mcg
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:49 am

RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:03 pm

Came into gate B85 at DIA on a flight from MSO. There was an RJ at the next gate being prepared for departure. It looked all the bags had been loaded and to me it looked like the ramper was loading sand bags into the cargo hold. The bags were bright red in color and were about the size of a bag of lawn fertilizer. They really looked like sand bags to me.

As a passenger it sometimes seems to me that the RJ has interesting weight and balance challenges, but I really can't imagine an airline loading sand into a plane to keep the weight and balances within standard.

Could these bags have been sand bags? If not, deos anybody have any suggestion as to what they might have been?

Thanks
 
mpdpilot
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:44 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:07 pm

Having done a few W&B for the RJ. It is quite nose heavy and yes occasionally it will require some ballast in the cargo hold to being the CG within limits. Typically this is needed on shorter flights but I guess there are number of times when this might be required.
One mile of highway gets you one mile, one mile of runway gets you anywhere.
 
FlyDeltaJets
Posts: 1635
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:24 pm

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:15 pm

I noticed this on the short flights with low baggage counts as well as a person riding in the jumpseat.
The only valid opinions are those based in facts
 
mcg
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:49 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:16 pm

Thanks, this would be consistent with the behavior I've observed of shifting passengers to the rear of less than full RJ's.

Thanks again for the info.
 
Alias1024
Posts: 2247
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:13 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:41 pm



Quoting Mcg (Thread starter):
They really looked like sand bags to me.

That is because they were sand bags. Many airlines use sand bags as ballast for weight and balance purposes, including Skywest. Others use water filled containers. I've seen spare aircraft tires and bundles of inflight magazines used when enough ballast was not on hand.

The CRJ-200 was designed back when average passenger weights were lower. Now, the higher average weights mandated by the FAA lead to a nose heavy airplane.
It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems with just potatoes.
 
Goldenshield
Posts: 5015
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 3:45 pm

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:46 pm



Quoting Mcg (Reply 3):
Thanks, this would be consistent with the behavior I've observed of shifting passengers to the rear of less than full RJ's.

Thanks again for the info.

It happens to mainline aircraft, too, albiet without sand bags (although I've seen some carriers use them.) By moving the bags to a further aft position, they can shift the moment of the aircraft towards the aft in order to minimize, and even nullify, the movement of passengers in the cabin.

The only downside about the sandbags, is that while they help to balance the aircraft, they are also counted as payload, which may bump a passenger.
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
 
pilotpip
Posts: 2821
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 3:26 pm

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:54 pm



Quoting Alias1024 (Reply 4):

That is because they were sand bags. Many airlines use sand bags as ballast for weight and balance purposes, including Skywest. Others use water filled containers. I've seen spare aircraft tires and bundles of inflight magazines used when enough ballast was not on hand.

The CRJ-200 was designed back when average passenger weights were lower. Now, the higher average weights mandated by the FAA lead to a nose heavy airplane.

Pax weights have little effect on the 145. It's always been nose heavy, especially without T/Rs. Likely has more to do with stretching a shorter design.
DMI
 
mpdpilot
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:44 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:03 pm



Quoting Goldenshield (Reply 5):
The only downside about the sandbags, is that while they help to balance the aircraft, they are also counted as payload, which may bump a passenger.

That has to be pretty rare as most of the time the ballast is only needed when the plane is light meaning the extra weight wouldn't do much and there are plenty of seats. Then when the flight is full it is less likely to have this problem as the cargo hold will be pretty full already. Just the experience I had though so I guess it is possible.
One mile of highway gets you one mile, one mile of runway gets you anywhere.
 
Goldenshield
Posts: 5015
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 3:45 pm

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:11 pm



Quoting MPDPilot (Reply 7):
Just the experience I had though so I guess it is possible.

It's not very often that it happens. Usually, with a full load, you'll see sandbags when there's someone in the jumpseat.
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
 
JER757
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:48 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:54 am



Quoting Pilotpip (Reply 6):
Pax weights have little effect on the 145. It's always been nose heavy, especially without T/Rs. Likely has more to do with stretching a shorter design.

I believe its to do with the wings being placed relatively far back along the fuselage?

Its been a while since I've done W&B for an RJ/146 but it always struck me as relatively easy to trim; nothing more than having to move a few pax on lighter loaded flights...
Gale force fog... don't you love it?
 
mcg
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:49 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:24 pm

Thanks again for everyone's info. FYI my reference to 'RJ' is really the Bombardier RJ-200, the fifty seater.
 
josekmlb
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 7:34 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:10 am

The past week or so most planes have been loading up sand bags for ATL since they seem to run out of sand bags had to put on like 1100lbs of sand for ATL on a RJ-200 last week. But you do seem to get alot of sands bags off the RJs.
 
super737
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:14 pm

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:36 pm

On embraer jets E135s and so forth, Fuel can be used as ballast. For example an extra 1500kgs on top of the uplift required for the flight can be added to help balance the ship.
If its not a super tractor its not a plane
 
FlyASAGuy2005
Posts: 3965
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:55 am

RE: RJ Weight And Balance Question

Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:00 am



Quoting Alias1024 (Reply 4):
I've seen spare aircraft tires and bundles of inflight magazines used when enough ballast was not on hand.

I've done that a few times as well. Usually during the evening flights when no one is around to find bags. Had to make a trip to Stores to get old magazines or get a tire from GSE.

Most I had one night was something like 600 LBS.
What gets measured gets done.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blacksoviet, StereoTechque and 18 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos