smartt1982
Topic Author
Posts: 226
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:17 pm

### 737, 1x Reverser Inop And Perf Calculations

Hi

Hoping someone can share some information regarding performance calculations on the 737 with 1 reverser inop.
In our European operator we have a particular set of rules in how we calculate performance with 1 reverser inop and I was just wondering if it is just our company or is dictated by legislation.
We calculate take-off performance with 1 reverser inop from a WET runway but we reduce max weight by 1050kg and reduce V1 by 2 knots.
For take-off calculations from a slippery/contaminated runway with 1 reverser inop we calculate distance using the “no reverse thrust” (we don’t take credit for the remaining one)
For inflight landing calculations onto a runway with 1 reverser inop we use the “No reverse thrust option”.
I realise that it makes sense to do so but I cannot seem to find reference to it from the relevant legislation such as EU OPS but in CS25 I found this under CS25.125 .

“(g) If any device is used that depends on the
operation of any engine, and if the landing distance
would be noticeably increased when a landing is
made with that engine inoperative, the landing
distance must be determined with that engine
inoperative unless the use of compensating means
will result in a landing distance not more than that
with each engine operating.
[Amdt. No.:25/3]”

Is it referring to do or is that something that the manufacture has to take account of with all reversers working?

Fabo
Posts: 1154
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:30 am

### RE: 737, 1x Reverser Inop And Perf Calculations

Boy, is that some lawyerspeak.

Anyway arent operators supposed to calculate every landing/takeoff, at least on dry surface, without reversers?
The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT

tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

### RE: 737, 1x Reverser Inop And Perf Calculations

 Quoting Fabo (Reply 1):Anyway arent operators supposed to calculate every landing/takeoff, at least on dry surface, without reversers?

The operators are supposed to use the certified data. It's the OEM's that have to do the certified data without reversers for a dry runway.

However, the 737 is an oddball in being one of the few aircraft to certify the *wet* performance including reverse thrust. That's not normal. Since they did that, you need to correct the wet performance numbers if you have an inop reverser.

This is sort of tacitly regulatory...you need to use certified performance data and, for the 737 on a wet runway, that data included reverse thrust so you need to account for it. For most other aircraft, the certified data never included the use of reverse thrust so you don't need to correct for it being missing.

Tom.

YYZatcboy
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:15 am

### RE: 737, 1x Reverser Inop And Perf Calculations

Here our Aerodata computer makes weight calculations but we also add an additional 20% factor to all landing distances.
DH1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30/80 717 727 735/6/7/8/9 744 762/3 77E/W E40/75/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150
J/S DH8D 736/7/8

smartt1982
Topic Author
Posts: 226
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:17 pm

### RE: 737, 1x Reverser Inop And Perf Calculations

 Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 2):However, the 737 is an oddball in being one of the few aircraft to certify the *wet* performance including reverse thrust. That's not normal. Since they did that, you need to correct the wet performance numbers if you have an inop reverser.

So other aircraft eg 757/767/777 etc all were certified on wet runways without having to use thrust reversers? How come it was differnet for the 737?

tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

### RE: 737, 1x Reverser Inop And Perf Calculations

 Quoting smartt1982 (Reply 4):So other aircraft eg 757/767/777 etc all were certified on wet runways without having to use thrust reversers? How come it was differnet for the 737?

The others don't have certified wet runway performance data (they have advisory data). If you pull out a 757 FCOM it will just have a Takeoff Speeds table. A 737 FCOM has two...Takeoff Speeds - Dry Runway and Takeoff Speeds - Wet Runway.

I suspect that the 737 did it because short field performance is a lot more important for them than for any other Boeing aircraft, but I'm not sure about that.

Tom.

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bambel, jupiter2 and 1 guest

### Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos