GlobalMoose
Topic Author
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:44 pm

Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:19 pm

Searched the DB and couldn't find a good answer...

I'm used to using ICAO codes all the time in the 'office;' they work quite well for their established purpose as location identifiers.

My question is to the existence of IATA codes - why do we maintain two different set of codes when one (ICAO) works? Do the airlines save money by printing 3 numbers rather than 4 (ridiculous, I know, but every 1/1000th of a cent may help)? Was it because it is easier for the pax and ground agents to associate destinations with IATA instead of ICAO (LHR vs EGLL)?

Thanks,
When it absolutely positively has to be there ... at some point.
 
26point2
Posts: 814
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:30 pm

Good question.

ICAO codes certainly have some logic to them, at least to the initiated folks they do. Easy to tell any airport, or at least be able to make a logical guess, by its ICAO code once the convention is understood.

I can't answer your question but my guess is most IATA codes were established before ICAO codes. Not sure how long ICAO has been around...part of the United Nations I believe.

I still don't understand why KDEN is really DEN but referred to as DIA. But I digress.
 
User avatar
glen
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:43 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:31 pm

Don't know if it is the main (and probably not the only) reason too keep IATA codes, but there is still a lot of software around (especially for ground handling) which runs with IATA codes only.
While keeping the codes costs practically nothing, getting rid of them would cost all airlines probably a lot of money.
"The horizon of many people is a circle with zero radius which they call their point of view." - Albert Einstein
 
GlobalMoose
Topic Author
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:44 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:34 pm

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 1):

As an aside, I agree with you about Denver. When I lived in Colorado Springs it always annoyed me when the locals referred to the airport as DIA (Denver International Airport, I know) but an annoyance none the less when I knew the real name was KDEN or DEN  
When it absolutely positively has to be there ... at some point.
 
rfields5421
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:39 pm

Quoting GlobalMoose (Thread starter):
Do the airlines save money by printing 3 numbers rather than 4 (ridiculous, I know, but every 1/1000th of a cent may help)?

At one time there was a significant additional costs for using 4 digit codes over smaller codes.

Computer memory, storage and programming capacity were incredibly expensive, and saving a digit or two saved a lot of money. I should also add that IATA codes date from before computers, when information about airline tickets and all the other financial details was sent by telex and telegraph, where every letter costs money.

IATA codes are primarily a key part of the financial system of billing, payments and tracking for the airline industry.

There was a plan to drop IATA two and three letter codes and move to three letter ICAO codes for airlines, and four letter ICAO codes for locations.

There were significant cost and technical issues related to the computer programming, the need to upgrade tens of thousands of terminals and such. I believe the plan is officially dead.

IATA is a group focused on the financial and business operational aspects of the airline business. Their codes fit their purposes. IATA has many other codes related to many other aspects of the business of running airlines.

ICAO is a group focused on the safe navigation and operation of aircraft, not necessarily airlines. ICAO does have a regional structure to their codes for airports, weather stations, international flight service station and area control centers.

Both ICAO and IATA codes have a historical bias/ background which is difficult to change.

[Edited 2013-03-19 16:48:37]
 
rfields5421
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:46 pm

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 1):
my guess is most IATA codes were established before ICAO codes.

IATA was established in Havana in April 1945, but is a descendant of an airline organization dating back to 1919.

IATA is a trade group run by a group of airlines to coordinate their business operations.

ICAO was established as a UN agency in 1947, but is a descendant of the International Commission for Air Navigation which dates from 1903.
 
User avatar
cjg225
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:59 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:50 pm

Thanks for asking the question and thanks for the answers. Fascinating stuff. I had no idea that ICAO codes had that meaning to them.
Restoring Penn State's transportation heritage...
 
User avatar
cjg225
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:59 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:55 pm

Quoting GlobalMoose (Reply 3):

As an aside, I agree with you about Denver. When I lived in Colorado Springs it always annoyed me when the locals referred to the airport as DIA (Denver International Airport, I know) but an annoyance none the less when I knew the real name was KDEN or DEN

I can understand the locals to some extent.

Where I live, ABE is the airport. It used to be known as ABE for a long time, but the name was changed many years ago to Lehigh Valley International Airport and people started calling it LVIA, especially when signage in the area (like on the highways) was changed to reflect the name change. Many people still call it ABE, and its code is ABE, but LVIA has taken priority because, well, that's what it's name is as far as the public is concerned.

I would suspect that it is the same way in Denver. When the airport is being called "Denver International Airport," people are likely to shorten than to DIA out of convenience. Even if DEN is the IATA code, most people don't know IATA codes and will call the airport by it's name or the acronym of its name, even if that acronym is not the IATA code.

LAX is a good example where the code and the colloquial (and official) names line up perfectly.
Restoring Penn State's transportation heritage...
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18974
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:12 am

Quoting GlobalMoose (Thread starter):
Do the airlines save money by printing 3 numbers rather than 4 (ridiculous, I know, but every 1/1000th of a cent may help)?
Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 4):
There was a plan to drop IATA two and three letter codes and move to three letter ICAO codes for airlines, and four letter ICAO codes for locations.

There were significant cost and technical issues related to the computer programming, the need to upgrade tens of thousands of terminals and such. I believe the plan is officially dead.

Yes, it was going to cost many millions to reprogram all the legacy systems, change tickets to add space for the additional characters in airline codes etc. The proposal was dropped at least 20 years ago if not longer.

However, if memory correct the proposal was only to change to the 3-letter airline codes since they were starting to run out of possible 2-letter combinations. I can't recall any proposal to change to the 4-character ICAO airport codes. The latter would have also been problematic as IATA also assigns 3-letter codes for cities/metropolitan areas (e.g. LON/NYC/PAR/YMQ/YTO etc.) and railway stations, bus stations etc., not just airports, and ICAO codes only exist for airports.

They resolved the shortage of 2-letter airline codes by introducing alpha-numeric codesl (e.g. B6, U2, 7F etc
 
mrcazzy
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:44 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:25 am

Could it also be that originally the IATA codes were more helpful when there was less airports. When there were more airports being built they eventually ran out of codes then decided to put the extra letter.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17087
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:05 am

ICAO does use three letter codes for navaids. So you'll have KOCF for Ocala Airport and OCF for the VOR at Ocala Airport.

Quoting GlobalMoose (Reply 3):
As an aside, I agree with you about Denver. When I lived in Colorado Springs it always annoyed me when the locals referred to the airport as DIA (Denver International Airport, I know) but an annoyance none the less when I knew the real name was KDEN or DEN

MNL has the same "issue". People call it NAIA (Ninoy Aquino International Airport). Another one in The Philippines is CRK, officially Clark International Airport. Since it was previously Diosdado Macapagal International Airport, people shorten it to DMIA.

Yeah that's not confusing for visitors. 
Quoting MrCazzy (Reply 9):

Could it also be that originally the IATA codes were more helpful when there was less airports. When there were more airports being built they eventually ran out of codes then decided to put the extra letter.

I don't think so. Even before WWII you'd probably struggle with only 3 letters for all the airports and airbases world wide.

Sounds like parallel evolution to me. And to be fair routing of aircraft and routing of pax can be "two separate worlds" quite easily.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
User avatar
neutrino
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 5:33 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:54 pm

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 10):
MNL has the same "issue". People call it NAIA (Ninoy Aquino International Airport). Another one in The Philippines is CRK, officially Clark International Airport. Since it was previously Diosdado Macapagal International Airport, people shorten it to DMIA.


And Tiger Airways added to the confusion by calling it Manila(Clark) initially and Clark(Manila) now. I know of quite a few Singaporeans and Filipinos who ended up at the wrong airport - both on landing which caused some inconvenience and on intended boarding which caused some HELL).
Don't know about other nationalities but I suspect some had also suffered the same.
Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis
 
ANITIX87
Posts: 2952
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:52 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:18 pm

Quoting cjg225 (Reply 7):
Where I live, ABE is the airport.

That's exactly the example I was going to use. I went to school at Lehigh University and when friends told me they were flying home from LVIA I always shook my head.

TIS
www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
 
User avatar
cjg225
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:59 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:42 pm

Quoting ANITIX87 (Reply 12):
That's exactly the example I was going to use. I went to school at Lehigh University and when friends told me they were flying home from LVIA I always shook my head.

But my point is that that's what it's called now. Most people don't know IATA or ICAO codes. If they did, my "FLY SUX" t-shirt would get a lot more laughs and smiles as opposed to, "how low-class"-kind of looks from people (of course, I do get asked somewhat frequently by the most random people if I'm from Sioux City!).

ABE hasn't been referred to as "ABE" around the valley with any real frequency in 12-15 years. I've lived here for 23 years; when I was a kid, it was always "ABE," but when the airport rebranded, from a marketing perspective, what people called it changed. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.

To be honest, though, I heard some time ago (maybe 1-2 years ago) that they were re-rebranding back to ABE, but the big bushes at the entrance to the airport still are arranged to spell "LVIA" and all the road/highway signs still say "LVIA" or "Lehigh Valley International" on them. Why would your average valley resident call it "ABE" when the airport markets itself as "Lehigh Valley International"? (A cursory check of the airport website just now says to me that they primarily brand themselves as LVIA but have stepped-up the usage of the ABE moniker a lot in various things, including using ABE as the acronym for their value statement).

I'm sure it's the same elsewhere. If the Denver airport is marketing itself as Denver International Airport since at least 1994, why would your average citizen (who, remember, probably doesn't even know what an IATA code is) call it DEN?
Restoring Penn State's transportation heritage...
 
26point2
Posts: 814
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:31 pm

Lehigh Valley International Airport sounds super fancy. What international destinations can I fly to?
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18974
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:42 pm

Quoting cjg225 (Reply 13):
I'm sure it's the same elsewhere. If the Denver airport is marketing itself as Denver International Airport since at least 1994, why would your average citizen (who, remember, probably doesn't even know what an IATA code is) call it DEN?

Edmonton International Airport (YEG) has long used the "EIA"acronym in marketing and press releases etc, not the IATA code YEG. The EIA acronym is prominent in their website, including the URL.
http://www.flyeia.com/

On the other hand, Vancouver makes extensive use of the YVR code.
http://www.yvr.ca/en/default.aspx
 
User avatar
cjg225
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:59 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:03 pm

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 14):
Lehigh Valley International Airport sounds super fancy. What international destinations can I fly to?

That's a question I've oft asked myself. lol
Restoring Penn State's transportation heritage...
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17087
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:17 pm

Quoting neutrino (Reply 11):
And Tiger Airways added to the confusion by calling it Manila(Clark) initially and Clark(Manila) now. I know of quite a few Singaporeans and Filipinos who ended up at the wrong airport - both on landing which caused some inconvenience and on intended boarding which caused some HELL).

Ah yes, Ryanair style. Calling Skavsta "Stockholm" and Bergamo "Milano". "It's almost Manila" if you squint. 
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
KELPkid
Posts: 5247
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:33 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:29 pm

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 14):
Lehigh Valley International Airport sounds super fancy. What international destinations can I fly to?

As you're probably aware, it most likely means that US Customs/Immigration is available at the field (and if international flights are a rarity there, then it is probably by prior notification, considering it isn't really close to the Canadian border   ).
Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
 
26point2
Posts: 814
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:55 pm

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 18):

Yes. Thank you. I always find it amusing when airports try to market themseles by labeling the airport as "international" when there is no scheduled commercial international airline service. Sure, customs might be available but it's clearly an effort to make the airport seem more than it is.

We have one near where I live...FAT. They call it Fresno Yosemite International Airport. Another marketing effort in naming..there have been some scheduled international flights here but this airport is ridiculously far from Yosemite Valley. It might be the closest commercial airport but still a 2 hour drive. Some might argue that KFAT is close to the park boundary/gate but no one comes to FAT to drive to the nearby park gate....they want see Half Dome...and that takes 2 hours.

Now, to add to this thread the KFAT is sometimes referred to by local media as FYI (Fresno Yosemite Int'l). It's a joke.

Why not simply change the name of the city to FresYES! That would surely bring 'em in.

[Edited 2013-03-20 17:12:27]
 
User avatar
cjg225
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:59 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:26 am

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 18):

As you're probably aware, it most likely means that US Customs/Immigration is available at the field (and if international flights are a rarity there, then it is probably by prior notification, considering it isn't really close to the Canadian border ).

I did not know that. Thanks for the information.
Restoring Penn State's transportation heritage...
 
MrBuzzcut
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:25 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:19 am

I am somewhat partial to the 4-digit codes when looking at something like Flight Aware, the first character is pretty helpful because if you don't know the exact airport identifier, you can at least know what region of the world the flight is coming from.

There was one time I noticed a flight from HNL-MDY (flown direct by a twin turboprop) was listed on Flight Aware as PHNL-KMDW, which obviously wasn't happening...I'm not sure how all of that works but I imagine the flight plan was listed in the system as HNL-MDW instead of HNL-MDY.

The other 3 letter code story I have is when the mail handlers in HNL would confuse KWA (not where I was working) and AWK (where I was working). Mail flights were every two weeks (along with the regular cargo flight), it happened a couple of times that AWK mail ended up on KWA. Annoying, because it would take a couple of weeks for it to get back to HNL and then put on the right plane. Not that a P in front of either would have helped matters much.
 
blueflyer
Posts: 3633
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:17 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:41 am

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 18):
As you're probably aware, it most likely means that US Customs/Immigration is available at the field

It is a landing rights airport, but the "international" moniker is usually a branding exercise. There is nothing stopping you from building a dirt strip in your backyard and calling it Grassland InterContinental Mega Hub.

There is a legal definition of "international airport" for customs and immigration purposes (basically an airport where international flights can land without prior permission) but it does not preclude any airport not on the list (found under § 122.13) from marketing themselves as international to the public.

[Edited 2013-03-20 22:42:43]
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has no clothes.
 
citationjet
Posts: 2258
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 2:26 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:02 pm

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 4):
At one time there was a significant additional costs for using 4 digit codes over smaller codes.

I know that in the 1930s and 1940s, some airlines used 2 digit city codes. For instance Braniff used the 2 digit city codes llisted below. I am not sure if the 2 digit city codes were a formal or informal system, and I don't know the origin, however these codes were documented in Braniff's employee newletters. They may have been developed by Braniff for their own internal purposes.

In fact some of the 2 digit codes Braniff used are still a mystery as to what city they referred to: IQ, TW and WD, for instance.

AQ Amarillo, TX
FV Fort Worth, TX
LI Little Rock, AR
TS Tulsa, OK
BN Burlington, IA
GS Galveston, TX
LU Lubbock, TX
XC Mexico City
CD Colorado Springs, CO
HU Houston, TX
MO Moline, IL
XN Austin, TX
CG Chicago, IL
IC Wichita, KS
OL Oklahoma City, OK
WC Waco, TX
CR Corpus Christi, TX
JI Brownsville, TX
PC Ponca City, OK
WF Wichita Falls, TX
DL Dallas, TX
JR San Antonio, TX #2
PU Pueblo, CO
ZN San Antonio, TX #1
DV Denver, CO
KC Kansas City, MO
TO Topeka, KS
Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
 
timz
Posts: 6100
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:19 pm

Two-letter airport (city?) codes lasted until around 1947. Dunno if all airlines used the same codes-- probably yes? They were probably used for interline ticketing?
 
citationjet
Posts: 2258
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 2:26 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:24 pm

I just found a great video that describes the history behind airport codes in the US.
http://sawyeraviation.com/what-is-the-history-of-your-airport-code/
Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
 
26point2
Posts: 814
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:56 pm

CJ...

Thanks for the video...fun. I especially liked the shout out to the Canadian band Rush and their YYZ morse code as the initial bass line. Check it out on YouTube...its cool. Once read an interview and when asked about the YYZ song Geddy Lee said (paraphrasing)..."When our bag tags say YYZ it's always a good day, we are going home".

[Edited 2013-03-21 11:10:43]
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 13831
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sat Mar 23, 2013 5:42 pm

Quoting MrBuzzcut (Reply 21):
I am somewhat partial to the 4-digit codes

Not me. EGLL doesn't help me as much as LHR (and just to be picky, I'll point out they are letters, not digits...).
Inspiration, move me brightly! Light the song with sense and color.
Hold away despair, more than this I will not ask.
Faced with mysteries dark and vast, statements just seem vain at last.
Some rise, some fall, some climb, to get to Terrapin!
 
SKC
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:48 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:18 am

I'd even go as far as to say that DIA really started taking hold during its construction. Stapleton was the main airport in DEN for years, and was obviously referred to as, Stapleton. When the new airport was being built, the moniker DIA started taking off if for nothing else, so people would know which airport you were talking about. They knew that DIA was the new one, DEN, the old one.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
jetmatt777
Crew
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 2:16 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:26 am

Quoting CitationJet (Reply 23):
I know that in the 1930s and 1940s, some airlines used 2 digit city codes. For instance Braniff used the 2 digit city codes llisted below. I am not sure if the 2 digit city codes were a formal or informal system, and I don't know the origin, however these codes were documented in Braniff's employee newletters. They may have been developed by Braniff for their own internal purposes.

Which is where LAX got it's X from. When the transition to 3-letter codes came in to play, they simply added an X to get LA to 3 letters. Or so I have heard.
Lighten up while you still can, don't even try to understand, just find a place to make your stand and take it easy
 
timz
Posts: 6100
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:05 pm

Quoting CitationJet (Reply 23):
IQ, TW and WD

In the 1946 OAG IQ is Colorado Spr, TW is Topeka and WD is Wichita.
 
citationjet
Posts: 2258
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 2:26 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:49 pm

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 29):
Which is where LAX got it's X from. When the transition to 3-letter codes came in to play, they simply added an X to get LA to 3 letters. Or so I have heard.

I have since learned that PHX and PDX have an X for the same reason.
Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
 
citationjet
Posts: 2258
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 2:26 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:47 pm

Quoting timz (Reply 30):
In the 1946 OAG IQ is Colorado Spr, TW is Topeka and WD is Wichita.

Great, thanks for solving that mystery. Can you verify the other cities I listed in Reply #23 are consistent with the 1946 OAG?
Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11423
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:10 pm

Quoting Revelation (Reply 27):
Not me. EGLL doesn't help me as much as LHR (and just to be picky, I'll point out they are letters, not digits...).

I agree. EGLL gets me to it being a British airport, but if I didn't have it memorized, I don't know how I'd get to Heathrow. Same with EGKK or LGW or, in other parts of the world, SCEL (SCL) or RJAA (NRT).

Some of them make more sense, like EHAM (AMS), EPWA (WAW), VIDP (DEL) or RKSI (ICN), but it's a mixed bag.
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
timz
Posts: 6100
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:14 pm

In the 1945-46 OAG Lubbock is LX (LU is Laredo), San Antonio Alamo Field 8 1/2 miles N of town is JR. Others as listed in reply 23.
 
RyanairGuru
Posts: 6554
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:59 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:49 am

Quoting cjg225 (Reply 7):
changed many years ago to Lehigh Valley International Airport and people started calling it LVIA, especially when signage in the area (like on the highways) was changed to reflect the name change.

Same in Greensboro, when I lived there I never got used to PTI - Piedmont Triad International. To me it was either Greensboro or GSO. All the highway/airport signage etc said PTI though.



On the subject of ICAO codes, how do they decide which country gets which letter?

For example, New Zealand is (helpfully) NZ** whereas Australia is Y***

Also, why is it the norm in the USA to use the IATA code prefixed by a K (eg KEWR) whereas in other countries it appears to be a totally random letter combination (EGLL for LHR, EGCC for MAN etc)
Worked Hard, Flew Right
 
rfields5421
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:43 pm

Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 35):
how do they decide which country gets which letter?

They are tied into international radio identification codes, similar to how international aircraft registrations are done.

That international system came into effect a few years before aviation became possible on a wide scale.

Initially airport identification codes were the codes of the radio transmitter at the airport. Aircraft registration codes were also the radio codes assigned to the radio on the aircraft.

It has evolved over the past century into the standards used today.
 
r2rho
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:13 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:57 pm

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 8):
They resolved the shortage of 2-letter airline codes by introducing alpha-numeric codesl (e.g. B6, U2, 7F etc

Which has led to some really random airline codes over the past 15-20 years, with no connection whatsoever to the brand. U2 or 4U at least have found a clever workaround.

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 8):
if memory correct the proposal was only to change to the 3-letter airline codes since they were starting to run out of possible 2-letter combinations.

Spanish airports actually show the 3-letter ICAO codes on the departure screens etc. But that is at their own initiative, no official convention or agreement.

Quoting jetmatt777 (Reply 29):
Which is where LAX got it's X from. When the transition to 3-letter codes came in to play, they simply added an X to get LA to 3 letters. Or so I have heard.

...    same goes for a lot of the other "x" out there too.

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 1):
Easy to tell any airport, or at least be able to make a logical guess, by its ICAO code once the convention is understood.

Not really, because the convention only fixes the first two letters (or even just the 1st as in US or Canada), the other two being at the complete discretion of the country. Even within Europe different rules are used:
In France, the 3rd letter is the FIR, then 4th is a pseudo-alphabetical order. Thus, LFBO is TLS - absolutely no relation to the airport name.
In Spain, the 2 last letters are more intuitive: LEMD for Madrid, LEIB for Ibiza, ....
In UK:

Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 35):
why is it the norm in the USA to use the IATA code prefixed by a K (eg KEWR) whereas in other countries it appears to be a totally random letter combination (EGLL for LHR, EGCC for MAN etc)

ICAO codes are helpful for unambiguous airport identification when you run out of 3-letter codes, but are not at all intuitive for practical use!
 
rfields5421
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:42 pm

Quoting r2rho (Reply 37):
but are not at all intuitive for practical use!

Some nations have a system to their ICAO codes which makes them very intuitive and simple for use.

For example - any airport in Germany with EDD_ as the first three letters is a major commercial airport. Other nations similar letter combinations for their main commercial airports. Japan's RJAA, RJBB, RJCC - etc are a similar scheme.

A few years ago, Indonesia changed nearly airport ICAO code in the country. Now the first two letters of the ICAO code will tell you where the airport is located within a few hundred miles - usually the correct island the airport is located upon.

For many years all the ET_ _ codes in Germany were Allied Air Bases. Germany appears to be changing those codes to ED _ _ codes as the bases are returned to them.

Of course some nation's codes are completely hopeless as geographic indicators - the US being a prime example.
 
User avatar
Polot
Posts: 4786
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:01 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:55 pm

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 38):
Some nations have a system to their ICAO codes which makes them very intuitive and simple for use.

They are only intuitive and simple to use if you already know the system behind them though.

I know RJAA is NRT, but I have absolutely no clue what airport RJBB or RJCC is. The most I could say is that it is an airport in Japan- but Japan has many major international airports (as does Germany).

Most IATA codes (although certainly not all) have some easily identifiable connection to the name of the airport or the city that it is in. For the layman that is more intuitive than a system that only those in the "know" know.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17087
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:16 am

Perhaps there is an advantage to a non-intuitive naming system: You don't take things for granted and really check where you are going. 

In operational reality, of course, ICAO codes being non-intuitive is hardly an issue. Dispatchers and pilots know where they are going.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
r2rho
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:13 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:33 pm

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 38):
any airport in Germany with EDD_ as the first three letters is a major commercial airport. Other nations similar letter combinations for their main commercial airports. Japan's RJAA, RJBB, RJCC - etc are a similar scheme.

But there you go, you named another two countries, another two systems. You'd have to learn the indvidual naming scheme for each country in order to decipher the last 2 letters. So, not very practical in the end.
 
rfields5421
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:17 pm

While it might not always be intuitive, it is certainly more organized than the IATA code system.

Most of us have a hundred or so major IATA codes memorized, but will have no clue about which airports are identified by the few thousand other codes.

At least the folks involved in the operation and navigation of aircraft can be in the ballpark when given an ICAO code.

That is the main difference. If we come from the cockpit, navigation focus, we understand ICAO. If we come from the passenger, business side we understand IATA.
 
User avatar
Starlionblue
Posts: 17087
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:54 pm

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:23 am

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 42):
That is the main difference. If we come from the cockpit, navigation focus, we understand ICAO. If we come from the passenger, business side we understand IATA.

  
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - John Ringo
 
26point2
Posts: 814
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:57 pm

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 42):
While it might not always be intuitive, it is certainly more organized than the IATA code system.

Agreed, and this was my point earlier.

If one knows what the regional letter prefix represents (R, E, L, M, S, etc) then the Country Code follows and that is usually intuitive such as J for Japan, M for Mexico, E for Espana, D for Deutschland, etc. With the exception N. America (K and C) the ICAO code convention makes some amount of sense. Likely other exceptions but generally speaking it has some logic to it.

Those who are accustomed to the codes can usually work out, at least regionally, where the airport is by its ICAO.
 
rfields5421
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sat Apr 06, 2013 2:01 pm

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 44):
Likely other exceptions but generally speaking it has some logic to it.

And the big problem for both ICAO and IATA is that history prevents a real organized system.

Many airports, and nations, insist upon using codes which developed long ago - many before IATA or IACO existed.
 
timz
Posts: 6100
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:42 pm

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 45):
Many airports, and nations, insist upon using codes which developed long ago - many before IATA or IACO existed.

When did IATA start-- 1946ish? Whose current code existed before that?
 
timz
Posts: 6100
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sat Apr 06, 2013 11:05 pm

Turns out in 1944 lots of cities had three-letter codes that were the same as their present airport codes. Not that many in the US, put plenty elsewhere.

Dunno who picked the code letters; probably the code referred to the city, not its airport?
 
rfields5421
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:45 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:33 pm

Quoting timz (Reply 46):
Whose current code existed before that?

See the post earlier in the thread about some of the old two digit codes in the US, and how the follow up post about how airports such as LAX, PDX, PHX all are additions of the letter X to their two digit codes.
 
Asturias
Posts: 1953
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:32 am

RE: Why Do Iata Codes Exist?

Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:08 am

Great thread!

I've always preferred the IATA codes, they're more 'human' to me and the ICAO codes more 'mechanical' and cold.

In the end the ICAO codes fail as well in their logic (e.g. Kosovo being grouped with Greenland) and thus not reliable in their ugliness.
Tonight we fly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests