Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:22 pm

Till now, I was sure I may use any Manufacturer's or Regulatory Agency's approved documents to close and item in a/c Technical Log Book, provided you use correct effectivity.
In my new company, they use only Aircraft Maintenance Manual, others are unofficially vetoed. FI, a part of a mayor assembly found damaged and it's replaced whith a spare part which p/n is retrieved from Manufacturer's Part Catalog, they still stride to find any AMM reference for that repalcement, frequently using a "Standard Practices" item.
So my questions: Who define which are the alllowed approved documents to be use by Mx: a) Regulatory Agency; b) Manufacturer; c) Operator. And where I can find this regulation.

Many thanks
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9938
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:36 pm

Quoting Apprentice (Thread starter):
Who define which are the alllowed approved documents to be use by Mx: a) Regulatory Agency; b) Manufacturer; c) Operator. And where I can find this regulation.

It goes back to the ongoing airworthiness of the aircraft, i.e. keeping the certificate of airworthiness (CofA) valid. It then comes under the rules of the regulator that issued the certificate of airworthiness.

In an airline environment dealing with large aircraft they will have procedures that are approved by the regulator that issued the CofA that deal with approved methods, written procedures, and parts.

If you are in such an environment, I would suggest that the quality assurance people would be the ones to ask for the specifics relating to your organization.

I have written this post somewhat vague, as a lot of aircraft are operated in different countries from where they were manufactured, each country has the right to establish their own rules.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:49 pm

Thanks for prompt answer. I still will have to work a little bit harder. I will have to probe that B777 AIPC is approved and accepted by FAA.!!!
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
Dalmd88
Posts: 2412
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 3:19 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:41 pm

I've always heard it this way. The IPC is the configuration source. Which part number widget is approved for this s/n aircraft. It is not a approved manual for how to install the widget. That would be the AMM or CMM or SRM possibly.
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:43 am

Quoting dalmd88 (Reply 3):

We are talking about a Cam-Latch, which is part of a whole ASSY. How to replace this particular cam You will not find in AMM or CMM, and nothing to do with SRM
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9938
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:31 am

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 4):
How to replace this particular cam You will not find in AMM or CMM, and nothing to do with SRM

In the US refer to AC No: 20-62E

"a. Replacement of Parts and Materials. The performance rules for replacement of parts and materials used in the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration of aircraft that have (or have had) a U.S. airworthiness certificate, and components thereof, are specified in § 43.13 and part 145, § 145.201. These rules require that the installer of a part use methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the FAA. Additionally, the installer of a part must accomplish the work in such a manner and use materials of such quality that the product or appliance worked on will be at least equal to its original or properly altered condition with respect to the qualities affecting airworthiness.

b. Replacement of Articles. The continued airworthiness of an aircraft, which includes the replacement of articles, is the responsibility of the owner/operator, as specified in parts 91, 119, 121, 125, and 135; and §§ 91.403, 121.363, 125.243 and 135.413. These rules require that the installer determine that an article is eligible for installation on a product or component prior to returning that product or component to service with the part installed. Those rules also require that the installation of a part must be accomplished in accordance with data approved by the FAA, if the installation constitutes a major repair or alteration.

c. Conforming to Regulations. As part of determining whether installation of an article conforms with all applicable regulations, the installer should establish that the article was manufactured under a production approval pursuant to part 21, that an originally acceptable part has been maintained in accordance with part 43, or that the part is otherwise eligible for installation (i.e., has been found to conform to data approved by."

In short, the process should be your stores area will receive the part from the manufacturer or supplier with paperwork indicating that it is suitable for installation on an aircraft.

When replacing the part, you need to "use methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the FAA". These would be your procedures manuals, which will cover specific type related manuals like the AMM, and usually also covers documents like "AC 43.13-1, Acceptable Methods, Techniques and Practices—Aircraft Inspection and Repair.". Many "common sense" tasks are not found in the AMM, and "Standard practices" like "AC 43.13-1" are used.

Unscrewing a cam latch, checking the new part is airworthy and the same as the one being replaced, and reattaching it with the same fasteners would fall into that sort or category IMHO.

This will depend as I indicated above where the aircraft has its CofA issued from.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:30 am

Quoting zeke (Reply 5):
Unscrewing a cam latch, checking the new part is airworthy and the same as the one being replaced, and reattaching it with the same fasteners would fall into that sort or category IMHO.

You also could use AMM chapter 20 "Standard Practices" for such a job.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:45 pm

Quoting zeke (Reply 5):
Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 6):

Talking in this case about part 25 airplane. An AC is deemed more appropiate for smallers planes.
And yes, AMM ATA 20 will be acceptable, but in other job I was prompted to use AIPC as the only acceptable manual that would indicate both that a proper part is been used and that the job may be performed: any part illustrated in bold may be replaced.
My problem is that I can't find the statement from FAA in this case, saying that B AIPC is approved an accepted doc.
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
737tdi
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:05 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:12 am

I have never seen the IPC used or be an acceptable document for the physical act of changing a part. I do use it as an aid but never as a "how to", or document it as a reference in the log book or non-routine card. Chapter 20 is the catch all if the part is attached with screws/bolts/nuts, the SRM would cover rivets, hi-locks, cherry max, etc.. Chapter 20 includes almost all day to day "routine maintenance".

The only place the IPC would be used in the logbook would be in the parts info. entry area where even there you don't use the chapter or subchapter. Most operators this is strictly part no., on/off and serial no. on/off and position installed.
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9938
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:20 am

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 7):
An AC is deemed more appropiate for smallers planes.

Not sure where you got that impression, even ETOPS is covered by the AC.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:57 pm

Quoting zeke (Reply 9):

I didn't find proper way to say, I apologize, just wanted to remark that with commercial planes is not usual to refer to AC43 when answering ATL. What we commonly use are AMM, SRM, WDM, FIM....
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
737tdi
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:05 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:26 pm

Quoting zeke (Reply 9):

Even though it is covered it is not an acceptable reference for a sign off at least here in the US. All references must be from the manufacturers MM or the MPM.
 
humanitarian
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:00 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:50 pm

Some items are covered in the airlines FAA approved GMM.
 
m1m2
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:39 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:52 pm

Regarding using the IPC as a reference, I was always taught to use the AMM, not the IPC.

I have seen diagrams in the IPC with assemblies shown differently than the AMM. In this case the AMM takes precedence. Anyone else ever run across this?

Also, most larger operations do have some of their own procedures which are derived from the manufactures maintenance manuals. In this case I will use this as my reference as it is all linked back to the AMM.
 
b78710
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:21 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:22 am

I usually just make one up haha
 
fr8mech
Posts: 6672
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:00 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:14 pm

Your organization's General Maintenance Manual or General Policies and Procedures Manual (or whatever you call the document that tells a maintenance organization how to work) will spell out which manuals can be used as reference material.

I have yet to find an operator that allows an IPC to be used as an installation reference source. For a cam-loc fastener, I would delve into chapter 20. If the cam-loc is not specifically called out, I would use the vaguest fastener reference I could find.
When seconds count...the police are minutes away.
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9938
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:12 pm

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 11):
All references must be from the manufacturers MM or the MPM.

Nope, it is what is acceptable to the FAA, which is normally in the approved company manuals. To put a curve ball in the discussion, there are aircraft flying and being maintained in the US that do not have a manufacturer.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
humanitarian
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:00 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:02 am

Quoting zeke (Reply 16):
Nope, it is what is acceptable to the FAA, which is normally in the approved company manuals.

Correct, I recall being told the FAA approved GMM takes precedence over the AMM. We were supposed to check the GMM first. The IPC is to be used for ordering replacement parts and when doing so, proper effectivity is of critical importance. The FAA has busted many techs and carriers on improper effectivity.
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:12 am

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 2):

Thanks for prompt answer. I still will have to work a little bit harder. I will have to probe that B777 AIPC is approved and accepted by FAA.!!!

The AIPC is technically not an FAA approved document and neither is the maintenance manual in its entirety. The instructions for continued airworthiness are required to be complied with to maintain the airworthiness certificate of the airplane but technically the FAA does not review each document. The FAA mandates that the type certificate holder issues ICA

The Maintenance Review Board report is the FAA approved document that requires maintenance and is used to generate the task cards ( along with a section of the maintenance planning document that include airworthiness limitations and certification maintenance requirements) for required maintenance.

The holder of the operating certificate is required to follow the ICA or have approval to deviate from them as a part of their approved maintenance program.

Here is some useful information: http://aviationglossary.com/instruct...s-for-continued-airworthiness-ica/

[Edited 2013-02-20 20:28:15]
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:14 am

Quoting Humanitarian (Reply 17):


So I went to our GMM and:

1. PREFACE

1.1. COMPANY MANUALS
1.1.1. The Company Maintenance Manual System, which consists of those manuals listed in this publication, is designed to provide information covering organization, scope of maintenance, responsibility and general policies and procedures for the methods and techniques employed in the maintenance of the aircraft and associated equipment. The manuals will provide all Maintenance personnel with necessary information and instructions to perform their duties and responsibilities with a high degree of safety.


1.6.2. The Company has adopted technical manuals published by the appropriate airframe and power plant manufacturers for use in maintenance, inspection, overhaul, repair, and servicing as follows:
1.6.2.1. Applicable Aircraft Manufacturers:
1. Aircraft Maintenance Manual
2. Wiring Diagram Manual
3. Schematic System Manual
4. Fault Isolation Manual
5. Aircraft Illustrated Parts Catalog
6. Nondestructive Test Manual
Z Structural Repair Manual
8. Illustrated Tool/Equipment Manual
9. Standard Practices Manual
10. Powerplant Buildup Manual
11. Component Maintenance Manual — Manufacturer
12. Component Maintenance Manual — Vendors
13. Corrosion Prevention Manual
14. Standard Practices Wiring Manual
15. Automated Task Cards and Index
16. Service Bulletins
17. All Operator’s Letters

Accordingly, AIPC is part of the Manual System , and ...provides .. information and instructions.. to perform Mx duties.
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:34 am

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 18):

Roseflyer: Many thanks for your explanation. I was searching for it during the whole week, writting everyone unssuccesfully. The problem is that now that I have the answer, I ashamed: it's a classic question from the A/P Tests: ALS is FAA approved, whole AMM is not!! Time for a recurrent?
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
boeingfixer
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:02 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:16 pm

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 19):
Accordingly, AIPC is part of the Manual System , and ...provides .. information and instructions.. to perform Mx duties.

Is this a direct quote from your GMM or are you assuming, since it's listed in your GMM, that it is an approved reference for performing and releasing a Mtx task?

In our operation the approved manuals for our use is much the same but the IPC is only used for parts and effectivity and is also our only source for configuration management. All of our Mtx tasks have to reference back to our approved material but we cannot use the IPC to sign out a maintenance entry.

Cheers,

John
Cheers, John YYC
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:28 pm

Quoting boeingfixer (Reply 21):

Yes is a direct quotte of the only parts from our GMM where I found any references related.

The initial question arised because in previous job, we were encouraged to use all manufactures' info. For example, for a wiring pb a WDM or even SSM would be used and in a case like the one I had, when replacing a simple plate, part of a whole assy, without any direct reference in AMM, we used AIPC which provides a clears indication of how it it's assemblied and of course effectivity. We also were allowed to use MT, SIL, and company issued Technical Notes.
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
boeingfixer
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:02 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:32 pm

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 22):
...........in a case like the one I had, when replacing a simple plate, part of a whole assy, without any direct reference in AMM, we used AIPC which provides a clears indication of how it it's assemblied and of course effectivity.

For our operation we would use simple language to describe what we did if it was not covered by any of our approved material. In a case such as yours our entry would be something like: Screws A,B,C removed and plate D removed. New plate D installed with original hardware, screws A,B,C, as per original installation.

Cheers,

John
Cheers, John YYC
 
humanitarian
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:00 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:11 am

The IPC can be used 'for reference only' purposes but I have never seen it used as a legal reference for work accomplished in returning an aircraft to service. Unlike the AMM, the IPC does not provide step by step instructions for replacing that part or component you found in the IPC. For example, when changing a main wheel assy the IPC does not show the torques required nor the tire pressure and you certainly should not be guessing what those are.

Another favorite thing the FAA looks for when stopping by is that the reference material you are using must be current and/or say "for reference only" on the document. When you print the AMM reference from the computer to change that wheel, it shows the date it was printed and it had better be for that day only. Manual references can change overnight in the online world and they don't want you using expired references stashed in your tool box.
 
737tdi
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:05 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:52 am

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 22):
For example, for a wiring pb a WDM or even SSM would be used and in a case like the one I had, when replacing a simple plate




With any commercial aircraft that I have been involved with, performed maint. on, only half of your above quote would be acceptable. The use of the WDM is 100% acceptable, the use of the SSM is not. When you research within the WDM you have to use the effective diagram to that particular "tail no., serial no., line no., and variable no.. This data is updated on a regular basis to new, different equipt. coming into your operation. The SSM is a very good all around manual but is not updated nor does it show aircraft effectivity. I.E.: You are working on an FMC discrepancy and need to replace a connector, you would use the WDM with the proper effectivity because an earlier or later effectivity could be wired differently. The SSM would not show this, only the general connection.

I don't know if you know this but every aircraft comes with its own set of diagrams and repair drawings, differences data. When we receive a 737 from Boeing these books come with the aircraft and are given to aircraft records and engineering so this new info. can be incorporated into the MM, IPC, WDM, SRM etc..

Hope that is not to confusing.
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:11 am

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 25):
I don't know if you know this but every aircraft comes with its own set of diagrams and repair drawings, differences data. When we receive a 737 from Boeing these books come with the aircraft and are given to aircraft records and engineering so this new info. can be incorporated into the MM, IPC, WDM, SRM etc..

On a 737, Boeing customizes the manuals for every plane it delivers and they are updated every 120 days for the original purchase carrier.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
Apprentice
Topic Author
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:51 pm

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:24 am

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 25):
The use of the WDM is 100% acceptable, the use of the SSM is not

And yes, we were authorized to use SSM when, for instance, a LRU would not work because a relay signal was missing. SSM is very handy when no specific FIM is written. SSM are airplane specific and as every manual, updated.

Quoting boeingfixer (Reply 23):
Screws A,B,C removed and plate D removed. New plate D installed with original hardware, screws A,B,C, as per original installation

And that is almost a quote of a AIPC: IAW AIPC: xx-xx-xx, fig xx, items xxx, xxx, xxx
A "NO" is a positive answer., "DON'T KNOW" is not. My Tutor
 
boeingfixer
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:02 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 27):
Quoting boeingfixer (Reply 23):
Screws A,B,C removed and plate D removed. New plate D installed with original hardware, screws A,B,C, as per original installation
Quoting Apprentice (Reply 27):
And that is almost a quote of a AIPC: IAW AIPC: xx-xx-xx, fig xx, items xxx, xxx, xxx

Almost but no cigar. The IPC doesn't give you any specific directions. You still need to describe the sequence of the work you performed if it isn't covered in your approved material.

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 25):
The use of the WDM is 100% acceptable, the use of the SSM is not.

BTW, the SSM for our fleet is aircraft specific which is updated on a regular interval and is approved material for the use in troubleshooting and rectifying a snag. It may be that our SSM goes into very good detail as far a connector, pin, relay numbering, etc.. is concerned. If we need more in depth information like splice, wire, terminal block numbering etc.. we will go to the WDM.

Cheers,

John
Cheers, John YYC
 
737tdi
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:05 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:45 am

Quoting Apprentice (Reply 27):




You originally asked a question and it was answered in many different yet intelligent ways.

Take this as you want or need. I have worked in this industry as a mech. for over 30 years. I have worked Boeing, Douglas, McD, and Airbus. I have worked heavy overhaul, line maintenance, shop maintenance and check maintenance. The only survivable references are the MM, SRM, WDM, CMM. Any others are suspect and subject. I am not disregarding singular written EA's, IA,s, etc.. If you stick to these four manuals you will never be wrong, except in the use of EA's, IA's..

Again, Do not use a SSM, as a maintenance sign off. EVER. Everything covered in the SSM is covered in the WDM with much more detail. I looked today and verified that with Boeing the SSM does not differentiate between specific line nos. It is very unspecific. It is general at best. Do not use the SSM if you are working commercial aircraft in the US. At most all of it will be correct and it is a great info. place. It is not a reference. PERIOD. There is no flexibility here. It is not a sign off reference because it is not accurate per aircraft.

I don't know how else to explain it? The SSM is a learn how to? Familiarize with? Not a maintenance manual. It even tells you that at the beginning and the end. Agree or disagree but there is no argument, talk to you FAA rep.. He is there to help you???
 
fr8mech
Posts: 6672
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:00 am

RE: Allowed References When Signing A Tech Log

Sun Feb 24, 2013 3:27 pm

Quoting boeingfixer (Reply 28):
BTW, the SSM for our fleet is aircraft specific which is updated on a regular interval and is approved material for the use in troubleshooting and rectifying a snag

While an SSM is revised and updated and does provide effectivity ranges, it just provides a "10,000 foot" overview of the applicable system or sub-system. The SSM should never be used as a documented reference when clearing an item. From the "Front Matter" of a B767 SSM:

B. Purpose of System Schematic Manual

The System Schematic Manual (SSM) was prepared to serve as a source of information to assist in understanding system function and to facilitate fault isolation to the Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) level. It is not intended for use as a substitute for other maintenance documentation (i.e., Fault Isolation Manual, Maintenance Manual, Wiring Diagram Manual). The SSM does not include information for testing. The procedures in the Fault Isolation Manual should be used for any fault isolation requiring testing. The procedures in the Maintenance Manual should be used to support removal and installation of components. The Wiring Diagram Manual (WDM) should be used as a reference to isolate faults in wiring and in-line disconnects.
The data contained in this manual are customized for each airline. Except for those features added by service bulletin or specifically requested by the airline, these data include coverage for only those features that are part of the airplane as delivered by Boeing.


Note: that the SSM does not list the IPC amongst the manuals.

I reviewed our GMM and found that there is no specific prohibition against using the IPC as a reference for installation. But, one of the surest ways to get a logpage kicked back from QA/QC is to use the IPC in lieu of a document that provides instruction.

If the component being installed does not have a specific AMM, et. al. reference, then, it is generally acceptable to use a generic chapter 20 reference. If the AMT (or organization) is uncomfortable using that sort of reference, than a manufacturer's drawing may provide the information required. I've found torque values, installation materials (sealants, adhesives, etc), orientation, etc. on drawings that are acceptable as a reference. The IPC rarely goes into such detail.

[Edited 2013-02-24 07:34:35]

[Edited 2013-02-24 07:36:39]
When seconds count...the police are minutes away.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Starlionblue and 13 guests