babybus
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 5:07 am

A380 Wasted Space?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 pm

Fantastic aircraft that it is I have been wondering about the amount of empty space on the aircraft.

The entrance lobby is great and sets the tone but I was wondering about the area on the upper deck around the stairs.

Could airlines put J class seats in there? The argument goes that J class pax don't care much for window views hence VS have their J class pointing away from the windows. It would actually make for a cosy cabin and earn more revenue.

At the moment it is used for bench type seats or the 'art gallery' on AF.

What are the issues for not using that space more efficiently?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Nitin Sarin - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Stefan Sonnenberg

and with that..cabin crew, seats for landing please.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23074
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:51 pm

Quoting Babybus (Thread starter):
What are the issues for not using that space more efficiently?

They currently don't need to thanks to the economics of the plane.
 
baroque
Posts: 12302
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:15 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:59 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
Quoting Babybus (Thread starter):
What are the issues for not using that space more efficiently?

They currently don't need to thanks to the economics of the plane.

From the parts I have seen, a lot of the extra space seems on QF to go into the business area. A casual look at that area does suggest it is a bit wasteful - but not entirely sure how you could use it better. Probably not a popular suggestion!

Y is a bit more spacious and the extra seat width seems to be what allows me to get my shanks at an angle, thus preventing the dreaded knee capping.

For QF, Premium Y in the A380 is preferable to similar in the 747, in part due to it being on the upper deck.
 
travelavnut
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:35 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:27 pm

IIRC EK uses that space for the shower room.

Maybe some other carriers can put a few massage chairs there, or a game room 
Live From Amsterdam!
 
User avatar
CrimsonNL
Posts: 1798
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:34 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:36 pm

Quoting Babybus (Thread starter):

What are the issues for not using that space more efficiently?

From what I understood around the time the beast first flew, is that because there are no windows, they are not allowed to seat passengers here. So unless you put in a shower room like EK or something fancy, it pretty much is a waste of space if you ask me.

Rgds Martijn
Always comparing your flown types list with mine
 
cmf
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:22 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:14 pm

It is because of the lack of emergency exit in front of those seats.
Don’t repeat earlier generations mistakes. Learn history for a better future.
 
bohica
Posts: 2303
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:21 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:16 pm

FAR's now require new designs to have an evacuation route ahead and behind the seat. Putting seats in the area the OP suggests would violate the regulation because the only route would be behind the seat, even though it is next to stairs. The "bench" style seats, art galleries, showers, etc. are not used for taxi, takeoff and landing.

BTW, the 748 was certified in its current exit configuration because it was grandfathered under the original 747 design.
 
hal9213
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 6:03 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:14 pm

There is plenty of stuff on an airplane requiring space but not being seats, like toilets and galleys. Even if it were allowed to place seats in that area, and if airlines cut all the fancy showers and galleries, they would still place galleys, toilets, storages, crew rests or whatever in there, but not seats, due to the specialised shape of the areas.
 
WingedMigrator
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:45 am

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:50 pm

Quoting Babybus (Thread starter):
I was wondering about the area on the upper deck around the stairs.

That space is reserved for door six, to be used for the A389

 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23074
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:06 pm

Quoting WingedMigrator (Reply 8):
That space is reserved for door six, to be used for the A389.

Would they need a "Door 6"? The stairs would still be at the head of the main deck as an evacuation route for the cabin forward of Door U1L/U1R.

[Edited 2011-10-14 14:09:03]
 
WingedMigrator
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:45 am

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:33 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 9):
Would they need a "Door 6"? The stairs would still be at the head of the main deck as an evacuation route for the cabin forward of Door U1L/U1R.

Most of the stretch for the A389, possibly more than shown in my diagram, will be in section 13. You've effectively got an 18-abreast fuselage plug full of economy seats (in a high-density configuration, which must be designed for) that will put more evacuation traffic on door 1 than it can handle. Hence the new door 6, which was originally in the A388 design but was dropped for weight reasons. The door spacing on the A388 is a bit funky and uneven, but when you add the fuselage plugs for the A389 it all starts to make sense.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17079
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:02 am

Quoting WingedMigrator (Reply 10):
The door spacing on the A388 is a bit funky and uneven, but when you add the fuselage plugs for the A389 it all starts to make sense.

I think the long distance between the upper deck doors is because the slides need to clear the wing.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
WingedMigrator
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:45 am

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:33 am

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 11):
I think the long distance between the upper deck doors is because the slides need to clear the wing.

What's unusual is the very short distance between doors forward and aft of the wing on the A388. If you do the 85-meter A389, my point was that the door spacing becomes remarkably even:

 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17079
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:23 am

Quoting WingedMigrator (Reply 12):
What's unusual is the very short distance between doors forward and aft of the wing on the A388. If you do the 85-meter A389, my point was that the door spacing becomes remarkably even:

You are correct, but I don't think that the reason for the spacing. The wing is simply in the way of the slides. The over wing doors and the upper deck doors make the slide arrangement very complex. Much easier to have the doors where there is no wing.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
2H4
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:30 am

Quoting bohica (Reply 6):
FAR's now require new designs to have an evacuation route ahead and behind the seat.

When did that requirement begin? I always think about that when I'm seated in the aft seats of the CRJ-200.
Intentionally Left Blank
 
Gemuser
Posts: 4301
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 12:07 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:18 am

Quoting bohica (Reply 6):
FAR's now require new designs to have an evacuation route ahead and behind the seat.

And how many individual A380s are certified & operated to the FARs?
Does EASA have the same requirements? Which would be a lot more relevant.

Gemuser
DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17079
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:35 pm

Quoting gemuser (Reply 15):
Quoting bohica (Reply 6):
FAR's now require new designs to have an evacuation route ahead and behind the seat.

And how many individual A380s are certified & operated to the FARs?

Does that really matter? If Airbus has any hope, no matter how faint, of selling to the US market, they can't ignore FAA requirements.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
Gemuser
Posts: 4301
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 12:07 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:04 am

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 16):
Does that really matter? If Airbus has any hope, no matter how faint, of selling to the US market, they can't ignore FAA requirements.

True, but does it make sense to spend the money now, (I assume there is some money involved in ANY certification issue) if EASA does not require it, when ANY USA based order seems very far off? Especially if its something that seems as if it can be solved during cabin fit out.

My point was that the FARs are irrelevant to ANY current operator, UNLESS EASA has the same requirement, which they may or may not, hence that question.

Gemuser
DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
 
babybus
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 5:07 am

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:51 pm

It also begs the question why other airlines apart from Emirates haven't turned that area into luxury bathrooms.

Apart from Emirates the other airlines haven't cleverly used that space. It would be better used as crew bunks or a passenger bar.
and with that..cabin crew, seats for landing please.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23074
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:52 pm

Quoting Babybus (Reply 18):
It also begs the question why other airlines apart from Emirates haven't turned that area into luxury bathrooms.

All that water for the showers does cut into the revenue payload a bit. It's also been a maintenance issue at times (leaks).



Quoting Babybus (Reply 18):
Apart from Emirates the other airlines haven't cleverly used that space. It would be better used as crew bunks or a passenger bar.

Lounges and bars don't seem to be a big draw for premium cabin passengers. Maybe put the cheap seats in the front part of the upper deck and let them have a lounge / bar...   
 
hal9213
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 6:03 pm

RE: A380 Wasted Space?

Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:30 pm

Quoting Babybus (Reply 18):
It also begs the question why other airlines apart from Emirates haven't turned that area into luxury bathrooms.

LH has a luxury bath there. It just doesnt have a shower.
And for all others, I guess luxury restroom is a premium for first class, which -for many other operators- is on the main deck.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests