cvg2lga
Topic Author
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 11:48 am

Are These Specs Good To Run FSX On

Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:58 pm

•Processor Brand: AMD
•Processor Speed: Up to 1.9 Ghz
•Processor Type: AMD A8-4500M Quad-Core
•Cache Memory Installed Capacity: 4MB L2 Cache
•System RAM: 6 GB•Memory RAM Type: DDR3
•Maximum RAM Supported: 6 GB
•Data Storage Capacity: 750GB Hard Drive Capacity•Hard Drive Speed: 5400 RPM
•Built-In Graphics Card Model: AMD Radeon HD 7640G
They don't call em' emergencies anymore. They call em' Patronies.
 
nickh
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:49 pm

RE: Are These Specs Good To Run FSX On

Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:57 am

You should be fine with those specs. Regardless of the application, never, ever skimp on RAM, it is not that expensive purchase and it makes a huge difference.

The video card that you are using should work, do make sure that your card drivers are updated to the newest versions.

A faster Hard Drive would be nice, but consider getting an external SSD (USB 3.0 SSD) or something like that to throw the scenery data and frequenly accessed data on, that will improve the performance a bit, especially when transitioning rapidly from scene to scene, esp., multi-player mode.

Get a decent flight controller - there are so many available, but one of my favorites (personal preference, of course, your mileage may vary) is the Microsoft Freestyle Pro w/Force Feedback and Motion Sensing - hard to find, they do not make it any more, but worth it if you can find it.
Another one is the Sidewinder Dual Strike, which has a nice array of programmable keys that you can assign to do the most commonly used functions.

Gee, I wish we had one of those on the real G.A. aircraft that I used to fly, so long ago... (SMILE).

Anyway, good luck and happy flying.

-Nick
"We all have wings, but some of us don't know why..."
 
CalebWilliams
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:48 pm

RE: Are These Specs Good To Run FSX On

Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:02 pm

Nick's right on here.

You can never have too fast a processor and too much memory for FSX (well, if you have addons, anyway). SSD is great, but I wouldn;t want anything slower that 7200rpm. Not that I had a choice back in the day.

The flight controller, mine's 6-8 year old Saitek. works great.
Caleb Williams MSP AUS STL AMS CPH LGW YYZ
 
Fabo
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:30 am

RE: Are These Specs Good To Run FSX On

Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:42 pm

I would go for nVidia and Intel though. The general consensus is, that these brands work FSX better than comparable AMD/ATi hardware.
Also on the notion of CPU, for FSX specifically you are better of with higher frequency dualcore than lower frequency quadcore, due to its old core architecture.
The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
 
nickh
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:49 pm

RE: Are These Specs Good To Run FSX On

Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:23 am

Quoting Fabo (Reply 3):
Also on the notion of CPU, for FSX specifically you are better of with higher frequency dualcore than lower frequency quadcore, due to its old core architecture.

There really are different schools of thought on this, and it depends on several factors, wether a higher frequency dual-core is better than a lower frequency multi-core. It depends on the generation of the Northbridge/Southbridge chipsets that you are using on your computer's motherboard, FSB speed, RAM clock speed, DMA clocking and else.

An important thing is wether the software/OS is aware of the multi-cores and can really make use of them.

For example, out of the several machines that I use on a daily basis for my work, two of them that I run FSX on, one is a genuine 8-CPU Intel XEON based 64-bit machine with 64GB of DDR3 RAM, and another is my personal laptop with a 4-core Intel i7 64-bit processor with dual threads per core and 16GB of DDR3 RAM.
FSX and the underlying OS (depending on which) can take advantage of either the true 8-CPU machine or the 4-core w/dual threaded architecture, in varying operating modes.

So in many cases, a well written multi-core-aware application can work better on a slower clocked CPU than just throwing more GHz at the problem.

But still, one cannot dismiss the value of a decent GPU and a decent amount of RAM. And a decently fast HDD/SSD.

Still - many factors to consider.

-Nick
"We all have wings, but some of us don't know why..."
 
Fabo
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:30 am

RE: Are These Specs Good To Run FSX On

Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:35 pm

Quoting nickh (Reply 4):
So in many cases, a well written multi-core-aware application can work better on a slower clocked CPU than just throwing more GHz at the problem.

Yes, but FSX is not exactly one of those...  

I agree with RAM, GPU and HDD points...
The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos