jayeshrulz
Topic Author
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:36 pm

Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm

As wikipedia says, "On 25 May 2012 the first aircraft of the fleet, a former Singapore Airlines Boeing 777-200ER (operated as 777-200) was painted in the yellow-white FlyScoot.com livery.
Engines derated to non-ER standard.Two more being added.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoot#Fleet

Weren't there alot cheaper 772A's available in the market? Ex AI? CX? Why did they de-rate the 772-ERs? I know SQ has none, but cheaper alternatives were available!

And 407 pax in a 772! Oh my! Never shall i fly this airline!.
Keep flying, because the sky is no limit!
 
col
Posts: 1692
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 2:11 am

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:31 pm

They have always been derated, even in SQ days. They are the ex regional SQ versions. Only the SV registered units are not derated.
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 11831
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:45 pm

Quoting col (Reply 1):
They have always been derated, even in SQ days.

  

The question is, why not re-rate them for the Scoot 402 pax configuration. I suspect they still haul cargo, just more weight in people. Even on the relatively short routes, I could see a little more thrust being in order. But that depends if they will fly out further.

Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
And 407 pax in a 772!

I've read 402. I know, small difference. But that's an extra half row!

Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
Weren't there alot cheaper 772A's available in the market?

The facilities are for RR or GE engines. Most of the 772As are Pratt powered. I doubt SQ/Scoot was looking to buy those used.

Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
but cheaper alternatives were available!

After commissions? I expect the ex-SQ aircraft, once one removed the buying and selling commissions, were the lowest cost alternative.

But hey, there were replaced by leased A333s in SQ's fleet. Maybe airbus will make Scoot a deal when those leases expire.  

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 11002
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:06 pm

Isn't Scoot part of SQ, their own LCC?

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 2):
But hey, there were replaced by leased A333s in SQ's fleet. Maybe airbus will make Scoot a deal when those leases expire.

I doubt it when Scoot can get the SQ B-773s, which are a little older than than the A-333s. The SQ B-773s have 332 seats, their A-333s only have 285 and some of their B-772 (derated ERs) seat 323.

The B-773 can be cattle-car configuered up to 550 seats, the A-333 "only" 440 seats.
 
theginge
Posts: 488
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:53 am

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:30 pm

If they are not using them on routes that require the ER then it may be cheaper to de rate them. Presuming they may well operate at a lower Max Take Off Weight which would then incur lower landing fees etc than operating them as ER's if they don't need that performance.
 
User avatar
Polot
Posts: 4792
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:01 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:01 pm

Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
Weren't there alot cheaper 772A's available in the market? Ex AI? CX? Why did they de-rate the 772-ERs? I know SQ has none, but cheaper alternatives were available!

Did Scoot actually pay anything for the planes, or were they just shifted over from SQ? I don't know how independently it is being run from SQ, alternatives might not have been necessarily cheaper.
 
initious
Posts: 937
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:54 am

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:55 am

The thrusts are derated but they can be electronically programmed to produce more trust akin to the SV* series. "777-200" is just a scheduling code in order not to mix them up with the higher capability SV* series back in SQ days as the SV* series flies the European and other long haul routes while SR* and SQ* series flies regional routes. They are all still officially known as Boeing 777-200ERs. SQ has never operated the Boeing 777-200 before.

Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
And 407 pax in a 772! Oh my! Never shall i fly this airline!.

Hey guess what, I have a flight with them tonight.  Wink (Or tomorrow morning at 2am.. Whatever you like)

[Edited 2012-06-24 20:01:24]
One way I will fly around the world!
 
mandala499
Posts: 6458
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:28 am

It's a paper derate. Derating the engines affects the maximum capable MTOW... this gets translated to the aircraft's certified MTOW, makes the navigation, parking and landing charges easier.
The lower engine thrust rating required, makes for cheaper thrust licenses from RR.

Now, if you need to upscale it, just uprate them again.

So, to answer:

Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
Weren't there alot cheaper 772A's available in the market? Ex AI? CX? Why did they de-rate the 772-ERs? I know SQ has none, but cheaper alternatives were available!

The aircraft is still a 772ER.
Engineering is supported by SIAE.
Scoot relies on SQ for support.
SQ knows well their 777-212ERs... and the quirks of each aircraft.
So, it makes sense for Scoot to use 777-212s (apart from suspicions of "favorable rates" for the 777s coming from SQ...)

Now why did SQ ordered 777-200ERs and then derate them?
Simple, RESALE VALUE! The non-ERs are now dead ducks in the used market. So, the operator that got those ex-SQ derated ones, can always rerate them to full ER thrusts and MTOWs.

Mandala499
When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
 
Thai744
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 9:25 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:07 am

Sorry to sound stupid... but as a mere enthusiast, and not working in aviation or being mechanically minded, would someone mind explaining what "de-rated" means?

I assume the engines on the aircraft now as 777-200's are the same as when the aircraft was considered a 777-200ER?

How does it work?

Thanks in advance.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11804
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:27 am

Quoting Thai744 (Reply 8):
I assume the engines on the aircraft now as 777-200's are the same as when the aircraft was considered a 777-200ER?

How does it work?

I'm not an expert, but as far as I know, it basically electronically limits the maximum thrust the engine can generate, which in effect limits the MTOW of the aircraft.

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 7):
It's a paper derate.

When you say that, does that mean there's nothing actually preventing the engines from being used to their max thrust?
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
mandala499
Posts: 6458
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:02 am

Quoting Thai744 (Reply 8):
I assume the engines on the aircraft now as 777-200's are the same as when the aircraft was considered a 777-200ER?

How does it work?

The engines are capable of I think 93.4klbs... these engines are controlled by the FADEC.
So, why use the excess thrust you don't need? Get a FADEC plug for the thrust you need... This then goes to other things such as MTOW, etc... (which gets reported when you pay your ATC bills... the lower the MTOW and MLW, the cheaper it is).

The case of Garuda's original A333, they were derated to 68klbs... this suits the low MTOW they wanted to use... BUT as the envelope requirements expand, they need to get higher MTOWs, to the extent that the A332s they got, I think are fitted with 72klbs engines.

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 9):
When you say that, does that mean there's nothing actually preventing the engines from being used to their max thrust?

There is the FADEC plug. Sure you can use the max 93.4klbs on a paper MTOW limited to 506000lbs..
But that's a waste of money for thrust you're never going to use... you might aswell limit buying the 82k or less thrust plug license... (a heck of a lot cheaper)
When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11804
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:26 am

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 10):

There is the FADEC plug. Sure you can use the max 93.4klbs on a paper MTOW limited to 506000lbs..
But that's a waste of money for thrust you're never going to use... you might aswell limit buying the 82k or less thrust plug license... (a heck of a lot cheaper)

Gotcha, that's basically what I thought. So there is a limiter in the logic, which could potentially be bypassed.

Thanks!
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
chieft
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:04 pm

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 2):
Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
And 407 pax in a 772!

I've read 402. I know, small difference. But that's an extra half row!

It is 402:

ScootBiz
32 ScootBiz seats in a 2-4-2 configuration, with a seat pitch of 38", 22" seat width, and 8" of seat recline, plus a footrest.

Economy
There are 370 Economy seats in a 3-4-3 configuration, with seat pitch ranging from 31" to 35

In single class, 440 pax would be possible...

[Edited 2012-06-25 05:04:44]
Aircraft are marginal costs with wings.
 
flipdewaf
Posts: 1542
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:28 am

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:05 pm

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 11):
So there is a limiter in the logic, which could potentially be bypassed.

Not really a limiter just a different commanded thrust so it can't really be bypassed, I don't think you can just use a jumper on it.

Fred
Image
 
mandala499
Posts: 6458
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 8:47 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:55 am

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 11):
Gotcha, that's basically what I thought. So there is a limiter in the logic, which could potentially be bypassed.

It's a non-bypassable limiter.
To bypass it, you gotta get a new "plug" for it... that plug is at the FADEC.
Firewall the thrust levers, you're only going to get the maximum allowed by the plug.
When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11804
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:02 pm

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 14):
It's a non-bypassable limiter.
To bypass it, you gotta get a new "plug" for it... that plug is at the FADEC.
Firewall the thrust levers, you're only going to get the maximum allowed by the plug.

Ah ok, thanks for the clarification.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
jayeshrulz
Topic Author
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:36 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:21 am

Quoting col (Reply 1):
They have always been derated, even in SQ days. They are the ex regional SQ versions. Only the SV registered units are not derated.
Quoting mandala499 (Reply 7):
Simple, RESALE VALUE! The non-ERs are now dead ducks in the used market. So, the operator that got those ex-SQ derated ones, can always rerate them to full ER thrusts and MTOWs.

Ahh. thanks guys! Dint know this. They've been to Mumbai on Multiple occasions...

Quoting chieft (Reply 12):
It is 402:

ScootBiz
32 ScootBiz seats in a 2-4-2 configuration, with a seat pitch of 38", 22" seat width, and 8" of seat recline, plus a footrest.

Economy
There are 370 Economy seats in a 3-4-3 configuration, with seat pitch ranging from 31" to 35

In single class, 440 pax would be possible...

Thanks for posting this. It really sounds cramped!   

Quoting initious (Reply 6):
Hey guess what, I have a flight with them tonight. Wink (Or tomorrow morning at 2am.. Whatever you like)

Oh great, how was it?

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 14):
It's a non-bypassable limiter.
To bypass it, you gotta get a new "plug" for it... that plug is at the FADEC.
Firewall the thrust levers, you're only going to get the maximum allowed by the plug.

I suppose the 772ER is certified for higher MTOW.... will the MTOW decrease once the thrust is reduced?
Keep flying, because the sky is no limit!
 
imiakhtar
Posts: 611
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 3:35 am

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:10 am

Quoting jayeshrulz (Reply 16):
I suppose the 772ER is certified for higher MTOW

Correct.

Quoting jayeshrulz (Reply 16):
will the MTOW decrease once the thrust is reduced

Not necessarily. AA 77Es for example have the 92klbs rated Trent 892 but operate at the highest MTOW available. Same with EK 773s.
Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky?
 
jayeshrulz
Topic Author
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:36 pm

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:53 am

Quoting imiakhtar (Reply 17):
Not necessarily. AA 77Es for example have the 92klbs rated Trent 892 but operate at the highest MTOW available. Same with EK 773s.

Yeah but what if load is full? Will the runway be enough of taking off de rated?
Keep flying, because the sky is no limit!
 
imiakhtar
Posts: 611
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 3:35 am

RE: Why Did Scoot De-rate SQ 772ER's To 772?

Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:18 pm

Quoting jayeshrulz (Reply 18):
Yeah but what if load is full? Will the runway be enough of taking off de rated?

I guess it's not too much of an issue. Afterall, AA uses the 77E on the ORD-DEL route which would be close to MTOW and EK uses the 773 on 7 hour + sectors in Europe and Asia-Australia.
Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TZTriStar500 and 10 guests