Thom@s
Topic Author
Posts: 11674
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2000 2:03 am

Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Thu Sep 27, 2001 2:00 am

Yep, a good oldfashioned question. And I'm not looking to complain, i'm looking for advice. So, any help?











The last 2 I thought would be accepted for sure.

Any advice will be helpful.

Thom@s
"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Thu Sep 27, 2001 2:04 am

No 1.)
Cant see a diefference between the plane and the sky. Could also be my monitor.
2.)
A little bit grainy
3.)
Thec cockpit isn't sharp and or the outside is may be a little overexposed
4.)
Dark side?
5.) part of the plane missing.
My 2 Euro-Cents
Peter
-
 
Staffan
Posts: 3879
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:21 am

RE: Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Thu Sep 27, 2001 2:33 am

What reason did you get for having them rejected?

Rgeards,

Staffan
 
AndyEastMids
Posts: 1060
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 10:24 pm

RE: Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Thu Sep 27, 2001 3:53 am

My guesses would be (of course it would help if we had guidelines  Big grin )

1. Dunno. Maybe someone has a thing against head on shots - could be any Saab, anytime, anywhere.

2. Looks a little soft / unsharp

3. Flight deck details unsharp / out of focus, and outside over exposed

4. Dunno. Maybe airplane too small / too much unused space?

5. Incomplete airplane and no clear motive for pciture, unless it was of the control tower in which case closer cropping of the tower might have been in order.

Of the pics, I like the DanTrans ATR best, but who am I to judge!

Seeing as the UK isn't in the Euro or Dollar zones, I'll have to say that this is just my two penneth worth.

Andy
 
Thom@s
Topic Author
Posts: 11674
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2000 2:03 am

RE: Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Thu Sep 27, 2001 7:01 pm

Hmmm, I see. I don't remember the reasons, as the confirmation mail got deleted. But I can see the reasons. Still, I don't have a clue how to make the pics sharper with the edges getting "choppy"

Any help?

Thom@s
"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
 
Lindy
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed May 19, 1999 10:42 pm

RE: Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Fri Sep 28, 2001 12:09 am

Thomas, maybe screeners are Polish soccer supporters  Big grin

hahahaha

BTW. I like last two photos very much.
BWIADCA - Nikon D100
 
Dazed767
Posts: 4968
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:55 am

RE: Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Fri Sep 28, 2001 12:24 am

The fourth one has the best chance. Crop a little off the ends, sharpen it a little bit, and you might be good to go. It's a nice shot, just needed to be more full frame.
 
Thom@s
Topic Author
Posts: 11674
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2000 2:03 am

RE: Why Were The Pictures Rejected?

Fri Sep 28, 2001 2:49 am

Hehe Lindy, that thought has crossed my mind. But why should they hold a grudge on the Norwegians, they beat us....oh great, I could just sit on a grenade. Do'h. Big grin

I'll try the cropping procedure Dazed, thanks for the advice.

And that goes for all of you.

Thom@s
"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests