certificate A20WE this subtype is not mentioned.
In fact they remained 747-200B aircraft in all documentation.
During September 1984 till march 1886 the following 12 aircraft were converted (not in the right order).
- B747-206B serial numbers 21110, 21111,21549,21550,21659,21660,21848,22376,22379 and 22380.
- B747-2B3B serial numbers 22514 and 22515

I have two questions concerning this conversion :

-Is there an STC (Supplemental Type Certificate) issued for this conversion? I couldn't find on Internet.

- Are pictures available (on the net) of the actual modification in the Boeing factory in Seattle. I can remember that some were publicized in KLM magazines.

.
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
 
User avatar
TZTriStar500
Posts: 872
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 1:33 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:16 pm

It was an STC if the TC was not amended. I did some looking in the Regulatory and Guidance Library and came across STC's SA1442CE-D, SA1443CE-D, and SA1444CE-D which state they install an extended upper deck and Type I door on the LH side so these are likely the STC's.

The applicant is Boeing Wichita which specializes in these type of modifications though the photos I have seen show the actual modifications taking place in the Everett factory. I'm sure there are photos, but I cannot recall where I saw them.
35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.
 
User avatar
747classic
Topic Author
Posts: 2050
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:53 pm

Thank you for searching on the Internet for me
However all these STC's are from the (inside) extension of the upper-deck to put pax. seats in the former lounge area. During this modification also extra pax. windows and one extra emergency escape door was added on the left side. Most 747-100's and early 747-200's were delivered with one RH emergency escape door and 3 windows at each side. All above mentioned STC's were performed around 1980.
KLM performed this modification on 747-206B aircraft, powered by JT9D-7W engines.
These aircraft did not receive the upper-deck extension to make them 747-300's look-alikes.
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
 
zanl188
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:05 pm

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:39 pm



Quoting 747classic (Thread starter):
- Are pictures available (on the net) of the actual modification in the Boeing factory in Seattle. I can remember that some were publicized in KLM magazines.

I've looked several times for pictures of this mod on the net and found nothing. I remember seeing the pix in Aviation Week and Space Technology back in the 80s. More recently I've seen them as a greyed out background for an ad in the same mag - sorry I don't recall which issue or who the ad was for.
Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
 
User avatar
TZTriStar500
Posts: 872
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 1:33 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:13 am



Quoting 747classic (Reply 2):
Thank you for searching on the Internet for me
However all these STC's are from the (inside) extension of the upper-deck to put pax. seats in the former lounge area. During this modification also extra pax. windows and one extra emergency escape door was added on the left side. Most 747-100's and early 747-200's were delivered with one RH emergency escape door and 3 windows at each side. All above mentioned STC's were performed around 1980.
KLM performed this modification on 747-206B aircraft, powered by JT9D-7W engines.
These aircraft did not receive the upper-deck extension to make them 747-300's look-alikes.

You are absolutely correct and I should have thought of that. The SUD mod installs Type A exits also and not Type I. This has been quite the conundrum and intrigued me very much as I have not found a direct STC or TC amendment that covers these aircraft.

I looked further into the TCDS and saw that the -100/200 series upper decks are limited to either 32 or 45 if they are in compliance with either Special Condition 25-61-NW-1 or 25-71-NW-3. The latter allowed 45 if there was a straight stairway versus the spiral stairway. Since the -200 SUD mod is not part of the TC and does not appear to be an STC, they chose not to increase the upper deck capacity to 110 match the 100 SUD and -300. It looks like the mod was strictly structural to provide more floor space only and not a higher passenger capacity. I now think it was performed under Boeing SB and considered part of the TC certification basis. It almost certainly required an AFM change however.

If I remember correctly, I thought I read that the first or first couple of aircraft where modified in Everett and KLM did the rest in-house.

If anyone else has more detailed technical knowledge of how these aircraft were modified from a certification standpoint, I would like to know.
35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.
 
Tod
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:51 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:16 am

I think that it was driven by an SB.

If so, the updated IPC would reflect that.

Tod
 
User avatar
747classic
Topic Author
Posts: 2050
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:58 am



Quoting TZTriStar500 (Reply 4):
If I remember correctly, I thought I read that the first or first couple of aircraft where modified in Everett and KLM did the rest in-house.

All aircraft were modified in Everett.
I am asking all these technical/operational questions because I am searching for all relevant data about the classic 747-200/300 aircraft that were flown under the dutch register.
After working almost 30 years with KL and MP as a 747-F/E on all these aircraft , there are still some loose ends. In the end I am planning to write a book about this subject.

Relevant aircraft :
747-206B PH-BUA,B,C.D,E,F and G
747-206B(SUD)SF PH-BUH and I ( most modified 747 aircraft in the world )
747-206M(SUD) PH-BUK,L,M,N,T
747-206B(SUD) PH-BUO,P,R
747-306M PH-BUU,V,W
747-21AC PH-MCE,F
747-228F PH-MCN

In advance thanks for the cooperation
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
 
DH106
Posts: 595
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 5:32 pm

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:09 am



Quoting 747classic (Reply 6):
Relevant aircraft :
747-206B PH-BUA,B,C.D,E,F and G

PH-BUF clearly wasn't around at the time of these mods.
...I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tanhauser Gate....
 
User avatar
747classic
Topic Author
Posts: 2050
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:54 am



Quoting DH106 (Reply 7):
PH-BUF clearly wasn't around at the time of these mods.

I was only explaining why I was interested in detailed data of all 747-200/300's, registered under the Dutch register. To be exactly to the point : I operated all these aircraft, except PH-BUF, because I joined KLM in 1978.
But I am still looking for all data over the actual SUD-modification of the CF-6 powered 747-206B aircraft. My file is not complete on this point.
All comments are welcome.
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.
 
User avatar
kl5147
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:58 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:05 pm



Quoting 747classic (Reply 6):
All aircraft were modified in Everett.

AFAIK BUA/B/C/D/E/G were modified in Wichita.
The others in Everett.
Since you worked at EHAM you probably know the dates in the file below.
I got them for the PW powered a/c from a -former- KLM BWK.
There might be a variation in "to/from" Boeing dates, since they are -as I recall- given for departure/arrival at EHAM. So they might differ from the actual arrival/departure in the US
Big version: Width: 850 Height: 1169 File size: 123kb
Upperdeck modifiactions of KLM 747's (PW & GE)


btw, Welcome to A-net!

[Edited 2009-08-18 12:08:06]
"The world is just a click away!"
 
User avatar
747classic
Topic Author
Posts: 2050
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:13 am

RE: 747-200B SUD Questions

Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:54 pm

The exact dates of the lounge to pax. modification of the upper deck of the PW-powered aircraft were not known to me, thanks.
If you have some info about the STC or pictures of the actual SUD modification in Seattle , pls. let me know.

regards Peter.
Operating a twin over the ocean, you're always one engine failure from a total emergency.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: RetiredWeasel, WIederling and 15 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos