747400sp
Topic Author
Posts: 3845
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 7:27 pm

If EMB Was To Stretch The E-195-X To 160 Ft?

Sat May 01, 2010 2:15 am

There a topic about EMB building a 757 replacement in Civil-A. right now. I was thinking, what if the E-195-X was stretch some more to a 757 size, with a 120 ft wing span and 160ft length and eight wheel main undercarriage and more powerful engines?

[Edited 2010-05-01 14:44:52 by srbmod]
 
CRJ900
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:48 am

If EMB Was To Stretch The E-195-X To 160 Ft?

Sat May 01, 2010 7:53 pm

And keep the 2+2 seating config? And people complain that the CRJ1000 has a long cabin... this one would have 40 rows  
Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
 
mandala499
Posts: 6458
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: If EMB Was To Stretch The E-195-X To 160 Ft?

Sat May 01, 2010 10:39 pm

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 1):
this one would have 40 rows

Worse... to carry 200 pax on a 2+2 you'd need 50 rows... I don't fancy flying in a 54 row narrowbody with 220 seats...
  
When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
 
rwessel
Posts: 2448
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:47 pm

RE: If EMB Was To Stretch The E-195-X To 160 Ft?

Mon May 03, 2010 7:57 pm

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 2):
Worse... to carry 200 pax on a 2+2 you'd need 50 rows... I don't fancy flying in a 54 row narrowbody with 220 seats...

Maybe they could do a double decker?   
 
747400sp
Topic Author
Posts: 3845
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 7:27 pm

RE: If EMB Was To Stretch The E-195-X To 160 Ft?

Mon May 03, 2010 8:08 pm

Quoting rwessel (Reply 3):
Maybe they could do a double decker?

HA HA. Lol   

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests