caleb1
Topic Author
Posts: 479
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:51 am

UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:52 pm

I have a friend who is an LAX based flight attendant for United and she told me that UAL crews typically get at least a 48 hour layover in Sydney. She was therefore surprised to learn that Delta crews who operate LAX-SYD flights are only scheduled for a 24 hour layover. My question is that, if my information is correct, how can there be such a large disparity in layover times. I am not an FA, but aren't there minimum crew rest issues involved in planning layovers for flight crews? United and Delta both have the same flight times from LAX to Sydney, so why do UAL crews get a full day more of extra rest than Delta crews? Again, this is all assumng that my initial information is correct.

[Edited 2012-12-31 13:54:48]
 
anstar
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 3:49 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:57 pm

usually flight crews get more than the minimum.

ie on AMS-SFO KLM crews get a 24 hour layover but Virgin and BA crews doing LHR-SFO which is shorter ger 48 hours.

And on LON-LAS I believe BA LHR crews get 24 hrs and LGW crews get 48 hrs.
 
AADC10
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 7:40 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:04 pm

The difference is likely because DL FAs do not have a union while UA FAs do. I doubt the DL pilots would tolerate only a 24 hour layover.
 
azjubilee
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2000 5:26 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:04 pm

A lot of it has to do with the flight schedule. With DL only having one flight per day out of SYD, it's only natural for them to schedule the minimum amount of time the schedule will allow. For example, crews arrive on Monday at 840am and leave Tuesday at 1155am. Thus, it turns out to be roughly 27 hours, which is more than the minimum required rest. With UA, given the fact that they have LAX, SYD and MEL flights, it creates more possibilities for scheduling the crews for rest. In general, when flights are not daily to destinations, the crews will have multiple days in that destination. This is purely due to logistics and not the company rewarding them with a paid vacation! =)
 
tullamarine
Posts: 1612
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 1999 1:14 pm

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:07 pm

I assume one of the UA crews in Syd from LAX or SFO has only 24 hours but gets an easy and short shift of doing the Syd-Mel-Syd add-on this would only be a 4 hour shift and the crew wouldn't have to check out from their hotel
717,721/2,732/3/4/5/7/8/9,742/3/4,752/3,762/3,772,W,310,320/1,332/3,388,DC9,DC10,F28,F100,142,143,E90,CR2,D82/3/4,SF3,AT
 
LAXSTEW
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:48 pm

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:22 pm

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 2):

DL pilots and F/As have the same layover. I'd say most of us prefer the 1-day layover....makes for a very efficient trip.
 
catiii
Posts: 2387
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:18 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:22 pm

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 2):

I'm surprised that those union UA F/A's tolerate those inferior pay rates that they have relative to the nonunion DL F/A's.  

In any event it would seem to me that a productive rotation is one with a shorter layover, his minimizing time away from home while maximizing pay.

[Edited 2012-12-31 14:25:06]
 
N707PA
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2000 11:01 pm

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:38 pm

Would the fact that DL has flat bed F/A crew rests on the 77L make a difference?
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:09 pm

I am a bit surprised since the DL SYDNEY-LAX flight departs in the morning rather in the afternoon on UA.

Quoting N707PA (Reply 7):

Would the fact that DL has flat bed F/A crew rests on the 77L make a difference?


So does the UA 747
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
edina
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:51 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:06 am

Quoting anstar (Reply 1):

KL crew get considerably more time off at base after a duty than BA hence the diaparity.
Worked on - Caravelle Mercure A300 A320 F27 SD3-60 BAe146 747-100/200/400 DC10-30 767 777 737-400 757 A319 A321
 
B4REAL
Posts: 2557
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 5:53 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:18 pm

I became particularly familiar with one DL F/A as we sat together very frequently as she finished her trip and went home. She would do (at the time - 2005ish) CVG-LGW-CVG, flew out on a Tuesday PM, arrived Weds PM, flew back Thursday. She loved it. We frequently would be paired together CVG-GRR when DL operated the 732 on the route. She said that particular arrangement was perfect for her and her work week was Tuesday through Thursday. She since re-based to DTW when the route was cut, but not sure if she has the same arrangement with DTW-LHR-DTW.
B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
 
VH-BZF
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 1999 1:28 pm

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:06 pm

When UA used to fly their daily B744's LAX-AKL-MEL-AKL-LAX (UA841/UA842) the F/A's & tech crew would overnight in AKL southbound for 48 hours, then operate the AKL-MEL-AKL shuttle, overnight for another 23-24 hours before departing again for LAX.

I think Qantas crew have a similar arrangement for crew who operate SYD-LAX-(JFK)-LAX-SYD on the QF107/108 pairing? ie. 48 hours in LAX the first time, then they either layover in NYC or sometimes do the shuttle back to LAX, either way they layover in LAX again for another 24hrs and then head back to SYD. However Qantas crews on the A380 ex SYD & MEL arrive in the morning into LAX, have around 36 hours layover before departing the following evening back to Australia.

Usually the airlines have formulas or agreements in place with the relevant unions on layovers.

Cheers BZF
Ansett Australia - (was) One of the worlds great airlines!
 
User avatar
jetjack74
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 6:35 am

RE: UA Vs. DL- Crew Layovers In Sydney

Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:41 am

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 2):
The difference is likely because DL FAs do not have a union while UA FAs do. I doubt the DL pilots would tolerate only a 24 hour layover.

Has nothing to do with it. If we were union, we'd probably have a shorter layover if it was humanly possible

Quoting catiii (Reply 6):
I'm surprised that those union UA F/A's tolerate those inferior pay rates that they have relative to the nonunion DL F/A's.  
Quoting catiii (Reply 6):
In any event it would seem to me that a productive rotation is one with a shorter layover, his minimizing time away from home while maximizing pay.

True statement. For the most part, we only care about the highest value trip in the shortest amount of duty days. We would trade a long layover in a second for more time off post-trip. Most of the crews who do such highly-coveted trips such as LAX-SYD, ATL-JNB, JFK-NRT, DTW-PEK, as exotic as these destinations are, I can bet you many of these people that fly these trips, that's all they do all month, a 3 or a 4-day rotation with 26+hrs of credit hrs.
Made from jets!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests